Re: Request for splitting oxygen-icons tarball
On Friday 02 of March 2012 13:35:24 Dirk Mueller wrote: On Tuesday 28 February 2012, Harald Sitter wrote: Phonon only does xz tarballs, so dep-wise xz is required anyway... you might just as well do the kde release tars in xz too ;) I'm fine with switching to xz. anyone having a problem with that? Gentoo hat Please do so. /Gentoo hat -- regards MM signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Request for splitting oxygen-icons tarball
On Friday 02 March 2012 05:44:52 Eric Hameleers wrote: Slackware's preferred archive compression is xz. So, you have my blessing. Same in Arch. +1 for xz -- Andrea ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Request for splitting oxygen-icons tarball
El Divendres, 2 de març de 2012, a les 13:35:24, Dirk Mueller va escriure: On Tuesday 28 February 2012, Harald Sitter wrote: Phonon only does xz tarballs, so dep-wise xz is required anyway... you might just as well do the kde release tars in xz too ;) I'm fine with switching to xz. anyone having a problem with that? I feel that switching from gz to xz from 4.8.0 to 4.8.1 is a bit weird. But if packagers like it... Albert Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Request for splitting oxygen-icons tarball
On Friday 02 March 2012, Eric Hameleers wrote: On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Dirk Mueller wrote: On Tuesday 28 February 2012, Harald Sitter wrote: Phonon only does xz tarballs, so dep-wise xz is required anyway... you might just as well do the kde release tars in xz too ;) I'm fine with switching to xz. anyone having a problem with that? Thanks, Dirk Slackware's preferred archive compression is xz. So, you have my blessing. Same in Fedora. The order of preference is xz bz2 gz (the smaller, the better, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL , so in practice we'll normally want xz, and it's also what our binary RPMs use). Kevin Kofler ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Request for splitting oxygen-icons tarball
On 02/27/2012 01:20 AM, Max Brazhnikov wrote: On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:47:11 +0100, Sune Vuorela wrote: On Sunday 26 February 2012 23:29:37 Max Brazhnikov wrote: Does debian's oxygen-icon-theme package, which contains only png icons, violate the license? No. just like debian's systemsettings package, which contains compiled code also doesn't violate the license. Why oxygen-icons split on two tarballs, one with png icons and another with svg only, will violate the license, while systemsettings debian package + kde-workspaces source tarball don't? In both cases, the sources is a apt-get source away. In both cases you get the tarball created by Dirk What's the difference then? that's hopefully obvious. Not for me apparently :). Could you clarify it or point me at good explanation? /Sune More than splitting the package, I would rather like to have a sane compression applied to it as I mentioned previously: 359M oxygen-icons-4.8.0.tar.bz2 203M oxygen-icons-4.8.0.tar.xz using xz -9 cuts of just 156M for me. Such a huge tarball is a bit of a pain to handle, even if I agree with Sune that having all icons in one place is handy. Philip ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Request for splitting oxygen-icons tarball
Hi, Can you please stop packing scalable icons or pack them in a separate tarball? They are not needed for building anyway and downloading them is just a waste of time, bandwidth and disk space for those who build KDE from sources. Thanks, Max ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Request for splitting oxygen-icons tarball
On Sunday 26 February 2012, Max Brazhnikov wrote: Can you please stop packing scalable icons or pack them in a separate tarball? They are not needed for building anyway and downloading them is just a waste of time, bandwidth and disk space for those who build KDE from sources. This has already been discussed and rejected (the SVGs are the source code, they have to be shipped to comply with the license), please read the mailing list archives. Kevin Kofler ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Request for splitting oxygen-icons tarball
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:39:48 +0100, Sune Vuorela wrote: On Sunday 26 February 2012 21:24:16 Max Brazhnikov wrote: Hi, Can you please stop packing scalable icons or pack them in a separate tarball? They are not needed for building anyway and downloading them is just a waste of time, bandwidth and disk space for those who build KDE from sources. They're needed for license compliance, and it is really nice that they are in the same source tarball like the rest. Please keep it this way. /Sune Does debian's oxygen-icon-theme package, which contains only png icons, violate the license? What's the difference then? ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Request for splitting oxygen-icons tarball
On Sunday 26 February 2012 21:24:16 Max Brazhnikov wrote: Hi, Can you please stop packing scalable icons or pack them in a separate tarball? They are not needed for building anyway and downloading them is just a waste of time, bandwidth and disk space for those who build KDE from sources. They're needed for license compliance, and it is really nice that they are in the same source tarball like the rest. Please keep it this way. /Sune -- Man, do you know how to rename the line from Excel 95 and from the tools inside MS-DOS? The point is that you neither must ping a SIMM over the AT gadget, nor ever have to load the fan for disabling a DirectX system. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Request for splitting oxygen-icons tarball
On Sunday 26 February 2012 23:29:37 Max Brazhnikov wrote: Does debian's oxygen-icon-theme package, which contains only png icons, violate the license? No. just like debian's systemsettings package, which contains compiled code also doesn't violate the license. In both cases, the sources is a apt-get source away. In both cases you get the tarball created by Dirk What's the difference then? that's hopefully obvious. /Sune -- Do you know how can I reset the RO SMTP shell from Netscape 4.5.3? The point is that from the control tools menu inside Photoshop you must ping a connection of a connector to a SMTP pin over the parallel mouse, so that then from the control panel menu within ICQ you should click a pin in order to log from the mousepad. ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Request for splitting oxygen-icons tarball
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:47:11 +0100, Sune Vuorela wrote: On Sunday 26 February 2012 23:29:37 Max Brazhnikov wrote: Does debian's oxygen-icon-theme package, which contains only png icons, violate the license? No. just like debian's systemsettings package, which contains compiled code also doesn't violate the license. Why oxygen-icons split on two tarballs, one with png icons and another with svg only, will violate the license, while systemsettings debian package + kde-workspaces source tarball don't? In both cases, the sources is a apt-get source away. In both cases you get the tarball created by Dirk What's the difference then? that's hopefully obvious. Not for me apparently :). Could you clarify it or point me at good explanation? /Sune ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
