Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem frompager transmitters

2004-12-22 Thread Mark Holman

Something like that should be passed along to the Repeater Council or the 
Official Observer  to see if they can talk to this individual. unless he 
wants to be famous in the ARRL web site with a letter from the FCC or 
something.

I can't offer any other solution.

Mark Holman  AB8RU
***  IT Student *
Happy Holidays
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem 
frompager transmitters



 It sure is - a mess, that is. Repeated offers to the guy to offer help 
 with
 a Service Monitor, etc. have gone rejected. He's using a ham dual-bander
 mobile radio at a high-level site, and some of the garbage noise has 
 caused
 one of the main local 2-Meter Portland Repeaters to kerchunk continually
 whenever the IRLP or Echolink (or whatever it's called) system keys up.
 It's also tied up one of the main local 2-Meter simplex channels that was
 normally designated for many years as a Remote Base to Remote Base
 channel.

 What some people won't do just to be a Repeater Owner.

 LJ



 Original Message:
 -
 From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:12:06 -0600
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem
 frompager transmitters



 Sounds like a similar problem here in Portland, Oregon.

 We have a guy running an IRLP node here on what is commonly thought of as 
 2
 meter simplex frequencies.  The station is on a broadcast tower with high
 elevation running about 375 watts ERP!!!  Mobiles 100 miles away can 
 clearly
 hear the IRLP node!!  The IRLP node is made from amateur grade RF
 equipement 
 has had SEVERAL problems with causing interference with the inputs of 
 other
 repeaters in the area.  Attempting to talk to the owner  suggesting he 
 put
 sharp cavity filters on the transmitter resulted in his reply of then I
 wouldn't be able to be frequency agile.

 Meanwhile, his deviation has been measured at +/- 9 KHz, and he argues 
 that
 there is nothing wrong because a telecom service agency measured  set his
 deviation.

 -- Original Message --
 Received: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:23:57 AM CST
 From: Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem
 from
 pager transmitters


 Except that the vast majority of VHF transmitters/networks weren't
 really capable of multi-freq on the fly as you describe. At least around
 here, anyway, they were virtually all Micor PURC stations.
 And most sites would not have allowed the transmitters to remain without
 cavites anyway.
 -- 
 Jim Barbour
 WD8CHL


 Joe wrote:

  You will find less and less narrow band cavities on paging transmitters
  lately.  As the paging industry slowly goes into their death spiral of
  loosing customers, they no longer need 2, 4 or more transmitters at
 each
  site to deal with the capacity of pagers out there.  What some
 companies
  are doing is leaving one transmitter at the site and doing
  multi-frequencies out of a single transmitter (This is assuming they
 were

  all on the same band, 900Mhz for example.)  When they multi-frequency a
  transmitter they need to remove any narrow band filters off the
 transmitter
  output.  This may explain why some ham repeater sites that were quiet
 now

  have noise problems.  The irony of it is that you see paging
 transmitters

  leaving a site and think that the noise floor is going to go down, only
 to

  find that the nose increases tenfold.
 
  73, Joe, K1ike
 
  At 09:53 AM 12/21/2004, you wrote:
 
 All paging transmitters involved should have narrow bandpass cavities
 and circulators on their outputs. That's usually considered a must at
 any site. If the paging company isn't willing to spend the money for
 that, then they aren't to serious about staying in business.
 The good news is that VHF common carrier paging is slowly going away,
 and the remaining frequencies will likely be dropped and released back
 into the general pool in a few years, or less.
 There is virtually no VHF paging here in NE Ohio anymore.
 --
 Jim Barbour
 WD8CHL






 Yahoo! Groups Links
















 Yahoo! Groups Links








 
 mail2web - Check your email from the web at
 http://mail2web.com/ .







 Yahoo! Groups Links







 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem frompager transmitters

2004-12-22 Thread JOHN MACKEY

Since the system is not a coordinated repeater, it has nothing to do with the
coordination coucil.  At least one OO did speak with the licensee.  There were
several discussion about this within the OO ranks.

-- Original Message --
Received: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08:02:45 PM CST
From: Mark Holman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem 
frompager transmitters

 
 Something like that should be passed along to the Repeater Council or the 
 Official Observer  to see if they can talk to this individual. unless he 
 wants to be famous in the ARRL web site with a letter from the FCC or 
 something.
 
 I can't offer any other solution.
 
 Mark Holman  AB8RU
 ***  IT Student *
 Happy Holidays
 - Original Message - 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:58 PM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem 
 frompager transmitters
 
 
 
  It sure is - a mess, that is. Repeated offers to the guy to offer help 
  with
  a Service Monitor, etc. have gone rejected. He's using a ham dual-bander
  mobile radio at a high-level site, and some of the garbage noise has 
  caused
  one of the main local 2-Meter Portland Repeaters to kerchunk continually
  whenever the IRLP or Echolink (or whatever it's called) system keys up.
  It's also tied up one of the main local 2-Meter simplex channels that was
  normally designated for many years as a Remote Base to Remote Base
  channel.
 
  What some people won't do just to be a Repeater Owner.
 
  LJ
 
 
 
  Original Message:
  -
  From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:12:06 -0600
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem
  frompager transmitters
 
 
 
  Sounds like a similar problem here in Portland, Oregon.
 
  We have a guy running an IRLP node here on what is commonly thought of as

  2
  meter simplex frequencies.  The station is on a broadcast tower with high
  elevation running about 375 watts ERP!!!  Mobiles 100 miles away can 
  clearly
  hear the IRLP node!!  The IRLP node is made from amateur grade RF
  equipement 
  has had SEVERAL problems with causing interference with the inputs of 
  other
  repeaters in the area.  Attempting to talk to the owner  suggesting he 
  put
  sharp cavity filters on the transmitter resulted in his reply of then I
  wouldn't be able to be frequency agile.
 
  Meanwhile, his deviation has been measured at +/- 9 KHz, and he argues 
  that
  there is nothing wrong because a telecom service agency measured  set
his
  deviation.
 
  -- Original Message --
  Received: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:23:57 AM CST
  From: Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem
  from
  pager transmitters
 
 
  Except that the vast majority of VHF transmitters/networks weren't
  really capable of multi-freq on the fly as you describe. At least around
  here, anyway, they were virtually all Micor PURC stations.
  And most sites would not have allowed the transmitters to remain without
  cavites anyway.
  -- 
  Jim Barbour
  WD8CHL
 
 
  Joe wrote:
 
   You will find less and less narrow band cavities on paging
transmitters
   lately.  As the paging industry slowly goes into their death spiral of
   loosing customers, they no longer need 2, 4 or more transmitters at
  each
   site to deal with the capacity of pagers out there.  What some
  companies
   are doing is leaving one transmitter at the site and doing
   multi-frequencies out of a single transmitter (This is assuming they
  were
 
   all on the same band, 900Mhz for example.)  When they multi-frequency
a
   transmitter they need to remove any narrow band filters off the
  transmitter
   output.  This may explain why some ham repeater sites that were quiet
  now
 
   have noise problems.  The irony of it is that you see paging
  transmitters
 
   leaving a site and think that the noise floor is going to go down,
only
  to
 
   find that the nose increases tenfold.
  
   73, Joe, K1ike
  
   At 09:53 AM 12/21/2004, you wrote:
  
  All paging transmitters involved should have narrow bandpass cavities
  and circulators on their outputs. That's usually considered a must at
  any site. If the paging company isn't willing to spend the money for
  that, then they aren't to serious about staying in business.
  The good news is that VHF common carrier paging is slowly going away,
  and the remaining frequencies will likely be dropped and released back
  into the general pool in a few years, or less.
  There is virtually no VHF paging here in NE Ohio anymore.
  --
  Jim Barbour
  WD8CHL
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem frompager transmitters

2004-12-21 Thread Neil McKie


  Cute ... I saw that too but declined to comment ... 

  Neil 

JOHN MACKEY wrote:
 
 Hmmm, after 20 years of ham radio, past experience in commercial 
 2 way  currently working as an Chief Engineer in the radio 
 broadcast field and possessing my Extra Amateur and GROL, I don't 
 know what a FCC 1st class licensed ham is!! 
 
 -- Original Message --
 Received: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:54:16 PM CST
 From: kc4ih [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with to the repeater frequencies by FCC 1st class licensed hams
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






RE: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem frompager transmitters

2004-12-21 Thread Buley, Kenneth L \(GE Consumer Industrial\)

No, you didn't !!! ;)

Kenneth Buley
Bullitt County DES CD-2
Bullitt County Red Cross/Certified ECRVDriver/Operator BC-6
Bullitt County ARES\RACES Coordinator KY4DES 


-Original Message-
From: Neil McKie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 12:28 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem
frompager transmitters




  Cute ... I saw that too but declined to comment ... 

  Neil 

JOHN MACKEY wrote:
 
 Hmmm, after 20 years of ham radio, past experience in commercial 
 2 way  currently working as an Chief Engineer in the radio 
 broadcast field and possessing my Extra Amateur and GROL, I don't 
 know what a FCC 1st class licensed ham is!! 
 
 -- Original Message --
 Received: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:54:16 PM CST
 From: kc4ih [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with to the repeater frequencies by FCC 1st class licensed hams
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem frompager transmitters

2004-12-21 Thread Neil McKie


  Thank you, sir!  

  Neil - WA6KLA 


Buley, Kenneth L (GE Consumer  Industrial) wrote:
 
 No, you didn't !!! ;)
 
 Kenneth Buley
 Bullitt County DES CD-2
 Bullitt County Red Cross/Certified ECRVDriver/Operator BC-6
 Bullitt County ARES\RACES Coordinator KY4DES
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Neil McKie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 12:28 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem
 frompager transmitters
 
   Cute ... I saw that too but declined to comment ...
 
   Neil
 
 JOHN MACKEY wrote:
 
  Hmmm, after 20 years of ham radio, past experience in commercial
  2 way  currently working as an Chief Engineer in the radio
  broadcast field and possessing my Extra Amateur and GROL, I don't
  know what a FCC 1st class licensed ham is!!
 
  -- Original Message --
  Received: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:54:16 PM CST
  From: kc4ih [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   with to the repeater frequencies by FCC 1st class licensed hams
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem frompager transmitters

2004-12-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

It sure is - a mess, that is. Repeated offers to the guy to offer help with
a Service Monitor, etc. have gone rejected. He's using a ham dual-bander
mobile radio at a high-level site, and some of the garbage noise has caused
one of the main local 2-Meter Portland Repeaters to kerchunk continually
whenever the IRLP or Echolink (or whatever it's called) system keys up.
It's also tied up one of the main local 2-Meter simplex channels that was
normally designated for many years as a Remote Base to Remote Base
channel.

What some people won't do just to be a Repeater Owner.

LJ



Original Message:
-
From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:12:06 -0600
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem 
frompager transmitters



Sounds like a similar problem here in Portland, Oregon.

We have a guy running an IRLP node here on what is commonly thought of as 2
meter simplex frequencies.  The station is on a broadcast tower with high
elevation running about 375 watts ERP!!!  Mobiles 100 miles away can clearly
hear the IRLP node!!  The IRLP node is made from amateur grade RF
equipement 
has had SEVERAL problems with causing interference with the inputs of other
repeaters in the area.  Attempting to talk to the owner  suggesting he put
sharp cavity filters on the transmitter resulted in his reply of then I
wouldn't be able to be frequency agile. 

Meanwhile, his deviation has been measured at +/- 9 KHz, and he argues that
there is nothing wrong because a telecom service agency measured  set his
deviation.

-- Original Message --
Received: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:23:57 AM CST
From: Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem 
from
pager transmitters

 
 Except that the vast majority of VHF transmitters/networks weren't 
 really capable of multi-freq on the fly as you describe. At least around 
 here, anyway, they were virtually all Micor PURC stations.
 And most sites would not have allowed the transmitters to remain without 
 cavites anyway.
 -- 
 Jim Barbour
 WD8CHL
 
 
 Joe wrote:
 
  You will find less and less narrow band cavities on paging transmitters 
  lately.  As the paging industry slowly goes into their death spiral of 
  loosing customers, they no longer need 2, 4 or more transmitters at
each 
  site to deal with the capacity of pagers out there.  What some
companies 
  are doing is leaving one transmitter at the site and doing 
  multi-frequencies out of a single transmitter (This is assuming they
were

  all on the same band, 900Mhz for example.)  When they multi-frequency a 
  transmitter they need to remove any narrow band filters off the
transmitter 
  output.  This may explain why some ham repeater sites that were quiet
now

  have noise problems.  The irony of it is that you see paging
transmitters

  leaving a site and think that the noise floor is going to go down, only
to

  find that the nose increases tenfold.
  
  73, Joe, K1ike
  
  At 09:53 AM 12/21/2004, you wrote:
  
 All paging transmitters involved should have narrow bandpass cavities
 and circulators on their outputs. That's usually considered a must at
 any site. If the paging company isn't willing to spend the money for
 that, then they aren't to serious about staying in business.
 The good news is that VHF common carrier paging is slowly going away,
 and the remaining frequencies will likely be dropped and released back
 into the general pool in a few years, or less.
 There is virtually no VHF paging here in NE Ohio anymore.
 --
 Jim Barbour
 WD8CHL
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 





mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/