RE: [Repeater-Builder] Anyone have a Motorola house part number secret decoder ring?

2008-03-21 Thread Stu Benner
I am ignorant about the particular parts you are discussing. However,
caution should be used when dealing with ceramics such as this. They may be
Beryllium oxide which has excellent thermal conductivity and electrical
insulation properties, however, it is a carcinogen. A web search will reveal
lots of information on the material.
 
Regards,
Stu
W3STU.

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DCFluX
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 11:48
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Anyone have a Motorola house part number
secret decoder ring?



I had to grind the flange and ceramic of the 4062 with my dremmel to
make it fit the PCB in the FT-857D. Took me 3 PPL-6060s from my scrap
pile of Johnsons before I found another one with a working final
transistor. The first transistor I salvaged didn't have the ceramic
ground down enough so when I was tightening it down with a loud pop
the ceramic seperated from the copper flange. Pissed me off because it
was still a good transistor.

Had to rebuild the triplexer feeding it. I don't know what it is but I
have seen a rash of PCB spontanious combustion in Yaesu UHF radios.
This one was burning a hole under one of the chip inductors. I don't
know, maybe FR4 doesnt like UHF?

I also had to grab a tuning cap from the Johnson to fine match the
transistor on UHF.

Got it doing 15W on UHF and 40W on VHF. It works, just not as good as
the original, About a dB and a half down, but it's cheap so who cares?
I got 46W on VHF but started to have thermal fold back problems.


 



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Intermod software

2008-02-02 Thread Stu Benner
I suppose that could be done for a single unknown but more than one unknown
candidate frequency would result in unlimited combinations. I would find
useful a program that could handle broadband candidate signal sources. I've
used multiple narrowband sources spaced appropriately to do this in the
past. Very tedious approach. Time to start coding - in my *free* time!
 
Stu
W3STU

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Arck
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 13:05
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Intermod software



Every IM calculator I've seen only deals with those freqs entered 
into a list. All well and good when you're analyzing known factors 
but what if you're trying to nail down a mix/IM that is caused by an 
unknown third party (offsite) source?

Anyone know of such a program that will allow you to enter your 
site's freqs and give you *probable* other freqs that might cause a problem?

Ken
--
I am Shakespeare of Borg. Prepare to be or not to be



 



[Repeater-Builder] Desense Problem on 222 MHz Repeater

2008-01-25 Thread Stu Benner
Our group has substantial technical knowledge and experience, but we've been
just about beaten down by a problem with our repeater. A brief overview of
our situation follows.
 
We have a 222 MHz repeater comprised of a converted Micor mobile, Telewave
TPRD-2254 BpBr duplexer, AM-6155 PA modified for class C operation at 250W,
and a DB-264JJ antenna at 80 ft. fed by 1/2' Heliax on a commercial FM
broadcast tower . With the duplexer terminated into a load, we have about 1
dB degradation in sensitivity when transmitting. However, with the antenna
connected to the duplexer, we experience in excess 15 dB of desensitization.
We have eliminated other narrowband transmitters and analog TV transmitters
as contributing factors. We are left with a channel 12 digital TV
transmitter at an adjacent site as a key contributor to the problem. Our
hypothesis is that we have broadband IMD products from the mix of our
transmitter and the DTV transmitter that are appearing in and near our
receiver passband. Is it a rusty bolt problem or is there some other
non-linear component somewhere on the site or in our system that is the
mixing point - we don't know.
 
I'd be interested in beginning a dialog with anyone who might be able to
give us some further insight into this problem.
 
Regards,
Stu Benner
W3STU
Boonsboro, MD


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Desense Problem on 222 MHz Repeater

2008-01-25 Thread Stu Benner
Thanks to everyone for the replies so far. Please see comments embedded
below. I think that they address most of the comments, questions, and
recommendations posed by all to this point.
 

 

If you suspect IMD between the channel 12 DTV transmitter and your Tx
carrier, work on attenuating the DTV signal. Using cavity notch filters to
reject the entire 6 MHz of DTV isn't too practical, so instead, try adding
pass cavities on your Tx before the duplexer input.  That will help
determine if the IM is originating in your PA. An isolator *may* help, but
with channel 12 being the better part of 20 MHz away (about 10%), it may not
afford full protection -- isolators don't have infinite bandwidth.
Likewise, finding a 250 watt 220 MHz isolator may not be easy. I think I
have some 220 isolators that came off a combiner (Sinclair), but doubt
they're good for 250 watts judging by their size.


[Stu] Agree, notches don't work well for that plus we don't have handy any
cavities that will tune there. Have used up to two BP cavities in the TX
path along with a 2-stage isolator. No difference in desense is observed. 

If you suspect a rusty bolt mix, use an alternate antenna for testing. If
nothing else, try a quarter-wave whip (suitable for operation at your 250
watts TPO), even if it's just temporarily mounted on the tower (be sure it's
at a sufficient height to prevent desense due to close proximity to the
repeater itself).
[Stu] We're presently on split antennas. One is at about 80 ft., the other
is at about 15 ft. This improves the desense on the order of 6 dB. 

Another good possibility is IM in your receiver front end (or preamp, if
you're using one). Again, pass cavities are your friend here. Attenuate
the channel 12 signal as much as possible and see if it makes a difference.
Have you looked at what sigs are reaching your receiver input on a spectrum
analyzer? With 15 dB of desense, you should be able to see the culprit(s);
it's not like they're going to be buried in the noise if it's causing 15 dB
of desense.
[Stu] The desense is significant with or without a preamp. Worse with but I
can't find my notes to quote numbers. Used up to 2 BP cavities on RX with no
perceptable difference in desense. Have also installed a DCI 4-pole filter
on RX and TX with no effect. Have looked at the receiver input with a
spectrum analyzer. The most significant signal is the one FM broadcast
transmitter at the site. Running power down on it or turning it off has no
effect on the desense. Our TX signal at our RX input is consistent with our
measured duplexer isolation (about -88 dBc or -34 dBm). Within several
hundred kHz of the RX frequency there are no detectable narrowband signals. 

Even that 1 dB of desense would give me some agita. I'd verify that the
duplexers are properly tuned and the transmitter is clean before even
starting down any other paths related to the channel 12 issue. IIRC, the
Telewave cavities have adjustable coupling. If necessary, sacrifice a
little extra loss for additional rejection if necessary.
[Stu] I tuned the duplexer myself with a network analyzer and the
transmitter looks clean. I have coupling set where I get about 1 dB through
loss and the notches are at about 88 dB on TX and about 90 dB on RX. 

I also assume you're using all known-good interconnect cables (no foil+braid
or other cables not suitable for duplex operation).
[Stu] All cables are either Heliax or double braided. 

Are you using a Polyphaser or other type of surge arrestor? If so, try
bypassing it. I've seen gas discharge tube type surge arrestors become
noisemakers after absorbing a strike.
[Stu] Yes but there is no difference in desense when it is removed. 

Has the VSWR changed at all on your antenna? If so, it could indicate water
in a connector or the harness which will cause all kinds of grief, including
wideband noise.
[Stu] The problem has existed since the repeater was installed. It exists
whether we duplex on a DB264 at 80 feet or a G7-220 at 15 feet, both fed
with Heliax 

Finally, does the desense change appreciably if you vary transmitter power
output (it probably will). Do you any have desense when running on just
exciter power?
[Stu] The desense is roughly proportional to transmit power. Barely
perceptable at 20W (exciter only) with split antennas. A little worse at 20W
(exciter only) using one antenna. Have tried both tube-type and solid state
amplifiers at various power levels. 

--- Jeff WN3A