RE: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Intermod

2007-02-05 Thread Fred Flowers
I have come to the same conclusion.  

 

Fred N4GER

 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Schafer
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 2:05 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Intermod

 

I would strongly suspect that new preamp to be the culprit.

 

73

Gary  K4FMX

 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 2:35 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Intermod

 

On 2/3/07, Jeff DePolo [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:jeff%40depolo.net net wrote:

 I think I see how Steve's logic is leaning, and I agree - I don't see any
 logical mix here until you include a user's transmission on one of the
 repeater's inputs. Fred - do you hear ALL 147.33 transmitter activity
 coming in on the 147.765 input, or just when there is actually a user
keyed
 up on 147.93? If the latter, that's a big clue...

 --- Jeff

Yep, that's going to be the key... been there done that... Ye olde 600
KHz split on VHF problem.

It creates perfect mixes with users and the repeaters themselves that
fall right smack on the input of the next repeater along the band. A
close-in high-powered user to a VHF repeater can mix with it with bad
results for the next in line machine. Requiring CTCSS on a different
tone than the original machine and users will cover up the problem,
but not fix it, of course... not a permanent fix, but sometimes
necessary.

If Jeff's observation is correct, and you only hear input activity...
try to find a ham who's rig causes the issue consistently (and you'll
probably find that HT users don't, also -- they're usually just too
weak to create a strong-enough mix).

Then you can have that person lower their power and see if the problem
signal on the repeater's input seems to drop out quickly or get much
weaker, since you're looking for a mix that would drop off rapidly as
one of the transmitter's power levels was lowered.

If that's not it... have a 600 KHz AM station in your town? There's
always the possibility of other mixes as well... Jeff's test is the
kicker to start with -- do you hear the full TX tail of the other
repeater or just user input? Does it do it on ALL transmissions or
just certain users? Anyone involved in the situation live real close
to either repeater, who you know has high gain antennas and runs lots
of power?

Nate WY0X

 



RE: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Intermod

2007-02-05 Thread Fred Flowers
You're right, however I have no control over the 165 repeater.  The owner
has been informed.  I have no clue what he is going to do.  I'm willing to
help, however the monkey is on his back.

Fred N4GER

 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Schafer
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 5:02 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Intermod

 

The 165 repeater needs an additional notch in its transmitter.

 

73

Gary  K4FMX

 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred Flowers
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 5:04 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Intermod

 

Steve, Jeff, Nate,

Ya'll are on the right track. I did some additional tests. It not the
147.765 subscriber it's the 147.93 subscriber that is throwing the stinky
stuff into the fan. Keying the 33 repeater does not cause the 165 repeater
to come up. However, when both repeaters are on the air 33 will keep 165
keyed  the 33 audio can be heard on the 165 repeater. As soon as the 33
subscriber unkeys the interfering signal on 165 goes away. 

I a ham not infected with ctcss phobia, therefore 33 (which I built) has RX
 TX tone. This lets me TX on 33's input  not key the repeater. The 165
repeater is not interfered with. Also lowering the power of the 147.930 TX
clears the problem. 174.33, 147.93  147.165 have to be on the air to cause
the problem in the 147.765 RX. I assume it is in the 147.765 RX, I don't
have access to look at RX audio on the 147.165 repeater.

Is it valid to add 600 kHz to the intermod calculator? I get an interesting
fifth order when I do.

147.9300 MHz - 147.3300 MHz - 147.1650 MHz - 0.6000 MHz - 0.6000 MHz =
147.7650 MHz Right on the 147.165 input.

As I said before, the owner may have added a preamp to 147.165 a day or two
ago. This problem just came to light last night. These two repeaters have
been on the air for years. I was wrong about the spacing, they are 4 miles
apart. The 33 repeater equipment was getting tired  I replaced it with a
Mastr II station repeater two weeks ago. I can't say for sure if the
problem started with new 33 equipment or the preamp on 165.

It looks to me like the cure is to notch 147.930 at the 147.756 receiver.
Anyone have any thoughts.

Fred N4GER

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:35 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Intermod

On 2/3/07, Jeff DePolo [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:jeff%40depolo.net net wrote:

 I think I see how Steve's logic is leaning, and I agree - I don't see any
 logical mix here until you include a user's transmission on one of the
 repeater's inputs. Fred - do you hear ALL 147.33 transmitter activity
 coming in on the 147.765 input, or just when there is actually a user
keyed
 up on 147.93? If the latter, that's a big clue...

 --- Jeff

Yep, that's going to be the key... been there done that... Ye olde 600
KHz split on VHF problem.

It creates perfect mixes with users and the repeaters themselves that
fall right smack on the input of the next repeater along the band. A
close-in high-powered user to a VHF repeater can mix with it with bad
results for the next in line machine. Requiring CTCSS on a different
tone than the original machine and users will cover up the problem,
but not fix it, of course... not a permanent fix, but sometimes
necessary.

If Jeff's observation is correct, and you only hear input activity...
try to find a ham who's rig causes the issue consistently (and you'll
probably find that HT users don't, also -- they're usually just too
weak to create a strong-enough mix).

Then you can have that person lower their power and see if the problem
signal on the repeater's input seems to drop out quickly or get much
weaker, since you're looking for a mix that would drop off rapidly as
one of the transmitter's power levels was lowered.

If that's not it... have a 600 KHz AM station in your town? There's
always the possibility of other mixes as well... Jeff's test is the
kicker to start with -- do you hear the full TX tail of the other
repeater or just user input? Does it do it on ALL transmissions or
just certain users? Anyone involved in the situation live real close
to either repeater, who you know has high gain antennas and runs lots
of power?

Nate WY0X

Yahoo! Groups Links

 



RE: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Intermod

2007-02-05 Thread Fred Flowers
I knew what you meant, thanks.

Fred N4GER

 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Schafer
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 11:43 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Intermod

 

Oops I meant to say needs a notch in the receiver tuned to its transmitter.

 

73

Gary  K4FMX

 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Schafer
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 6:02 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Intermod

 

The 165 repeater needs an additional notch in its transmitter.

 

73

Gary  K4FMX

 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred Flowers
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 5:04 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Intermod

 

Steve, Jeff, Nate,

Ya'll are on the right track. I did some additional tests. It not the
147.765 subscriber it's the 147.93 subscriber that is throwing the stinky
stuff into the fan. Keying the 33 repeater does not cause the 165 repeater
to come up. However, when both repeaters are on the air 33 will keep 165
keyed  the 33 audio can be heard on the 165 repeater. As soon as the 33
subscriber unkeys the interfering signal on 165 goes away. 

I a ham not infected with ctcss phobia, therefore 33 (which I built) has RX
 TX tone. This lets me TX on 33's input  not key the repeater. The 165
repeater is not interfered with. Also lowering the power of the 147.930 TX
clears the problem. 174.33, 147.93  147.165 have to be on the air to cause
the problem in the 147.765 RX. I assume it is in the 147.765 RX, I don't
have access to look at RX audio on the 147.165 repeater.

Is it valid to add 600 kHz to the intermod calculator? I get an interesting
fifth order when I do.

147.9300 MHz - 147.3300 MHz - 147.1650 MHz - 0.6000 MHz - 0.6000 MHz =
147.7650 MHz Right on the 147.165 input.

As I said before, the owner may have added a preamp to 147.165 a day or two
ago. This problem just came to light last night. These two repeaters have
been on the air for years. I was wrong about the spacing, they are 4 miles
apart. The 33 repeater equipment was getting tired  I replaced it with a
Mastr II station repeater two weeks ago. I can't say for sure if the
problem started with new 33 equipment or the preamp on 165.

It looks to me like the cure is to notch 147.930 at the 147.756 receiver.
Anyone have any thoughts.

Fred N4GER

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:35 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Intermod

On 2/3/07, Jeff DePolo [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:jeff%40depolo.net net wrote:

 I think I see how Steve's logic is leaning, and I agree - I don't see any
 logical mix here until you include a user's transmission on one of the
 repeater's inputs. Fred - do you hear ALL 147.33 transmitter activity
 coming in on the 147.765 input, or just when there is actually a user
keyed
 up on 147.93? If the latter, that's a big clue...

 --- Jeff

Yep, that's going to be the key... been there done that... Ye olde 600
KHz split on VHF problem.

It creates perfect mixes with users and the repeaters themselves that
fall right smack on the input of the next repeater along the band. A
close-in high-powered user to a VHF repeater can mix with it with bad
results for the next in line machine. Requiring CTCSS on a different
tone than the original machine and users will cover up the problem,
but not fix it, of course... not a permanent fix, but sometimes
necessary.

If Jeff's observation is correct, and you only hear input activity...
try to find a ham who's rig causes the issue consistently (and you'll
probably find that HT users don't, also -- they're usually just too
weak to create a strong-enough mix).

Then you can have that person lower their power and see if the problem
signal on the repeater's input seems to drop out quickly or get much
weaker, since you're looking for a mix that would drop off rapidly as
one of the transmitter's power levels was lowered.

If that's not it... have a 600 KHz AM station in your town? There's
always the possibility of other mixes as well... Jeff's test is the
kicker to start with -- do you hear the full TX tail of the other
repeater or just user input? Does it do it on ALL transmissions or
just certain users? Anyone involved in the situation live real close
to either repeater, who you know has high gain antennas and runs lots
of power?

Nate WY0X

Yahoo! Groups Links

 



RE: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Intermod

2007-02-03 Thread Fred Flowers
Thanks

 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Finch
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 5:14 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [SPAM] RE: [Repeater-Builder] Intermod

 

Google Commshop.

 

 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred Flowers
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 8:37 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Intermod

 

Does anyone have a source for an intermod calculation program?

 

Fred N4GER 

 

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.21/665 - Release Date: 2/2/2007
11:39 PM

 


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.21/665 - Release Date: 2/2/2007
11:39 PM




Visit OurPhonelist.com http://www.ourphonelist.com 
It's free and you'll never lose track of a phone number again!