Re: dropping libkface from KDE Applications - was - Re: What to do with the repos we don't ship anymore in KDE Applications 17.12

2017-11-16 Thread Albert Astals Cid 
El dilluns, 13 de novembre de 2017, a les 0:31:35 CET, Albert Astals Cid va 
escriure:
> El dilluns, 13 de novembre de 2017, a les 0:01:49 CET, Andreas Sturmlechner
> va
> escriure:
> > On 12 November 2017 at 23:57, Albert Astals Cid  wrote:
> > > I don't understand why you want to move it to extragear if it is
> > > unmaintained, who is going to do releases?
> > 
> > Maybe I don't understand either, I'm fine with it going the same way as
> > blogilo.
> 
> Ok, if it's broken and noone seems to care about it lets drop it.
> 
> I've CC'ed the 4 people that have made any commit in the last 4 years in
> case they want to object, you have until this thursday at 23:59 UTC.

Noone disagreed so dropped.

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> Cheers,
>   Albert

Re: dropping libkface from KDE Applications - was - Re: What to do with the repos we don't ship anymore in KDE Applications 17.12

2017-11-13 Thread Pino Toscano 
In data lunedì 13 novembre 2017 00:31:35 CET, Albert Astals Cid ha scritto:
> El dilluns, 13 de novembre de 2017, a les 0:01:49 CET, Andreas Sturmlechner 
> va 
> escriure:
> > On 12 November 2017 at 23:57, Albert Astals Cid  wrote:
> > > I don't understand why you want to move it to extragear if it is
> > > unmaintained, who is going to do releases?
> > 
> > Maybe I don't understand either, I'm fine with it going the same way as
> > blogilo.
> 
> Ok, if it's broken and noone seems to care about it lets drop it.
> 
> I've CC'ed the 4 people that have made any commit in the last 4 years in case 
> they want to object, you have until this thursday at 23:59 UTC.

The only commit I did recently was removing the LSM file (!).

Apart from that, libkface is one of the many digikam-ware stuff around,
i.e. things that either digikam people want to control fully (but
without cring much about non-digikam usages), or that they stop caring
once digikam stops using it.  Since the case here is the latter, just
drop it from Applications (where it should not have been part, to begin
with).

-- 
Pino Toscano

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: dropping libkface from KDE Applications - was - Re: What to do with the repos we don't ship anymore in KDE Applications 17.12

2017-11-13 Thread Weng Xuetian 
IIRC my commit was just to fix issue that I hit when packaging it on our
distribution. If it is going to be moved to unmaintained then I have no
issue with that.

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 3:31 PM Albert Astals Cid  wrote:

> El dilluns, 13 de novembre de 2017, a les 0:01:49 CET, Andreas
> Sturmlechner va
> escriure:
> > On 12 November 2017 at 23:57, Albert Astals Cid  wrote:
> > > I don't understand why you want to move it to extragear if it is
> > > unmaintained, who is going to do releases?
> >
> > Maybe I don't understand either, I'm fine with it going the same way as
> > blogilo.
>
> Ok, if it's broken and noone seems to care about it lets drop it.
>
> I've CC'ed the 4 people that have made any commit in the last 4 years in
> case
> they want to object, you have until this thursday at 23:59 UTC.
>
> Cheers,
>   Albert
>

Re: dropping libkface from KDE Applications - was - Re: What to do with the repos we don't ship anymore in KDE Applications 17.12

2017-11-12 Thread Luca Beltrame 
In data lunedì 13 novembre 2017 00:31:35 CET, Albert Astals Cid ha scritto:

> I've CC'ed the 4 people that have made any commit in the last 4 years in
> case they want to object, you have until this thursday at 23:59 UTC.

No objections on my side.

-- 
Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team
GPG key ID: A29D259B

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

dropping libkface from KDE Applications - was - Re: What to do with the repos we don't ship anymore in KDE Applications 17.12

2017-11-12 Thread Albert Astals Cid 
El dilluns, 13 de novembre de 2017, a les 0:01:49 CET, Andreas Sturmlechner va 
escriure:
> On 12 November 2017 at 23:57, Albert Astals Cid  wrote:
> > I don't understand why you want to move it to extragear if it is
> > unmaintained, who is going to do releases?
> 
> Maybe I don't understand either, I'm fine with it going the same way as
> blogilo.

Ok, if it's broken and noone seems to care about it lets drop it.

I've CC'ed the 4 people that have made any commit in the last 4 years in case 
they want to object, you have until this thursday at 23:59 UTC.

Cheers,
  Albert