Re: Virginia ban on state troopers mentioning Jesus Christ in public prayers

2008-09-26 Thread Christopher Lund
A necessary travesty?  More proof that religious liberty and legislative prayer 
are like Harry Potter and Voldemort * neither can live while the other survives?

Best,
Chris
 
__
Christopher C. Lund
Assistant Professor of Law
Mississippi College School of Law
151 E. Griffith St.
Jackson, MS  39201
(601) 925-7141 (office)
(601) 925-7113 (fax)
Papers: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=363402 

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/26/2008 10:08 AM 

Thoughts?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/24/AR2008092403471.html?hpid=sec-religion
 

-- 
Prof. Steven Jamar
Howard University School of Law
Associate Director, Institute of Intellectual Property and Social Justice 
(IIPSJ) Inc.


___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Re: Virginia ban on state troopers mentioning Jesus Christ in public prayers

2008-09-26 Thread Ira (Chip) Lupu
Chaplains speaking at public events are not ministering to the particular 
religious needs of state troopers (in that private context, chaplains can pray 
in ways that accommodate and facilitate the beliefs of those to whom they are 
ministering).  At public events, open to all (and sometimes mandatory) 
chaplains are the voices of the state, and should be limited to ceremonial, 
non-sectarian prayer. 

Bob Tuttle and I discuss this question in our paper on the military chaplaincy, 
110 W. Va. L. Rev. 89, 148-159 (2007).

There is lurking here a prior question of whether the government should be free 
to appoint chaplains in the first place for police officers, firefighters, or 
public employees generally (as Indiana recently did, only to back down in the 
face of a lawsuit).  Police officers and firefighters, unlike prisoners and 
members of the armed forces, are not under the care and control of the 
government.  Why is government ministering to police officers and firefighters, 
who are free to seek their own private, spiritual counsel?


 Original message 
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:21:42 -0500
From: Christopher Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Subject: Re: Virginia ban on state troopers mentioning Jesus Christ in public 
prayers  
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu

   A necessary travesty?  More proof that religious
   liberty and legislative prayer are like Harry Potter
   and Voldemort - neither can live while the other
   survives?
   Best,
   Chris

   __
   Christopher C. Lund
   Assistant Professor of Law
   Mississippi College School of Law
   151 E. Griffith St.
   Jackson, MS  39201
   (601) 925-7141 (office)
   (601) 925-7113 (fax)
   Papers:
   http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=363402
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/26/2008 10:08 AM 
   Thoughts?

   
 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/24/AR2008092403471.html?hpid=sec-religion

   --
   Prof. Steven Jamar
   Howard University School of Law
   Associate Director, Institute of Intellectual
   Property and Social Justice (IIPSJ) Inc.

___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. 
 Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people 
can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward 
the messages to others.
Ira C. Lupu
F. Elwood  Eleanor Davis Professor of Law
George Washington University Law School
2000 H St., NW 
Washington, DC 20052
(202)994-7053
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.


RE: Virginia ban on state troopers mentioning Jesus Christ in public prayers

2008-09-26 Thread W. A. Wildhack III
The latest suit by the Military Religious Freedom Foundation on these issues
was filed this week in Kansas (I got a copy of the complaint at 
http://www.militaryreligiousfreedom.org/urgent%20_issues/complain_sept08.pdf

About ten pages of the complaint look like a repeat of the broader
allegations catalogued in the earlier case involving Spc. Jeremy Hall.
However, the specific allegations in this action as I read them on the first
and last few pages are directed at sectarian (specifically Christian)
prayers offered by chaplains at mandatory command events.

With that shift in focus, do any of you think this argument will get more
traction than some of MRFF's earlier filings?

Bill Wildhack
--Member, Florida Bar and bar of the U.S. District Court for the Middle
District of Florida
--Minister of Word and Sacrament, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)
--Commander, Chaplain Corps, U.S. Navy Reserve 

**Disclaimer:  Any views expressed below are my own and do not necessarily
reflect the official position of the Department of the Navy or the Navy
Chaplain Corps.**

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ira (Chip) Lupu
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 12:45 PM
To: Law  Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Virginia ban on state troopers mentioning Jesus Christ in
public prayers

Chaplains speaking at public events are not ministering to the particular
religious needs of state troopers (in that private context, chaplains can
pray in ways that accommodate and facilitate the beliefs of those to whom
they are ministering).  At public events, open to all (and sometimes
mandatory) chaplains are the voices of the state, and should be limited to
ceremonial, non-sectarian prayer. 

Bob Tuttle and I discuss this question in our paper on the military
chaplaincy, 110 W. Va. L. Rev. 89, 148-159 (2007).

There is lurking here a prior question of whether the government should be
free to appoint chaplains in the first place for police officers,
firefighters, or public employees generally (as Indiana recently did, only
to back down in the face of a lawsuit).  Police officers and firefighters,
unlike prisoners and members of the armed forces, are not under the care and
control of the government.  Why is government ministering to police officers
and firefighters, who are free to seek their own private, spiritual counsel?


 Original message 
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:21:42 -0500
From: Christopher Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Subject: Re: Virginia ban on state troopers mentioning Jesus Christ in
public prayers  
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu

   A necessary travesty?  More proof that religious
   liberty and legislative prayer are like Harry Potter
   and Voldemort - neither can live while the other
   survives?
   Best,
   Chris

   __
   Christopher C. Lund
   Assistant Professor of Law
   Mississippi College School of Law
   151 E. Griffith St.
   Jackson, MS  39201
   (601) 925-7141 (office)
   (601) 925-7113 (fax)
   Papers:
   http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=363402
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/26/2008 10:08 AM 
   Thoughts?


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/24/AR2008092403
471.html?hpid=sec-religion

   --
   Prof. Steven Jamar
   Howard University School of Law
   Associate Director, Institute of Intellectual
   Property and Social Justice (IIPSJ) Inc.

___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.
Ira C. Lupu
F. Elwood  Eleanor Davis Professor of Law
George Washington University Law School
2000 H St., NW 
Washington, DC 20052
(202)994-7053
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
wrongly) forward the messages to others.


___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly

Re: Virginia ban on state troopers mentioning Jesus Christ in public prayers

2008-09-26 Thread Will Linden
   My first reaction on seeing your subject line, not mentioning chaplains, 
was 'Jesus Christ! What were they thinking of?'

 On reading the story, I was amused by the complaint about Republicans 
blaming the governor for everything, including tooth decay. As opposed to 
blaming Bush for everything, including the tsunami?


At 11:08 AM 9/26/08 -0400, you wrote:
Thoughts?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/24/AR2008092403471.html?hpid=sec-religionhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/24/AR2008092403471.html?hpid=sec-religion

--
Prof. Steven Jamar
Howard University School of Law
Associate Director, Institute of Intellectual Property and Social Justice 
(IIPSJ) Inc.
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as 
private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are 
posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or 
wrongly) forward the messages to others.

___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.