Re: [Repeater-Builder] 900 mhz pa equip and other goodies

2004-05-22 Thread Larry Williams
The amps are all gone, I was surprised at the response. We've had them
around for a couple of years, but the project they were intended for was
scrapped. (Thank goodness, hate putting stuff online that I don't have
docs on)  Glad some folks could use them.




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project

2004-05-22 Thread w9mwq
Question is, I a am putting a remote base on my RLC2 controller with 
the RBI-1 interface.  All is working ok.  What I need some ideas on 
is how to keep the transmitter from killing the receiver of the 
repeater?  What can be done to isolate the two radios.  The radio is 
a Kenwood TM-731 and is running only 5 watts.  What are some 
thoughts.  Thanks.

Mathew






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project

2004-05-22 Thread Q
More details needed.What is the repeater? WHat frequencies are you trying to
use? If running the same band on a remote,you will need lots of antenna
separation. We use 140' of vertical separation. You also will not be able to
work frequencies close to your own without filters of some type.Some close
frequencies will be impossible to use. It all depends on the frequency
separation vs. antenna/filter isolation.
- Original Message -
From: w9mwq [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 9:11 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project


 Question is, I a am putting a remote base on my RLC2 controller with
 the RBI-1 interface.  All is working ok.  What I need some ideas on
 is how to keep the transmitter from killing the receiver of the
 repeater?  What can be done to isolate the two radios.  The radio is
 a Kenwood TM-731 and is running only 5 watts.  What are some
 thoughts.  Thanks.

 Mathew







 Yahoo! Groups Links











 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project

2004-05-22 Thread Mathew Quaife
Well the repeater is one that I built from a couple of regency repeaters,
which is going to be changed here in the near future.  The duplexer is a TX
RX setup.   Won't be able to get that much seperation, at most about 40 feet
is what I will be able to get, maybe 50.  I can understand the seperation.
Would there be any advantage to putting the radio in an RF box for
shielding?

Mathew

- Original Message -
From: Q [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project


 More details needed.What is the repeater? WHat frequencies are you trying
to
 use? If running the same band on a remote,you will need lots of antenna
 separation. We use 140' of vertical separation. You also will not be able
to
 work frequencies close to your own without filters of some type.Some close
 frequencies will be impossible to use. It all depends on the frequency
 separation vs. antenna/filter isolation.
 - Original Message -
 From: w9mwq [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 9:11 PM
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project


  Question is, I a am putting a remote base on my RLC2 controller with
  the RBI-1 interface.  All is working ok.  What I need some ideas on
  is how to keep the transmitter from killing the receiver of the
  repeater?  What can be done to isolate the two radios.  The radio is
  a Kenwood TM-731 and is running only 5 watts.  What are some
  thoughts.  Thanks.
 
  Mathew
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 







 Yahoo! Groups Links










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project

2004-05-22 Thread Ken Arck
At 09:15 PM 5/21/2004 -0500, you wrote:

Would there be any advantage to putting the radio in an RF box for
shielding?

---The short answer? Only if you put the antenna(s) in a shielded box too. 

You're asking too much of physics by trying to run a remote base on the
same band as your repeater :-)

Ken

--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
http://www.irlp.net




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project

2004-05-22 Thread Virden Clark Beckman
Trade the antenna for a shielded dummy load, or possibly 1000 feet of
rg400 to attenuate the signal down.

Ken Arck wrote:
 
 At 09:15 PM 5/21/2004 -0500, you wrote:
 
 Would there be any advantage to putting the radio in an RF box for
 shielding?
 
 ---The short answer? Only if you put the antenna(s) in a shielded box too.
 
 You're asking too much of physics by trying to run a remote base on the
 same band as your repeater :-)
 
 Ken
 

-- 
73...Clark Beckman N8PZD




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project

2004-05-22 Thread Mathew Quaife
So then no real good way of doing it, is what i am gathering?


 Would there be any advantage to putting the radio in an RF box for
 shielding?

 ---The short answer? Only if you put the antenna(s) in a shielded box
too.

 You're asking too much of physics by trying to run a remote base on the
 same band as your repeater :-)

 Ken

 --

 President and CTO - Arcom Communications
 Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
 http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
 AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
 http://www.irlp.net





 Yahoo! Groups Links










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project

2004-05-22 Thread Virden Clark Beckman
I guess it depends on the amount of filtering you can have for each of
the frequencies you want to use, and the cable switching needed to use
the cavities for that freq. Imagine a coax switch with a port for every
frequency you want to activate, now duplicate that so that you can
transmit and recieve, you will need a dummy load for each unused
transmit port to keep the impedance correct there on the recieve side
you will just need the filter with a deep enough notch to get the remote
base freq in and keep the rest out. The 731 has 10 memories if my memory
is still holding up, so when you are finished you will have a controller
with 10 outputs, 20 sets of cavities, 9 dummy loads, 2 10 port switches,
2 more antennas and feedline runs and then you can begin to tune out
whatever else you find once you connect the antennas to the outside
world. There is a way to do it but it depends on your desire to aquire
the components needed to allow it to co-exist, and the patience to get
it all working together. In the commercial market it would probably cost
about 35-40k to make this work, but with tower tenants on long enough
leases to amortize the capital investment it will even pay for itself if
nobody gets cold feet. As for a ham radio project, it may not be
practical as every time you want a different freq. you will have to go
try tuning the associated cavity set/s and that will grow old after a
few cold or hot trips to the tower site. It is not a push button
adventure if thats what you were thinking, there is a ever present noise
floor to contend with not including the noise you have already on-site.

Mathew Quaife wrote:
 
 So then no real good way of doing it, is what i am gathering?
 
  Would there be any advantage to putting the radio in an RF box for
  shielding?
 
  ---The short answer? Only if you put the antenna(s) in a shielded box
 too.
 
  You're asking too much of physics by trying to run a remote base on the
  same band as your repeater :-)


-- 
73...Clark Beckman N8PZD




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project

2004-05-22 Thread Kevin Custer
w9mwq wrote:

Question is, I a am putting a remote base on my RLC2 controller with 
the RBI-1 interface.  All is working ok.  What I need some ideas on 
is how to keep the transmitter from killing the receiver of the 
repeater?  What can be done to isolate the two radios.  The radio is 
a Kenwood TM-731 and is running only 5 watts.  What are some 
thoughts.  Thanks.


As others mentioned, vertical antenna separation is most of the key.  I 
have successfully installed in-band remote bases at most of my 2 meter 
repeater sites, and where you cannot get a bunch of antenna separation, 
filtering is a necessity.  Most of the time, a notch filter placed in 
the remote base line tuned to the receiver frequency can really help.  
It does the same thing as your duplexer, notches transmitter side band 
noise on the repeater receivers frequency.

Kevin






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project

2004-05-22 Thread Kevin Custer






Ken Arck wrote:

  At 09:15 PM 5/21/2004 -0500, you wrote:

  
  
Would there be any advantage to putting the radio in an RF box for
shielding?

  
  
---The short answer? Only if you put the antenna(s) in a shielded box too. 

You're asking too much of physics by trying to run a remote base on the
same band as your repeater :-)


I disagree. One of my lower powered 2 meter repeaters will
successfully remote base at the next channel, 15 kc away. I use about
100 feet of vertical separation, hand tuned to find the null, and a
nice clean link radio. The link radio is a ICOM 2-AT and I run it at
200 mW most of the time. One thing to remember is you usually don't
need much power when linking from a repeater site, so, use as little as
necessary.

Kevin














Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.











Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project

2004-05-22 Thread Kevin Custer
Mathew Quaife wrote:

So then no real good way of doing it, is what i am gathering?


Don't let other discourage you so much.  Just because their experience 
hasn't been a good one doesn't mean you should give up. 
Try moving the antenna around (up/down - back/forth) while doing a link, 
you may see quite a difference in a few feet or even inches. Same 
principal as inching the car ahead at a stoplight to get your favorite 
FM radio station in better.  Use simple antennas for the remote base 
like a small beam or a ground plane, and don't be afraid to experiment.

Kevin






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Maxtracs as Repeaters, some Questions

2004-05-22 Thread bbedoe




Hi All!

As the title suggests, I have a couple of questions about the use of Maxtracs as repeater radios, links, etc. I'm a die hard Micor man with 3 Micor and 1 Mastr II repeaters on the air so forgive me as I movefrom 1970s to1990s technology! Hi Hi!! I hope these don't sound to elementary.

1. I've seen the MRT articles for linking 2 maxtracs together, besides theRICK and these adapters,has anyone rig a full blown controller, say a Scom 7k to these bad boys using the 16 pin plug on the back?

2. Under the software control of these radios (RSS) can the RF power out be dialed down low enough as not to mess the finials and still drive an external PA? Low enough maybe to drive a Micor 60-100 PA. (In the Micor, if you turn the power down to low the finals don't like it... a lot!)

3. Not being as robust as a micor/mastrII, what about heat, cooling, fans? Do these radios have any kind of continuos duty rating?

4. Some have called these radios "barn doors" for being so wide open on the front end. Has this been a problem? Can they be preselected? This was a good thing on the Micors!

5. What other pit falls have I missed?

A couple of Club members in our weather spotter group are crossbanding an UHF to VHF maxtracs to get back to the repeater and it sounds good and is surprising simple (KISS) to rig and operate. It almost seems to simple.

I know this is basically a GR300 so how do they compare?

They have done their homework so now I need to do mine!

Thanks all!
Keep the flames to a minimum!

Brian, WD9HSY

PS ... OH Boy! SMT! Just what I need with Bifocals!













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










RE: [Repeater-Builder] Maxtracs as Repeaters, some Questions

2004-05-22 Thread Rich Garcia





The PA's can be turned down but thre is a 
limit..I have not bothered looking how low it will go but I am sure the Micor PA 
probably needs in the area of 350mw or so and I doubt you can do that. I don't 
have the time now but I am actually curiousas to how low it will go. 


The 16 pin connector will do just fine, try 
to get Maxtrac's or 16 Channel GM300's. The 8ch GM's with 16 pin can still be 
used but the pin configuration is not programmable. Also NOT ALL Maxtracs are 16 
pin be careful when doing E-Bay.

I have used these radios with the ICS 
controllers without a problem, a controller is not an issue with radios. As long 
as you have the outputs or are willing to tap inside of the radio any controller 
will work with any radio.

These heatsinks are not very much of 
anything. I would go 50% and put some high flow fans on it, they can get "red" 
hot inno time at all. 

The RICK is fine but audio is somewhat poor, 
the radios can do much better with some of the other controllers out 
there.

Rich

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 9:21 
  AMTo: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com; 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Maxtracs 
  as Repeaters, some Questions
  Hi All!
  
  As the title suggests, I have a couple of questions about the use of 
  Maxtracs as repeater radios, links, etc. I'm a die hard Micor man with 3 
  Micor and 1 Mastr II repeaters on the air so forgive me as I movefrom 
  1970s to1990s technology! Hi Hi!! I hope these don't sound to 
  elementary.
  
  1. I've seen the MRT articles for linking 2 maxtracs together, 
  besides theRICK and these adapters,has anyone rig a full blown 
  controller, say a Scom 7k to these bad boys using the 16 pin plug on the 
  back?
  
  2. Under the software control of these radios (RSS) can the RF power out 
  be dialed down low enough as not to mess the finials and still drive an 
  external PA? Low enough maybe to drive a Micor 60-100 PA. (In the 
  Micor, if you turn the power down to low the finals don't like it... a 
  lot!)
  
  3. Not being as robust as a micor/mastrII, what about heat, cooling, 
  fans? Do these radios have any kind of continuos duty rating?
  
  4. Some have called these radios "barn doors" for being so wide open on 
  the front end. Has this been a problem? Can they be 
  preselected? This was a good thing on the Micors!
  
  5. What other pit falls have I missed?
  
  A couple of Club members in our weather spotter group are crossbanding an 
  UHF to VHF maxtracs to get back to the repeater and it sounds good and is 
  surprising simple (KISS) to rig and operate. It almost seems to 
  simple.
  
  I know this is basically a GR300 so how do they compare?
  
  They have done their homework so now I need to do mine!
  
  Thanks all!
  Keep the flames to a minimum!
  
  Brian, WD9HSY
  
  PS ... OH Boy! SMT! Just what I need with 
  Bifocals!













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Maxtracs as Repeaters, some Questions

2004-05-22 Thread Scannr




Brian

Yes the Maxtracs can be used in the same manner as the GM300/M series in the 
GR repeaters, Uually Maxtracs don't like the power being turned down to far or
they will generate some interesting spurs, I usually don't go anylower than
10 watts, on some radio's I have played with I've gotten lucky and been able to 
go down to 4 watts without any wierd stuff happening, the PA's aren't ment to be
continuous duty even turned down they will heat up so a fan is good.

I have interfaced maxtracs to Link Communications RLC4's without any problems
I also have a 2 watt maxtrac on an RLC3. receive pl will help but as you noted they have
a "barn door" for a front end

we are currently using a GR400 at 1 of our sites without any major problems

Steve KC7YNS















Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project

2004-05-22 Thread Chuck Kelsey
Almost forgot. If things don't work out, you may be able to accomplish what
you want by changing to a Micor or Master II receiver. Recency was never
known for its ability to be very selective and the receivers were always
prone to overload problems. But it's still worth a try.

Chuck
WB2EDV


- Original Message - 
From: Chuck Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project


 I agree with Kevin. Try it.

 Keep your remote base TX output as low as you can. Try always to work with
 repeaters and users with big signals. It amazing what a big signal can
do
 to override desense.

 Consider installing a flat, horizontal screen between the two antennas to
 try to get additional isolation. Use heliax for all cable runs and double
 shielded to all the radio equipment.

 You may be surprised what you can accomplish.

 Chuck
 WB2EDV



 - Original Message - 
 From: Kevin Custer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 9:06 AM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project


  Mathew Quaife wrote:
 
  So then no real good way of doing it, is what i am gathering?
  
 
  Don't let other discourage you so much.  Just because their experience
  hasn't been a good one doesn't mean you should give up.
  Try moving the antenna around (up/down - back/forth) while doing a link,
  you may see quite a difference in a few feet or even inches. Same
  principal as inching the car ahead at a stoplight to get your favorite
  FM radio station in better.  Use simple antennas for the remote base
  like a small beam or a ground plane, and don't be afraid to experiment.
 
  Kevin
 







 Yahoo! Groups Links












 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project

2004-05-22 Thread Chuck Kelsey
Make that MASTR! not Master. I DO know how to spell it ;-)

Chuck
WB2EDV


- Original Message - 
From: Chuck Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project


 Almost forgot. If things don't work out, you may be able to accomplish
what
 you want by changing to a Micor or Master II receiver. Recency was never
 known for its ability to be very selective and the receivers were always
 prone to overload problems. But it's still worth a try.

 Chuck
 WB2EDV









 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Looking for info on DB products cans (6meter)

2004-05-22 Thread Kevin Custer
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Randy Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I have a set of DB products cans, model #DB4032. Previously they were on
 48.600 mhz TX, 49.300 RX. I am trying to take them to 52..270 MHZ RX ,
 53.270 TX. Anyone have a source for data or instructions how I can
get these
 to move that far?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Randy, W0AVV

This might help:
http://www.repeater-builder.com/loband/

Kevin





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project

2004-05-22 Thread Kevin Custer
Ken Arck wrote:

---I don't disagree with what you're saying here, Kevin. But based on the
radios he stated he was using (a Regency repeater and a Kenwood mobile),
he's fighting more issues than you do in your above scenario. Spectral
noise from the remote is greater in his setup and I have little doubt the
Regency receiver (I am quite familiar with them) has as tight a front end
as a receiver you'd use :-)

There's many a Db handicap right there!


The receiver in the above scenario was a Hamtronics.

Kevin






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] GE Mastr II

2004-05-22 Thread Kevin Custer

Make that MASTR! not Master. I DO know how to spell it ;-)


The only thing that is worse is to see someone write Master 11, what the 
hell is a master eleven?






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Mastr II

2004-05-22 Thread Budd Turner : N7EOJ



Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com wrote:

From: Kevin Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Make that MASTR! not Master. I DO know how to spell it ;-)The only thing that is worse is to see someone write Master 11, what the hell is a master eleven?
Hi Kevin: ThoseMaster II Master 11 radios go for very cheap on eBay
		Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70/year













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Mastr II

2004-05-22 Thread Chuck Kelsey





Once in a while, but most of us are wise and search 
on all the common "misspellings."

I seem to be able to tolerate "Mastr 2" without a 
problem, but the Mastr 11 (eleven) is the worst for me.

Chuck
WB2EDV




  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Budd Turner : N7EOJ 
  
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 12:10 
  PM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Mastr 
  II
  
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  wrote: 
  
From: Kevin Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Make that MASTR! not 
Master. I DO know how to spell it ;-)The only thing that is worse is 
to see someone write Master 11, what the hell is a master 
eleven?
Hi Kevin: ThoseMaster II Master 11 radios go for 
very cheap on eBay
  
  
  Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo! Domains - Claim 
  yours for only $14.70/year 













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project

2004-05-22 Thread mch
Why? I've done it for about 15 years. I can't use it within about 60 kHz
of the local repeater, but otherwise it's fine. I just used a cavity to
notch out the repeater TX. The loss of sensitivity near the repeater TX
frequency is overcome by the strength of the repeaters at the site.

Joe M.

Ken Arck wrote:
 
 You're asking too much of physics by trying to run a remote base on
 the same band as your repeater :-)





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] GE Mastr II

2004-05-22 Thread mch
About 8 generations down the MASTR line? :-)

Joe M.

Kevin Custer wrote:
 
 The only thing that is worse is to see someone write Master 11, what
 the hell is a master eleven?





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project

2004-05-22 Thread Ken Arck
At 01:09 PM 5/22/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Why? I've done it for about 15 years. I can't use it within about 60 kHz
of the local repeater, but otherwise it's fine. I just used a cavity to
notch out the repeater TX. The loss of sensitivity near the repeater TX
frequency is overcome by the strength of the repeaters at the site.

--I think you guys are missing the point. His problem is the remote base
xmtr is taking out the repeater receiver, not the other way around. 

While you're correct about probably being able to tighten up things, if
he's going to run any power on the remote TX and it is frequency agile, he
has some issues.

Note he did not say he is running an inband LINK - he said an RBI-1 with a
Kenwood mobile REMOTE BASE. Hence the strong inferrence to wanting to be
able to move the Kenwood radio around, frequency wise.

Did I miss something?

Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
http://www.irlp.net




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Maxtracs as Repeaters, some Questions (no flames included)

2004-05-22 Thread James







Maxtracs, GM300, and CDM series are all good radios!

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
  
  Hi All!
  
  As the title suggests, I have a couple of questions about the
use of Maxtracs as repeater radios, links, etc. I'm a die hard Micor
man with 3 Micor and 1 Mastr II repeaters on the air so forgive me as I
movefrom 1970s to1990s technology! Hi Hi!! I hope these don't sound
to elementary.
  

All the time. If yours will allow you to program the pins .. its easy.
I have used S-com, and Link-Comm controllers on Maxtracs, CDM series,
GM series radios.


  1. I've seen the MRT articles for linking 2 maxtracs together,
besides theRICK and these adapters,has anyone rig a full blown
controller, say a Scom 7k to these bad boys using the 16 pin plug on
the back?


  2. Under the software control of these radios (RSS) can the RF
power out be dialed down low enough as not to mess the finials and
still drive an external PA? Low enough maybe to drive a Micor 60-100
PA. (In the Micor, if you turn the power down to low the finals don't
like it... a lot!)

Is your radio a 40 or 45 watt version ... then it will only go down to
20 watts and still hold specs. If it is a 20 watt version, then it will
go all the way down to 1 watt
(model # beginning with D44 is UHF high power, D43 is VHF hi power, D33
is VHF low, D34 is UHF low)

  
  3. Not being as robust as a micor/mastrII, what about heat,
cooling, fans? Do these radios have any kind of continuos duty rating?

I use cooling fans on even the ones that are just link radios. I also
run them at 20 watts for hiigh power units, or 10 watts for low power
units.


  
  4. Some have called these radios "barn doors" for being so wide
open on the front end. Has this been a problem? Can they be
preselected? This was a good thing on the Micors!

I preselect them using bandpass cavities, or you can use the DCI
filters or celwave preselectors (the latter mentioned is sold as an
option with this type unit for repeater use.)

  
  5. What other pit falls have I missed?

Check the PA transistors, I usually resolder them with silver solder.
If you do not do this, and they get a little too warm, they will
unsolder themselves. The silver solder gives you a little more
temperature range.


  
  A couple of Club members in our weather spotter group are
crossbanding an UHF to VHF maxtracs to get back to the repeater and it
sounds good and is surprising simple (KISS) to rig and operate. It
almost seems to simple.
  
  I know this is basically a GR300 so how do they compare?

A GR300 is just two GM300 mobiles in a box with a Rick interface and
usually a celwave notch only duplexer with 15 amp supply.


  
  They have done their homework so now I need to do mine!
  
  Thanks all!
  Keep the flames to a minimum!
  
  Brian, WD9HSY
  
  PS ... OH Boy! SMT! Just what I need with Bifocals!

Oh yeah, no internal mods or jumpers needed unless you don't have a 16
pin accessory connector ... REST EASY :) No Flames here!!














Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.















Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project

2004-05-22 Thread bradley glen
Hi Kevin

I run a star uhf linked system all on uhf between
430-440 here in South Africa , both the repeaters
439/431 and link 434/433 .I have had success with this
but there are many factors influencing the end result
.

Regards

Brad  ZS5WT
--- Kevin Custer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ken Arck wrote:
 
 At 09:15 PM 5/21/2004 -0500, you wrote:
 
   
 
 Would there be any advantage to putting the radio
 in an RF box for
 shielding?
 
 
 
 ---The short answer? Only if you put the
 antenna(s) in a shielded box too. 
 
 You're asking too much of physics by trying to run
 a remote base on the
 same band as your repeater :-)
 
 
 I disagree.  One of my lower powered 2 meter
 repeaters will successfully 
 remote base at the next channel, 15 kc away.  I use
 about 100 feet of 
 vertical separation, hand tuned to find the null, 
 and a nice clean link 
 radio.  The link radio is a ICOM 2-AT and I run it
 at 200 mW most of the 
 time.  One thing to remember is you usually don't
 need much power when 
 linking from a repeater site, so, use as little as
 necessary.
 
 Kevin
 





__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Domains – Claim yours for only $14.70/year
http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer 




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Base Project

2004-05-22 Thread Kevin Custer








Ken Arck wrote:

  At 01:09 PM 5/22/2004 -0400, you wrote:
  
  
Why? I've done it for about 15 years. I can't use it within about 60 kHz
of the local repeater, but otherwise it's fine. I just used a cavity to
notch out the repeater TX. The loss of sensitivity near the repeater TX
frequency is overcome by the strength of the repeaters at the site.

  
  
--I think you guys are missing the point. His problem is the remote base
xmtr is taking out the repeater receiver, not the other way around. 


The (notch) cavity goes in the remote base line, to reduce the remote
base transmitter side band noise out of the repeater receiver.














Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.











Re: [Repeater-Builder] GE Mastr II

2004-05-22 Thread Fred Flowers


I see that I'm not the only that has a pet peeve about "Mastr II, Channel Guard so on". If GE hadn't sold out we may have had a "Mastr XI".  Fred KF4QZN  - Original Message - From: Kevin Custer Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 10:46 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] GE Mastr II Make that MASTR! not Master. I DO know how to spell it ;-)The only thing that is worse is to see someone write Master 11, what the hell is a master eleven?Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoocom/group/Repeater-Builder/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Mastr II

2004-05-22 Thread JOHN MACKEY
Mastr !! is what I find the most annoying. 

Chuck Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Once in a while, but most of us are wise and search on all the common
 misspellings.
 
 I seem to be able to tolerate Mastr 2 without a problem, but the Mastr 11
 (eleven) is the worst for me.
 
 Chuck
 WB2EDV
 
 
 
   - Original Message - 
   From: Budd Turner : N7EOJ
   To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 12:10 PM
   Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Mastr II
 
 
   Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 From: Kevin Custer
 Make that MASTR! not Master. I DO know how to spell it ;-)
 
 The only thing that is worse is to see someone write Master 11, what
the
 hell is a master eleven?






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Johnson PPL-6000

2004-05-22 Thread JOHN MACKEY
I am curious to know if anyone has ever tried to make a portable repeater out
of a Johnson PPL-6000 UHF?  I had a friend of mine recently tell me they make
good small repeaters  wondered what the experiences were of others?

thanks






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Mot. Handie Talkie RF Link

2004-05-22 Thread Marvin K Hoffman
Mike:

Post a price so I can make an offer.

Marv Hoffman, WA4NC

- Original Message -
From: Mike Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Mot. Handie Talkie RF Link

 Hi Paul. It's been a while, hope this finds you doing well. What 
 do you 
 want for this box? Do you have pictures?
 
 Mike Pugh KA4MKG
 Lexington, Ky.
 
 K.Paul Boggs wrote:
 
  I have for sale or trade a Motorola Handie
  Talkie RF Link. 440-512MHZ. Presently on
  466.1125 TX 451.1125 RX  PL 6Z 167.9
  2/4 watt. Runs on 12V 110/220 vollt. Built in
  power supply, internal duplexer. In factory
  metal box. DO NOT HAVE ORIGINAL LID.
  or rubber gasget.  Go to BATLABS before
  contacting me direct. Have Motorola Service
   Manual. Weight now 15lbs. Make a great portable
  emergency repeater. All factory, NO MODS
  Paul
   
   
  K.Paul Boggs
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] ') [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Mountain Emergency Communications
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  -
 ---
  Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  * To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
 
  * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
') Repeater-Builder-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service . target=lhttp://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/. 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Johnson PPL-6000

2004-05-22 Thread Kevin Custer
JOHN MACKEY wrote:

I am curious to know if anyone has ever tried to make a portable repeater out
of a Johnson PPL-6000 UHF?  I had a friend of mine recently tell me they make
good small repeaters  wondered what the experiences were of others?

Johnny,

Here is some information on the PPL-6000 series EF Johnson equipment:
http://www.repeater-builder.com/rbtip/johnson-index.html

Kevin






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] GE Mastr II

2004-05-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kinda like the notations I often see for the Motorola Syntor XX.
(one X too many).

LJ

Original Message:
-
From: mch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 13:16:48 -0400
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] GE Mastr II


About 8 generations down the MASTR line? :-)

Joe M.

Kevin Custer wrote:
 
 The only thing that is worse is to see someone write Master 11, what
 the hell is a master eleven?





 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 



mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] GE Mastr II

2004-05-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or talking to some of the folks in 2-way radios shops down in the South
(dubya fower land) that call them MASS STAR TWO series radios.
LJ

Original Message:
-
From: mch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 13:16:48 -0400
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] GE Mastr II


About 8 generations down the MASTR line? :-)

Joe M.

Kevin Custer wrote:
 
 The only thing that is worse is to see someone write Master 11, what
 the hell is a master eleven?





 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 



mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Looking for info on DB products cans (6meter)

2004-05-22 Thread Kevin King
Kevin,

I made the same mistake. The 4032 is the Helical 6 can duplexer. Your link
is for the big pass cans. and that is a db4042.

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Custer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 11:29 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Looking for info on DB products cans
(6meter)


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Randy Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 I have a set of DB products cans, model #DB4032. Previously they were on
 48.600 mhz TX, 49.300 RX. I am trying to take them to 52..270 MHZ RX ,
 53.270 TX. Anyone have a source for data or instructions how I can
get these
 to move that far?

 Thanks,

 Randy, W0AVV

This might help:
http://www.repeater-builder.com/loband/

Kevin






Yahoo! Groups Links











 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Mastr II

2004-05-22 Thread Steve Grantham
Well..  If you want to get technical.. Why don't you go ahead and properly
type MASTR in all caps?

Steve
AA5SG

- Original Message - 
From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Mastr II


 Mastr !! is what I find the most annoying.

 Chuck Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Once in a while, but most of us are wise and search on all the common
  misspellings.
 
  I seem to be able to tolerate Mastr 2 without a problem, but the Mastr
11
  (eleven) is the worst for me.
 
  Chuck
  WB2EDV
 
 
 
- Original Message - 
From: Budd Turner : N7EOJ
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 12:10 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GE Mastr II
 
 
Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com wrote:
  From: Kevin Custer
  Make that MASTR! not Master. I DO know how to spell it ;-)
 
  The only thing that is worse is to see someone write Master 11, what
 the
  hell is a master eleven?







 Yahoo! Groups Links











 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/