Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master
On Monday 17 December 2012, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 00:03:38, Luigi Toscano va escriure: Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis Tsiapaliokas va escriure: Hello, Attached, can somebody give it a try ? Alex I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work. With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached patch needed. So let's go for the cmake increase? Anyone against it? (I will need an answer before RC1 tag on tuesday night) I am all for it. On a side note, I have never understood the objection against 2.8.9 before as that is what was also required for framework. Hence, it would somewhat lower the barrier for the framework contribution, too. Not really. For the frameworks branch the most current cmake is required, which is 2.8.10.1 currently. We will stay there with the most current until we get somewhat stable. Alex ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.orgwrote: Not really. For the frameworks branch the most current cmake is required, which is 2.8.10.1 currently. We will stay there with the most current until we get somewhat stable. I see. My post seems to date back then when it was discussed. Apparently, I have not contributed to frameworks to even notice it, at least not the way through that branch. My understanding got outdated. Thank you for the information. :) Laszlo PS.: If only the entry barrier was not so high for even a basic tool like cmake. It is certainly not a problem for me as an arch user, but I can understand this a -1 for many. This is of course off-topic here. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master
El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:37:59, Alexander Neundorf va escriure: On Sunday 16 December 2012, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote: Hello, Attached, can somebody give it a try ? Alex I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work. With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached patch needed. The attached patch should work. It's not nice, but should work (works at least for me). I tried this patch and boost was still listed amongst the non found packages in the summary, so i'll update the cmake requirement to 2.8.9 Thanks a lot for the help. Cheers, Albert Alex ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
