[Repeater-Builder] Re: db comparisons

2004-08-30 Thread Laryn Lohman
Charles, I agree.  I was thinking more of base to mobile operation.  

Just for fun, I ran some numbers in Radio Mobile with parameters from 
a real system that I am familiar with on 2M.  I varied antenna HAAT 
and transmitter power to determine changes in coverage area and 
radius.  The numbers with * are the real system.  I hope this table 
survives the posting process and is still readable... If not I'll 
post in another format.  Numbers have been rounded...

Ant. HAAT MCoverage sq miCoverage radius mi

110 743127
55* 523523
27  338818
13  235015


Tx output WCoverage sq miCoverage radius mi

400 729027
100*523523
25  341118
6.25211514

Laryn K8TVZ

  

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Charles Miller ham-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Larry,
 
 Doubling the antenna height does not always increase the gain. It 
does help
 in most cases but if the antenna's are line of sight it makes 
little or no
 difference.
 
 Charles Miller
 WD5EEH
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 2:34 PM
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: db comparisons
 
 
 
 
  --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, mch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  You can gain 3dB by either doubling your power (or ERP), or by
   doubling the antenna height.
 
  Actually, doubling antenna height is usually close to 6db gain.
 
  Laryn K8TVZ
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: db comparisons

2004-08-30 Thread mch

Spacing looks fine on both posts here, but I have HTML turned off on
Yahoo.

Joe M.

Laryn Lohman wrote:
 
 Ouch, the spacing between numbers disappeared :(  I hope y'all can
 figure it out.  Stretch the numbers out to form three columns under
 the headings.
 
 Laryn K8TVZ
 
 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  Charles, I agree.  I was thinking more of base to mobile
 operation.
 
  Just for fun, I ran some numbers in Radio Mobile with parameters
 from
  a real system that I am familiar with on 2M.  I varied antenna HAAT
  and transmitter power to determine changes in coverage area and
  radius.  The numbers with * are the real system.  I hope this table
  survives the posting process and is still readable... If not I'll
  post in another format.  Numbers have been rounded...
 
  Ant. HAAT MCoverage sq miCoverage radius mi
 
  110 743127
  55* 523523
  27  338818
  13  235015
 
 
  Tx output WCoverage sq miCoverage radius mi
 
  400 729027
  100*523523
  25  341118
  6.25211514
 
  Laryn K8TVZ
 
 
 
  --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Charles Miller ham-
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Larry,
  
   Doubling the antenna height does not always increase the gain. It
  does help
   in most cases but if the antenna's are line of sight it makes
  little or no
   difference.
  
   Charles Miller
   WD5EEH
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 2:34 PM
   Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: db comparisons
  
  
   
   
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, mch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
You can gain 3dB by either doubling your power (or ERP), or by
 doubling the antenna height.
   
Actually, doubling antenna height is usually close to 6db gain.
   
Laryn K8TVZ
   
   
   
   
   
   
Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






[Repeater-Builder] WTD: Icom RP-1220 Service Manual

2004-08-30 Thread N6KYD





Hello,
I am looking for a copy of the ICOM RP-1220 service 
manual.
If someone can help me out it would be appreciated. 
I have an intermittent power output. It only keys up at 10 watts occasionally 
and most the time power output is at 1.5 watts.
Can't seem to isolate the problemto a poor 
connection.

Sincerely,
Mike N6KYD













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










[Repeater-Builder] 68hc11 repeater design

2004-08-30 Thread Howard Rubin
Group,

I am looking for a repeater application that runs on the 68hc11
microprocessor.  Can anyone advise further?

Thanks,
Howard, N3FEL
Bensalem, PA
USA






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] New / used repeater for TA2KT

2004-08-30 Thread TA0U






Dear Sirs,
We are a Emergency Radio Amateur Club based in Istanbul...
We need urgently a repeater for our club...

The frq must be 145.787,5 -600 88.5 Ton.
These are the spec taht we need but a repeater for 2 meters will be enough for us..

Can you pls inform us about the availabilies and the prices...
The repeater can be a used one also...
We have the possibiliy to repair it...

Hoope to hear you soon..
Best regards

Urcun CANEL
TA0U
		Do you Yahoo!?
Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now.













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










[Repeater-Builder] Re: db comparisons

2004-08-30 Thread Laryn Lohman
Ouch, the spacing between numbers disappeared :(  I hope y'all can 
figure it out.  Stretch the numbers out to form three columns under 
the headings.

Laryn K8TVZ

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 Charles, I agree.  I was thinking more of base to mobile 
operation.  
 
 Just for fun, I ran some numbers in Radio Mobile with parameters 
from 
 a real system that I am familiar with on 2M.  I varied antenna HAAT 
 and transmitter power to determine changes in coverage area and 
 radius.  The numbers with * are the real system.  I hope this table 
 survives the posting process and is still readable... If not I'll 
 post in another format.  Numbers have been rounded...
 
 Ant. HAAT MCoverage sq miCoverage radius mi
 
 110 743127
 55* 523523
 27  338818
 13  235015
 
 
 Tx output WCoverage sq miCoverage radius mi
 
 400 729027
 100*523523
 25  341118
 6.25211514
 
 Laryn K8TVZ
 
   
 
 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Charles Miller ham-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Larry,
  
  Doubling the antenna height does not always increase the gain. It 
 does help
  in most cases but if the antenna's are line of sight it makes 
 little or no
  difference.
  
  Charles Miller
  WD5EEH
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 2:34 PM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: db comparisons
  
  
  
  
   --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, mch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   You can gain 3dB by either doubling your power (or ERP), or by
doubling the antenna height.
  
   Actually, doubling antenna height is usually close to 6db gain.
  
   Laryn K8TVZ
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
  
  





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Motorola R2001 DC Cable pin outs

2004-08-30 Thread banjupb
Hi Guys
Can you help with the pin out of the 12v DC socket on the rear of 
the test set
I am putting test set on a truck for the bush ASAP.
Cheers
Brett






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: motrac base station conversion to repeater

2004-08-30 Thread Neil McKie

  Hello ... 

  You mentioned in an earlier e-mail the model number C53MHB-3100BR 
 - I am looking at the manual, Motorola Part number 68P81005E75. 

Matt wrote:
 
 If it's possible to do this conversion and I end up doing it, this
 repeater won't see that much usage compared to a lot of other ham
 repeaters...it's just for a small group of people who I don't think
 will abuse it *too* much...but anyway, here's what I found in
 looking at it again:
 
 TKN6413A - on one of the wire bundle connectors going from power
 supply to exciter 

  ... Part number of the cable assembly in the power supply. 


 PT7 - red, stamped on power supply near bottom  

  Possibly an inspection stamp? 


 TLN8847A1 - on small circuit board on back side of power supply 

  The Private-Line Oscillator  Delay (Encoder) Circuit Board. 


 25D84561A01 and 5247338 - on the larger of the two black 
 transformers

  The main power supply transformer part number. 

  The 524 is the manufacturer number (who made it for Motorola) 
 ... the 7338 is the year (1973) and week (38th) the transformer 
 was manufactured. 


 27E83972GQ5 - on upper part of power supply, on side of chassis 

  27E ... is a chassis part number. 


  Power Supply Model Number is most likely TPN1068AC 

  Transmitter Model Number is most likely TTD1673AA 

  Receiver Model Number is most likely TRD1742AA 


 
 Hopefully, out of those numbers, at least one of them is meaningful
 and provides the info you need.  I'll look forward to your reply.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Matt 


  Continuing ... 

  There are two other specific models of the somewhat similar radio: 

  C53MHX at 55 watts output - 
  C63MHX at 85 watts output -
  C73MHX at 100 watts output -
   All three are Compa-Station Base Radio, Continuous Duty 

  C73MHY at 100 watts output - Compa-Station Repeater RT 

  Both use the same power supply TPN1073AA and the 24D84948A01 
 Main Transformer 

  Pictures in both manuals shows a blower assembly attached to the 
 transmitter heat sink.  

  The part number of the C5/6/73MHX Manual is 68P81008E60 / 10/24/69 

  The part number of the C73MHY Manual is 68P81008E65 / 10/24/69 


  




 
 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
Before you get too far into this, please note Motorola made
   three versions of the power supply you may be currently looking
 at.
 
Most likely, the power supply you have there is the intermittent
   duty version.  The part number of the power transformer and/or
 the
   power supply model number will tell you for certain.
 
Intermittent duty is a 20-25% transmit / 75-80% receive ...
 meaning
   the power supply won't survive when used as the so-called typical
   ham radio repeater - where close to a 100% transmit duty cycle
   should be expected.
 
Please post the power supply model numbers (all you can locate -
   rubber stamped on the chassis) and the power transformer part
   number too if possible.
 
Hope this helps,
 
BTW, I have the manuals on all three power supply chassis'.
 
Neil - WA6KLA
 
 
  Matt wrote:
  
   Hi.  I was given a Motorola Motrac base station...it's model #
   C53MHB-3100BR, and comes in the short cabinet, with card cage,
 etc.
   I was looking at it earlier today and see that there's a place
 for a
   Squelch Gate card and Tone Decoder card in the card cage, as
 well as
   a spot in the bottom of the unit where it looks like a second SO-
 239
   connector could be mounted.  There are also separate cables
 running
   to the bottom of the cabinet from the TX and RX sections.
  
   This leads me to believe that this unit was made with the
 potential
   for conversion to a repeater station.  My theory is that I could
   stick in one of my extra Squelch Gate cards, make two separate
   connectors for TX and RX, and do something to make the receiver
 stay
   active while the TX is running, and it should work.
  
   Has anyone done this before? Any suggestions, advice, notes, etc?
  
   Thanks,
  
   Matt
  






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] SS-32/5K/Micor

2004-08-30 Thread scomind





Hi Kevin,

I am installing a Comm Spec SS-32 encoder in a Micorrepeater. I am using a logic output from an S-Com 5Kcontroller to key the ground connection to the encoderwhenever the RX COR is active. I need to do this tobe able to link into another system.My problem is when ever the encoder is keyed orunkeyed, it causes the TX to drift off frequency about+/- 900Hz. It apears that this is being casued by a capcharging/discharging. I have tried several differenttone insertion points, always with the same result.

I haven't seen many responses, so I'll toss out some suggestions.

There is probably a DC bias on the Micor side of the audio connection. The SS-32 has a 1 uF polarized cap in series with the tone output withits "+" side toward the SS-32. When the SS-32 has its ground connection floating, the cap probably sees 12V on the SS-32 side and some other (lower) voltage on the Micor side. When the SS-32 is operating, the voltage on the SS-32 side of the cap may be lower than the Micor side.If the cap operatesreversed biased, it can leak or short, causing wierd problems. You could try a 1 uF nonpolarized cap in series with the tone lead to see if that's the case.

If that wasn't the problem, andif you have plenty of CTCSS level coming from the SS-32 and can afford to lose some, use a smaller nonpolarized cap (say, 0.1 uF) in series. The lower value will attenuate the level, but may also reduce the drift effect you're seeing.

73,
Bob, WA9FBO













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










[Repeater-Builder] Re: SS-32/5K/Micor

2004-08-30 Thread motarolla_doctor
Use a series resister AND a 1 uF non polorized cap in series with the 
PL tone going to the Micor. Try to use the same point in the Micor 
that the factory used.

May be the way you are keying the encoder, the Micor exciter will 
respond to DC shifts as a frequency shift.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] BIG Yard Sale

2004-08-30 Thread motarolla_doctor

There is a big yard sale on Sept 4 th and 5th, 

Lots of Motorola sruff.. P200's NIB !!! VHF and UHF/charger! STX 
spkr/mic, Expo rapid charger.. 

Portables, and lots of parts.  SpectraTac Receivers. Zetron M 45 
patch,  VHF Stationmaster antennas,

 Benifit for San Gabriel Valley USAR Team, (A 501.C non profit corp.) 

Donations of equipment or trades accepted at the sale. 

dwleeper AT hotmail com

3133 San Leon in El Monte, CA just off the I10 at Peck road, 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] message error

2004-08-30 Thread ian wells
Hi guys .I am sorry i haven't returned any messages as my internet 
email sever has stuffed up and i haven't received any messages for 2 
days or more .it is just i checked up on the builder website to see 
the messages i have missed.Thanks to all that replied .The db 
comparrison is being asked as i have 6db antennas on each of my 
470meg repeaters and they aren't getting any real distance over flat 
country .we had 12 db coaxial antennas on our local uhf repeater and 
then changed them to what was called coppercore antenas and we made a 
huge difference to our long distance coverage .The range of the 6db 
isn't bad but we wanted to pick up another 20-50kms at least and 
installing linears on the site wont benifit as it wont improve rx 
range without rx masthead amps so the better sugestion was to install 
higher gain antenas .the sites would be able to be upgraded to 12 db 
antenas if we can find a supplier .the highest we have found is 9db .
but i will certainly take all sugestions into consideration.thank you 

Thank you
Ian Wells
Kerinvale Comaudio
mail service 1017,
Biloela,4715.
www.kerinvalecomaudio.com.au
1-email- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2-email- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3-email- [EMAIL PROTECTED]





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Propogation Prediction

2004-08-30 Thread Fred Seamans





There are some very high quality computer 
propagation predicting computer programs available that use USGS data maps. 
However these are expensive and only the companies that are into coverage 
predicting in a commercial way can afford them. But they are good.

The first paper on VHF and UHF Propagation 
predicting that I became aware of was written by an engineer at GE Mobile Radio 
Department in 1962. It was well circulated and included in their Data File as a 
Bulletin 10003-1 (Abstract: This bulletin is provided for calculating the 
coverage which a certain VHF and UHF transmitter will provide or for calculating 
the power which a transmitter must have to cover a certain area. Such factors as 
path clearance, transmission line losses, antenna gains, and reliability are all 
taken into account for paths as long as 1000 miles). It is written for the 
knowledgeable technician and engineer. The charts and curves contained in this 
work were the basis for most all future computer propagation predicting programs 
of the 80's. For the radio shops and limited users this was a life saver. Also, 
a slide rule type prediction calculator (Range and Transmitter Power Calculator) 
was designed for the mobile radio sales people to use. These were such good 
tools that most manufactures and sales people in the 60's and 70's highly valued 
there use, even "M's" sales people would carry one in their brief 
cases.

I doubt you could find the slide rule calculator 
now unless someone hoarded a bunch of them. The Datafile Bulletin 10003-1 dated 
July 1962 could be copied from some of the old timers in the industry. It could 
be of great benefit to answer some of the recent questions that have been on the 
Repeater-Builder mail.

Sorry I do not have any extras. Maybe someone has 
some that could be scanned and posted.

Fred













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] SS-32/5K/Micor

2004-08-30 Thread Kevin Berlen



Thanks for your thoughts Bob. I have managed to minimize the problem by
doing as you suggested - I put a .1 uF cap and a 27K resistor is series
with the tone output of the SS-32. The frequency still drifts when the
tone is keyed and unkeyed, but now only about 50-60 Hz. I think that this
is acceptable. 73,
Kevin, K9HX
At 10:16 PM 8/29/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Hi Kevin,


I am installing a Comm Spec SS-32 encoder in a Micor
repeater. I am using a logic output from an S-Com 5K
controller to key the ground connection to the encoder
whenever the RX COR is active. I need to do this to
be able to link into another system.

My problem is when ever the encoder is keyed or
unkeyed, it causes the TX to drift off frequency about
+/- 900Hz. It apears that this is being casued by a cap
charging/discharging. I have tried several different
tone insertion points, always with the same result.


I haven't seen many responses, so I'll toss out some suggestions.

There is probably a DC bias on the Micor side of the audio connection.
The SS-32 has a 1 uF polarized cap in series with the tone output with
its + side toward the SS-32. When the SS-32 has its ground
connection floating, the cap probably sees 12V on the SS-32 side and some
other (lower) voltage on the Micor side. When the SS-32 is operating, the
voltage on the SS-32 side of the cap may be lower than the Micor side. If
the cap operates reversed biased, it can leak or short, causing wierd
problems. You could try a 1 uF nonpolarized cap in series with the tone
lead to see if that's the case.

If that wasn't the problem, and if you have plenty of CTCSS level coming
from the SS-32 and can afford to lose some, use a smaller nonpolarized
cap (say, 0.1 uF) in series. The lower value will attenuate the level,
but may also reduce the drift effect you're seeing.

73,
Bob, WA9FBO





Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
 
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
Yahoo! Terms of Service. 














Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.














Re: [Repeater-Builder] BIG Yard Sale

2004-08-30 Thread Mr. Edgar McKinney
DANG! Thats a long walk from West Virginia!!!  Big Grin 

motarolla_doctor wrote:

 There is a big yard sale on Sept 4 th and 5th,

 Lots of Motorola sruff.. P200's NIB !!! VHF and UHF/charger! STX
 spkr/mic, Expo rapid charger..

 Portables, and lots of parts.  SpectraTac Receivers. Zetron M 45
 patch,  VHF Stationmaster antennas,

  Benifit for San Gabriel Valley USAR Team, (A 501.C non profit corp.)

 Donations of equipment or trades accepted at the sale.

 dwleeper AT hotmail com

 3133 San Leon in El Monte, CA just off the I10 at Peck road,





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Propogation Prediction

2004-08-30 Thread Joe D
You could use my free path analysis tool, rfProfiler-Light, to 
predict the path loss in various directions from your transmitter 
site.  

http://www.rfsoftware.com/rfpl/downloads.shtml

It is not as slick as the expensive programs, but what do you want 
for free!

Joe, N2UF


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Fred Seamans 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 There are some very high quality computer propagation predicting 
computer programs available that use USGS data maps. However these 
are expensive and only the companies that are into coverage 
predicting in a commercial way can afford them. But they are good.
 
 The first paper on VHF and UHF Propagation predicting that I became 
aware of was written by an engineer at GE Mobile Radio Department in 
1962. It was well circulated and included in their Data File as a 
Bulletin 10003-1 (Abstract: This bulletin is provided for calculating 
the coverage which a certain VHF and UHF transmitter will provide or 
for calculating the power which a transmitter must have to cover a 
certain area. Such factors as path clearance, transmission line 
losses, antenna gains, and reliability are all taken into account for 
paths as long as 1000 miles). It is written for the knowledgeable 
technician and engineer. The charts and curves contained in this work 
were the basis for most all future computer propagation predicting 
programs of the 80's. For the radio shops and limited users this was 
a life saver. Also, a slide rule type prediction calculator (Range 
and Transmitter Power Calculator) was designed for the mobile radio 
sales people to use. These were such good tools that most 
manufactures and sales people in the 60's and 70's highly valued 
there use, even M's sales people would carry one in their brief 
cases.
 
 I doubt you could find the slide rule calculator now unless someone 
hoarded a bunch of them. The Datafile Bulletin 10003-1 dated July 
1962 could be copied from some of the old timers in the industry. It 
could be of great benefit to answer some of the recent questions that 
have been on the Repeater-Builder mail.
 
 Sorry I do not have any extras. Maybe someone has some that could 
be scanned and posted.
 
 Fred





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] message error

2004-08-30 Thread Paul Guello
Don't assume that antenna gain is the only thing that
effects range.  Antenna height, size and length of
feedline, quality of antenna and how it is mounted and
duplexer quality and tuning all effect range as well
as transmitter power and overall receiver sensitivity.
 High RF enviroments can also degrade receiver
performance.  Take a look at your repeater as a
system,  looking at the quality of all of the devices
as well as the quality of the installation.  One
poorly installed connector can eliminate all the
bennifits from everything else being correct.
Paul, kb0wlc

--- ian wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi guys .I am sorry i haven't returned any messages
 as my internet 
 email sever has stuffed up and i haven't received
 any messages for 2 
 days or more .it is just i checked up on the builder
 website to see 
 the messages i have missed.Thanks to all that
 replied .The db 
 comparrison is being asked as i have 6db antennas on
 each of my 
 470meg repeaters and they aren't getting any real
 distance over flat 
 country .we had 12 db coaxial antennas on our local
 uhf repeater and 
 then changed them to what was called coppercore
 antenas and we made a 
 huge difference to our long distance coverage .The
 range of the 6db 
 isn't bad but we wanted to pick up another 20-50kms
 at least and 
 installing linears on the site wont benifit as it
 wont improve rx 
 range without rx masthead amps so the better
 sugestion was to install 
 higher gain antenas .the sites would be able to be
 upgraded to 12 db 
 antenas if we can find a supplier .the highest we
 have found is 9db .
 but i will certainly take all sugestions into
 consideration.thank you 
 
 Thank you
 Ian Wells
 Kerinvale Comaudio
 mail service 1017,
 Biloela,4715.
 www.kerinvalecomaudio.com.au
 1-email- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 2-email- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 3-email- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
 
 




__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] RC-96 EEPROM

2004-08-30 Thread Tedd Doda
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:11:25 -0500, Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ wrote:

I attempted to get the binary info out of my U30 
and found it was blank.

Seems I'm having the same problem here as well
Bryon. Does the controller boot normally with
that eeprom in place?

I have verified that the eprom programmer works on all the other eproms I 
check this weekend

I'm starting to think that the 6264 is slightly 
different from a standard 2864, but the 2864
works in it's place??

This was a private email to me, so I hope you
don't mind me sending it to the list Bryon.



Tedd Doda, VE3TJD

Lazer Audio and Electronics
Baden, Ontario, Canada





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Propogation Prediction

2004-08-30 Thread Tony King - W4ZT
At 09:03 AM 8/30/2004, Joe D wrote:
You could use my free path analysis tool, rfProfiler-Light, to
predict the path loss in various directions from your transmitter
site.

http://www.rfsoftware.com/rfpl/downloads.shtml

It is not as slick as the expensive programs, but what do you want
for free!

Joe, N2UF

Joe,

That's a great little program!  THANK YOU!

73, Tony,  W4ZT





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Propogation Prediction

2004-08-30 Thread Mr. Edgar McKinney
How does it work?

Is it like CETs as in looking down and seeing a probable footprint?

Ed - kb8qeu

Tony King - W4ZT wrote:

 At 09:03 AM 8/30/2004, Joe D wrote:
 You could use my free path analysis tool, rfProfiler-Light, to
 predict the path loss in various directions from your transmitter
 site.
 
 http://www.rfsoftware.com/rfpl/downloads.shtml
 
 It is not as slick as the expensive programs, but what do you want
 for free!
 
 Joe, N2UF

 Joe,

 That's a great little program!  THANK YOU!

 73, Tony,  W4ZT


 Yahoo! Groups Links









 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: motrac base station conversion to repeater

2004-08-30 Thread Jim B.
Don't forget-Motrac and Micor cards are different! If you have Micor 
cards, you can, with some patience and a good soldering iron, re-wire it 
to work on the Motrac, but they are not pin-compatible. 'Course if you 
have Motrac cards, then that's moot ;C}

Matt wrote:

 Thanks for the info.  I have a spare Time Out Timer board too, in 
 addition to a couple Squelch Gate cards, so I should have the cards 
 I need for this.  Extra cooling is definetly part of the plan too.
 
 The only other thing is, do you have any suggestions on the easiest 
 way to get the receiver to stay active while the transmitter is 
 keyed?  Best place to make this mod? Any thoughts on that would be 
 much appreciated.  (Especially since I don't have a service manual 
 for the unit!) 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Matt
 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Propogation Prediction

2004-08-30 Thread Doug Younker

There is radio mobile http://www.cplus.org/rmw/english1.html and there is a
yahoo group dedicated to it's support and use.  However you will be using
rfprofiler light out of the box much easier. INMO.
doug


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.744 / Virus Database: 496 - Release Date: 08/24/2004





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






[Repeater-Builder] Re: Propogation Prediction

2004-08-30 Thread Joe D
You specify a location using longitude/latitude.  Then you define a 
path either with another point (long/lat) or with a range and bearing 
from the starting point.

The program creates a terrain profile between the two points and 
then, using the Longley-Rice iterative terrain model, calculates the 
path-loss between the two points.

The freeware program uses 10-meter resolution 30-arc-second terrain 
data.

Joe, N2UF

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mr. Edgar McKinney 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 How does it work?
 
 Is it like CETs as in looking down and seeing a probable footprint?
 
 Ed - kb8qeu
 
  At 09:03 AM 8/30/2004, Joe D wrote:
  You could use my free path analysis tool, rfProfiler-Light, to
  predict the path loss in various directions from your transmitter
  site.
  
  http://www.rfsoftware.com/rfpl/downloads.shtml
  
  It is not as slick as the expensive programs, but what do you 
want
  for free!
  
  Joe, N2UF






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] RC-96 EEPROM

2004-08-30 Thread Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ
Yes the controller boots fine and functions as it should...

Very strange the I see the 6264 blank as you do.


Maybe someone else will have some input on this?


Bryon K0BSJ

At 10:11 AM 8/30/2004, you wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:11:25 -0500, Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ wrote:

 I attempted to get the binary info out of my U30
 and found it was blank.

Seems I'm having the same problem here as well
Bryon. Does the controller boot normally with
that eeprom in place?

 I have verified that the eprom programmer works on all the other eproms I
 check this weekend

I'm starting to think that the 6264 is slightly
different from a standard 2864, but the 2864
works in it's place??

This was a private email to me, so I hope you
don't mind me sending it to the list Bryon.



Tedd Doda, VE3TJD

Lazer Audio and Electronics
Baden, Ontario, Canada






Yahoo! Groups Links











 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] RC-96 EEPROM

2004-08-30 Thread Rogers, Ron
Hey folks,

A 6264 is an 8K X 8 CMOS Static RAM..when you unplug it, it loses all data.
The 2864 is an 8K X 8 CMOS EEPROM...does not lose data when unplugged.

They are completely different

Ron Rogers
WW8RR 
(previously WB8ERB)


-Original Message-
From: Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 11:56 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] RC-96 EEPROM


Yes the controller boots fine and functions as it should...

Very strange the I see the 6264 blank as you do.


Maybe someone else will have some input on this?


Bryon K0BSJ

At 10:11 AM 8/30/2004, you wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:11:25 -0500, Bryon Jeffers K0BSJ wrote:

 I attempted to get the binary info out of my U30
 and found it was blank.

Seems I'm having the same problem here as well
Bryon. Does the controller boot normally with
that eeprom in place?

 I have verified that the eprom programmer works on all the other eproms I
 check this weekend

I'm starting to think that the 6264 is slightly
different from a standard 2864, but the 2864
works in it's place??

This was a private email to me, so I hope you
don't mind me sending it to the list Bryon.



Tedd Doda, VE3TJD

Lazer Audio and Electronics
Baden, Ontario, Canada






Yahoo! Groups Links











 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Attn: Cushman Monitor fans-user-supporters

2004-08-30 Thread Ted Bleiman K9MDM - MDM Radio



PLUGINS AVAILABLE
Found after Garage Sale ( you never know whats on these shelves...even we don't know.)

Plugin for Cush CE-3-4-5-6 $$ ea $$

1 Model 302 FM Deviation Meter $100
2 Model 304 25-50 mhz hisens 100
3 Model 305 145-175 mhz Hisens 100
1 Model 305B 145-175 mhz hisens100
buy 2 save $25 buy 3 save$40 
shipping included all tested working units
m/c anad visa accepted 708-681-0300






Ted Bleiman K9MDM
MDM Radio Ltd - 1629-B N. 31 st Ave Melrose Park, IL 60160 708.681.0300 fax 708.681.9800 web http://www.mdmradio.com - 
See our website for "SPECIAL DEALS"

		Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










RE: [Repeater-Builder] RE: RC-96 EEPROM

2004-08-30 Thread Rogers, Ron
Tedd:
I have not been following this thread so I have no idea of the whole story 
here. I was simply explaining the difference between the 6264 and the 2864.

But, many years ago someone made a low profile socket for the 6216 and 6264 
chips that had a built-in battery and blocking diode. To give your CMOS RAM 
chips battery backed capability, you simply plugged this special socket onto 
the existing socket on the PC board, then plugged in your CMOS RAM chips.
Could it be someone retrofitted this RC-96 with this mod ??

Ron Rogers
WW8RR


-Original Message-
From: Tedd Doda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 1:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] RE: RC-96 EEPROM


On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:38:08 -0400, Rogers, Ron wrote:

A 6264 is an 8K X 8 CMOS Static RAM..when you unplug it, it loses all data.
The 2864 is an 8K X 8 CMOS EEPROM...does not lose data when unplugged.

Hi Ron:

Well that would make sense! My only question arises
is how can the base data be loaded into the 6264
if it looses it's data when unplugged? As the RC-96
doesn't have any backup battery, how is the data saved?

Cross-posted to the ACC list.



Tedd Doda, VE3TJD

Lazer Audio and Electronics
Baden, Ontario, Canada





 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Mitrek element failure

2004-08-30 Thread n1iic Jason Greene
Hi, all. I have a mitrek that I have duplexed and for some reason it keeps
blowing RX elements. I compared it to others that I have here, and the
voltages on pins 2 and 3 are close, but not on. What are the tolerances of
the elements for the voltages, and has anyone else lost RX elements like
this?

Thanks

Jason







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] RE: RC-96 EEPROM

2004-08-30 Thread Tedd Doda
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:38:08 -0400, Rogers, Ron wrote:

A 6264 is an 8K X 8 CMOS Static RAM..when you unplug it, it loses all data.
The 2864 is an 8K X 8 CMOS EEPROM...does not lose data when unplugged.

Hi Ron:

Well that would make sense! My only question arises
is how can the base data be loaded into the 6264
if it looses it's data when unplugged? As the RC-96
doesn't have any backup battery, how is the data saved?

Cross-posted to the ACC list.



Tedd Doda, VE3TJD

Lazer Audio and Electronics
Baden, Ontario, Canada





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] r100 repeater question

2004-08-30 Thread texaswpd103
I have a copy of the manual coming that I will forward to you when I 
get it. I need your help on getting this thing programmed. I 
purchased the polaris #9 cable and I have the Mot. Field Programming 
software, but I keep getting an error that Device not ready when I 
try to read the data. Any ideas?

Thanks,

Ryan Holt





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] r100 question

2004-08-30 Thread texaswpd103
Sorry, the last post was mistakenly sent to the list. I realize it is 
too specific for general conversation. Won't happen again.

Ryan





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: motrac base station conversion to repeater

2004-08-30 Thread Neil McKie

  Someone correct me if I am wrong here - I haven't worked on a 
 Motrac repeater in a very long time - 

  Station Logic Module - the diode that connects to pin 3 (anode 
 connects to pin 3) is the Receiver Mute circuit - lifting one end 
 of that diode should leave the receiver unmuted during transmit.  

  Neil 


Matt wrote:
 
 Thanks for the info.  I have a spare Time Out Timer board too, in
 addition to a couple Squelch Gate cards, so I should have the cards
 I need for this.  Extra cooling is definetly part of the plan too.
 
 The only other thing is, do you have any suggestions on the easiest
 way to get the receiver to stay active while the transmitter is
 keyed?  Best place to make this mod? Any thoughts on that would be
 much appreciated.  (Especially since I don't have a service manual
 for the unit!)
 
 Thanks,
 
 Matt
 
 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, motarolla_doctor
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The part number, 25D84561A01, is the power transformer.
 
  Now, let's see how many Compa base and repeaters have Neil and I
  worked on over the years.
 
  Any way Neil still has the books and can determine which
 transformer
  that is. There is also some taps on the secondary to lower the B+
 for
  about 40 or 60 watts. Add a good fan on the PA heatsink and you
 should
  be ok.
 
  The 'Tone' decoder is in the receiver, the 'Tone Decoder' in the
 card
  cage is most likley the Tone Remote tone decoder.. you probally do
 not
  need it. Just need to add the Squelch Gate and Time Out Timmer
 boards.
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: dB compariisons

2004-08-30 Thread Bob Dengler
At 8/29/2004 12:07 PM, you wrote:

 Actually, the old standard was 6 db per S unit., but then there really
never has been a real standard for S units that anyone has followed.

Al,
K9SI

I was once told that Collins radio had standardized S9 to be 50 µV.  That 
would put S1 at 0.20 µV.

The S-meters on most of my VHF/UHF ham gear seem to hit max. indication 
around 10 µV.

Bob NO6B






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: dB compariisons

2004-08-30 Thread W9DHI
You are correct the standard is 50 µV for a S9 indication, and you are also
right most ham rigs are way, way, way off.  Except for those we build
ourselves.  My HF rig shows exactly S9 for 50 µV.  But that is the only
thing nowadays that could be considered standard.  The S meter is run off
the AGC circuit controlling the gain of the IF amp in most radios.  However
how that is created is different in all rigs and the variation from S9
either lower or higher will probably not be calibrated.

Gregg R. Lengling, W9DHI, Retired
Administrator http://www.milwaukeehdtv.org
K2/100 S#3075 KX1 S# 57
Member:  ARRL, RSGB, RCA, WERA and ORC
 


-Original Message-
From: Bob Dengler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 4:12 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: dB compariisons

At 8/29/2004 12:07 PM, you wrote:

 Actually, the old standard was 6 db per S unit., but then there really
never has been a real standard for S units that anyone has followed.

Al,
K9SI

I was once told that Collins radio had standardized S9 to be 50 µV.  That 
would put S1 at 0.20 µV.

The S-meters on most of my VHF/UHF ham gear seem to hit max. indication 
around 10 µV.

Bob NO6B






 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: dB compariisons

2004-08-30 Thread Neil McKie

  Bob, I have not run that test - but I can if you need more info 
 on the subject.  I have three HF radios and numerous VHF/UHF radios 
 here. 

  Neil - WA6KLA 

  BTW, found your picture yesterday ...  ;) 

  http://www.tasma.org/nl0407.pdf


Bob Dengler wrote:
 
 At 8/29/2004 12:07 PM, you wrote:
 
  Actually, the old standard was 6 db per S unit., but then there really
 never has been a real standard for S units that anyone has followed.
 
 Al,
 K9SI
 
 I was once told that Collins radio had standardized S9 to be 50 µV.  That
 would put S1 at 0.20 µV.
 
 The S-meters on most of my VHF/UHF ham gear seem to hit max. indication
 around 10 µV.
 
 Bob NO6B
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: dB compariisons

2004-08-30 Thread mch
That's so they 'receive better' than the competition. ;-

Joe M.

Bob Dengler wrote:
 
 The S-meters on most of my VHF/UHF ham gear seem to hit max.
 indication around 10 µV.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/