Re: [Kde-pim] Fwd: Re: KDE 4.4.98 (4.4 RC3)

2010-02-07 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Sunday 07 February 2010 22:32:18 Thiago Macieira wrote:
   Em Domingo 7. Fevereiro 2010, às 22.11.43, Sebastian Kügler escreveu:
  On Sunday 07 February 2010 04:31:56 Eike Hein wrote:
   Let me re-summarize the situation for clarity: Right
   now you have to be careful about what's inside the
   QString you pass to KNotification, because if it con-
   tains characters in a certain Unicode character range
   your application will crash as a result due to D-Bus
   closing the connection.
 
  Is this actually a regression over 4.3?
 
  If not, there's no point in holding the release back for it, since it
  doesn't affect this bug (neither positively, nor negatively).
 
 No, it's not a regression.

Good that it doesn't get in the way of releasing 4.4.0.

 However, it is a remote crash exploit. It should be fixed immediately.

I fully agree of course.
-- 
sebas

 http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org |  GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team


Re: [Kde-pim] Fwd: Re: KDE 4.4.98 (4.4 RC3)

2010-02-06 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Friday 05 February 2010, Thomas McGuire wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Thursday 04 February 2010 21:58:46 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
  On Monday 01 February 2010 14:29:52 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
   https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211128
   https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96

Bug 96 exists as long as Kontact exists, i.e. since KDE 
3.something.


  On Thursday 04 February 2010 19:33:25 Dirk Mueller wrote:
   both seem to be present in 4.4.0 as well. does anyone know which
   commits introduced those bugs?
  
  PIMsters, any idea?
 
 I commented on both bugs. While they might be annoying, they are
 hardly hat important and IMHO don't warrant posting to the
 release-team mailing list.

FWIW, I fully agree with Thomas's assessment.


Regards,
Ingo


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team


Re: [Kde-pim] Fwd: Re: KDE 4.4.98 (4.4 RC3)

2010-02-06 Thread Eike Hein
On 2/6/2010 2:54 AM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
 Alright, suppose those are not blockers then. Thanks for having a look at it 
 (both).

I have just flagged another bug as a release blocker,
with Thiago's blessing:

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199485

The short version is that we have to add some payload
screening to KNotify to avoid a nasty crash until the
issue is tackled in either Qt (not until 4.6.3 at the
earliest) or D-Bus (who knows).


-- 
Best regards,
Eike Hein
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team


Re: [Kde-pim] Fwd: Re: KDE 4.4.98 (4.4 RC3)

2010-02-05 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Friday 05 February 2010 21:17:30 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
   On Friday 05 February 2010, Thomas McGuire wrote:
  On Thursday 04 February 2010 21:58:46 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
   On Monday 01 February 2010 14:29:52 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211128
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96
 
 Bug 96 exists as long as Kontact exists, i.e. since KDE 
 3.something.
 
   On Thursday 04 February 2010 19:33:25 Dirk Mueller wrote:
both seem to be present in 4.4.0 as well. does anyone know which
commits introduced those bugs?
  
   PIMsters, any idea?
 
  I commented on both bugs. While they might be annoying, they are
  hardly hat important and IMHO don't warrant posting to the
  release-team mailing list.
 
 FWIW, I fully agree with Thomas's assessment.

Alright, suppose those are not blockers then. Thanks for having a look at it 
(both).

Cheers,
-- 
sebas

http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team