Re: Review of special packager access

[Ben Cooksley]

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Vadim Zhukov  wrote:
> 2016-07-20 10:29 GMT+03:00 Ben Cooksley :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just as a final reminder, i've yet to see responses from:
>>
>> - Asplinux
>
> BTW, ASPLinux is no more. http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=asp

Thanks Vadim, i've now closed that account.

>
> --
>   WBR,
>   Vadim Zhukov

Cheers,
Ben
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Review of special packager access

[Vadim Zhukov]

2016-07-20 10:29 GMT+03:00 Ben Cooksley :
> Hi all,
>
> Just as a final reminder, i've yet to see responses from:
>
> - Asplinux

BTW, ASPLinux is no more. http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=asp

--
  WBR,
  Vadim Zhukov
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Review of special packager access

[Jeff Bai]

Thanks.

2016年7月20日 15:54，"Ben Cooksley" 写道：

> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Jeff Bai  wrote:
> > Hi all.
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> >
> > I am a developer for the AOSC project, and confirming that we are still
> > actively using the depot server for pre-packaging.
>
> Thanks, that's now been noted.
>
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Jeff Bai
>
> Cheers,
> Ben
>
> >
> >
> > 2016年7月8日 19:41，"Ben Cooksley" 写道：
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a
> > distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as
> > this contains important details.
> >
> > First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to
> > kde-distro-packag...@kde.org, which is our usual list for
> > communicating with packagers. It would seem a number of you are
> > missing from there :)
> >
> > Prompted by a recent email I took a look at the list of accounts (one
> > per distribution) which are provided in order to facilitate early
> > access to packages - however for many i've no idea who would be the
> > relevant point of contact.
> >
> > I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
> > confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
> > general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be
> > appreciated if folks could check over their ~/.ssh/authorized keys
> > file and remove any outdated keys.
> >
> > If your distribution has completely lost access, please have someone
> > with an email address belonging to that distribution's domain email
> > sysad...@kde.org to sort that out.
> >
> > KDE servers normally use a format something like this to clearly label
> > whose key(s) are whose, for those that might find it helpful.:
> >
> > ## Name 
> > ssh-rsa
> >
> > ## Next Name
> >
> > The list of accounts, which should approximately correspond to
> > distributions, is as follows:
> >
> > - Active
> > - Aix
> > - Aosc
> > - Archlinux
> > - Arklinux
> > - Asplinux
> > - Bluewhite64
> > - Chakra
> > - Conectiva
> > - Crux
> > - Darwin
> > - Debian
> > - Exherbo
> > - Fedora
> > - FreeBSD
> > - Gentoo
> > - Kaos
> > - Mageia
> > - Magic
> > - Mandriva
> > - Meego
> > - NetBSD
> > - OpenBSD
> > - PCLinuxOS
> > - PLD
> > - Redhat
> > - Rpath
> > - Siduction
> > - Slackware
> > - Slamd64
> > - SUSE
> > - Tld
> > - Tru64
> > - Tukaani
> > - Turbo
> > - Ubuntu
> > - Uludag
> > - Uoirix
> > - Uomandriva
> > - Uosolaris
> > - Vine
> > - Yellow
> > - Yoper
> >
> > In two weeks time we'll go ahead and disable ones we don't get a response
> > from.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ben Cooksley
> > KDE Sysadmin
> > ___
> > release-team mailing list
> > release-team@kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > release-team mailing list
> > release-team@kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
> >
> ___
> release-team mailing list
> release-team@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
>
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Review of special packager access

[Ben Cooksley]

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Jeff Bai  wrote:
> Hi all.

Hi Jeff,

>
> I am a developer for the AOSC project, and confirming that we are still
> actively using the depot server for pre-packaging.

Thanks, that's now been noted.

>
> Best regards,
> Jeff Bai

Cheers,
Ben

>
>
> 2016年7月8日 19:41，"Ben Cooksley" 写道：
>
> Hi all,
>
> My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a
> distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as
> this contains important details.
>
> First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to
> kde-distro-packag...@kde.org, which is our usual list for
> communicating with packagers. It would seem a number of you are
> missing from there :)
>
> Prompted by a recent email I took a look at the list of accounts (one
> per distribution) which are provided in order to facilitate early
> access to packages - however for many i've no idea who would be the
> relevant point of contact.
>
> I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
> confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
> general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be
> appreciated if folks could check over their ~/.ssh/authorized keys
> file and remove any outdated keys.
>
> If your distribution has completely lost access, please have someone
> with an email address belonging to that distribution's domain email
> sysad...@kde.org to sort that out.
>
> KDE servers normally use a format something like this to clearly label
> whose key(s) are whose, for those that might find it helpful.:
>
> ## Name 
> ssh-rsa
>
> ## Next Name
>
> The list of accounts, which should approximately correspond to
> distributions, is as follows:
>
> - Active
> - Aix
> - Aosc
> - Archlinux
> - Arklinux
> - Asplinux
> - Bluewhite64
> - Chakra
> - Conectiva
> - Crux
> - Darwin
> - Debian
> - Exherbo
> - Fedora
> - FreeBSD
> - Gentoo
> - Kaos
> - Mageia
> - Magic
> - Mandriva
> - Meego
> - NetBSD
> - OpenBSD
> - PCLinuxOS
> - PLD
> - Redhat
> - Rpath
> - Siduction
> - Slackware
> - Slamd64
> - SUSE
> - Tld
> - Tru64
> - Tukaani
> - Turbo
> - Ubuntu
> - Uludag
> - Uoirix
> - Uomandriva
> - Uosolaris
> - Vine
> - Yellow
> - Yoper
>
> In two weeks time we'll go ahead and disable ones we don't get a response
> from.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben Cooksley
> KDE Sysadmin
> ___
> release-team mailing list
> release-team@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
>
>
>
> ___
> release-team mailing list
> release-team@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
>
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Review of special packager access

[Jeff Bai]

Hi all.

I am a developer for the AOSC project, and confirming that we are still
actively using the depot server for pre-packaging.

Best regards,
Jeff Bai

2016年7月8日 19:41，"Ben Cooksley" 写道：

Hi all,

My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a
distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as
this contains important details.

First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to
kde-distro-packag...@kde.org, which is our usual list for
communicating with packagers. It would seem a number of you are
missing from there :)

Prompted by a recent email I took a look at the list of accounts (one
per distribution) which are provided in order to facilitate early
access to packages - however for many i've no idea who would be the
relevant point of contact.

I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be
appreciated if folks could check over their ~/.ssh/authorized keys
file and remove any outdated keys.

If your distribution has completely lost access, please have someone
with an email address belonging to that distribution's domain email
sysad...@kde.org to sort that out.

KDE servers normally use a format something like this to clearly label
whose key(s) are whose, for those that might find it helpful.:

## Name 
ssh-rsa

## Next Name

The list of accounts, which should approximately correspond to
distributions, is as follows:

- Active
- Aix
- Aosc
- Archlinux
- Arklinux
- Asplinux
- Bluewhite64
- Chakra
- Conectiva
- Crux
- Darwin
- Debian
- Exherbo
- Fedora
- FreeBSD
- Gentoo
- Kaos
- Mageia
- Magic
- Mandriva
- Meego
- NetBSD
- OpenBSD
- PCLinuxOS
- PLD
- Redhat
- Rpath
- Siduction
- Slackware
- Slamd64
- SUSE
- Tld
- Tru64
- Tukaani
- Turbo
- Ubuntu
- Uludag
- Uoirix
- Uomandriva
- Uosolaris
- Vine
- Yellow
- Yoper

In two weeks time we'll go ahead and disable ones we don't get a response
from.

Thanks,
Ben Cooksley
KDE Sysadmin
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Review of special packager access

[Ben Cooksley]

Hi all,

Just as a final reminder, i've yet to see responses from:

- Active
- Aix
- Aosc
- Asplinux
- Crux
- Darwin
- Magic
- Meego
- PCLinuxOS
- PLD
- Redhat (Fedora has responded, this appears to be a duplicate account)
- Rpath
- Siduction
- Tld
- Tru64
- Turbo
- Uludag
- Uoirix
- Uomandriva
- Uosolaris
- Vine
- Yellow
- Yoper

The accounts for the above will be closed based on the lack of
response in 2 days time.

Big thanks to all of those who have responded.

Cheers,
Ben
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Review of special packager access

[Ben Cooksley]

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Rex Dieter  wrote:
> Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
>> I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
>> confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
>> general point of contact for that distribution
>
> Fedora is still active, contact:
> Rex Dieter 

Hi Rex,

Thanks for the details.
As Fedora and Redhat are related, can you comment on the Redhat entry there?

>
> Thanks
>
> -- Rex

Regards,
Ben

>
> ___
> release-team mailing list
> release-team@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Review of special packager access

[Rex Dieter]

Ben Cooksley wrote:

> I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
> confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
> general point of contact for that distribution

Fedora is still active, contact:
Rex Dieter 

Thanks

-- Rex

___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Review of special packager access

[Ben Cooksley]

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Michael Palimaka  wrote:
> Hi Ben,

Hi Michael,

>
> On 08/07/16 21:39, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
>> confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
>> general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be
>> appreciated if folks could check over their ~/.ssh/authorized keys
>> file and remove any outdated keys.
>
> I confirm that Gentoo is still active. Our primary contacts are:
>
> Johannes Huber 
> Michael Palimaka 
>
> We have also reviewed our ~/.ssh/authorized_keys.

Perfect, i've now noted that - thanks for confirming.

>
> Kind regards,
>
> Michael

Cheers,
Ben
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Review of special packager access

[Ben Cooksley]

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Eric Hameleers  wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a
>> distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as
>> this contains important details.
>>
>> First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to
>> kde-distro-packag...@kde.org, which is our usual list for
>> communicating with packagers. It would seem a number of you are
>> missing from there :)
>>
>> Prompted by a recent email I took a look at the list of accounts (one
>> per distribution) which are provided in order to facilitate early
>> access to packages - however for many i've no idea who would be the
>> relevant point of contact.
>>
>> I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
>> confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
>> general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be
>> appreciated if folks could check over their ~/.ssh/authorized keys
>> file and remove any outdated keys.
>>
>> If your distribution has completely lost access, please have someone
>> with an email address belonging to that distribution's domain email
>> sysad...@kde.org to sort that out.
>>
>> KDE servers normally use a format something like this to clearly label
>> whose key(s) are whose, for those that might find it helpful.:
>>
>> ## Name 
>> ssh-rsa
>>
>> ## Next Name
>>
>> The list of accounts, which should approximately correspond to
>> distributions, is as follows:
>>
>> - Active
>> - Aix
>> - Aosc
>> - Archlinux
>> - Arklinux
>> - Asplinux
>> - Bluewhite64
>> - Chakra
>> - Conectiva
>> - Crux
>> - Darwin
>> - Debian
>> - Exherbo
>> - Fedora
>> - FreeBSD
>> - Gentoo
>> - Kaos
>> - Mageia
>> - Magic
>> - Mandriva
>> - Meego
>> - NetBSD
>> - OpenBSD
>> - PCLinuxOS
>> - PLD
>> - Redhat
>> - Rpath
>> - Siduction
>> - Slackware
>> - Slamd64
>> - SUSE
>> - Tld
>> - Tru64
>> - Tukaani
>> - Turbo
>> - Ubuntu
>> - Uludag
>> - Uoirix
>> - Uomandriva
>> - Uosolaris
>> - Vine
>> - Yellow
>> - Yoper
>>
>> In two weeks time we'll go ahead and disable ones we don't get a response
>> from.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ben Cooksley
>> KDE Sysadmin
>

Hi Eric,

>
> I confirm that Slackware is still alive and using the early access to the
> KDE source tarballs.
> You can use the following contacts:
> Patrick Volkerding 
> Eric Hameleers 
>
> Note that as far as I know, Bluewhite64 and Slamd64 (two Slackware 64bit
> spinoffs from before Slackware had its own 64bit edition) are dead for years
> now. And Tukaani is no longer a (slackware based) distro but now only
> develops XZ compression tools.

Thanks for confirming that, it's been noted now.
I've closed the accounts for those three distros now (Bluewhite64,
Slamd64, Tukaani) - Distrowatch & their own site confirms that they're
all defunct now.

>
> Cheers, Eric

Thanks,
Ben

>
> --
> Eric Hameleers 
> Home: http://alien.slackbook.org/blog/
>
> ___
> Kde-distro-packagers mailing list
> kde-distro-packag...@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-distro-packagers
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Review of special packager access

[Ben Cooksley]

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Nicolas Lécureuil
 wrote:
> Le 2016-07-08 13:39, Ben Cooksley a écrit :
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a
>> distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as
>> this contains important details.
>>
>> First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to
>> kde-distro-packag...@kde.org, which is our usual list for
>> communicating with packagers. It would seem a number of you are
>> missing from there :)
>>
>> Prompted by a recent email I took a look at the list of accounts (one
>> per distribution) which are provided in order to facilitate early
>> access to packages - however for many i've no idea who would be the
>> relevant point of contact.
>>
>> I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
>> confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
>> general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be
>> appreciated if folks could check over their ~/.ssh/authorized keys
>> file and remove any outdated keys.
>>
>> If your distribution has completely lost access, please have someone
>> with an email address belonging to that distribution's domain email
>> sysad...@kde.org to sort that out.
>>
>> KDE servers normally use a format something like this to clearly label
>> whose key(s) are whose, for those that might find it helpful.:
>>
>> ## Name 
>> ssh-rsa
>>
>> ## Next Name
>>
>> The list of accounts, which should approximately correspond to
>> distributions, is as follows:
>
>
>> - Mageia
>
>
> We are still active and i am the contact.

Thanks Nicolas, that's been noted now.

>
> --
> Regards,
> Nicolas Lécureuil
> Mageia KDE Team

Cheers,
Ben
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Review of special packager access

[Michael Palimaka]

Hi Ben,

On 08/07/16 21:39, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
> confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
> general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be
> appreciated if folks could check over their ~/.ssh/authorized keys
> file and remove any outdated keys.

I confirm that Gentoo is still active. Our primary contacts are:

Johannes Huber 
Michael Palimaka 

We have also reviewed our ~/.ssh/authorized_keys.

Kind regards,

Michael
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Review of special packager access

[Eric Hameleers]

On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Ben Cooksley wrote:


Hi all,

My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a
distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as
this contains important details.

First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to
kde-distro-packag...@kde.org, which is our usual list for
communicating with packagers. It would seem a number of you are
missing from there :)

Prompted by a recent email I took a look at the list of accounts (one
per distribution) which are provided in order to facilitate early
access to packages - however for many i've no idea who would be the
relevant point of contact.

I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be
appreciated if folks could check over their ~/.ssh/authorized keys
file and remove any outdated keys.

If your distribution has completely lost access, please have someone
with an email address belonging to that distribution's domain email
sysad...@kde.org to sort that out.

KDE servers normally use a format something like this to clearly label
whose key(s) are whose, for those that might find it helpful.:

## Name 
ssh-rsa

## Next Name

The list of accounts, which should approximately correspond to
distributions, is as follows:

- Active
- Aix
- Aosc
- Archlinux
- Arklinux
- Asplinux
- Bluewhite64
- Chakra
- Conectiva
- Crux
- Darwin
- Debian
- Exherbo
- Fedora
- FreeBSD
- Gentoo
- Kaos
- Mageia
- Magic
- Mandriva
- Meego
- NetBSD
- OpenBSD
- PCLinuxOS
- PLD
- Redhat
- Rpath
- Siduction
- Slackware
- Slamd64
- SUSE
- Tld
- Tru64
- Tukaani
- Turbo
- Ubuntu
- Uludag
- Uoirix
- Uomandriva
- Uosolaris
- Vine
- Yellow
- Yoper

In two weeks time we'll go ahead and disable ones we don't get a response from.

Thanks,
Ben Cooksley
KDE Sysadmin


I confirm that Slackware is still alive and using the early access to 
the KDE source tarballs.

You can use the following contacts:
Patrick Volkerding 
Eric Hameleers 

Note that as far as I know, Bluewhite64 and Slamd64 (two Slackware 
64bit spinoffs from before Slackware had its own 64bit edition) are 
dead for years now. And Tukaani is no longer a (slackware based) 
distro but now only develops XZ compression tools.


Cheers, Eric

--
Eric Hameleers 
Home: http://alien.slackbook.org/blog/
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Review of special packager access

[Nicolas Lécureuil]

Le 2016-07-08 13:39, Ben Cooksley a écrit :

Hi all,

My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a
distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as
this contains important details.

First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to
kde-distro-packag...@kde.org, which is our usual list for
communicating with packagers. It would seem a number of you are
missing from there :)

Prompted by a recent email I took a look at the list of accounts (one
per distribution) which are provided in order to facilitate early
access to packages - however for many i've no idea who would be the
relevant point of contact.

I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please
confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a
general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be
appreciated if folks could check over their ~/.ssh/authorized keys
file and remove any outdated keys.

If your distribution has completely lost access, please have someone
with an email address belonging to that distribution's domain email
sysad...@kde.org to sort that out.

KDE servers normally use a format something like this to clearly label
whose key(s) are whose, for those that might find it helpful.:

## Name 
ssh-rsa

## Next Name

The list of accounts, which should approximately correspond to
distributions, is as follows:



- Mageia


We are still active and i am the contact.

--
Regards,
Nicolas Lécureuil
Mageia KDE Team
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Review of special packager access

[Bernhard Rosenkraenzer]

Hi,

On 2016-07-08 13:39, Ben Cooksley wrote:

- Arklinux


has merged with OpenMandriva - safe to remove (but OpenMandriva needs 
access... Will talk to sysad...@kde.org)



- Conectiva


went down with the Mandriva bankruptcy, should be safe to remove


- Mandriva


doesn't exist anymore, succeeded by OpenMandriva and Mageia.

ttyl
bero
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team