Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
Both don't work at all, and there's no maintainer. I vote for them to be removed of KDE. Albert ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
kcalc will be replaced with speedcrunch or something? ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
On Sunday 25 November 2007 17:21:08 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Both don't work at all, and there's no maintainer. I vote for them to > be removed of KDE. Try posting a blog first to ask if someone will step up to do the work. -- Thomas Zander pgpjb8rG1WlFp.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 25, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Both don't work at all, and there's no maintainer. I vote for them > to be > removed of KDE. At least move kregexpeditor to playground. It's on my TODO to make it work again, but I'll need until KDE 4.1 to get it done - -- Matt -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) iD8DBQFHSariA6Vv5rghv0cRAqlKAKCRwU4BumWx/fEY7BsqMStR9YwnywCgiEmQ hvuj+SvqplDQxh7gfwN6zg8= =HMQl -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
Removing kcalc seems daft to me. It's pretty much essential for a sane desktop. Are you saying there are some problems with it that need fixing or just playing jobsworth? Cheers Rich. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
On Sunday 25 November 2007 17:38:20 Thomas Zander wrote: > On Sunday 25 November 2007 17:21:08 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Both don't work at all, and there's no maintainer. I vote for them to > > be removed of KDE. > > Try posting a blog first to ask if someone will step up to do the work. That's 4.1 timeframe. Finding a maintainer and having the code fixed does not sounds like reality to me with our current timeframe. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
A Diumenge 25 Novembre 2007, Richard Moore va escriure: > Removing kcalc seems daft to me. It's pretty much essential for a sane > desktop. Are you saying there are some problems with it that need > fixing or just playing jobsworth? Problem i have: * I can't not start it, it ends up in an inifite loop Problem other people has: * It doesn't know how to add http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152713 Real problem: * No maintainer No playing here, i'm just not in mood. Albert > > Cheers > > Rich. > ___ > release-team mailing list > release-team@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Sebastian Kuegler wrote: > On Sunday 25 November 2007 17:38:20 Thomas Zander wrote: > > On Sunday 25 November 2007 17:21:08 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > Both don't work at all, and there's no maintainer. I vote for them to > > > be removed of KDE. > > > > Try posting a blog first to ask if someone will step up to do the work. > > That's 4.1 timeframe. Finding a maintainer and having the code fixed does > not sounds like reality to me with our current timeframe. I agree with Richard, a sane desktop needs a calculator. So is it too late to replace kcalc by speedcrunch ? (Speedcrunch is allready using Qt4, it's better than kcalc anyway) Or just leave to distribution to install Speedcrunch ? -- Cyrille Berger ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
On Sunday 25 November 2007 19:46:52 Cyrille Berger wrote: > On Sunday 25 November 2007, Sebastian Kuegler wrote: > > On Sunday 25 November 2007 17:38:20 Thomas Zander wrote: > > > On Sunday 25 November 2007 17:21:08 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > > Both don't work at all, and there's no maintainer. I vote for them to > > > > be removed of KDE. > > > > > > Try posting a blog first to ask if someone will step up to do the work. > > > > That's 4.1 timeframe. Finding a maintainer and having the code fixed does > > not sounds like reality to me with our current timeframe. > > I agree with Richard, a sane desktop needs a calculator. So is it too late > to replace kcalc by speedcrunch ? (Speedcrunch is allready using Qt4, it's > better than kcalc anyway) Or just leave to distribution to install > Speedcrunch ? For 4.0, it is too late. For 4.1, speedcrunch is probably a good option. There's a calculator plasmoid that might help in the meantime, though it's not in kdebase. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
On 11/25/07, Albert Astals Cid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A Diumenge 25 Novembre 2007, Richard Moore va escriure: > > Removing kcalc seems daft to me. It's pretty much essential for a sane > > desktop. Are you saying there are some problems with it that need > > fixing or just playing jobsworth? > > Problem i have: > * I can't not start it, it ends up in an inifite loop I'm getting a segfault on startup here, but that seems to be a kiconloader issue. > > Problem other people has: > * It doesn't know how to add http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152713 The problems in that bug seem to be more display related. > > Real problem: > * No maintainer > > No playing here, i'm just not in mood. I'm not playing either, I think we need a calculator. I'll try to look into what's broken it. Rich, ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
I've just tested trunk and if I remove the kcalc 16x16 svgz that is causing a crash on startup in QSvgRenderer then kcalc can add fine. Have you actually tested any of the problems in this report or do I need to go through them one by one? Rich. On 11/25/07, Richard Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/25/07, Albert Astals Cid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A Diumenge 25 Novembre 2007, Richard Moore va escriure: > > > Removing kcalc seems daft to me. It's pretty much essential for a sane > > > desktop. Are you saying there are some problems with it that need > > > fixing or just playing jobsworth? > > > > Problem i have: > > * I can't not start it, it ends up in an inifite loop > > I'm getting a segfault on startup here, but that seems to be a > kiconloader issue. > > > > > Problem other people has: > > * It doesn't know how to add http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152713 > > The problems in that bug seem to be more display related. > > > > > Real problem: > > * No maintainer > > > > No playing here, i'm just not in mood. > > I'm not playing either, I think we need a calculator. I'll try to look > into what's broken it. > > Rich, > ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
On 11/25/07, Richard Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just tested trunk and if I remove the kcalc 16x16 svgz that is > causing a crash on startup in QSvgRenderer then kcalc can add fine. > Have you actually tested any of the problems in this report or do I > need to go through them one by one? I've now tried all the examples in that bug report and they all work fine for me. The only issues I've found are that 1) the oxygen style seems to clip the numbers in the buttons slightly and 2) QSvgRenderer can't handle kcalc's SVG icon. I've reported the Qt crash to qt-bugs. Has anyone else here actually been able to reproduce the problems that were reported? Rich. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
A Dilluns 26 Novembre 2007, Richard Moore va escriure: > I've just tested trunk and if I remove the kcalc 16x16 svgz that is > causing a crash on startup in QSvgRenderer then kcalc can add fine. > Have you actually tested any of the problems in this report or do I > need to go through them one by one? As i said, it enters and endless loop on start, so i did not test anything. KNumber::operator quint64(void) const seems to call itself if you are on a 64 bit machine like i am. Albert > > Rich. > > On 11/25/07, Richard Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/25/07, Albert Astals Cid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A Diumenge 25 Novembre 2007, Richard Moore va escriure: > > > > Removing kcalc seems daft to me. It's pretty much essential for a > > > > sane desktop. Are you saying there are some problems with it that > > > > need fixing or just playing jobsworth? > > > > > > Problem i have: > > > * I can't not start it, it ends up in an inifite loop > > > > I'm getting a segfault on startup here, but that seems to be a > > kiconloader issue. > > > > > Problem other people has: > > > * It doesn't know how to add > > > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152713 > > > > The problems in that bug seem to be more display related. > > > > > Real problem: > > > * No maintainer > > > > > > No playing here, i'm just not in mood. > > > > I'm not playing either, I think we need a calculator. I'll try to look > > into what's broken it. > > > > Rich, > > ___ > release-team mailing list > release-team@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
On Monday 26 November 2007, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > As i said, it enters and endless loop on start, so i did not test anything. > > KNumber::operator quint64(void) const seems to call itself if you are on a > 64 bit machine like i am. So, how about debugging and fixing that issue? I don`t like to drop kcalc now. For 4.1 we can decide for something else if there is an alternative. A (IMHO) better solution would be to get rid of KNumber and use the C++ library for big numbers. Also fixes a license problem (because GMP is GPLv3, so legally its impossible to ship KCalc at the moment). Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
On Monday 26 November 2007, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > As i said, it enters and endless loop on start, so i did not test
> > anything.
> >
> > KNumber::operator quint64(void) const seems to call itself if you
> > are on a 64 bit machine like i am.
>
> So, how about debugging and fixing that issue?
Attached patch makes it work for me, but I have no idea if this is the
right way to do it or not.
Andras
--
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
Index: kcalcdisplay.cpp
===
--- kcalcdisplay.cpp (revision 741923)
+++ kcalcdisplay.cpp (working copy)
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
#include "kcalcdisplay.h"
#include "kcalcdisplay.moc"
+
KCalcDisplay::KCalcDisplay(QWidget *parent)
:QLabel(parent), _beep(false), _groupdigits(false), _button(0), _lit(false),
_num_base(NB_DECIMAL), _precision(9),
@@ -303,7 +304,7 @@
being set with "setAmount"). Return value is the new base. */
int KCalcDisplay::setBase(NumBase new_base)
{
- CALCAMNT tmp_val = static_cast(getAmount());
+ CALCAMNT tmp_val = getAmount();
switch(new_base)
{
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
A Dilluns 26 Novembre 2007, vàreu escriure: > On Monday 26 November 2007, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > As i said, it enters and endless loop on start, so i did not test > > anything. > > > > KNumber::operator quint64(void) const seems to call itself if you are on > > a 64 bit machine like i am. > > So, how about debugging and fixing that issue? My mood is past the line of trying to debug and fix programs i don't know and i don't care, sorry about that. Albert > > I don`t like to drop kcalc now. For 4.1 we can decide for something else if > there is an alternative. > > A (IMHO) better solution would be to get rid of KNumber and use the C++ > library for big numbers. Also fixes a license problem (because GMP is > GPLv3, so legally its impossible to ship KCalc at the moment). > > > Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
A Dilluns 26 Novembre 2007, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > A Dilluns 26 Novembre 2007, vàreu escriure: > > On Monday 26 November 2007, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > As i said, it enters and endless loop on start, so i did not test > > > anything. > > > > > > KNumber::operator quint64(void) const seems to call itself if you are > > > on a 64 bit machine like i am. > > > > So, how about debugging and fixing that issue? > > My mood is past the line of trying to debug and fix programs i don't know > and i don't care, sorry about that. Someone fixed it starting on amd64, now i can reproduce http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152713. Albert > > Albert > > > I don`t like to drop kcalc now. For 4.1 we can decide for something else > > if there is an alternative. > > > > A (IMHO) better solution would be to get rid of KNumber and use the C++ > > library for big numbers. Also fixes a license problem (because GMP is > > GPLv3, so legally its impossible to ship KCalc at the moment). > > > > > > Dirk > > ___ > release-team mailing list > release-team@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
On Monday 26 November 2007, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > A Dilluns 26 Novembre 2007, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > > A Dilluns 26 Novembre 2007, vàreu escriure: > > > On Monday 26 November 2007, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > > As i said, it enters and endless loop on start, so i did not > > > > test anything. > > > > > > > > KNumber::operator quint64(void) const seems to call itself if > > > > you are on a 64 bit machine like i am. > > > > > > So, how about debugging and fixing that issue? > > > > My mood is past the line of trying to debug and fix programs i > > don't know and i don't care, sorry about that. > > Someone fixed it starting on amd64, now i can reproduce > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152713. Yes, Pascal Létourneau (I don't know him...) fixed it. But as I stated in the BR, I cannot reproduce it. Andras -- Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
On Monday 26 November 2007, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Someone fixed it starting on amd64, now i can reproduce > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152713. which version of gmp is that? Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
On Monday 26. November 2007 20:30:51 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > So, how about debugging and fixing that issue? > > My mood is past the line of trying to debug and fix programs i don't know > and i don't care, sorry about that. Ok, fair enough. I think we should avoid proposing to delete based on that, though. KCalc seems to actually be releasable and working for a substantial set of users :) -- Thomas Zander signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Removing kregexpedit and kcalc
kcalc works fine here: Using x86_64 (gutsy). Intel processor. Using libgmp3-dev version 2:4.2.1+dfsg-5ubuntu4 ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
