Re: Upcoming KDE 4.4 vs. Bug #162485 (no suitably sufficient SSL/TLS support)
On 1/8/2010 11:22 AM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: Maybe contacting a company that can help here with the available funds would be the way to go? At least that could help solving the have money, need feature-problem. There are some companies around that have done contracted work on KDE in the past. Since you are willing to sponsor this work, two places you might look for experienced kdelibs developers are KO GmbH ( http://www.kogmbh.com ) and KDAB ( http://www.kdab.com ). Please understand that I am not vouching for them -- I have no personal experience working with either of these companies. I only suggest them as I know that there are large pools of KDE expertise at both companies. --Jeff signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Upcoming KDE 4.4 vs. Bug #162485 (no suitably sufficient SSL/TLS support)
Matthias Andree wrote: The problem - to me - seems to be that showstopper bugs aren't stopping the KDE show to gain the necessary attention Several related issues, based on my own experience and perceptions as mostly a lurker on the release team: 1. KDE currently has a time-based schedule 2. This isn't a bug, but a missing feature 2a. We have no documented or objective criteria to identify showstopper bugs (or features, for that matter) 3. We have no obvious/documented process for dealing with conflicts between 1 and 2. Now, I'd welcome discussions and input on how best to deal with these (in the 4.5 timeframe). I'll even offer some suggestions of my own, after pondering it a bit. -- Rex p.s. I'd love to be shown wrong about any of the above assertions about things not being obvious or documented. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
