[Repeater-Builder] Re: Wouxun Radio
Terry, I wondered the same question about a year ago and discovered that they are type-accepted. Not that I would allow one on a system that I was in charge of for PS work. I looked on the FCC website and saw that they were... There is nothing saying that they can't be used on a HAM system though. Hope this helps, Phil KK6PE --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "terry dalpoas" wrote: > > This may be a dumb question, but I'll ask anyway. I saw some dual band > portables on eBay, new for about $100, made by Wouxun. I doubt very much > they are FCC type accepted. Is it okay to use these on amateur frequencies? > Thanks in advance. > > Terry, KM5UQ >
[Repeater-Builder] Re: Fw: FCC R&O Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
Dave, I was looking for it on the FCC website, and I saw nothing. Would be very interesting reading. I would also enjoy reading of the internal docs at ReconRobotics. Phil KK6PE --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, David Struebel wrote: > > Regarding the orginal R&O, does anyone have access to the comments that were > received by the FCC on this proposal? Did the ARRL comment on it? > > Dave WB2FTX
[Repeater-Builder] Re: Fw: FCC R&O Involving the Amateur 70cm Band
Laryn and others, Here is the link to the R&O #08-63 . Please notice the dates on this-it was in 2008... I do not think that the FCC should grant this at all, but we need to let our representatives know both at the ARRL, FCC and senators/congresscritters know that we find this encroachment unacceptable. Maybe they should take over UPS's claim on the 220 band... Phil KK6PE http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1077A1.txt --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "larynl2" wrote: > > Anyone have a real link to this? Those of us on the Web do not get > attachments... > > Laryn K8TVZ
