Absolutely, seconding this suggestion. I forgot that it wasn't already
there. I think Codeberg is today far-and-away the most robust and
popular service that has an explicit software-freedom dedicated focus.
If there are any concerns (there may be very few), I am almost certain
they would actively engage with us in discussing and working to resolve
them.
I am myself using Codeberg now as the repository service for my projects.
Aaron
On 2023-11-05 9:07, Yevhen Babiichuk wrote:
Hello!
I think that Code Berg [1] is enough popular to be in the list [2]. If
it is bad, it would be good to have it in the list to show people they
shouldn't use it. If it is good, they idea will be the same but opposite.
[1] https://codeberg.org/
[2] https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html
