Re: Request for splitting oxygen-icons tarball

2012-02-27 Thread Harald Sitter
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Philip Muskovac  wrote:
> More than splitting the package, I would rather like to have a sane
> compression applied to it

+1

Phonon only does xz tarballs, so dep-wise xz is required anyway... you
might just as well do the kde release tars in xz too ;)

HS
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team


Re: Request for splitting oxygen-icons tarball

2012-02-27 Thread Philip Muskovac

On 02/27/2012 01:20 AM, Max Brazhnikov wrote:

On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:47:11 +0100, Sune Vuorela wrote:

On Sunday 26 February 2012 23:29:37 Max Brazhnikov wrote:

Does debian's oxygen-icon-theme package, which contains only png icons,
violate the license?


No. just like debian's systemsettings package, which contains compiled code
also doesn't violate the license.


Why oxygen-icons split on two tarballs, one with png icons and another with svg 
only, will violate the license, while systemsettings debian package + 
kde-workspaces source tarball don't?


In both cases, the sources is a apt-get source away. In both cases you get the
tarball created by Dirk


What's the difference then?


that's hopefully obvious.


Not for me apparently :). Could you clarify it or point me at good explanation?


/Sune



More than splitting the package, I would rather like to have a sane 
compression applied to it

as I mentioned previously:
359M oxygen-icons-4.8.0.tar.bz2
203M oxygen-icons-4.8.0.tar.xz

using xz -9 cuts of "just" 156M for me. Such a huge tarball is a bit of 
a pain to handle, even if I agree with Sune that having all icons in one 
place is handy.


Philip
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team