Re: KDE/kdebase/runtime/phonon
On Saturday 15 December 2007, Dirk Mueller wrote: On Friday 14 December 2007, Thiago Macieira wrote: No. And, in hindsight, it shouldn't have been committed to trunk. I forgot to ask for a Qt (not qt-copy) branch on Subversion. I think playground-multimedia would be a good place for it, together with the other phonon backends. Yes, but whoever moves them, please put them in playground/multimedia/phonon not phonon-backends. I want to move the backends from the latter to phonon, too. -- Matthias Kretz (Germany) http://Vir.homelinux.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: GStreamer backend on kdebase
On Saturday 15 December 2007 11:07:02 Thomas Zander wrote: I think that is the bottom line here is; do we want phonon to work for a bigger chunk of people or not? Having more backends seems like a good thing to me... That is entirely not the point here. We're months past features freeze, we'll tag 'final' in 4.0. It is just too late to add new code at this point when it doesn't fix a showstopper. At the very least, adding it to trunk/ should be decided by Matthias, k-c-d and/or release-team, not inside TT (nor any other company). I understand that it has been inadvertently importing it into trunk/, so this seems to be a non-issue. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE/kdebase/runtime/phonon
Op Saturday 15 December 2007 09:56 schreef u: Allen Winter wrote: Let's be nice and communicative with the Trolls before making the move. Thiago, can you take the job of informing the folks at TrollTech about this? Agreed. Playground sounds best. My only worry is that those plugins are now supposed to be feature-frozen in the Qt 4.4 branch, which isn't exactly what playground means. How about kdereview, then? No, that's not what review is for. Anyway, ThomasZ has indicated there has been a lot of review from Tt people, so I would be happy with a move to extragear. Toma___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
