Permission Request to Backport a Desktop File Addition to kdebase 4.3
Hello all, I implemented a small feature for konqueror's searchbar plugin[1]. This new feature requires new property in the kdebase's webshortcut searchprovider desktop file, [Suggest] that contains the suggestion service for a specific search provider [2]. Since this request has been committed to the konq-plugins extragear module as well, it will be included in the konq-plugins extragear accompanying KDE 4.3. (KDE extragear has different release schedule, doesn't it?). But if the searchprovider desktop file addition is not in the kdebase 4.3, this feature is just non-functional (but no harm at all). Hence I request to backport the searchprovider desktop file additional property to kdebase 4.3 to make this feature also functional in KDE 4.3. Since it is a property addition to the desktop file, it should not affect any other KDE modules, hence it is harmless. But if it is not allowed, we already have this for 4.4 :) (I still have few TODOs for this feature, one is supporting opensearch) Best regards, Fredy Yanardi [1] http://fyanardi.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/hello-world-and-a-little-feature-for-konqueror/ [2] http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revrevision=988310 ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Permission Request to Backport a Desktop File Addition to kdebase 4.3
A Dimarts, 30 de juny de 2009, Fredy Yanardi va escriure: Hello all, I implemented a small feature for konqueror's searchbar plugin[1]. This new feature requires new property in the kdebase's webshortcut searchprovider desktop file, [Suggest] that contains the suggestion service for a specific search provider [2]. Since this request has been committed to the konq-plugins extragear module as well, it will be included in the konq-plugins extragear accompanying KDE 4.3. (KDE extragear has different release schedule, doesn't it?). But if the searchprovider desktop file addition is not in the kdebase 4.3, this feature is just non-functional (but no harm at all). Hence I request to backport the searchprovider desktop file additional property to kdebase 4.3 to make this feature also functional in KDE 4.3. Since it is a property addition to the desktop file, it should not affect any other KDE modules, hence it is harmless. But if it is not allowed, we already have this for 4.4 :) (I still have few TODOs for this feature, one is supporting opensearch) In my opinion we are too late in the process for new features, besides i'm not sure if that'd need new strings to translate but then it would be a double no from my side. Albert Best regards, Fredy Yanardi [1] http://fyanardi.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/hello-world-and-a-little-feature-f or-konqueror/ [2] http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revrevision=988310 ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Permission Request to Backport a Desktop File Addition to kdebase 4.3
Op Tuesday 30 June 2009 22:11 schreef u: A Dimarts, 30 de juny de 2009, Fredy Yanardi va escriure: Hello all, I implemented a small feature for konqueror's searchbar plugin[1]. This new feature requires new property in the kdebase's webshortcut searchprovider desktop file, [Suggest] that contains the suggestion service for a specific search provider [2]. Since this request has been committed to the konq-plugins extragear module as well, it will be included in the konq-plugins extragear accompanying KDE 4.3. (KDE extragear has different release schedule, doesn't it?). But if the searchprovider desktop file addition is not in the kdebase 4.3, this feature is just non-functional (but no harm at all). Hence I request to backport the searchprovider desktop file additional property to kdebase 4.3 to make this feature also functional in KDE 4.3. Since it is a property addition to the desktop file, it should not affect any other KDE modules, hence it is harmless. But if it is not allowed, we already have this for 4.4 :) (I still have few TODOs for this feature, one is supporting opensearch) In my opinion we are too late in the process for new features, besides i'm not sure if that'd need new strings to translate but then it would be a double no from my side. Albert I agree with Albert, hard freeze is there for ages already. And it is on a very visible point in KDE, so we want it properly tested before releasing it... Besides the plugins are released at the same time as konq, so that's no convincing argument. Toma -- KDE Developer___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Permission Request to Backport a Desktop File Addition to kdebase 4.3
Hello Tom and Albert, If that's the case, I'll surely follow the rule :) Thank you, Fredy Yanardi On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Tom Albers t...@kde.org wrote: Op Tuesday 30 June 2009 22:11 schreef u: In my opinion we are too late in the process for new features, besides i'm not sure if that'd need new strings to translate but then it would be a double no from my side. Albert I agree with Albert, hard freeze is there for ages already. And it is on a very visible point in KDE, so we want it properly tested before releasing it... Besides the plugins are released at the same time as konq, so that's no convincing argument. Toma -- KDE Developer ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
