KDE Frameworks 5 TP1 tarballs
Stupid bugged GMail app...resending to ML. On Jan 5, 2014 12:40 PM, "David Faure" wrote: > > The first technical preview of KF5 is up for packaging, on depot.kde.orgin > unstable/frameworks/4.95.0 > > I haven't done a release in a very VERY long time, so tell me if I forgot to > do anything... > > Since this is the first KF5 release, one thing that you guys might need for > packaging is the specification of dependencies between the frameworks. > > You can find it in kde-build-metadata/dependency-data-kf5-qt5, attached here > for convenience. > All "tier1" frameworks (see http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List) are not > mentionned in that file (on the left side), because they only depend on Qt and > extra-cmake-modules. > > For description of the frameworks, see README.md in each framework. > > And now the bad news: we'd like to release on January 7. > But this is just a technical preview of something technical (= not usable by > end users), I'm not sure if we *need* to have binary packages by that date. Great! I don't think binary packages are needed; they would be nice, but not a requirement IMHO. I did a list[1] of packages sort by build order if some one needs it. [1] https://gist.github.com/andreascarpino/8257468 -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Dependency cycle with nepomuk-core & mobipocket
On Sunday 03 November 2013 22:42:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > You compile stuff three times in a circle and fix it ;-) > > No really, the only thing i can think of is moving the okular mobipocket > plugin code over to the okular repo, that should untangle the loop. Status? KDE 4.11.80 suffers of this dep-cycle. -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.10.3 Tags
On Thursday 09 May 2013 09:33:28 Torgny Nyblom wrote: > Oups, sorry about that, tags are pushed as I type. Hi, seems that kdeexamples got tagged too and I guess it is not intentional. -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE SC 4.10.3 tarballs
On Saturday 04 May 2013 14:33:44 Torgny Nyblom wrote: > The tarballs for the 4.10.3 release are now available in the usual location. > > Sorry for the delay but there was an issue with one repo that needed to be > sorted before creating the tarballs. > > I've not compiled them so please report any issues you find but everything > is green in jenkins[1]. Hi, I'm not sure you read BUG#319543[1] so I'm highlighting it here. Maybe you want to investigate on how this did happen this time. [1] https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319543 -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Better testing of tagged tars
On Saturday 02 February 2013 08:17:15 Rex Dieter wrote: > Has anyone ever explicitly said making packages available to targetted > testers was a *bad* idea? Yes, take a look to Martin's thread in date 3th June 2012. Also, I've been 'call back' time ago (about two years ago or less) from a KDE dev privately. > Keep in mind when I said "targetted testers", they need to be aware that > these are not public or release builds yet, that is all. Well, the installation instructions are not sent by mail privately, but shared with the community. -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Better testing of tagged tars
On Monday 04 February 2013 21:03:48 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Can you provide an easier way to find Dirk's mail, like a webarchive mail or > at least an approximate date of the email and the subject? ATM I can't find it neither (the discussion about this "issue" forked from the original topic), but take a look to Martin's thread "Why are 4.8.80 packages already out in the wild?" in date 3th July '12. > Avaliable is a very broad word. Please define exactly what you want to do. We'd like to know if we can put the packages in a repository not enabled, neither available, at install time. The instructions on how to enable this repo are in a dedicated thread in the official forum and/or in the official wiki. Oh, and in the KDE wiki page "how to install betas" as well. -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Better testing of tagged tars
LS Since there is not a clear answer yet, and both the undersigned Distro's feel a better way of testing the tagged tars is needed during the 4-5 days before they are officially released, we'd like to make a proposal on behalf of the Linux distributions Arch Linux and the Chakra-Project. Consistently we are the first to warn and report about bugs in just released tars, but neither distro has a good way of building these packages, store them safely on their servers, and keep them completely hidden from the public. Big question truly is why they should be hidden. Both these distro's do not make it possible for the regular user to find these packages. The repo's where they are placed are not on any official repo list made available to any regular user installing these distro's, only those with inside info how to edit the needed files, will be able to find these packages. We also know there is a fear bug reports for non-released KDE version will surface, but we both educate our testers to report any issues found internally, and if it is clear it is not a distro specific bug, not testers but a distro developer will convey the found bug/issue to the appropriate channel. We, as Arch Linux and Chakra-Project developers would like to propose now to follow the recommendation set by Dirk Mueller in the last long ml thread regarding this issue, and have the build packages from the tagged tars available to our testers during the time period between tagging and release. Arch Linux: Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org Chakra-Project: Manuel Tortosa manutort...@chakra-project.org Anke Boersma abveri...@chakra-project.org ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: 4.10.0 tarballs available (for packagers)
On Thursday 31 January 2013 08:55:15 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > kdepim has been respun to include With boost 1.52 a patch is needed to build kleopatra, see BUG#304111 for more. -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: 4.10 RC1 tarballs available for packagers
On Tuesday 18 December 2012 23:56:36 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > I have built the packages and build fine here Everything built fine here too, but both kde-base-artwork and kde-workspace installs /usr/share/apps/ksplash/Themes/Default/ -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: kdesdk migration
On Monday 10 December 2012 13:28:45 Jeremy Whiting wrote: > Hello release team guys, > > In preparing the kdesdk rules for migrating kdesdk from svn to git I'm > wondering what the best time would be to migrate. I see 4.10 beta is to be > tagged next week, would it be best to get the migration done before then? > or wait until after 4.10 is finally released towards the end of January? > Either way I'll do a set of conversions into scratch tonight for the > application maintainers to check. > As a packager I would say _before_ 4.10 final release. We already packaged the first sets of tarballs, so we could package the new kdesdk packages for the RC1. No need to add extra work to the 4.11 release IMHO. -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: 4.10 beta1 tarballs available for packagers
On Friday 16 November 2012 23:08:19 you wrote: > On Friday 16 November 2012 20:59:37 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > I've updated the kdepimlibs tarball to include > > cb96016dc74978a219b192f0355fe88548ad6a93 so that it does not install > > FindQJson.cmake since it should not be needed and might conflict with the > > one provided by the qjson tarball. > > > > sha1sum of that file is now f792dbc1d0829925939f4fd61fe88d834baca445 > > Please fix the permissions :) Permissions fixed by bcooksley. Also, the bug reports numbers I reported were wrong; they are #310220, #310221 -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: 4.10 beta1 tarballs available for packagers
On Friday 16 November 2012 20:59:37 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > I've updated the kdepimlibs tarball to include > cb96016dc74978a219b192f0355fe88548ad6a93 so that it does not install > FindQJson.cmake since it should not be needed and might conflict with the > one provided by the qjson tarball. > > sha1sum of that file is now f792dbc1d0829925939f4fd61fe88d834baca445 > Please fix the permissions :) -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: 4.10 beta1 tarballs available for packagers
On Friday 16 November 2012 15:15:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > The tarballs are in their usual packager-only location > > I'm attaching the sha1sum of the tarballs and the branches, hashes/revisions > they were cretead from. > > ** NEW DEPENDENCIES ** > akonadi 1.8.80 http://download.kde.org/stable/akonadi/src/ > > ** GONE TARBALLS ** > - kdegames has been split to mimic git repos so, so kdegames tarball is > gone - printer-applet > * Replaced by print-manager > > ** NEW TARBALLS ** > - nepomuk-widgets > * To be honest i'm not sure what it's for, i'd say compile it after > nepomuk- core (early in the process and you should be safe) > - picmi > * New game > - print-manager > * Replaces print-manager > - kdegames has been split to mimic git repos so: > * bomber > * bovo > * granatier > * kajongg > * kapman > * katomic > * kblackbox > * kblocks > * kbounce > * kbreakout > * kdiamond > * kfourinline > * kgoldrunner > * kigo > * killbots > * kiriki > * kjumpingcube > * klickety > * klines > * kmahjongg > * kmines > * knavalbattle > * knetwalk > * kolf > * kollision > * konquest > * kpat > * kreversi > * kshisen > * ksirk > * ksnakeduel > * kspaceduel > * ksquares > * ksudoku > * ktuberling > * kubrick > * libkdegames > * libkmahjongg > * lskat > * palapeli > > ** REWRITTEN SOFTWARE ** > - ktouch > * Rewritten from scrach > > I have built the packages and build fine here Great, I did build everything. The only issue I have are: * kate, pate build fails (KDEBUG#31020) * smokekde, okular bindings build fails (KDEBUG#31021) As a side note, could you contact both libwlocate and libkdeaccessibilityclient devs? Those libs are required by marble and kmag, but they have not a stable release. Also, kstarts requires libindi 0.9.6, which doesn't exist yet. Thank you Albert. -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: 4.9.3 tarballs available (for packagers)
On Friday 02 November 2012 01:38:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > The tarballs can be found in their usual embargo location (available only to > packagers) Did anyone built qyoto? I cannot build it with cmake 2.8.10, see https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309652 for info. Thanks -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: polkit-kde-kcmmodules editing /usr
On Wednesday 24 October 2012 11:36:53 Chris Reffett wrote: > Hello all, > We at Gentoo have noticed that polkit-kde-kcmmodules (or > polkit-kde-kcmmodules-1) is saving modified configurations to /usr. > You can find more info at > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438790 and the KDE bug at > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308934, but basically, there > should not be any file editing going on in /usr, it should be in /etc > instead. My question to the list: what are other distros doing about > this, and is this breaking things for you all, too? I cannot help here as we don't provide it in our repos. But on Arch Linux we have the same kind of issue with KDM; it stores the configs in /usr/share/config/kdm. How do you handle that? -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: kdebindings-kimono support for Soprano is broken in beta2
On Monday 11 June 2012 21:52:52 Manuel Tortosa wrote: > Ok, i have found that it needs a soprano with Clucene index support for > compiling, thanks. Uhm, it builds for me without clucene support in soprano. -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: final KDE 4.8.4 tarballs
On Wednesday 06 June 2012 23:13:39 Dirk Mueller wrote: > af1ff1da6f1fbd5eab18fdd57282f5c1 kdepim-4.8.4.tar.xz > > - kmail crash fix This doesn't build anymore: /build/src/kdepim-4.8.4/messageviewer/viewer_p.cpp: In member function ‘void MessageViewer::ViewerPrivate::openAttachment(KMime::Content*, const QString&)’: /build/src/kdepim-4.8.4/messageviewer/viewer_p.cpp:378:35: error: no matching function for call to ‘MessageViewer::ViewerPrivate::attachmentOpen(KMime::Content*&, KService::Ptr&)’ /build/src/kdepim-4.8.4/messageviewer/viewer_p.cpp:378:35: note: candidate is: In file included from /build/src/kdepim-4.8.4/messageviewer/viewer_p.cpp:25:0: /build/src/kdepim-4.8.4/messageviewer/viewer_p.h:228:8: note: void MessageViewer::ViewerPrivate::attachmentOpen(KMime::Content*) /build/src/kdepim-4.8.4/messageviewer/viewer_p.h:228:8: note: candidate expects 1 argument, 2 provided The others tarballs are fine. -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Re: Why are 4.8.80 packages already out in the wild?
On Jun 3, 2012 8:47 PM, "Martin Gräßlin" wrote: > I don't want to blame anyone (that's why I did not name the distros). I want > to know what we can do that versions which should not go to the users end up > on the users's system. And somehow I think it's also in the interest of the > distributions to ensure that packages which should not be used do not get > installed. Just imagine Albert would have called off the release due to severe > data loss issues... > > If mistakes happen, we have to identify them and ensure that they don't happen > in future :-) It's right. Anyway that repo isn't for end users. It's for the people that want a rock KDE 4.9 final release ;) ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Why are 4.8.80 packages already out in the wild?
On Jun 3, 2012 8:40 PM, "Albert Astals Cid" wrote: > Come on, you put your packages available before the official tar files are > available in the ftp and you're saying you did nothing wrong? That repo is empty for 9 months per year. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Why are 4.8.80 packages already out in the wild?
On Jun 3, 2012 8:08 PM, "Martin Gräßlin" wrote: > > Hi all, > > this weekend KWin received bug reports against 4.8.80 from distro packages > ([1], [2]). This quite surprised me as beta should not be out before Monday. > > Now I concider this as an issue if users can report bugs for a version we do > not yet expect. E.g. in KWin I had not yet created the version information - I > wanted to do this on Monday after the release. Because of that bug 301068 had > been reported incorrectly against 4.8.2 which quite confused me. > > For Beta 1 this seems not so much an issue, but for Beta 2 such too early > releases can waste quite some time. Consider we don't notice and investigate > why a bug fix did not work? And even if we notice we have to spend time asking > the user to verify which version was actually in use. > > So I would like to know, what's the reason why distros ship the packages too > early and whether we find it acceptable that distros ship the packages too > early. > Well...In Arch I released the packages some hour before Tom's thread about calling off beta1. You guys decided to delay it only, so I kept the packages in the unstable repo to let our devs test them, but I didn't announce them. I guess the "Install KDE 4.9" wiki page on techbase did the rest. Anyway, if you want to blame someone I guess you should blame users not us. Cheers ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Beta 1: New Plans
On Thursday 31 May 2012 18:09:33 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > c856242b22693ecb55c40a78081b0691 kdepim-4.8.80.tar.xz Just to inform you that I had to apply this[1] patch to build the new kdepim tarball. Cheers [1] https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdepim/repository/revisions/26f9d62b9a9b4bfa736b342903d16dc0d8739d98/diff -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Nepomuk-Core clashes with other Repos
On Saturday 26 May 2012 07:32:09 Eric Hameleers wrote: > Then can you at least post URL's of the commits which fix this, so > that we can use those as patches in our beta1 packages? I already replied yesterday to the thread in the packager ml, anyway: kde-runtime installs nepomukcommon fix: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kde- runtime/repository/revisions/959412fdd7a3bbff6921474342d1209c212a410d nepomuk-core install nepomuk-rcgen fix: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdelibs/nepomuk- core/repository/revisions/6ec4e729e2426dac37e9e27932d4d9e579d53ba4/diff/CMakeLists.txt nepomuk-core asks for kde-workspace fix: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdelibs/nepomuk- core/repository/revisions/b60025c6d5d6201b2bbe6881f11c431ec2671677 Also: * nepomuk-core needs soprano from git to build * kde-base-artwork doesn't build (cmakelist.txt is missing some line) * strigi-multimedia provides an empty package * kdebindings-smokekde doesn't build soprano bindings using soprano from git (bugs reported) -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Packaging 4.9: kdelibs?
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 00:07:09 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > You did not read the part where i can't change the version to 4.8.80 in 4.8 > branch and tag that, right? Whoops sorry, I read it too fast and I replied even more fast... -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Packaging 4.9: kdelibs?
On Tuesday 22 May 2012 23:36:54 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > kdelibs is special since we don't have a master branch to package, i need to > package from the 4.8 branch, that's fine *but* the issue is that i have to > increase the version number and thus I can't tag 4.8.80 since I can't commit > the version number increase to 4.8 branch. If I'm not wrong Dirk releases the git tags, only when we (the packagers) confirm that everything's fine. So you (the KDE team) have a tag on git which corresponds to the tarball's content. Also I'm not wrong there was a discussion about this. Cheers -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8.3 tarballs uploaded (first part)
AndreaOn Thursday 03 May 2012 18:20:13 Scarpino wrote: > On Thursday 03 May 2012 18:19:06 Dirk Mueller wrote: > > thanks for the info. Given the rareness of the QQ plugin and that we're > > already quite late, I'll not pick up a patch for that issue for now. > Ok, what about libjingle? > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299299 Sorry, the bug report is https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299300 -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8.3 tarballs uploaded (first part)
On Thursday 03 May 2012 18:19:06 Dirk Mueller wrote: > thanks for the info. Given the rareness of the QQ plugin and that we're > already quite late, I'll not pick up a patch for that issue for now. Ok, what about libjingle? https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299299 Cheers -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8.3 tarballs uploaded (first part)
On Sunday 29 April 2012 23:15:18 Dirk Mueller wrote: > I just finished uploading the first part of KDE 4.8.3 tarballs. > > Known issues: > > - the re-assembled kdemultimedia tarball does not compile > - kde-l10n is still generating. Hi Dirk, all, using GCC 4.7, the Kopete QQ plugin fails to build: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299299 -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8.2 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
On Friday 30 March 2012 01:33:42 Dirk Mueller wrote: > > Hi, > > I just finished uploading the 4.8.2 tarballs. they're xz only for now. I've > created them with pixz(1) meanwhile, so that they're build within reasonable > amount of time. > > I've shortly tested it, and all xz variants I have available seem to be able > to handle those files just fine. Let me know if you find a problem with that > approach. > > Also, please mail release-team@kde.org about any issues you find as blocking > for this release. the plan is to release them tuesday or wednesday next week. Hi Dirk, everything's fine. Maybe you want to add this commit: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kde- baseapps/konsole/repository/revisions/bf3e57e94b54c1c4337d7960e0fda0ef98156451 Is a workaround to the font issue with Qt 4.8 (KDEBUG#280896) Thanks! -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Request for splitting oxygen-icons tarball
On Friday 02 March 2012 05:44:52 Eric Hameleers wrote: > Slackware's preferred archive compression is xz. So, you have my > blessing. Same in Arch. +1 for xz -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: [kde-announce] KDE Makes Second 4.8 Release Candidate Available
On 5 January 2012 13:02, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > Dirk, > the announcement says KDE 4.7.98, but your tarballs are 4.7.97. > Who's wrong? :) Forgot that. I talked with Sebastian and he's fixing the announcement. -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: [kde-announce] KDE Makes Second 4.8 Release Candidate Available
On 5 January 2012 11:54, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > The full announcement can be found at: > http://kde.org/announcements/announce-4.8-rc2.php Dirk, the announcement says KDE 4.7.98, but your tarballs are 4.7.97. Who's wrong? :) -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 RC2 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
On 3 January 2012 21:51, Dirk Mueller wrote: > > Hi, > > I've just finished uploading the RC2 tarballs. Syncing is not yet enabled,but > I'm doing a first test build. The state yesterday looked pretty good. > > Let me know if you have any issues that would block a fast release tomorrow. Ok. Every module built fine. Except Korundum which still doesn't build with ruby 1.9.3 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=287057 -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 Beta2 (4.7.90) tarballs uploaded
On Saturday 03 December 2011 11:22:48 Dirk Mueller wrote: > just finished uploading the Beta2 tarballs. I've applied a small patch to > kdelibs to make it look like a 4.8 version, although it is taken from 4.7 > branch. > > Still doing some basic testing on it, please let me know if you find any > issues. Thanks. Everything built fine here, except the akonadi bindings, but this seems already known: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283677 -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7.4 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
On Friday 02 December 2011 11:35:58 Eric Hameleers wrote: > That would be the 3rd time these two are absent... Dirk can you please > update your scripts? Well...this is the last 4.7 minor release so that's no more needed. -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 Beta1 tarballs uploaded (try#1)
On 17 November 2011 23:29, Dirk Mueller wrote: > just finished uploading the 4.8 Beta1 tarballs (all except l10n). Let me know > if you find any issues, I have not yet tested them. Dirk, activities have a bug and don't work as in KDE 4.7, see this[1] bug report for more info. Can you made a new kactivities' tarball? [1] https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=287451 -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 Beta1 tarballs uploaded (try#1)
On Thursday 17 November 2011 23:29:39 Dirk Mueller wrote: > Hi, > > just finished uploading the 4.8 Beta1 tarballs (all except l10n). Let me > know if you find any issues, I have not yet tested them. Dirk, Using 4.7.80 tarballs, kde-config prints: $ kde4-config --version | grep KDE KDE Development Platform: 4.7.3 (4.7.3) Are the tarball ok? Please, can you check them? -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 Beta1 tarballs uploaded (try#1)
On Thursday 17 November 2011 23:29:39 Dirk Mueller wrote: > Hi, > > just finished uploading the 4.8 Beta1 tarballs (all except l10n). Let me > know if you find any issues, I have not yet tested them. Hi, kdelibs installs: /usr/lib/libkactivities.so -> libkactivities.so.5 /usr/lib/libkactivities.so.5 -> libkactivities.so.5.7.0 /usr/lib/libkactivities.so.5.7.0 while kactivities installs: /usr/lib/libkactivities.so.6 -> libkactivities.so.6.0.0 /usr/lib/libkactivities.so -> libkactivities.so.6 /usr/lib/libkactivities.so.6.0.0 kdebase-workspace build with kactivities.so.6, so I guess the kdelibs tarball should be fixed and recreated. -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7.3 tarballs uploaded
On Friday 28 October 2011 10:21:58 Dirk Mueller wrote: > Hi guys, > > sorry for the late upload, I'm travelling and have a very bad connection. I > just finished uploading 1sst try of KDE 4.7.3 tarballs. Please let me (and > kde-packa...@kde.org) know about any major issues with them. > > > Targetted release date is tuesday or wednesday. Dirk, I suggest to revert this commit[1] as it causes this bug[2] [1] http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=kde- workspace.git&a=commitdiff&h=8d59876457387d1c72ca3626ae2d267adf100014 [2] https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285347 -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7.3 tarballs uploaded
On Friday 28 October 2011 10:21:58 Dirk Mueller wrote: > Hi guys, > > sorry for the late upload, I'm travelling and have a very bad connection. I > just finished uploading 1sst try of KDE 4.7.3 tarballs. Please let me (and > kde-packa...@kde.org) know about any major issues with them. I just built (successfully) the kdeaccessibility, kdeutils and kde-l10n tarballs. Everything went ok! -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7.1 tarballs (try #1)
On 2 September 2011 10:55, Ben Cooksley wrote: > You should now be able to access the 4.7.1 directory if you have a > packagers account. Confirmed. Works now. -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7.0 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
On 22 July 2011 17:32, Dirk Mueller wrote: > Please drop an email about show stopper issues to release-team@kde.org, and > any compilation issues or other messups with the tarballs to kde- > packa...@kde.org, and I'll respond. I guess this isn't a stopper, but we cannot build kdebindings-smokeqt with Qwt 6.0 here, see https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=278486 -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7 RC1 tarballs uploaded (try #2)
On Friday 24 June 2011 10:06:29 Pino Toscano wrote:
> They are -not- part of kdegraphics nor any other kde* module.
Since the first beta something is changed then:
$ ls unstable/4.6.80/src/*k{map,face}*
unstable/4.6.80/src/libkface-4.6.80.tar.bz2
unstable/4.6.80/src/libkmap-4.6.80.tar.bz2
$ ls unstable/4.6.90/src/*k{map,face}*
ls: cannot access unstable/4.6.90/src/*kmap*: No such file or directory
ls: cannot access unstable/4.6.90/src/*kface*: No such file or directory
--
Andrea
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7 RC1 tarballs uploaded (try #2)
On Thursday 23 June 2011 21:21:14 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > Dirk, > > am I missing something or did you miss kdenetwork? Also, there is no libkmap and libkface. -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7 RC1 tarballs uploaded (try #1)
On Thursday 23 June 2011 00:38:56 Dirk Mueller wrote: > Hi, > > just finished uploading the first set of KDE 4.7 RC1 (4.6.90) tarballs, not > well tested yet so far. > > this is the split build, and the l10n tarballs are still bulding. I'll spend > some time on the "superbuilds", or the consolidated tarballs tomorrow. kde-runtime fails to build for me: error: ‘qt_metatype_id’ is not a member of ‘QMetaTypeId’ log: http://paste.kde.org/86407/ qt 4.7.3 gcc 4.6.0 -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: RFC: Release Management Going Forward
> On Monday 20 June 2011, Manuel Tortosa wrote: > Well in our case in Chakra we switched our buildsystem already for match > the new separated tarballs.as in fact. our start was KDEMod, a modular > KDE set of packages, so the new way is the natural way for us, even > more monolithic tarballs makes hard simple things like get the kate > perl bindings compiling only each tarball once. Same here on Arch Linux. We prefer the grained tarballs too. -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDEPIM 4.6.0 Tarballs (try #1)
On Monday 06 June 2011 22:09:19 Allen Winter wrote: > Howdy, > > KDEPIM 4.6.0 is now released. > > Soon you will find tarballs on ftpmaster in /pub/kde/stable/kdepim-4.6.0 > > sha1sums > 283ea87b68a4750194d785361f6534af59edacf9 kdepim-4.6.0.tar.bz2 > 2a2e29ba805ae2c94fa4da6371693e59575d3ed8 kdepim-runtime-4.6.0.tar.bz2 Hi Allen, the previous tarballs where in kdepim-$version/src/, can you move these there? BTW, if everything build release date is today, right? Cheers -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.6.4 uploaded (try#1)
On Friday 03 June 2011 16:07:16 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > I can't find it in ftpmaster. Was it supposed to be in stable/4.6.4? Right. Seems they are in ktown. -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7 Beta1 (4.6.80) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
On Saturday 21 May 2011 02:00:44 Dirk Mueller wrote: > Please report any important packaging issues or must-fix bugs to the > release- t...@kde.org mailinglist. Build fails for both pykde4 and smokekde; I reported the bugs here[1] and here[2]. However, the second seems related to kdelibs. [1] https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273963 [2] https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273985 -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7 Beta1 (4.6.80) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
On Saturday 21 May 2011 23:29:43 Dirk Mueller wrote: > Can I get the opinion of the other distro packagers as well please? > Personally I was much more happy with the previous module-based layout, > though I can cope reasonable with the current situation as well. Any other > opinon? Here in Arch Linux we have no problem with the splitted layout. As Raphael said we have to spend some time to adjust our PKGBUILD, but it's fine. Anyway, both layouts are fine. -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDEPIM 4.6RC1 Tarballs (try #1)
On Friday 13 May 2011 16:44:58 Allen Winter wrote: > We keep them packager-only just in case there are problems. > > Once the packagers tell me that the stuff compiles properly against the > dependencies then I will ask to open up the permissions. This is a safety > check so bad tarballs don't survive out in the wild. I already said privately to Eike that GID was wrong, not permissions. They are fine now and I built the packages without issues here. -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDEPIM 4.6RC1 Tarballs (try #1)
On Friday 13 May 2011 11:43:15 Allen Winter wrote: > Howdy, > > I'm happy to announce that KDEPIM 4.6 has now entered into the Release > Candidate stage. > > Soon you will find tarballs on ktown in > ftp://ktown.kde.org/pub/kde/unstable/kdepim/4.5.96 > > sha1sums > f425f143fe3381be2bb018bab92d89fd112595f0 kdepim-4.5.96.tar.bz2 > fd1cf58d5b62c647a7920dfc1d79126843750b1e kdepim-runtime-4.5.96.tar.bz2 > > Translations are included as with all the previous KDEPIM 4.6 beta tarballs. > > Please test these and let me know if they build ok for you. Hi Allen, permissions aren't 644, also could be possible to move them in unstable/kdepim/4.5.96 as we used with the previous releases? They are stored in unstable/kdepim/4.5.96/src now. Thanks -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.6.3 tarballs (try#1 part1) uploaded
On 28 April 2011 18:23, Dirk Mueller wrote: > > Hi, > > I just finished the first set of KDE 4.6.3 tarballs. Missing are kdeedu, which > migrated completely into seperate modules in git and I have to reassemble it > again. > > I also need to figure out how to regenerate kdeplasma-addons. > > Please let me know of any issues with those tarballs. Seems that none of us noticed the new icons in the oxygen-icons tarball. Is this change intentional? I don't think new icons should be shipped with minor releases. Also they are inconsistent, see the KDE bug #272756. -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.6.3 tarballs (try#1 part1) uploaded
On Thursday 28 April 2011 18:23:22 Dirk Mueller wrote: > Please let me know of any issues with those tarballs. kdebase-workspace doesn't support Network Manager 0.9, could you fix this before release KDE 4.6.3? -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDEPIM 4.6 beta4 (second try)
On Monday 10 January 2011 10:15:01 Allen Winter wrote: > See /pub/kde/unstable/kdepim/4.5.94.1 on your ftp.kde.org mirror. > > 0243aa59c3acd9c38403b3acddb33c22c9c39c65 kdepim-4.5.94.1.tar.bz2 > f226165cd7f92524be354329097e5009b5754046 kdepim-runtime-4.5.94.1.tar.bz2 > > Please let me know if these build ok. Translations are fine and KAlarm/akonadi is disabled: these build! -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDEPIM 4.6beta4 Available
On Friday 07 January 2011 13:02:39 Allen Winter wrote: > I put message and doc translations inside the respective tarballs -- note > that each has their own set now. Sorry for spamming, but this is the list of missing index.docbook: da_kdepim/knode/index.docbook en_GB_kdepim/knode/index.docbook gl_kdepim/knode/index.docbook fr_kdepim/kalarm/index.docbook fr_kdepim/kmail/index.docbook fr_kdepim/knode/index.docbook fr_kdepim/korganizer/index.docbook ru_kdepim/knode/index.docbook -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDEPIM 4.6beta4 Available
On Friday 07 January 2011 19:35:15 Andrea Scarpino wrote: > Hi, da translations breaks build: > > [ 53%] Generating kwatchgnupg.gmo > kio_help4(25996): File ' "/build/src/kdepim-4.5.94/doc- > translations/da_kdepim/knode/index.docbook" ' does not exist. > make[2]: *** [doc-translations/da_kdepim/knode/index.cache.bz2] Error 2 > make[1]: *** [doc-translations/da_kdepim/knode/CMakeFiles/knode- > handbook.dir/all] Error 2 > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs and en too... [ 56%] Generating index.cache.bz2 kio_help4(8448): File ' "/build/src/kdepim-4.5.94/doc- translations/en_GB_kdepim/knode/index.docbook" ' does not exist. make[2]: *** [doc-translations/en_GB_kdepim/knode/index.cache.bz2] Error 2 make[1]: *** [doc-translations/en_GB_kdepim/knode/CMakeFiles/knode- handbook.dir/all] Error 2 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDEPIM 4.6beta4 Available
On Friday 07 January 2011 13:02:39 Allen Winter wrote: > I put message and doc translations inside the respective tarballs -- note > that each has their own set now. Hi, da translations breaks build: [ 53%] Generating kwatchgnupg.gmo kio_help4(25996): File ' "/build/src/kdepim-4.5.94/doc- translations/da_kdepim/knode/index.docbook" ' does not exist. make[2]: *** [doc-translations/da_kdepim/knode/index.cache.bz2] Error 2 make[1]: *** [doc-translations/da_kdepim/knode/CMakeFiles/knode- handbook.dir/all] Error 2 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.6 RC2 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
On 4 January 2011 18:12, Dirk Mueller wrote: > We'll release it as soon as there is positive feedback from the KDE Packagers. Everything built ok here. -- Andrea Scarpino Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.6 RC2 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
On Tuesday 04 January 2011 18:12:40 Dirk Mueller wrote: > Hi, > > I just finished uploading the KDE 4.6 RC2 tarballs (l10n still being > generated). > > Let me know of any urgent build issues, I have personally not yet tested > these packages. > > We'll release it as soon as there is positive feedback from the KDE > Packagers. Hi, I don't see packages. -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.5.90 (KDE 4.6 RC1) try#1 uploaded
On 22 December 2010 15:10, Dirk Mueller wrote: > I've just finished uploading the first set of KDE 4.6 RC1 tarballs. it does > not > include kdepim* as previously announced, however it includes kdepimlibs, which > is needed for the kdepim beta release. > > I'm going to ask for an explicit green light if we can announce this as it is. > the release schedule says to announce it ASAP, so I'm waiting now for > feedback. Everything built OK! -- Andrea Scarpino Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDEPIM 4.6beta3 Available
On Wednesday 22 December 2010 09:26:42 Andrea Scarpino wrote: > Build files here (missing header in the tarball): > > Linking CXX executable akonadi_pop3_resource > In file included from /build/src/kdepim- > runtime-4.6beta3/agents/maildispatcher/maildispatcheragent.cpp:27:0: > /build/src/kdepim- > runtime-4.6beta3/agents/maildispatcher/sentactionhandler.h:25:47: fatal > error: mailtransport/sentactionattribute.h: No such file or directory > compilation terminated. > make[2]: *** > [agents/maildispatcher/CMakeFiles/akonadi_maildispatcher_agent.dir/maildispa > tcheragent.o] Error 1 > make[1]: *** > [agents/maildispatcher/CMakeFiles/akonadi_maildispatcher_agent.dir/all] > Error 2 Oh I understand now, kdepimlibs 4.6 RC1 is needed. -- Andrea Scarpino Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.5.4 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
On 29 November 2010 13:44, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > Can this[1] be included in kdebase-runtime 4.5.4? > > [1] http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revision&revision=1196219 If you apply that patch you need to apply this one too: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revision&revision=1173672 -- Andrea Scarpino Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.5.4 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
On 29 November 2010 13:13, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > kdebase-runtime does not build with phonon 4.4.3, I don't know if this > can be considered as a bug because kde-support-4.5 does not include > this phonon version. Can this[1] be included in kdebase-runtime 4.5.4? [1] http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revision&revision=1196219 -- Andrea Scarpino Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.5.4 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
On 26 November 2010 21:22, Dirk Mueller wrote: > just finished uploading first set of KDE 4.5.4 tarballs.. sorry for being so > late, too much real life overruling today. > > seems to build mostly as far as I was able to see. Please report any build > issues/serious bugs to me, if possible with SVNr that fixes them. kdebase-runtime does not build with phonon 4.4.3, I don't know if this can be considered as a bug because kde-support-4.5 does not include this phonon version. Scanning dependencies of target kde [ 64%] Building CXX object phonon/platform_kde/CMakeFiles/kde.dir/kde_automoc.o /build/src/kdebase-runtime-4.5.4/phonon/kded-module/phononserver.cpp:59:1: error: redefinition of 'struct QMetaTypeId > >' /usr/include/KDE/Phonon/../../phonon/objectdescription.h:396:1: error: previous definition of 'struct QMetaTypeId > >' Linking CXX shared module ../../lib/kurisearchfilter.so make[2]: *** [phonon/kded-module/CMakeFiles/kded_phononserver.dir/phononserver.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [phonon/kded-module/CMakeFiles/kded_phononserver.dir/all] Error 2 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs [ 64%] Building CXX object phonon/platform_kde/CMakeFiles/kde.dir/kdeplatformplugin.o [ 65%] Building CXX object phonon/platform_kde/CMakeFiles/kde.dir/kiomediastream.o [ 65%] Built target kurisearchfilter [ 65%] Building CXX object phonon/platform_kde/CMakeFiles/kde.dir/devicelisting.o /build/src/kdebase-runtime-4.5.4/phonon/platform_kde/kdeplatformplugin.cpp:47:1: error: redefinition of 'struct QMetaTypeId > >' /usr/include/phonon/objectdescription.h:396:1: error: previous definition of 'struct QMetaTypeId > >' make[2]: *** [phonon/platform_kde/CMakeFiles/kde.dir/kdeplatformplugin.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs /build/src/kdebase-runtime-4.5.4/phonon/platform_kde/devicelisting.cpp:38:1: error: redefinition of 'struct QMetaTypeId > >' /usr/include/KDE/Phonon/../../phonon/objectdescription.h:396:1: error: previous definition of 'struct QMetaTypeId > >' make[2]: *** [phonon/platform_kde/CMakeFiles/kde.dir/devicelisting.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [phonon/platform_kde/CMakeFiles/kde.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 -- Andrea Scarpino Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.6 tarballs (try #2)
On 22 November 2010 23:17, Dirk Mueller wrote: > Please make sure to use the new tarballs and report any missing fixes/new > issues. Hi, kdenetwork does not build (I'm using libktorrent from git) Linking CXX shared module ../../../lib/kget_metalinkfactory.so [ 44%] Building CXX object kget/transfer-plugins/bittorrent/CMakeFiles/kget_bittorrentfactory.dir/bttransferhandler.o In file included from /build/src/kdenetwork-4.5.80/kget/transfer-plugins/bittorrent/bttransferhandler.cpp:16:0: /build/src/kdenetwork-4.5.80/kget/transfer-plugins/bittorrent/scandlg.h:27:45: fatal error: datachecker/datacheckerlistener.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[2]: *** [kget/transfer-plugins/bittorrent/CMakeFiles/kget_bittorrentfactory.dir/bttransferhandler.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [kget/transfer-plugins/bittorrent/CMakeFiles/kget_bittorrentfactory.dir/all] Error 2 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs -- Andrea Scarpino Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.6 Beta1 tarballs (4.5.80) uploaded
On Monday 22 November 2010 21:50:55 Pavel Heimlich, a.k.a. hajma wrote: > Hi Kevin, > KDEbindings do find Okular just fine here on the Solaris side of the > pool, using cmake 2.8.1. > OTOH I'd also sign the petition asking for relying on published > kdesupport tarballs instead of pulling them out of git. Here okular bindings are built too using cmake 2.8.3 -- Andrea Scarpino Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.6 Beta1 tarballs (4.5.80) uploaded
On Monday 22 November 2010 21:39:10 Dirk Mueller wrote: > Any idea where to find 4.4.3 release? I can't find it tagged on gitorious > nor was it uploaded to ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable. I used a snapshot from gitorious and it works. -- Andrea Scarpino Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.6 Beta1 tarballs (4.5.80) uploaded
On Friday 19 November 2010 20:51:06 Eric Hameleers wrote: > Is there a spec sheet with the dependencies / requirements for 4.6.x > available somewhere? phonon 4.4.3 for kdebase-runtime. -- Andrea Scarpino Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.5.2 tarballs (try#1 uploaded)
On 2 October 2010 06:45, Phil Miller wrote: > All went fine here to compile except two kde-l10n pkgs: > > kde-l10n-nn is kde-l10n-nl broke, not -nn Cheers -- andreascarpino.it Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.5.1 tarballs (try #1) uploaded (Dirk Mueller)
On Tuesday 31 August 2010 11:15:53 Phil Miller wrote: > sed -i -e "s~add_subdirectory( kcontrol )~~g" kde-l10n- > ru-$pkgver/docs/kdebase-runtime/CMakeLists.txt To keep some kcontrol translations I used: sed -i -e "s~add_subdirectory( proxy )~~g" kde-l10n-ru-$pkgver/docs/kdebase- runtime/kcontrol/CMakeLists.txt -- andreascarpino.it Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.5 Beta2 (4.4.85) uploaded
On Wednesday 09 June 2010 13:47:18 Dirk Mueller wrote: > is everybody fine with releasing Beta2 today (unlike originally planned > tomorrow morning)? > > It seems it all went smooth and at least opensuse has packages ready (and > people are asking for it already). Yes, that sounds fine. Here on Arch Linux we are ready too. -- Andrea Scarpino - andreascarpino.it KDE Maintainer in Arch Linux ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.4.2 tarballs (try #1) uploaded
On Saturday 27 March 2010 23:52:30 Simon Edwards wrote: > I'm not seeing this error on my 4.4 svn branch build. Can you tell me > which version of Python & PyQt you are using? > > Is anyone else seeing this problem? Hi, I have: pyqt 4.7.2 python 2.6.5 -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.4 RC2 uploaded
2010/1/20 Dirk Mueller : > > Hi, > > first set of RC2 tarballs uploaded. kde-l10n will come later. Please let me > know if you were able to successfully build and run them, as we want to > release them ASAP. kdebindings-smoke fails. log attached. qt 4.6.1 -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer kdebindings-4.3.95-1-i686-build.log Description: Binary data ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.4 RC1 (4.3.90) tarballs uploaded
2010/1/7 Dirk Mueller : > while I had the problem originally, after updating to 4.4 kdebase/workspace it > builds fine for me. But kdebase-workspace requires kdebindings-python to enable KDE Python support, if your solution work, one needs to build kdebase-workspace twice?? -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.4 RC1 (4.3.90) tarballs uploaded
2010/1/7 Eric Hameleers : > Here, kdelibs 4.3.90 fails to find shared-desktop-ontologies. The > 4.3.85 tarball did not have any problem finding and using > shared-desktop-ontologies. > The shared-desktop-ontologies which I have installed has not changed > at all in the meantime (this is v0.2). None problem with shared-desktop-ontologies 0.2 here. About the sip error I am trying to build it with the last sip snapshot. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.4 RC1 (4.3.90) tarballs uploaded
2010/1/6 Dirk Mueller : > Hi, > > I just finished the first set of 4.3.90 (KDE 4.4 RC1) tarballs and uploaded > them. kde-l10n still takes a few more hours, I'll upload them later. > > Please let me know of any urgent issues, we'd like to release this asap. Hi, kdebindings fails to build here: Linking CXX shared library ../../lib/pykde/phonon.so [ 83%] Built target python_module_PyKDE4_phonon [ 84%] Generating sip/plasma/sipplasmapart0.cpp, sip/plasma/sipplasmapart1.cpp, sip/plasma/sipplasmapart2.cpp, sip/plasma/sipplasmapart3.cpp, sip/plasma/sipplasmapart4.cpp, sip/plasma/sipplasmapart5.cpp, sip/plasma/sipplasmapart6.cpp, sip/plasma/sipplasmapart7.cpp sip: QAbstractAnimation has not been defined make[2]: *** [python/pykde4/sip/plasma/sipplasmapart0.cpp] Error 1 make[1]: *** [python/pykde4/CMakeFiles/python_module_PyKDE4_plasma.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.4 Beta2 (4.3.85) tarballs available
2009/12/21 Dirk Mueller : > 86fbd7d6038ed34bd701f05217ee7d87 kdebindings-4.3.85.tar.bz2 > > Builds now fine. It still does not here :( log attached -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer kdebindings-4.3.85-1-i686-build.log Description: Binary data ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
