[Repeater-Builder] Re: 147.435 Repeater in Simplex Channels Contrary to Part

2007-10-14 Thread Howard Klino
Not too long ago there was a posting that there was a repeater on the so called 
simplex freqs on 146 and 147.  I posted an answer that they were legal as 
stated by the ARRL in the Repeater Directory.  For those that think part 97 
says different should read what the ARRL says.  I don't think the ARRL would 
publish false info about the freqs.

The Repeater Directory makes no distinction as to what areas are allowed to use 
these freqs for repeaters.  Read the section in the book under Band Plans and 
then go to the freq plan for 2 meters.  Be sure to read the foot notes  Ant 
area can use these freqs for repeaters.

Howard  K2IMO

[Repeater-Builder] Re: 147.435 Repeater in Simplex Channels Contrary to Part

2007-10-14 Thread Laryn Lohman
OOooops there Bruce-- don't get too dyslexic on us.  147.3-4-5 is a
different frequency than 147.4-3-5...  

Laryn K8TVZ

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 The 4 coordinated  NARCC repeaters on the 147.945/345  pair in Northern 
 California will be very upset to learn that after decades of 
operation on this 
 pair, that their operation is illegal and should be shut down. 
 I think I'll pass on telling them that. 
  
 Bruce K7IJ