Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GMRS repeater wanted or parts to build one

2010-05-22 Thread Brian Raker
Brian,

I will contact you off list re: a repeater I have that would fit your bill
perfectly.

-Brian



On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Brian ke7...@sbcglobal.net wrote:



 Yes, I do, but I need one in a different location.  There are allot of hiss
 around here.


 - Original Message -
 *From:* kc7stw kc7...@yahoo.com
 *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 *Sent:* Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:13 AM
 *Subject:* [Repeater-Builder] Re: GMRS repeater wanted or parts to build
 one



 You do know there is one on the air now right!

 Contact off list...

 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, ke7wrc ke7...@... wrote:
 
  Hi, I am new to this group. I was wondering if anyone had a working used
 repeater for sale that I could use for GMRS or help in finding parts etc. to
 build my own. I would need everything including the cabinet, radio(s),
 controller, duplexer, antenna(s), and maybe even power supply. I would
 probably need to purchase liability insurance also, so any help with
 insurance providers, policy limits and customary insurance premiums would be
 of help as well. I live in the Reno/Sparks, Nevada area. Thank you for your
 time and help!
 
  Brian Becker
  KE7WRC
  WQDX970
 



 


[Repeater-Builder] Re: GMRS repeater wanted or parts to build one

2010-05-20 Thread kc7stw
You do know there is one on the air now right!

Contact off list...

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, ke7wrc ke7...@... wrote:

 Hi, I am new to this group.  I was wondering if anyone had a working used 
 repeater for sale that I could use for GMRS or help in finding parts etc. to 
 build my own.  I would need everything including the cabinet, radio(s), 
 controller, duplexer, antenna(s), and maybe even power supply.  I would 
 probably need to purchase liability insurance also, so any help with 
 insurance providers, policy limits and customary insurance premiums would be 
 of help as well.  I live in the Reno/Sparks, Nevada area.  Thank you for your 
 time and help!
 
 Brian Becker
 KE7WRC
 WQDX970





[Repeater-Builder] Re: GMRS repeater wanted or parts to build one

2010-05-20 Thread iuzpetnrdx2000
I sent you a direct email.

Steve. 

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, ke7wrc ke7...@... wrote:

 Hi, I am new to this group.  I was wondering if anyone had a working used 
 repeater for sale that I could use for GMRS or help in finding parts etc. to 
 build my own.  I would need everything including the cabinet, radio(s), 
 controller, duplexer, antenna(s), and maybe even power supply.  I would 
 probably need to purchase liability insurance also, so any help with 
 insurance providers, policy limits and customary insurance premiums would be 
 of help as well.  I live in the Reno/Sparks, Nevada area.  Thank you for your 
 time and help!
 
 Brian Becker
 KE7WRC
 WQDX970





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GMRS repeater wanted or parts to build one

2010-05-20 Thread Brian
Yes, I do, but I need one in a different location.  There are allot of hiss 
around here.

  - Original Message - 
  From: kc7stw 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 3:13 AM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: GMRS repeater wanted or parts to build one



  You do know there is one on the air now right!

  Contact off list...

  --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, ke7wrc ke7...@... wrote:
  
   Hi, I am new to this group. I was wondering if anyone had a working used 
repeater for sale that I could use for GMRS or help in finding parts etc. to 
build my own. I would need everything including the cabinet, radio(s), 
controller, duplexer, antenna(s), and maybe even power supply. I would probably 
need to purchase liability insurance also, so any help with insurance 
providers, policy limits and customary insurance premiums would be of help as 
well. I live in the Reno/Sparks, Nevada area. Thank you for your time and help!
   
   Brian Becker
   KE7WRC
   WQDX970
  



  

[Repeater-Builder] Re: GMRS Repeater Project Progress

2009-11-27 Thread kc8gpd
I now have a Pass/Reject Duplexer Coming To me for my GMRS Project.

A nice guy from the forums here is swapping one to me for my LPB 8ch mono 
broadcast board.

but due to the fact i may be moving to alabama soon, it will be official on 
dec. 1st. the repeater obviously will not be in the hunterdon county area now.

I will be going to City of Tuscaloosa in alabama so i will be searching for a 
free host in that area.

Guess having a Pass/Reject Duplexer will now allow me to colo the repeater on a 
tower site.





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-25 Thread n6lrv
I was describing the many bandwidth options offered in many new PC programmable 
commercial two-way radios today.
Maybe we're looking at two different things but I see GMRS channels as 12.5Khz 
apart from each other. Channel one for example is 462.5500 where channel two is 
462.5625.
Gary
 wd8chl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Paul, the underlying and unexpected contridiction here was not
  between 15Khz vs. 20Khz channel spacing but instead between 20Khz and
  25Khz channels more commonly found on UHF which as you know is where
  GMRS resides. Historically there's more than enough guard between
  channels to compensate for slight overdeviation or slight drift off
  channel but now everybody wants to tighten things up so new gear is
  coming stock with 4Khz max dev associated with 20Khz channels vs.
  5Khz dev which we've all enjoyed for years on 25/30Khz channels.
  Seems a bit odd of them to expect no interference problems from
  +/-5Khz peak dev on a 20Khz max channel but it is better for us users
  to have the option I suppose. Gary
 
 
 Huh? GMRS channels are still spaced 25 KHz apart. If someone is making 
 radios with 20KHz spacing, they are illegal-in the US...
 
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-25 Thread Milt
The GMRS full power channels are 462.550, 462.575, 462.600, 462.625, 
462.650, 462.675, 462.700, 462.725.  Deviation is +\- 5KHz.  Power output 50 
watts + antenna gain, if any.

 The interstitle channels like 462.5625 are used by the FRS 
kiddie-talkies.  500mW power, +\- 2.5KHz deviation, no external antennas.

Whoever thought that arrangement up had no comprehension of how a radio 
works.

If I were going to try to use GMRS today with the prolifiration of 
kiddie-talkies out there I would limit my receive radio bandwidth to the 
12.5K setting to cut down on the adjacent channel junk, but that means that 
any radio normally set for GMRS at 25KHz bandwidth will sound crappy.

Thank the FCC and the radio manufacturers for killing off a good service.

Milt
N3LTQ


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater


I was describing the many bandwidth options offered in many new PC 
programmable commercial two-way radios today.
 Maybe we're looking at two different things but I see GMRS channels as 
 12.5Khz apart from each other. Channel one for example is 462.5500 where 
 channel two is 462.5625.
 Gary
  wd8chl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Paul, the underlying and unexpected contridiction here was not
  between 15Khz vs. 20Khz channel spacing but instead between 20Khz and
  25Khz channels more commonly found on UHF which as you know is where
  GMRS resides. Historically there's more than enough guard between
  channels to compensate for slight overdeviation or slight drift off
  channel but now everybody wants to tighten things up so new gear is
  coming stock with 4Khz max dev associated with 20Khz channels vs.
  5Khz dev which we've all enjoyed for years on 25/30Khz channels.
  Seems a bit odd of them to expect no interference problems from
  +/-5Khz peak dev on a 20Khz max channel but it is better for us users
  to have the option I suppose. Gary


 Huh? GMRS channels are still spaced 25 KHz apart. If someone is making
 radios with 20KHz spacing, they are illegal-in the US...





 Yahoo! Groups Links









 Yahoo! Groups Links






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-24 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ
At 10:53 AM 01/23/08, you wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, George Henry wrote:
  There is a fairly easy crystal filter swap kit available for the
  Mitreks from Communications Specialists for $25.00.  And .0002%
  channel elements are also available (KXN1112A for RX, KXN1095A for TX
  - you really only need to meet the TX stability...)

Anyone got a source for the above? I have an MSR2000 that's in an
unconditioned space I need a transmit and recieve element for.

If all you want is a transmit element do a search on ebay with:
(knx-1095*,kxn1095*)

The parentheses and the comma set up an OR condition, the
asterisk allows a 1095, 1095A, 1095B, etc to be found, and
because the first one has a - in it you need to have it in quotes
(normally the - is used as an exception... if you were to type
in this:
coat wool -brown
you would show all wool coats except the brown ones.

If you want both transmit and receive elements use this:
(knx-1095*,kxn1095*, knx-1112*,kxn1112*)

Mike WA6ILQ



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-24 Thread wd8chl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 We? Who else are speaking for? I've submitted this question to the FCC for 
 clarification. We'll see what they say if they actually get back to me (they 
 usually don't).
 Gary


uh-'We' as users/radio people.



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-24 Thread wd8chl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Good idea Richard especially since Mitreks are wideband radios so making them 
 meet the narrower GMRS specs is probably a monumental task. I wonder if a 
 Mitrek can even meet the required frequency tolerance.
 Gary

You're not talking about the Part 90 narrowbanding? Part 95 (GMRS) does 
not have to narrowband. The 12.5 tertiaries are NB, but the normal 
channels can stay as they are.



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-24 Thread lists455
Gary,

A mobile relay station is defined as a device that relays mobile
traffic (i.e., a repeater). A fixed station is simply a base station,
at a fixed location, manually controlled by an operator. This is
standard across FCC controlled communications and is not GMRS
specific.

LMR repeaters are commonly licensed with a station class of FB2, which
the FCC designates as mobile relay. A fixed base station would be
classified as FB under an FCC license. When a system will have a fixed
base operating through a repeater you'll have both FB and FB2 on the
license.

Hopefully that clears it up.


On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:08:20 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

We? Who else are speaking for? I've submitted this question to the FCC for 
clarification. We'll see what they say if they actually get back to me (they 
usually don't).
Gary
 wd8chl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Gary wrote:
  CFR title 47 is available on the FCC's website for all to view. 95.135(a)
  reads  No station may transmit with more than 50 watts output power.
  Subpart (d) reads  A fixed station must transmit with no more than 15
  watts output power. 95.25 further defines land stations. My suggestion
  to the anonymous member is to read the rules and contact the FCC for any
  needed clarification as they have the final word.
  Gary
 
 fixed station refers to what we would call 'control stations'.
 Repeaters and base stations can run 50W.


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-24 Thread n6lrv
I wrote NARROWER GMRS SPECS. I did not write narrowband. After more study I see 
some possible contridictions in the rules as currently written for example, 
F3E/G3E GMRS emissions (probably the most common) are limited to 20Khz 
bandwidth but at the same time those emission types are also limited to +/-5Khz 
peak dev. I suspect the FCC doesn't really give a damn these days especially 
with rebanding, auctions, and now a congressional investigation on their 
doorstep.
Gary

 wd8chl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Good idea Richard especially since Mitreks are wideband radios so making 
  them meet the narrower GMRS specs is probably a monumental task. I wonder 
  if a Mitrek can even meet the required frequency tolerance.
  Gary
 
 You're not talking about the Part 90 narrowbanding? Part 95 (GMRS) does 
 not have to narrowband. The 12.5 tertiaries are NB, but the normal 
 channels can stay as they are.
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-24 Thread Paul Plack
Gary, 5 kHz deviation with a 3 kHz audio cutoff creates a signal at least 13
kHz wide, counting only the first set of sidebands. That's why many states
went from 15 kHz to a 20 kHz channel bandplan on 2m a few years ago. There's
nothing inconsistent in the FCC imposing both limits.
 
73,
Paul, AE4KR

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 1:33 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater



I wrote NARROWER GMRS SPECS. I did not write narrowband. After more study I
see some possible contridictions in the rules as currently written for
example, F3E/G3E GMRS emissions (probably the most common) are limited to
20Khz bandwidth but at the same time those emission types are also limited
to +/-5Khz peak dev. I suspect the FCC doesn't really give a damn these days
especially with rebanding, auctions, and now a congressional investigation
on their doorstep.
Gary

 wd8chl [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:wd8chl%40gmail.com com wrote: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:n6lrv%40cox.net  wrote:
  Good idea Richard especially since Mitreks are wideband radios so making
them meet the narrower GMRS specs is probably a monumental task. I wonder if
a Mitrek can even meet the required frequency tolerance.
  Gary
 
 You're not talking about the Part 90 narrowbanding? Part 95 (GMRS) does 
 not have to narrowband. The 12.5 tertiaries are NB, but the normal 
 channels can stay as they are.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 



 


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-24 Thread n6lrv
Thanks for that background info. I suppose that's one way to look at it but in 
my experience a mobile relay station now carries a different definition from 
the FCC as shown in Part 90.7 for example. They also define a fixed relay 
station so while at one time the term 'mobile relay station' may have passed as 
any repeater I wonder if they take a different position today. Gary
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Gary,
 
 A mobile relay station is defined as a device that relays mobile
 traffic (i.e., a repeater). A fixed station is simply a base station,
 at a fixed location, manually controlled by an operator. This is
 standard across FCC controlled communications and is not GMRS
 specific.
 
 LMR repeaters are commonly licensed with a station class of FB2, which
 the FCC designates as mobile relay. A fixed base station would be
 classified as FB under an FCC license. When a system will have a fixed
 base operating through a repeater you'll have both FB and FB2 on the
 license.
 
 Hopefully that clears it up.
 
 
 On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:08:20 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 We? Who else are speaking for? I've submitted this question to the FCC for 
 clarification. We'll see what they say if they actually get back to me (they 
 usually don't).
 Gary
  wd8chl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
  Gary wrote:
   CFR title 47 is available on the FCC's website for all to view. 95.135(a)
   reads  No station may transmit with more than 50 watts output power.
   Subpart (d) reads  A fixed station must transmit with no more than 15
   watts output power. 95.25 further defines land stations. My suggestion
   to the anonymous member is to read the rules and contact the FCC for any
   needed clarification as they have the final word.
   Gary
  
  fixed station refers to what we would call 'control stations'.
  Repeaters and base stations can run 50W.
 
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-24 Thread n6lrv
Paul,
the underlying and unexpected contridiction here was not between 15Khz vs. 
20Khz channel spacing but instead between 20Khz and 25Khz channels more 
commonly found on UHF which as you know is where GMRS resides. Historically 
there's more than enough guard between channels to compensate for slight 
overdeviation or slight drift off channel but now everybody wants to tighten 
things up so new gear is coming stock with 4Khz max dev associated with 20Khz 
channels vs. 5Khz dev which we've all enjoyed for years on 25/30Khz channels. 
Seems a bit odd of them to expect no interference problems from +/-5Khz peak 
dev on a 20Khz max channel but it is better for us users to have the option I 
suppose.
Gary
 Paul Plack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Gary, 5 kHz deviation with a 3 kHz audio cutoff creates a signal at least 13
 kHz wide, counting only the first set of sidebands. That's why many states
 went from 15 kHz to a 20 kHz channel bandplan on 2m a few years ago. There's
 nothing inconsistent in the FCC imposing both limits.
  
 73,
 Paul, AE4KR
 
   _  
 
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 1:33 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater
 
 
 
 I wrote NARROWER GMRS SPECS. I did not write narrowband. After more study I
 see some possible contridictions in the rules as currently written for
 example, F3E/G3E GMRS emissions (probably the most common) are limited to
 20Khz bandwidth but at the same time those emission types are also limited
 to +/-5Khz peak dev. I suspect the FCC doesn't really give a damn these days
 especially with rebanding, auctions, and now a congressional investigation
 on their doorstep.
 Gary
 
  wd8chl [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:wd8chl%40gmail.com com wrote: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:n6lrv%40cox.net  wrote:
   Good idea Richard especially since Mitreks are wideband radios so making
 them meet the narrower GMRS specs is probably a monumental task. I wonder if
 a Mitrek can even meet the required frequency tolerance.
   Gary
  
  You're not talking about the Part 90 narrowbanding? Part 95 (GMRS) does 
  not have to narrowband. The 12.5 tertiaries are NB, but the normal 
  channels can stay as they are.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
 
 
 
  



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-24 Thread Robert Koblish
Note also that a 0.005% frequency tolerance is 3 times as big at 450 MHz as
it is at 150, hence the wider channel spacing that has been used on UHF in
the past.

-Bob N3HAT

On Jan 24, 2008 5:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Paul,
 the underlying and unexpected contridiction here was not between 15Khz vs.
 20Khz channel spacing but instead between 20Khz and 25Khz channels more
 commonly found on UHF which as you know is where GMRS resides. Historically
 there's more than enough guard between channels to compensate for slight
 overdeviation or slight drift off channel but now everybody wants to tighten
 things up so new gear is coming stock with 4Khz max dev associated with
 20Khz channels vs. 5Khz dev which we've all enjoyed for years on 25/30Khz
 channels. Seems a bit odd of them to expect no interference problems from
 +/-5Khz peak dev on a 20Khz max channel but it is better for us users to
 have the option I suppose.
 Gary
  Paul Plack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Gary, 5 kHz deviation with a 3 kHz audio cutoff creates a signal at
 least 13
  kHz wide, counting only the first set of sidebands. That's why many
 states
  went from 15 kHz to a 20 kHz channel bandplan on 2m a few years ago.
 There's
  nothing inconsistent in the FCC imposing both limits.
 
  73,
  Paul, AE4KR
 
_
 
  From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 1:33 PM
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater
 
 
 
  I wrote NARROWER GMRS SPECS. I did not write narrowband. After more
 study I
  see some possible contridictions in the rules as currently written for
  example, F3E/G3E GMRS emissions (probably the most common) are limited
 to
  20Khz bandwidth but at the same time those emission types are also
 limited
  to +/-5Khz peak dev. I suspect the FCC doesn't really give a damn these
 days
  especially with rebanding, auctions, and now a congressional
 investigation
  on their doorstep.
  Gary
 
   wd8chl [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:wd8chl%40gmail.com com wrote:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:n6lrv%40cox.net  wrote:
Good idea Richard especially since Mitreks are wideband radios so
 making
  them meet the narrower GMRS specs is probably a monumental task. I
 wonder if
  a Mitrek can even meet the required frequency tolerance.
Gary
  
   You're not talking about the Part 90 narrowbanding? Part 95 (GMRS)
 does
   not have to narrowband. The 12.5 tertiaries are NB, but the normal
   channels can stay as they are.
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
 
 
 
 






 Yahoo! Groups Links






RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-24 Thread n6lrv
I should clarify that I was referring to new commercial gear coming stock with 
4Khz dev on 20Khz channels as one of the selectable bandwidths per channel. So 
far as I know most new VHF/UHF amateur gear these days is user selectable as 
either wideband or narrowband. I'm working more today with the newer Moto stuff 
(Astro, Pro, and Mototrbo) and don't keep up on the amateur gear as much I used 
to.
Gary
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Paul,
 the underlying and unexpected contridiction here was not between 15Khz vs. 
 20Khz channel spacing but instead between 20Khz and 25Khz channels more 
 commonly found on UHF which as you know is where GMRS resides. Historically 
 there's more than enough guard between channels to compensate for slight 
 overdeviation or slight drift off channel but now everybody wants to tighten 
 things up so new gear is coming stock with 4Khz max dev associated with 20Khz 
 channels vs. 5Khz dev which we've all enjoyed for years on 25/30Khz channels. 
 Seems a bit odd of them to expect no interference problems from +/-5Khz peak 
 dev on a 20Khz max channel but it is better for us users to have the option I 
 suppose.
 Gary


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-24 Thread wd8chl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I should clarify that I was referring to new commercial gear coming
 stock with 4Khz dev on 20Khz channels as one of the selectable
 bandwidths per channel. 

Educated guess-that's probably for the 800MHz NPSPAC channels. They are 
slightly narrower assignments, with +/-4KHz dev total.

I think they are 11K3 instead of 12K5 emission...?




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-24 Thread wd8chl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Paul, the underlying and unexpected contridiction here was not
 between 15Khz vs. 20Khz channel spacing but instead between 20Khz and
 25Khz channels more commonly found on UHF which as you know is where
 GMRS resides. Historically there's more than enough guard between
 channels to compensate for slight overdeviation or slight drift off
 channel but now everybody wants to tighten things up so new gear is
 coming stock with 4Khz max dev associated with 20Khz channels vs.
 5Khz dev which we've all enjoyed for years on 25/30Khz channels.
 Seems a bit odd of them to expect no interference problems from
 +/-5Khz peak dev on a 20Khz max channel but it is better for us users
 to have the option I suppose. Gary


Huh? GMRS channels are still spaced 25 KHz apart. If someone is making 
radios with 20KHz spacing, they are illegal-in the US...


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-23 Thread Richard Bessey
Hello,
I just wanted to add my 2 cents here.
I have been working the last ... 2 years on building a GMRS repeater out 
of two Motorola Mitrek's and a single M controller.
If I had one word of advice, buy a commercial one! Save yourself alot of 
frustration and money on the tools needed to build it.
These have been looking real good to me recently:
http://www.gmrsoutlet.com/home.php?cat=1

Regards,

Richard Bessey

wd8chl wrote:

 Gary wrote:
  CFR title 47 is available on the FCC's website for all to view. 
 95.135(a)
  reads  No station may transmit with more than 50 watts output power.
  Subpart (d) reads  A fixed station must transmit with no more than 15
  watts output power. 95.25 further defines land stations. My suggestion
  to the anonymous member is to read the rules and contact the FCC for any
  needed clarification as they have the final word.
  Gary

 fixed station refers to what we would call 'control stations'.
 Repeaters and base stations can run 50W.

  



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-23 Thread n6lrv
Where exactly do you find this in Part 95?
Gary
 Tom Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 A repeater is a mobile relay station, not a fixed station as defined in 
 the rules.  50 watts is the limit.
 
 thp



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-23 Thread n6lrv
We? Who else are speaking for? I've submitted this question to the FCC for 
clarification. We'll see what they say if they actually get back to me (they 
usually don't).
Gary
 wd8chl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Gary wrote:
  CFR title 47 is available on the FCC's website for all to view. 95.135(a)
  reads  No station may transmit with more than 50 watts output power.
  Subpart (d) reads  A fixed station must transmit with no more than 15
  watts output power. 95.25 further defines land stations. My suggestion
  to the anonymous member is to read the rules and contact the FCC for any
  needed clarification as they have the final word.
  Gary
 
 fixed station refers to what we would call 'control stations'.
 Repeaters and base stations can run 50W.
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-23 Thread n6lrv
Good idea Richard especially since Mitreks are wideband radios so making them 
meet the narrower GMRS specs is probably a monumental task. I wonder if a 
Mitrek can even meet the required frequency tolerance.
Gary

 Richard Bessey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Hello,
 I just wanted to add my 2 cents here.
 I have been working the last ... 2 years on building a GMRS repeater out 
 of two Motorola Mitrek's and a single M controller.
 If I had one word of advice, buy a commercial one! Save yourself alot of 
 frustration and money on the tools needed to build it.
 These have been looking real good to me recently:
 http://www.gmrsoutlet.com/home.php?cat=1
 
 Regards,
 
 Richard Bessey
 
 wd8chl wrote:
 
  Gary wrote:
   CFR title 47 is available on the FCC's website for all to view. 
  95.135(a)
   reads  No station may transmit with more than 50 watts output power.
   Subpart (d) reads  A fixed station must transmit with no more than 15
   watts output power. 95.25 further defines land stations. My suggestion
   to the anonymous member is to read the rules and contact the FCC for any
   needed clarification as they have the final word.
   Gary
 
  fixed station refers to what we would call 'control stations'.
  Repeaters and base stations can run 50W.
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-23 Thread George Henry
There is a fairly easy crystal filter swap kit available for the Mitreks from 
Communications Specialists for $25.00.  And .0002% channel elements are also 
available (KXN1112A for RX, KXN1095A for TX - you really only need to meet the 
TX stability...)

George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jan 23, 2008 9:16 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

Good idea Richard especially since Mitreks are wideband radios so making them 
meet the narrower GMRS specs is probably a monumental task. I wonder if a 
Mitrek can even meet the required frequency tolerance.
Gary





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-23 Thread George Henry
There is a fairly easy crystal filter swap kit available for the Mitreks from 
Communications Specialists for $25.00.  And .0002% channel elements are also 
available (KXN1112A for RX, KXN1095A for TX - you really only need to meet the 
TX stability...)

George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jan 23, 2008 9:16 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

Good idea Richard especially since Mitreks are wideband radios so making them 
meet the narrower GMRS specs is probably a monumental task. I wonder if a 
Mitrek can even meet the required frequency tolerance.
Gary





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-23 Thread Kris Kirby
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, George Henry wrote:
 There is a fairly easy crystal filter swap kit available for the 
 Mitreks from Communications Specialists for $25.00.  And .0002% 
 channel elements are also available (KXN1112A for RX, KXN1095A for TX 
 - you really only need to meet the TX stability...)

Anyone got a source for the above? I have an MSR2000 that's in an 
unconditioned space I need a transmit and recieve element for.

--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But remember, with no superpowers comes no responsibility. 
--rly


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-23 Thread rb_n3dab
Thank you Tom.
--
Doug   
N3DAB/WPRX486/WPJL709

 Tom Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

=
A repeater is a mobile relay station, not a fixed station as defined in 
the rules.  50 watts is the limit.

thp

Gary wrote:

 CFR title 47 is available on the FCC's website for all to view. 95.135(a)
 reads  No station may transmit with more than 50 watts output power.
 Subpart (d) reads  A fixed station must transmit with no more than 15
 watts output power. 95.25 further defines land stations. My suggestion
 to the anonymous member is to read the rules and contact the FCC for any
 needed clarification as they have the final word.
 Gary

 n3dab wrote:

  This in response to shady1070's original question and Gary's reponse.
 
  Unless I've been misinformed for the past 30+ years the maximum
  autorized output power for GMRS is 50 watts from the Xmtr.(Base,
  Mobile and Repeater). There are power limitations on the
  interstitial freqs. but Repeaters are only permitted on the 8
  designated pair $62/467.550 thu .725 in 25 KHz steps. Re: the
  original question about the rptr./controller set up I would suggest
  the Kenwood TKR-850 which has everything in one package Contoller,
  CWid, ctcss/dcs, computer programable, etc. and the Kenwood can be
  reprogammed down to the 440 band. GMRS rptrs. are not REQUIRED to
  ID, the GMRS user is, however if the all users operate under a single
  authorization/call sign CWid is allowed. Also, running a beacon type
  messages, voice or CWID, may be construed as non-directed traffic
  (broadcasting) by the FCC. There are many problems aaociated with
  building and installing a repeater including site
  location/acquisition, types of antennas, feed line, and duplexers to
  name a few. I believe you have a pretty good learning curve ahead of
  you. Wher are you located Shady?
 
  Doug N3DAB / WPRX486 / WPJL709
 
  --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   well, first off, assuming your repeater is land based and qualifies
  as a
   fixed station (they usually do) then your output power is limited
  to 15
   watts output, CFR Title 47 Part 95.135(d).
   Gary
  
   shady1070 wrote:
  
I Am looking to put a 40 watt repeater on Gmrs. I Know very
  little
about repeaters. I am looking for something That is Pc
  Programmable
and also my biggest concern is about a controller. I want A Nice
controller that does voice and I want to have the capabilities of
  a
phone patch for later use on 440. How do you connect the
  controller to
a repeater etc.. Can anybody recommend some stuff and help me
  out. I
cann't find anybody locally that can really halp me with this
  project.
   
Thanks
   
   
Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
   
  
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 

 



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.6/1229 - Release Date: 1/17/2008 
11:12 AM
  




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-23 Thread rb_n3dab
Narrow band is only required on the interstitial channels (those that fall 
between the repeater pairs) along with the reduced power requirements, but I 
don't believe the FCC would have any problem if were were to narrow band a 
repeater. However transient users and other may have a problem ,radio wise, in 
using it unless it is a private or closed system.
--
Doug   
N3DAB/WPRX486/WPJL709

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

=
Good idea Richard especially since Mitreks are wideband radios so making them 
meet the narrower GMRS specs is probably a monumental task. I wonder if a 
Mitrek can even meet the required frequency tolerance.
Gary

 Richard Bessey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Hello,
 I just wanted to add my 2 cents here.
 I have been working the last ... 2 years on building a GMRS repeater out 
 of two Motorola Mitrek's and a single M controller.
 If I had one word of advice, buy a commercial one! Save yourself alot of 
 frustration and money on the tools needed to build it.
 These have been looking real good to me recently:
 http://www.gmrsoutlet.com/home.php?cat=1
 
 Regards,
 
 Richard Bessey
 
 wd8chl wrote:
 
  Gary wrote:
   CFR title 47 is available on the FCC's website for all to view. 
  95.135(a)
   reads  No station may transmit with more than 50 watts output power.
   Subpart (d) reads  A fixed station must transmit with no more than 15
   watts output power. 95.25 further defines land stations. My suggestion
   to the anonymous member is to read the rules and contact the FCC for any
   needed clarification as they have the final word.
   Gary
 
  fixed station refers to what we would call 'control stations'.
  Repeaters and base stations can run 50W.
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-22 Thread n3dab
This in response to shady1070's original question and Gary's reponse.

Unless I've been misinformed for the past 30+ years the maximum 
autorized output power for GMRS is 50 watts from the Xmtr.(Base, 
Mobile and Repeater).  There are power limitations on the 
interstitial freqs. but Repeaters are only permitted on the 8 
designated pair $62/467.550 thu .725 in 25 KHz steps.   Re: the 
original question about the rptr./controller set up I would suggest 
the Kenwood TKR-850 which has everything in one package Contoller, 
CWid, ctcss/dcs, computer programable, etc. and the Kenwood can be 
reprogammed down to the 440 band.   GMRS rptrs. are not REQUIRED to 
ID, the GMRS user is, however if the all users operate under a single 
authorization/call sign CWid is allowed.  Also, running a beacon type 
messages, voice or CWID, may be construed as non-directed traffic 
(broadcasting) by the FCC.   There are many problems aaociated with 
building and installing a repeater including site 
location/acquisition, types of antennas, feed line, and duplexers to 
name a few.  I believe you have a pretty good learning curve ahead of 
you.  Wher are you located Shady? 

Doug  N3DAB / WPRX486 / WPJL709

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 well, first off, assuming your repeater is land based and qualifies 
as a
 fixed station (they usually do) then your output power is limited 
to 15
 watts output, CFR Title 47 Part 95.135(d).
 Gary
 
 shady1070 wrote:
 
  I Am looking to put a 40 watt repeater on Gmrs.  I Know very 
little
  about repeaters.  I am looking for something That is Pc 
Programmable
  and also my biggest concern is about a controller.  I want A Nice
  controller that does voice and I want to have the capabilities of 
a
  phone patch for later use on 440. How do you connect the 
controller to
  a repeater etc..  Can anybody recommend some stuff and help me 
out.  I
  cann't find anybody locally that can really halp me with this 
project.
 
  Thanks
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-22 Thread Gary
CFR title 47 is available on the FCC's website for all to view. 95.135(a)
reads  No station may transmit with more than 50 watts output power.
Subpart (d) reads  A fixed station must transmit with no more than 15
watts output power. 95.25 further defines land stations. My suggestion
to the anonymous member is to read the rules and contact the FCC for any
needed clarification as they have the final word.
Gary

n3dab wrote:

 This in response to shady1070's original question and Gary's reponse.

 Unless I've been misinformed for the past 30+ years the maximum
 autorized output power for GMRS is 50 watts from the Xmtr.(Base,
 Mobile and Repeater).  There are power limitations on the
 interstitial freqs. but Repeaters are only permitted on the 8
 designated pair $62/467.550 thu .725 in 25 KHz steps.   Re: the
 original question about the rptr./controller set up I would suggest
 the Kenwood TKR-850 which has everything in one package Contoller,
 CWid, ctcss/dcs, computer programable, etc. and the Kenwood can be
 reprogammed down to the 440 band.   GMRS rptrs. are not REQUIRED to
 ID, the GMRS user is, however if the all users operate under a single
 authorization/call sign CWid is allowed.  Also, running a beacon type
 messages, voice or CWID, may be construed as non-directed traffic
 (broadcasting) by the FCC.   There are many problems aaociated with
 building and installing a repeater including site
 location/acquisition, types of antennas, feed line, and duplexers to
 name a few.  I believe you have a pretty good learning curve ahead of
 you.  Wher are you located Shady?

 Doug  N3DAB / WPRX486 / WPJL709

 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  well, first off, assuming your repeater is land based and qualifies
 as a
  fixed station (they usually do) then your output power is limited
 to 15
  watts output, CFR Title 47 Part 95.135(d).
  Gary
 
  shady1070 wrote:
 
   I Am looking to put a 40 watt repeater on Gmrs.  I Know very
 little
   about repeaters.  I am looking for something That is Pc
 Programmable
   and also my biggest concern is about a controller.  I want A Nice
   controller that does voice and I want to have the capabilities of
 a
   phone patch for later use on 440. How do you connect the
 controller to
   a repeater etc..  Can anybody recommend some stuff and help me
 out.  I
   cann't find anybody locally that can really halp me with this
 project.
  
   Thanks
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
 


 Yahoo! Groups Links






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-22 Thread Tom Parker
A repeater is a mobile relay station, not a fixed station as defined in 
the rules.  50 watts is the limit.


thp

Gary wrote:


CFR title 47 is available on the FCC's website for all to view. 95.135(a)
reads  No station may transmit with more than 50 watts output power.
Subpart (d) reads  A fixed station must transmit with no more than 15
watts output power. 95.25 further defines land stations. My suggestion
to the anonymous member is to read the rules and contact the FCC for any
needed clarification as they have the final word.
Gary

n3dab wrote:

 This in response to shady1070's original question and Gary's reponse.

 Unless I've been misinformed for the past 30+ years the maximum
 autorized output power for GMRS is 50 watts from the Xmtr.(Base,
 Mobile and Repeater). There are power limitations on the
 interstitial freqs. but Repeaters are only permitted on the 8
 designated pair $62/467.550 thu .725 in 25 KHz steps. Re: the
 original question about the rptr./controller set up I would suggest
 the Kenwood TKR-850 which has everything in one package Contoller,
 CWid, ctcss/dcs, computer programable, etc. and the Kenwood can be
 reprogammed down to the 440 band. GMRS rptrs. are not REQUIRED to
 ID, the GMRS user is, however if the all users operate under a single
 authorization/call sign CWid is allowed. Also, running a beacon type
 messages, voice or CWID, may be construed as non-directed traffic
 (broadcasting) by the FCC. There are many problems aaociated with
 building and installing a repeater including site
 location/acquisition, types of antennas, feed line, and duplexers to
 name a few. I believe you have a pretty good learning curve ahead of
 you. Wher are you located Shady?

 Doug N3DAB / WPRX486 / WPJL709

 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
  well, first off, assuming your repeater is land based and qualifies
 as a
  fixed station (they usually do) then your output power is limited
 to 15
  watts output, CFR Title 47 Part 95.135(d).
  Gary
 
  shady1070 wrote:
 
   I Am looking to put a 40 watt repeater on Gmrs. I Know very
 little
   about repeaters. I am looking for something That is Pc
 Programmable
   and also my biggest concern is about a controller. I want A Nice
   controller that does voice and I want to have the capabilities of
 a
   phone patch for later use on 440. How do you connect the
 controller to
   a repeater etc.. Can anybody recommend some stuff and help me
 out. I
   cann't find anybody locally that can really halp me with this
 project.
  
   Thanks
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
 


 Yahoo! Groups Links








No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.6/1229 - Release Date: 1/17/2008 11:12 AM
 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Gmrs Repeater

2008-01-22 Thread wd8chl
Gary wrote:
 CFR title 47 is available on the FCC's website for all to view. 95.135(a)
 reads  No station may transmit with more than 50 watts output power.
 Subpart (d) reads  A fixed station must transmit with no more than 15
 watts output power. 95.25 further defines land stations. My suggestion
 to the anonymous member is to read the rules and contact the FCC for any
 needed clarification as they have the final word.
 Gary

fixed station refers to what we would call 'control stations'.
Repeaters and base stations can run 50W.