[Repeater-Builder] Wanted - MSR2000 UHF receivers

2009-04-06 Thread tedsims
I'm looking for a couple of MSR2000 UHF receivers, in the 450~470 MHz split 
(will be used at 440.750).

I might  also be interested in one (1) in the 470~512 split if the price is 
right, since I have a 450~470 MHz helical filter assembly from a hopelessly 
dead UHF receiver and I guess I can do a transplant.

Ted Sims
AI4LV
t...@tedsims.com



[Repeater-Builder] VHF Isolator wanted

2008-10-22 Thread tedsims
I'm looking for an isolator (or circulator) suitable for 147.18 MHz.

Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks.





[Repeater-Builder] MSR2000 wanted

2008-10-17 Thread tedsims
Looking for MSR2000 vhf repeater, preferably with continuous duty
amplifier suitable for 147.18.

Also interested in receiver and excited modules, both VHF and UHF, for
spares, and links. May be interested in other MSR2000 modules, parts,
cabinet hardware. etc.

Of course I'm looking for manuals!

Please reply offline directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks!





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Recommended commercial radios that use SMT technology - to convert to 2m rpt

2008-10-14 Thread tedsims
I wasn't clear about that...the motivation for rebuilding it is that
most of the equipment at the voting sites is gone. Just one rcv
cavity, and the antenna system at one site remain. I don't even know
what was installed there. Also, only one of these sites is still
available. I think we'll run 3 voting sites in the end, so we're
looking for two more. That's what I've got to work with.

At the main site, the current setup is a Mitrek receiver, a heavily
modified Kenwood TK-930 transmitter that can put out around 13W
continuous, driving an amp (can't remember what) with a single
MRF-174. It puts out about 85W into the duplexer. The TK-930 is brain
dead, so temporarily, I have put in a CDM-750 running 25W without the amp.

There's a box with 3 MSTR-II UHF receivers that used to listen to
voting sites connected to an LDG RVS-8. Each receiver is connected to
it's own beam antenna. These look OK.

That's what I've got to work with.






--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 tedsims wrote:
 
  I'm hoping that I can identify equipment that seems more familiar to
  me on the inside (PLL synthesis, SCF audio processing, LDMOS, surface
  mount). I know the MASTR II, Mitrek, etc. are very fine radios, but
  the inside of one of these looks completely alien to me. Any
suggestions?
 
 What's broken/breaking in the system today?  (In other words, what's
the 
 motivation to re-build it?)
 
 What's the budget like?  A modern voted system like that with all 
 new(er) rigs could get real expensive, real fast.
 
 Here's how it probably goes...
 
 The older stuff (like the Micor and MASTR II) are at least considered 
 modern up through the 1980's.  (They were still available new from
the 
 manufacturer close to 20 years after they first hit the market, which 
 says a whole lot for their design-quality and ability to work
seemingly 
 forever.  A lot of clubs/groups are still running them without any
more 
 than a quick trip to check sensitivity and PA output power, etc... once 
 a year.  If even that.
 
 The used market is flooded with this year right now, but won't be
forever.
 
 One of the positives of some of this older gear is that the complete 
 board assemblies on SOME of these models, are directly from the mobile 
 rigs.  The mobiles are so old now, they're getting to where they're
very 
 inexpensive in BULK if you find an auction, or similar... and you are 
 willing to swap boards and see what's working and what's not.  You can 
 build a mighty spares pile of known working receivers, exciters, 
 etc... for the older repeaters from mobile boards.  (I'm a MASTR II 
 fan, the Motos I hear this is harder... Moto didn't make their stuff 
 as interchangeable.  I don't know.  Your mileage may vary.)
 
 In the mid-80's gear like you're describing with more modern 
 components arrived.  But it was done on the cheap as far as actual 
 RF-design goes, with many of the rigs made overseas and of questionable 
 build quality.  The front-ends are quite a bit broader, even though it 
 added sensitivity... etc.  For links and receivers at high sites, this 
 is often backward of what you're trying to accomplish... and you end up 
 putting a lot of out-board filtering on the pile of receivers at the 
 voter site... to keep the out of band stuff nearby from bothering them.
 
 Systems like the MSR-2000, later the MSF-5000 from Motorola and the 
 MASTR III from GE/MA-Com came out as replacements for the gear
sold in 
 the early 80's.
 
 The MASTR III is still current product at MA/Com, the MSF-5000 as
far as 
 I know is.  They're still built like real repeaters... and anytime
you 
 have the space in the rack and the money to pay for them, they're well 
 worth it.  But they (especially NEW) are NOT cheap.
 
 For a ham radio voted-system, the sheer number of TX/RX pairs you need 
 means you probably can't afford a rack full of nice solid commercial 
 gear like that.  Size, power consumption, amount of space needed in the 
 racks... etc... would be too great.  So the pile of mobiles on a
shelf 
 thing is often done instead.
 
 Options would be things like others have already mentioned...
commercial 
 mobiles from the mid-80's like the GM-300/Radius series from Moto, 
 etc... that have the appropriate connectors on the back (16-pin) to
give 
 you the right connections needed to deal with voting systems... etc.
 
 For the TX part... running some of those rigs in their 10W varieties 
 works, but it's still  just a mobile rig.  Try to keep them cool. 
 (Which probably means adding fans to your PA heatsinks.)
 
 Basically, if you go this route, you're trading quality for quantity,it 
 works... but make sure you're planning to have spares sitting around, 
 pre-programmed, ready to go when you blow up a link radio in that 
 environment.   Since mobiles are generally cheap.
 
 Other interesting possibilities include using Kenwood TKR-series 
 repeaters as the links... (expensive, but nice...), etc

[Repeater-Builder] Recommended commercial radios that use SMT technology - to convert to 2m rpt

2008-10-11 Thread tedsims
I've been asked to help out in the replacement of an elaborate 2m
repeater system that has fallen into disrepair. At one time, there
were up to four remote receiver sites, with UHF links to a main site
with voting equipment. 

The duplexer, controller, voter box(RVS-8), an external PA, the
antenna system at the main site are to remain, but all the radio
equipment aside from a PA is to be replaced, including the links
radios, which are on frequencies around 441MHz.

I've worked with surface mount almost exclusively since I started work
in 1989, and would like to avoid equipment with a majority of
thru-hole parts if possible. The other person likely to be modifying
and interfacing radios also feels at home with surface mount.

So,I looking for suggestions - proven, reliable commercial radios that
might make good candidates for conversion to repeater hardware,
specifically - 

* Receivers, and transmitters for UHF links (1~2W would do)

* Receiver and transmitter for main site. We need about 12W to drive
an external PA. (Thinking about running a mobile transmitter at much
reduced power, with mods to improve efficiency at lower power).

I'm hoping that I can identify equipment that seems more familiar to
me on the inside (PLL synthesis, SCF audio processing, LDMOS, surface
mount). I know the MASTR II, Mitrek, etc. are very fine radios, but
the inside of one of these looks completely alien to me. Any suggestions?









[Repeater-Builder] Re: Recommended commercial radios that use SMT technology - to convert to 2m rpt

2008-10-11 Thread tedsims
The lack of helical filters in the front end is a concern, to be sure.

How about GE Delta and Phoenix? I thought I spotted helical filters in
some pictures online. These looks like more recent radios. Anyone
using them?

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, rtc_0001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The older foreign looking radios have several stages of helical 
 tuning in the front end  mixers. Much better selectivity than the 
 newer sm track tuned front ends.
 
 You could, of course, buy a filter for this but why? since the older 
 units come with a good one.
 
 Interfacing with the the older units is not much different than the 
 newer sm types except perhaps the newer ones have dedicated acc ports.
 
 As far as driving an amplifier goes, you can still do that with the 
 older, higher powered boxes by interfacing with earlier stages in the 
 pa's. If you do it right, you can retain the swr protection  power 
 output monitoring/leveling of the original radio while using the 
 external pa. 
 
 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Cort Buffington cort@ 
 wrote:
 
  I may sound a bit like a broken record here, but I really like  
  Motorola GM300s and R1225s for these jobs. Particularly the 10W  
  versions of both. Heat stays under control with a 10W radio much  
  better than the higher powered ones (even turned down).