Re: [Repoze-dev] Problems with repoze.sphinx.autointerface
Tres Seaver wrote: > I just released version 0.2, whicn now requires Sphinx >= 0.6.1. Wow, that was fast. Thank you very much. -- Thomas ___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
Re: [Repoze-dev] Problems with repoze.sphinx.autointerface
Tres Seaver wrote: > I haven't had a chance to look at it, and likely won't have for a bit. I > would be glad to apply a patch and release a new version, if that would > help. Actually, the immediate reason for the registration of the directive to break seems to have been fixed on the trunk back in May. Therefore, just cutting a bug-fix release would be very helpful. > I do know that newer versions of Sphinx are supposed to provide some > additional support for plugins like autointerface: the release notes for > 0.6[1] say: > > Autodoc now has a reusable Python API, which can be used to create custom > types of objects to auto-document (e.g. Zope interfaces). See also > Sphinx.add_autodocumenter(). OK, I've taken a glance at this, and it looks rather like a rewrite of the whole thing. I think I'd like to have that, so I might find some time for it at some point, but certainly not right away. Thank you for the pointer, anyway. -- Thomas ___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
Re: [Repoze-dev] Problems with repoze.sphinx.autointerface
Tres Seaver wrote: > I haven't had a chance to look at it, and likely won't have for a bit. I > would be glad to apply a patch and release a new version, if that would > help. OK, I'll try to come up with one. -- Thomas ___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
Re: [Repoze-dev] Problems with repoze.sphinx.autointerface
Alec Munro wrote:
> Seems this depends on docutils 0.5, as when used with docutils 0.4, it
> tries to import Directive from docutils.parsers.rst. Which isn't there.
>
> Upon updating docutils, it seems like it may not like sphinx 0.6.1. On
> line 112, it calls:
>
> app.add_directive('autointerface', AutoInterfaceDirective,
> 0, (1, 0, 1) )
>
> Which results in sphinx complaining:
>
> "when adding directive classes, no additional arguments may be given"
[...]
What has become of this? The same issue is biting me as well...
--
Thomas
___
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
