RE: May American court appoint only Muslim arbitrators, pursuant to anarbitration agreement?

2011-01-03 Thread SAMUEL M. KRIEGER
What if the dispute involved a matter of religious law or control of a
religious entity or a dispute between a parochial school and a faculty
member   ?

SAMUEL M. KRIEGER


-Original Message-
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Steven Jamar
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 11:46 AM
To: hamilto...@aol.com; Law  Religion issues for Law Academics
Cc: Law  Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: May American court appoint only Muslim arbitrators, pursuant to
anarbitration agreement?

What if it said apply Brazilian law and appoint only lawyers admitted  
to practice in brazil?

Sent from Steve Jamar's iPhone

On Jan 3, 2011, at 11:08 AM, hamilto...@aol.com wrote:

 What if the agreement said African Americans or women only?

 Marci


 Marci A. Hamilton
 Paul R. Verkuil Chair in Public Law
 Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
 Yeshiva University
 Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

 -Original Message-
 From: Volokh, Eugene vol...@law.ucla.edu
 Sender: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
 Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 07:06:03
 To: Law  Religion issues for Law  
 Academicsreligionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
 Reply-To: Law  Religion issues for Law Academics
religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu 
 
 Subject: May American court appoint only Muslim arbitrators,  
 pursuant to an
arbitration agreement?

 ___
 To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

 Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed  
 as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that  
 are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can  
 (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
 ___
 To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

 Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed  
 as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that  
 are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can  
 (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.

___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.


RE: May American court appoint only Muslim arbitrators, pursuant to an arbitration agreement?

2011-01-03 Thread SAMUEL M. KRIEGER
While I am not an academic (just a practicing lawyer in New York), I
understand there will be a panel at the forthcoming AALS meeting on the Beis
Din (rabbinic Arbitration). There is a long line of cases in NY on Beis Din
issues  ranging from panel selection, panel composition to enforcement of
judgments. 

SAMUEL M. KRIEGER

-Original Message-
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of verizon
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 2:00 PM
To: Law  Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: May American court appoint only Muslim arbitrators, pursuant to
an arbitration agreement?

I use a contract clause to arbitrate using a Christian arbitration service.
The clause spells out the service much like one would specify AAA to
arbitrate. The clause does not give requirements for the arbitrators, just
what organization will arbitrate.  The reasoning is that the Bible tells
Christians not to take their cases to secular courts.

Does that make a difference?

I was on a christian arbitration panel about 10 years ago.

Alan

Law Office of Alan Leigh Armstrong
18652 Florida St., Suite 225
Huntington Beach CA 92648-6006
714 375 1147 fax 714 782 6007
a...@alanarmstrong.com
Serving the family and small business since 1984



___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.

___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.


Re: NY Religious Corporations Law

2009-03-13 Thread SAMUEL M. KRIEGER
Will - While not wishing to prolong this, thread, that exactly is my point - 
Section 200 of the  RCL has an exception for decisions in the province of a 
spiritual officer while there is no such carve out under the NPCL. 
Arguably, a board of directors ( or a court) of a congregation incorporated 
under the NPCL may therefor override decisions of the spiritual officer.


SAMUEL M. KRIEGER,ESQ.
Krieger  Prager LLP
39 Broadway, Suite 920
New York, NY 10006
.
- Original Message - 
From: Will Linden wlin...@panix.com
To: Law  Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: NY Religious Corporations Law


 
  In a message dated 03/11/09 15:55:44 Central Daylight Time, 
 smkrie...@verizon.net writes:
Marc and Marci - If a congregation registers under the Not for Profit
 Corporation law , does that thereby allow ecclesiastical decisions to be
 subject to approval by lay governance or review by the courts? Are we
 elevating form over substance??


Can the lay board of directors direct that the Rabbi of an Orthodox
 Jewish congregation allow a female cantor to officiate or that he hold
 Sabbath sevices on Sunday ??  I would submit not - Davis v Scher , 97
 N.W.2d 137, 356 Mich. 291 (1959). What happens if on the other hand the
 Rabbi wamts to introduce these practices over board or membership
 opposition.? see,.  Katz v Singerman 241 La. 103, 127 So.2d 515. (1960).

  And in any case, the rabbi is a spiritual officer.

 Will Linden  wlin...@panix.com
 http://www.ecben.net/
 Magic Code: MAS/GD S++ W++ N+ PWM++ Ds/r+ A- a++ C+ G- QO++ 666 Y
 ___
 To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
 To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
 http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

 Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as 
 private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are 
 posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or 
 wrongly) forward the messages to others. 

___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.


Re: NY Religious Corporations Law

2009-03-12 Thread SAMUEL M. KRIEGER
I recognize that by black letter  law, a church is exempt. However for a church 
 to secure an actual letter of recognition of exemption  from the IRS , I have 
always believed there was a requirement to submit a Certificate of 
Incorporation (and By Laws), Trust agreement , Constitution or similar document-

Additionally, the document must contain  certain required clause, - no private 
innurment, disposition of assets upon dissolution.

These documents are  not necessarily utilized by Unincorporated Associations .

In the absence of an IRS recognition letter, the burden in an audit is on the 
taxpayer to prove the entity is exempt 

See Generally IRS Publication 557. 


SAMUEL M. KRIEGER,ESQ.
Krieger  Prager LLP
39 Broadway, Suite 920
New York, NY 10006
- Original Message - 
  From: Lawyer2974 
  To: Law  Religion issues for Law Academics 
  Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 10:22 AM
  Subject: Re: NY Religious Corporations Law


  Why would being an unincorporated association have any effect on tax status 
of a church?



  In a message dated 03/11/09 15:55:44 Central Daylight Time, 
smkrie...@verizon.net writes:
Marc and Marci - If  a congregation registers under the Not for Profit 
Corporation law , does that thereby allow ecclesiastical decisions to be 
subject to approval by lay governance or review by  the courts? Are we 
elevating form over substance?? 


Can the lay board of directors  direct that the Rabbi of an Orthodox Jewish 
congregation allow a female cantor to officiate or that he  hold Sabbath 
sevices on Sunday ??   I would submit not -Davis v Scher , 97 N.W.2d 137, 
356 Mich. 291 (1959). What happens if on the other hand the Rabbi wamts to 
introduce these practices over board or membership opposition.? see,.   Katz v 
Singerman  241 La. 103, 127 So.2d 515. (1960).

Two additional notes-
 1.Many of the cases in this area have courts straining to find a property 
interest and thereby granting jurisdiction to a secular court ... See PARK 
SLOPE JEWISH CENTER, ,v.CONGREGATION B'NAI JACOB, 90 NY2d 517, 686 N.E.2d 1330 
(1997) . (fascinating procedural history) 

2. Retaining unincorporated status  may result in making  the benefits of 
IRC Section 501 (c) (3) unavailable to the congregation. 


SAMUEL M. KRIEGER,ESQ.
Krieger  Prager LLP
39 Broadway, Suite 920
New York, NY 10006
Tel: (212) 363-2900
Fax: (212) 363-2999
- Original Message - 
  From: Douglas Laycock 
  To: Law  Religion issues for Law Academics 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 3:19 PM
  Subject: NY Religious Corporations Law


  So that's the escape route.  Makes sense that there had to be one.

  Quoting Marc Stern mst...@ajcongress.org:

   In New York, a religious institution is generally permitted to 
   register under the secular not for profit corporation law.
  
   
  
   From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu 
   [mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Friedman, 
   Howard M.
   Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 2:54 PM
   To: Law  Religion issues for Law Academics
   Subject: RE: Connecticut bill
  
  
  
   To the extent that the entire NY Religious Corporations Law is 
   mandatory, as opposed to merely default provisions that apply in the 
   absence of contrary rules in the organization's charter or bylaws, I 
   think there are serious constitutional issues with very many of the 
   internal governance provisions.
  
  
  
   *
   Howard M. Friedman
   Disting. Univ. Professor Emeritus
   University of Toledo College of Law
   Toledo, OH 43606-3390
   Phone: (419) 530-2911, FAX (419) 530-4732
   E-mail: howard.fried...@utoledo.edu
   *
  
   
  
   From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu 
   [mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of SAMUEL M. 
   KRIEGER
   Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 1:11 PM
   To: Law  Religion issues for Law Academics
   Subject: Re: Connecticut bill
  
  
  
   Just for the sake of perspective  on the proposed Connecticut 
   legislation, I would welcome any comments on  Section 200   of   the 
   New York Religious Corporations Law (codified in Article 10  
   applicable to Other Denominations - including Jewish Congregations 
   ) compared  to sub- sections (e) and (h) of the proposed Connecticut 
   legislation.
  
  
  
   --
  
  
  
   §  200.  Control  of  trustees  by  corporate  meetings;  salaries  of
 ministers.
  
  
  
 A  corporate  meeting  of  an  incorporated  church,  whose
 trustees  are  elective  as  such, may give directions, not 
inconsistent

Re: Connecticut bill

2009-03-11 Thread SAMUEL M. KRIEGER
Just for the sake of perspective  on the proposed Connecticut legislation, I 
would welcome any comments on  Section 200   of   the New York Religious 
Corporations Law (codified in Article 10  applicable to Other Denominations - 
including Jewish Congregations ) compared  to sub- sections (e) and (h) of the 
proposed Connecticut legislation.

--

§  200.  Control  of  trustees  by  corporate  meetings;  salaries  of
  ministers. 

  A  corporate  meeting  of  an  incorporated  church,  whose
  trustees  are  elective  as  such, may give directions, not inconsistent
  with law, as to the manner in which any of the temporal affairs  of  the
  church   shall  be  administered  by  the  trustees  thereof;  and  such
  directions shall be  followed  by  the  trustees.  The  trustees  of  an
  incorporated  church  to which this article is applicable, shall have no
  power to settle or remove or fix the salary of the minister, or  without
  the  consent  of  a  corporate  meeting,  to  incur debts beyond what is
  necessary for the care of the property of the corporation; or to fix  or
  charge the time, nature or order of the public or social worship of such
  church,  except  when  such  trustees are also the spiritual officers of
  such church.  (emphasis supplied) 


The provison  has been  in   NY law in some form since 1813 and was  last  
amended in 1909 .


SAMUEL M. KRIEGER,ESQ.
Krieger  Prager LLP
39 Broadway
New York, NY 10006
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Re: NY Religious Corporations Law

2009-03-11 Thread SAMUEL M. KRIEGER
Marc and Marci - If  a congregation registers under the Not for Profit 
Corporation law , does that thereby allow ecclesiastical decisions to be 
subject to approval by lay governance or review by  the courts? Are we 
elevating form over substance?? 


Can the lay board of directors  direct that the Rabbi of an Orthodox Jewish 
congregation allow a female cantor to officiate or that he  hold Sabbath 
sevices on Sunday ??   I would submit not -Davis v Scher , 97 N.W.2d 137, 
356 Mich. 291 (1959). What happens if on the other hand the Rabbi wamts to 
introduce these practices over board or membership opposition.? see,.   Katz v 
Singerman  241 La. 103, 127 So.2d 515. (1960).

Two additional notes-
 1.Many of the cases in this area have courts straining to find a property 
interest and thereby granting jurisdiction to a secular court . See PARK SLOPE 
JEWISH CENTER, ,v.CONGREGATION B'NAI JACOB, 90 NY2d 517, 686 N.E.2d 1330 (1997) 
. (fascinating procedural history) 

2. Retaining unincorporated status  may result in making  the benefits of IRC 
Section 501 (c) (3) unavailable to the congregation. 


SAMUEL M. KRIEGER,ESQ.
Krieger  Prager LLP
39 Broadway, Suite 920
New York, NY 10006
Tel: (212) 363-2900
Fax: (212) 363-2999
- Original Message - 
  From: Douglas Laycock 
  To: Law  Religion issues for Law Academics 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 3:19 PM
  Subject: NY Religious Corporations Law


  So that's the escape route.  Makes sense that there had to be one.

  Quoting Marc Stern mst...@ajcongress.org:

   In New York, a religious institution is generally permitted to 
   register under the secular not for profit corporation law.
  
   
  
   From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu 
   [mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Friedman, 
   Howard M.
   Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 2:54 PM
   To: Law  Religion issues for Law Academics
   Subject: RE: Connecticut bill
  
  
  
   To the extent that the entire NY Religious Corporations Law is 
   mandatory, as opposed to merely default provisions that apply in the 
   absence of contrary rules in the organization's charter or bylaws, I 
   think there are serious constitutional issues with very many of the 
   internal governance provisions.
  
  
  
   *
   Howard M. Friedman
   Disting. Univ. Professor Emeritus
   University of Toledo College of Law
   Toledo, OH 43606-3390
   Phone: (419) 530-2911, FAX (419) 530-4732
   E-mail: howard.fried...@utoledo.edu
   *
  
   
  
   From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu 
   [mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of SAMUEL M. 
   KRIEGER
   Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 1:11 PM
   To: Law  Religion issues for Law Academics
   Subject: Re: Connecticut bill
  
  
  
   Just for the sake of perspective  on the proposed Connecticut 
   legislation, I would welcome any comments on  Section 200   of   the 
   New York Religious Corporations Law (codified in Article 10  
   applicable to Other Denominations - including Jewish Congregations 
   ) compared  to sub- sections (e) and (h) of the proposed Connecticut 
   legislation.
  
  
  
   --
  
  
  
   §  200.  Control  of  trustees  by  corporate  meetings;  salaries  of
 ministers.
  
  
  
 A  corporate  meeting  of  an  incorporated  church,  whose
 trustees  are  elective  as  such, may give directions, not inconsistent
 with law, as to the manner in which any of the temporal affairs  of  the
 church   shall  be  administered  by  the  trustees  thereof;  and  such
 directions shall be  followed  by  the  trustees.  The  trustees  of  an
 incorporated  church  to which this article is applicable, shall have no
 power to settle or remove or fix the salary of the minister, or  without
 the  consent  of  a  corporate  meeting,  to  incur debts beyond what is
 necessary for the care of the property of the corporation; or to fix  or
 charge the time, nature or order of the public or social worship of such
 church,  except  when  such  trustees are also the spiritual officers of
 such church.  (emphasis supplied)
   
  
  
  
   The provison  has been  in   NY law in some form since 1813 and was  
   last  amended in 1909 .
  
  
  
  
  
   SAMUEL M. KRIEGER,ESQ.
   Krieger  Prager LLP
   39 Broadway
   New York, NY 10006
  
  




  Douglas Laycock
  Yale Kamisar Collegiate Professor of Law
  University of Michigan Law School
  625 S. State St.
  Ann Arbor, MI  48109-1215
734-647-9713



--


  ___
  To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
  To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

  Please