Re: adding kwebkitpart to KDE SC
El Divendres, 15 de juny de 2012, a les 12:35:12, Dawit A va escriure: On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:38 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote: On Thursday 29 March 2012 18:33:46 Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Dijous, 29 de març de 2012, a les 12:10:06, David Faure va escriure: On Wednesday 28 March 2012 19:38:25 Albert Astals Cid wrote: The technical point of view is not enough to guarantee something being part of the KDE SC, otherwise i could argue the same thing (don't want to have ugly KDE_VERSION around) for some obscure program only I would use. Hmm? This is about a crucial component for konqueror, not about some obscure program. Why did it went to extragear if it was a crucial component? Things evolve over time. kwebkitpart works much better than it used to, and on the other hand, khtml isn't catching up much with today's web. Do you really want to have a full khtml vs kwebkitpart debate here, or can we just go on with treating both equally, shipping both and letting users choose? Dirk wrote: The scripts are as usual in /trunk/kde-common/release, and dirk reads this :-) Hehe. So all we need to do is ensure kwebkitpart has a KDE/4.8 branch and then add it to modules.git, right? Well at this point it might be a bit late for adding to 4.8.4 all of sudden, so maybe we want to do this for 4.9 -- but then it means someone needs to remember to add it to modules.git at the exact right moment (after the last 4.8.x release and before the first 4.9.0 alpha)? Hmm... would it be too late to do this now since we are on 4.9.0 beta-2 already ? In my opnion yes, we are past feature freeze, past message freeze, etc. Cheers, Albert ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Nepomuk crashes in 4.8.4 fixed in KDE/4.8.x branch
On Saturday, June 16, 2012 15:33:17 Michael Pyne wrote: Any consensus on whether we will make a new kdelibs release? If so I would agree that it should be 4.8.5, with a 4.8.6 in ~1 month. If not that would make the upcoming routine release 4.8.5 (which is why I ask as I have an unrelated bugfix in there that I want to update the changelog for ;)). One thing is that our changelog XML does assume each KDE module in a release is the same version released at the same time, which would seem to argue for 4.8.4.1, or simply calling all of the KDE modules 4.8.6 at the next release... Regards, - Michael Pyne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Nepomuk crashes in 4.8.4 fixed in KDE/4.8.x branch
Am Donnerstag 14 Juni 2012, 01:31:18 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: Vishesh fixed the KDE/4.8.x branch of kdelibs. Can you guys verify it also fixes the issues for you? If so, what's the next step? Release an early 4.8.5? Repackage 4.8.4 kdelibs? Ideas? Cheers, Albert While I fully agree that the changes requiring the newer soprano should not have been there in the first place, I'm now a bit confused... what is, for our users, actually the better solution? * Upgrade Soprano to the beta version, and stick with the original Nepomuk 4.8.4 code (since, afaik, the changes were made to address some bug?) * Keep Soprano as is and use Vishesh's revert? /me is confused, maybe someone knowledgeable on the code details could comment... in the end it probably boils down to How big are the changes in Soprano? Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
monthly Gentoo KDE team meeting
Howdy all, just for general information the Gentoo KDE team has its monthly public meeting again next week, to be precise, #gentoo-meetings on freenode, thursday, 21 June 2012 19:00 utc Agenda can be found here (work in progress): http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/kde.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/maintainers/meetings/meeting-2012-06;hb=HEAD Cheers! Andreas -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
