[Reproducible-builds] Bug#794372: FTBFS: undefined reference to Glib::filename_display_basename
Source: gigedit Version: 0.2.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid stretch Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, The package fails to build: .../../src/gigedit/.libs/libgigedit.so: undefined reference to `Glib::filename_display_basename(std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const)' .../../src/gigedit/.libs/libgigedit.so: undefined reference to `Glib::str_has_suffix(std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const, std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const)' .../../src/gigedit/.libs/libgigedit.so: undefined reference to `RIFF::File::File(std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const)' .../../src/gigedit/.libs/libgigedit.so: undefined reference to `Glib::ustring::operator=(std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const)' .../../src/gigedit/.libs/libgigedit.so: undefined reference to `Glib::ustring::ustring(std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const)' .../../src/gigedit/.libs/libgigedit.so: undefined reference to `Gtk::SelectionData::set(std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const, int, unsigned char const*, int)' .../../src/gigedit/.libs/libgigedit.so: undefined reference to `Glib::build_filename(std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const, std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const)' .../../src/gigedit/.libs/libgigedit.so: undefined reference to `Gtk::SelectionData::get_target[abi:cxx11]() const' .../../src/gigedit/.libs/libgigedit.so: undefined reference to `Glib::path_get_dirname(std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const)' .../../src/gigedit/.libs/libgigedit.so: undefined reference to `Glib::path_get_basename(std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const)' .../../src/gigedit/.libs/libgigedit.so: undefined reference to `Glib::path_is_absolute(std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const)' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Makefile:552: recipe for target 'gigedit' failed Full build log: https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/gigedit.html -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.19.0-23-generic (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] Bug#794376: FTBFS: undefined reference to `boost::program_options::detail::cmdline::cmdline'
Source: fracplanet Version: 0.4.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, The package fails to build: obj/fracplanet.o: In function `boost::program_options::basic_command_line_parserchar::extra_parser(boost::function1std::pairstd::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar , std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar , std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const)': /usr/include/boost/program_options/detail/parsers.hpp:77: undefined reference to `boost::program_options::detail::cmdline::set_additional_parser(boost::function1std::pairstd::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar , std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar , std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const)' obj/fracplanet.o: In function `std::vectorstd::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar , std::allocatorstd::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar boost::program_options::to_internalstd::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar (std::vectorstd::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar , std::allocatorstd::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorcharconst)': /usr/include/boost/program_options/detail/convert.hpp:79: undefined reference to `boost::program_options::to_internal(std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const)' obj/fracplanet.o: In function `boost::program_options::basic_command_line_parserchar::basic_command_line_parser(int, char const* const*)': /usr/include/boost/program_options/detail/parsers.hpp:43: undefined reference to `boost::program_options::detail::cmdline::cmdline(std::vectorstd::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar , std::allocatorstd::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorcharconst)' obj/fracplanet.o: In function `main': /tmp/buildd/fracplanet-0.4.0/fracplanet.cpp:47: undefined reference to `boost::program_options::options_description::options_description(std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const, unsigned int, unsigned int)' obj/parameters_render.o: In function `ParametersRender::options()': /tmp/buildd/fracplanet-0.4.0/parameters_render.cpp:28: undefined reference to `boost::program_options::options_description::options_description(std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar const, unsigned int, unsigned int)' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Makefile:186: recipe for target 'fracplanet' failed Full build log: https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/fracplanet.html -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.19.0-23-generic (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] Bug#794375: FTBFS: pry/cli.rb: undefined method `new' for Slop:Module (NoMethodError)
Source: cucumber Version: 2.0.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid stretch Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, The package fails to build: /usr/bin/ruby2.1 /usr/bin/rspec --pattern ./spec/\*\*/\*_spec.rb -r json /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/pry/cli.rb:100:in `top (required)': undefined method `new' for Slop:Module (NoMethodError) from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require' from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/pry.rb:150:in `top (required)' from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require' from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require' from /tmp/buildd/cucumber-2.0.0/spec/spec_helper.rb:9:in `top (required)' from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require' from /usr/lib/ruby/2.1.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require' from /tmp/buildd/cucumber-2.0.0/spec/cucumber/cli/configuration_spec.rb:1:in `top (required)' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/configuration.rb:1327:in `load' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/configuration.rb:1327:in `block in load_spec_files' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/configuration.rb:1325:in `each' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/configuration.rb:1325:in `load_spec_files' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/runner.rb:103:in `setup' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/runner.rb:89:in `run' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/runner.rb:74:in `run' from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/runner.rb:42:in `invoke' from /usr/bin/rspec:4:in `main' /usr/bin/ruby2.1 /usr/bin/rspec --pattern ./spec/\*\*/\*_spec.rb -r json failed ERROR: Test ruby2.1 failed. Exiting. Full build log: https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/cucumber.html -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.19.0-23-generic (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] ARM build machines
Hi, https://reproducible.debian.net/index_repositories.html now shows missing armhf binaries too, so we can see which binNMUs we need to do... Next thing to do: fix dpkg as described in http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/Week-of-Mon-20150727/002569.html You might also be interested in https://jenkins.debian.net/userContent/todo.html#_reproducible_debian_armhf cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] Bug#794399: parsec47: please make the build reproducible
Source: parsec47 Version: 0.2.dfsg1-6 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: locale X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the reproducible builds effort [1], we have noticed that parsec47 could not be built reproducibly. A file list is sorted differently depending on the locale. The attached patch fixes this by sorting with LC_ALL set to C. Regards, Reiner [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff --git a/debian/patches/makefile.patch b/debian/patches/makefile.patch index ddffc50..2c3406d 100644 --- a/debian/patches/makefile.patch +++ b/debian/patches/makefile.patch @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ +++ b/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +GDC=gdc -+DSRC=src/mt.d $(shell find import src/abagames -name *.d | sort) ++DSRC=src/mt.d $(shell find import src/abagames -name *.d | LC_ALL=C sort) +EXE=parsec47 + +all: $(EXE) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] Bug#794400: tumiki-fighters: please make the build reproducible
Source: tumiki-fighters Version: 0.2.dfsg1-6 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: locale X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the reproducible builds effort [1], we have noticed that tumiki-fighters could not be built reproducibly. A file list is sorted differently depending on the locale. The attached patch fixes this by sorting with LC_ALL set to C. Regards, Reiner [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff --git a/debian/patches/makefile.patch b/debian/patches/makefile.patch index 80d8f39..3d9b4a6 100644 --- a/debian/patches/makefile.patch +++ b/debian/patches/makefile.patch @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ +++ b/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +GDC=gdc -+DSRC=$(shell find import src/abagames -name *.d | sort) ++DSRC=$(shell find import src/abagames -name *.d | LC_ALL=C sort) +EXE=tumiki-fighters + +all: $(EXE) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] Bug#794398: clhep: please make the build reproducible
Source: clhep Version: 2.1.4.1-1.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: locale X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the reproducible builds effort [1], we have noticed that clhep could not be built reproducibly. A file list is sorted differently depending on the locale. The attached patch fixes this by sorting with LC_ALL set to C. Regards, Reiner [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds diff --git a/debian/patches/reproducible_build.patch b/debian/patches/reproducible_build.patch new file mode 100644 index 000..3a90b7f --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches/reproducible_build.patch @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +Author: Reiner Herrmann rei...@reiner-h.de +Description: Sort file list to get reproducible results + +Index: clhep-2.1.4.1/getObjectList.in +=== +--- clhep-2.1.4.1.orig/getObjectList.in clhep-2.1.4.1/getObjectList.in +@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@ do +fi + done + +-echo $filelist ++echo $filelist | tr ' ' '\n' | LC_ALL=C sort | tr '\n' ' ' diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series index 3e08479..9ad0fac 100644 --- a/debian/patches/series +++ b/debian/patches/series @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ doxygen.conf clhep-config.patch tests.patch fix-double-comparision-in-testBug58950.patch +reproducible_build.patch signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] package uploaded to our repo
debbindiff_28.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] Bug#794347: marked as done (AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'add_details' while processing dh-ocaml_1.0.9_amd64.changes)
Your message dated Sun, 02 Aug 2015 15:34:49 + with message-id e1zlvhl-00024p...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#794347: fixed in debbindiff 28 has caused the Debian Bug report #794347, regarding AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'add_details' while processing dh-ocaml_1.0.9_amd64.changes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 794347: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794347 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: debbindiff Version: 27 Severity: normal Saw on rb.d.n: Sat Aug 1 21:07:20 UTC 2015 - debbindiff 27 will be used to compare the two builds: + timeout 30m schroot --directory /srv/reproducible-results/tmp.wN3zcbKY6k -c source:jenkins-reproducible-unstable-debbindiff -- sh -c 'export TMPDIR=/srv/reproducible-results/tmp.wN3zcbKY6k/dbd-tmp-G5legJK ; debbindiff --html /srv/reproducible-results/tmp.wN3zcbKY6k/dh-ocaml_1.0.9.debbindiff.html --text /srv/reproducible-results/tmp.wN3zcbKY6k/dh-ocaml_1.0.9.debbindiff.txt /srv/reproducible-results/tmp.wN3zcbKY6k/b1/dh-ocaml_1.0.9_amd64.changes /srv/reproducible-results/tmp.wN3zcbKY6k/b2/dh-ocaml_1.0.9_amd64.changes' Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/debbindiff, line 108, in module sys.exit(main()) File /usr/bin/debbindiff, line 94, in main parsed_args.file1, parsed_args.file2) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/__init__.py, line 66, in compare_root_paths return compare_files(FilesystemFile(path1), FilesystemFile(path2)) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/__init__.py, line 79, in compare_files return file1.compare(file2, source) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/binary.py, line 75, in wrapper return original_method(self, other, *args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/binary.py, line 171, in compare difference = self._compare_using_details(other, source) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/binary.py, line 144, in _compare_using_details details = [d for d in self.compare_details(other, source) if d is not None] File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/binary.py, line 75, in wrapper return original_method(self, other, *args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/debian.py, line 140, in compare_details differences.extend(my_container.compare(other_container, source)) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/debian.py, line 104, in compare debbindiff.comparators.compare_files(my_file, other_file, source=source)) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/__init__.py, line 79, in compare_files return file1.compare(file2, source) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/binary.py, line 75, in wrapper return original_method(self, other, *args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/binary.py, line 171, in compare difference = self._compare_using_details(other, source) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/binary.py, line 144, in _compare_using_details details = [d for d in self.compare_details(other, source) if d is not None] File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/binary.py, line 75, in wrapper return original_method(self, other, *args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/deb.py, line 87, in compare_details differences.extend(my_container.compare(other_container, source)) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/utils.py, line 180, in compare my_file, other_file, source=name)) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/__init__.py, line 79, in compare_files return file1.compare(file2, source) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/binary.py, line 75, in wrapper return original_method(self, other, *args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/binary.py, line 171, in compare difference = self._compare_using_details(other, source) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/binary.py, line 144, in _compare_using_details details = [d for d in self.compare_details(other, source) if d is not None] File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/binary.py, line 75, in wrapper return
[Reproducible-builds] Bug#786596: marked as done (still unicode problems: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 64-65: ordinal not in range(128))
Your message dated Sun, 2 Aug 2015 22:20:29 +
with message-id 2015080029.ga21...@chase.mapreri.org
and subject line Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#786596: still unicode problems:
'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 64-65: ordinal not in
range(128)
has caused the Debian Bug report #786596,
regarding still unicode problems: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in
position 64-65: ordinal not in range(128)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
786596: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786596
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
package: debbindiff
version: 20
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: toolchain
Hi,
when running debbindiff 20 on the build artifacts of openocd in unstable,
debbindiff fails like this:
Fri May 22 13:48:49 UTC 2015 - debbindiff 20 will be used to compare the two
builds:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/debbindiff, line 122, in module
sys.exit(main())
File /usr/bin/debbindiff, line 108, in main
parsed_args.file1, parsed_args.file2)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/__init__.py,
line 129, in compare_files
return comparator(path1, path2, source=source)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/changes.py,
line 89, in compare_changes_files
dot_changes2.get_path(filename
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/__init__.py,
line 129, in compare_files
return comparator(path1, path2, source=source)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/utils.py, line
43, in with_fallback
inside_differences = original_function(path1, path2, source)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/deb.py, line
53, in compare_deb_files
in_path1, in_path2, source=name))
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/__init__.py,
line 129, in compare_files
return comparator(path1, path2, source=source)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/utils.py, line
43, in with_fallback
inside_differences = original_function(path1, path2, source)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/xz.py, line
50, in compare_xz_files
source=[os.path.basename(new_path1), os.path.basename(new_path2)])
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/__init__.py,
line 129, in compare_files
return comparator(path1, path2, source=source)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/utils.py, line
43, in with_fallback
inside_differences = original_function(path1, path2, source)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/tar.py, line
65, in compare_tar_files
source=name.decode('utf-8')))
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debbindiff/comparators/__init__.py,
line 109, in compare_files
if os.path.isdir(path1) and os.path.isdir(path2):
File /usr/lib/python2.7/genericpath.py, line 49, in isdir
st = os.stat(s)
UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 64-65:
ordinal not in range(128)
However, when debbindiff 16 was used to compare the builds of openocd in
testing on May 5th, this worked nicely.
(Granted, the openocd version was slightly different (0.9.0~rc1-1 vs 0.9.0-1)
but I doubt that this matters. Now we could reschedule openocd in testing so
it would be tested with dbd20, but I'll leave this for later so the current
logs stay as they are.
https://reproducible.debian.net/artifacts/r00t-me/openocd_unstable_tmp-a3af8/
has artifacts for two more days...
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 01:26:42PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
when running debbindiff 20 on the build artifacts of openocd in unstable,
debbindiff fails like this:
Not sure how/when, but now debbindiff can process openocd without troubles.
Thus, closing.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
[Reproducible-builds] Reproducibility vs signatures
At some point we're hopefully going to support Secure Boot on amd64. That means there will be a signed kernel image (separate from the current linux-image packages) and a signed GRUB image. The kernel modules in the linux-image packages will also be signed, probably with an ephemeral key. All these signatures will all be embedded within binaries and will of course not be reproducible. The locations of differences will however be predictable. How should we deal with this limited variability? Could source packages or buildinfo describe the expected variations somehow? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Unix is many things to many people, but it's never been everything to anybody. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
