Re: Review Request 108516: Do not hardcode site-packages for the python libdir.
Hi Need someone to check when installing into /usr. I've tested the python patch on kde 4.9.98 and installed it into /usr/lib64/ and haven't had anything go wrong... yet ;) --- On Tue, 1/22/13, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: From: Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org Subject: Re: Review Request 108516: Do not hardcode site-packages for the python libdir. To: Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at Cc: Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org, Release Team release-team@kde.org, Build System kde-buildsys...@kde.org Date: Tuesday, January 22, 2013, 12:27 PM This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108516/ Personally and from a I know nothing about python perspective, I'd prefer this to not go to 4.10.0, seems like something a bit fragile that might break and we can't really afford that in 4.10.0 at the moment. I wouldn't mind seening it in master if you think that fixing the problems that might arise in the future should not be hard. So could this as a half-shipit. I'd like Kevin, Luca, Christophe to comment here too, but we can't all get what we want :D - Albert On January 21st, 2013, 11 a.m. UTC, Michael Jansen wrote: Review request for Build System, Release Team and Kevin Kofler. By Michael Jansen. Updated Jan. 21, 2013, 11 a.m. Description Do not hardcode site-packages for the python libdir. Testing Not much. Works the same as before. Need someone to check on debian. Need someone to check when installing into /usr. I think the strequal to check if PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES_INSTALL_DIR is different from PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES_DIR is not optimal but good enough. The only problem could be a trailing slash or different case on windows. Any hints to improve it? Diffs cmake/modules/FindPythonLibrary.cmake (7cef79b16521c759f38f1deea539a28a50c5d708) View Diff -Inline Attachment Follows- ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: nepomuk-core needs unreleased Soprano
The number of developers who need to be hit by a bus for the project to be destroyed. 1 means there's a single point of failure (you), i.e., whenever you aren't available for whatever reason (such as the past few days), everything grinds to a halt. As if there isn't enough bickering and finger pointing already. There is plenty of blame to go around. It would be great if people would start accepting responsibility for their actions rather than trying to scapegoat one person. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
Hi, I've built kde 4.7.95 against qt 4.8 and haven't had any issues. Infact, it ran a little faster and a lot more reliably when built against 4.8 than it ever did for me against 4.7.4. I didn't use any patches either. I wasn't aware that there was one, let alone that it was needed. Good luck. --- On Mon, 12/26/11, Phil Miller ph...@chakra-project.org wrote: From: Phil Miller ph...@chakra-project.org Subject: Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1) To: KDE release coordination release-team@kde.org Date: Monday, December 26, 2011, 9:21 AM KDE has some issues with qt-4.8.0. One of it is regarding QUrl.toLocalfile: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749213 Patching qt with followed patch fixes it: qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.0-QUrl_toLocalFile.patch Does anybody else has issues with KDE 4.7.95 build against qt-4.8.0 or would it be better to build the next RC against qt-4.7.4 again? -Inline Attachment Follows- ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
Hello again I read through the Chakra thread. Very interesting. I've not experienced any of those bugs. I have two boxes with qt 4.8. As for the distro, I have one multilib Gentoo install and one LFS no multilib. Feel free to ask if you have any more questions. Harry --- On Mon, 12/26/11, Phil Miller ph...@chakra-project.org wrote: From: Phil Miller ph...@chakra-project.org Subject: Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1) To: KDE release coordination release-team@kde.org Date: Monday, December 26, 2011, 2:54 PM May I ask what distro you are using? We have several issues with QT 4.8 and discussing that in our mailing-list: http://groups.google.com/group/chakra- devel/browse_thread/thread/db11f92846e962f Am Montag, 26. Dezember 2011, 13:20:52 schrieb Harry Miller: Hi, I've built kde 4.7.95 against qt 4.8 and haven't had any issues. Infact, it ran a little faster and a lot more reliably when built against 4.8 than it ever did for me against 4.7.4. I didn't use any patches either. I wasn't aware that there was one, let alone that it was needed. Good luck. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
kde-4.6.95
Hi I'm wondering where I can download the kdenetwork, kdemultimedia, and kdegraphics 4.6.95 tarballs at? I've got everything else but those. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Harry___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
