[Reproducible-builds] Hello, Happy, To Mee,t You,

2015-05-23 Thread faith coulibaly

 

/HELLO DEAR  (faithless...@hotmail.com}

  HOW ARE YOU TODAY, I HOPE ALL IS WELL. MY NAME IS FAITH, I AM VERY GOOD
LOOKING PERFECT BODY FIGURE GIRL KIND , SINCERE AND TRUSTED, GOD
FEARING.AND,I SAW YOUR PROFILE I WAS DELIGHTED TO CONTACT YOU, I HOPE YOU
WILL BE THE TRUE LOVING, HONEST AND CARING MAN, THAT I HAVE BEEN LOOKING
FOR, AND I HAVE SOMETHING SPECIAL TO TELL YOU ABOUT ME, SO PLEASE CONTACT
ME DIRECTLY THROUGH MY
  PRIVATE EMAIL (faithless...@hotmail.com) SO THAT I CAN ALSO SEND MY
PICTURE DIRECTLY TO YOU. REMEBER THAT LOVE HAS, NO COLOUR BARRIER,
RELIGIOUS,NATIONALITY OR DISTANCE BARRIER, BUT LOVE MATTERS MOST,MY
HAPPINESS/ MY JOY ALL IS IN YOUR HANDS,PLEASE DON'T LET ME DOWN OK.I
REGARDS I KISSS YOU, I WILL BE WAITING FOR YOUR RESPONSE LOVE.
  YOURS FAITH (faithless...@hotmail.com}/


Mensagem enviada através do email grátis AEIOU
http://www.aeiou.pt
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

[Reproducible-builds] 786601: Re: sbcl: ftbfs when locales-all is installed but not locales

2015-05-23 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi,

On Samstag, 23. Mai 2015, Holger Levsen wrote:
 Source: sbcl
 Version: 2:1.2.11-2
 Severity: serious
 User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
 Usertags: environment
 
 Hi,
 
 While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
 that sbcl fails to build from source, when when locales-all is installed
 but not locales:
[...]
 localedef -i en_US -f UTF-8 debian/tmpdir/usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8
 character map file `UTF-8' not found: No such file or directory
 cannot read character map directory `/usr/share/i18n/charmaps': No such
 file or directory

because:

$ dpkg -L locales|grep /usr/share/i18n/charmaps|wc -l
228
$ dpkg -L locales-all|grep /usr/share/i18n/charmaps|wc -l
0


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#786615: kfreebsd-10: source tarballs have unreproducible file order

2015-05-23 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Package: src:kfreebsd-10
Version: 10.1~svn274115-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch pending
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: fileordering

Hi,

The kfreebsd-10 (kernel) packaging creates two source tarballs:
  * orig.tar.xz, updated by the package maintainer for each new
upstream version
  * in kfreebsd-source, a binary arch-indep package

The ordering of files is uncertain when these tarballs are created,
perhaps especially on the ZFS filesystem.  The attached patch will
fix that, so that independently built tarballs don't differ
needlessly, and any real difference in their content is easy to
identify.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: kFreeBSD 9.0-2-amd64-xenhvm-ipsec
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds


[Reproducible-builds] Bug#786633: webkit2pdf: please make the build reproducible

2015-05-23 Thread Reiner Herrmann
Source: webkit2pdf
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-CC: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org

Hi!

While working on Debian's “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have
noticed that webkit2pdf doesn't build reproducibly.
The build date is embedded into the manpage.

The attached patch fixes this by using the date from the latest
changelog entry.

Regards,
 Reiner

[1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds



diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index cb5d30b..e49ea60 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 #!/usr/bin/make -f
 
-DATE=$(shell date +%F)
+DATE=$(shell dpkg-parsechangelog -S Date | date -u +%F -f -)
 OP=\(
 REL=$(shell head -1 debian/changelog | cut -d ${OP} -f 2 | cut -d '-' -f 1)
 MAN=debian/webkit2pdf


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#786637: nvidia-settings: please make the build reproducible

2015-05-23 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
Source: nvidia-settings
Version: 340.46-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps username hostname

Hi!

While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that nvidia-settings could not be built reproducibly.

The attached patch redefines DATE, WHOAMI, and HOSTNAME_CMD in
debian/rules to stable values. Once applied, nvidia-settings can be
built reproducibly in our current experimental framework.

 [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds

-- 
Lunar.''`. 
lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ  :  # apt-get install anarchism
`. `'` 
  `-   
diff -Nru nvidia-settings-340.46/debian/rules nvidia-settings-340.46/debian/rules
--- nvidia-settings-340.46/debian/rules	2014-09-08 11:26:06.0 +
+++ nvidia-settings-340.46/debian/rules	2015-05-23 18:57:40.0 +
@@ -28,6 +28,12 @@
 AUTOKEEP	 = debian/watch
 AUTOCLEAN	 = $(filter-out $(AUTOKEEP),$(AUTOGEN))
 
+# Redefine DATE to something stable to make the build reproducible
+DATE		= date -u --date='$(shell dpkg-parsechangelog -S Date)'
+# Cheat for user and hostname
+WHOAMI		= echo user
+HOSTNAME_CMD	= echo debian
+export DATE WHOAMI HOSTNAME_CMD
 
 %:
 	dh $@


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds