Re: [Reproducible-builds] ARM build machines
Hi, so on https://jenkins.debian.net/view/reproducible/ you can now see 12 armhf related jobs, so there is a setup_pbuilder_testing, setup_schroot_testing_debbindiff and a maintenance job for each of the four armhf build hosts. IOW: remote job scheduling now works \o/ What's missing now to make use of them: - dpkg 1.18.1.0~reproducible5 ftbfs in clean sid chroot, this needs to be fixed - the scheduler needs to be taught how to schedule armhf - the build script needs to be taught to deal with remote hosts Stay tuned. cheers, Holger P.S.: yes, in future those amd64 specific jobs should also be renamed to reflect that. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] dpkg_1.18.1.0~reproducible5 ftbfs
On 2015-07-31, Guillem Jover wrote: On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 16:49:13 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: so yesterday I tried to build http://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/debian/dpkg_1.18.1.0~reproducible5.dsc with pbuilder on sid/armhf and that failed _exactly_ like https://reproducible.debian.net/rbuild/unstable/amd64/dpkg_1.18.1.0~reproducible5.rbuild.log I then tried to build dpkg_1.18.1.dsc from sid proper and that built flawlessly on sid/armhf. Thus I conclude our reproducible patches cause this, whatever this is. Yet I lack time atm to debug this, so this mail is merely a note to Guillem and a call for help to the reproducible folks. Right, I noticed this quite some time ago, but forgot to bring it up. W/o having checked anything, it might be that whoever prepared the release perhaps forgot to «autoreconf -f -i» the sources and prepared it from a previous .dsc instead of a git tree? I *think* what's happening is the reproducible builds git tree doesn't include tags for the version, and .dist-version isn't present, so ./get-version is returning an empty string (it can't get it from git or From .dist-version), so autoreconf -f -i fails... running: echo 1.18.1.0~reproducible5 .dist-version autoreconf -f -i debuild -us -uc # or your build of choice Seems to fix/workaround the issue. live well, vagrant signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] package uploaded to our repo
dpkg_1.18.1.0~reproducible6.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] package uploaded to our repo
Hi, On Dienstag, 4. August 2015, Holger Levsen wrote: dpkg_1.18.1.0~reproducible6.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain and I've also managed to build this on armhf and upload these binaries too. Vagrant's hint of adding the .dist-version file helped, but this wasn't enough, I also had to run autoreconf as he described, which appearantly only changed files in .gitignore. Anyway, that debuild than succeeded on amd64 and after that I've build the package on armhf too... So, we have our basic experimental toolchain (=sid+patched dpkg) ready on armhf now too! https://reproducible.debian.net/index_repositories.html nicely now shows the 4 packages which still need to be buld for armhf, which I hope to do tomorrow... cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] Bug#794583: ocaml: Allow setting arbitrary RNG seed in ocamlopt
Source: ocaml Version: 4.01.0 Severity: wishlist User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: randomness X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that ocamlopt relies on temporary files whose names are generated randomly and are part of the output files' symbols. Therefore, we need a way to make these names determinist. For instance, reading an environment variable in the main function of ocamlopt (driver/optmain.ml) and calling “Random.seed 0” if it is set would be perfect. Using OCAMLPARAM (driver/compenv.ml) would work as well. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds Regards, Valentin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] package uploaded to our repo
gettext_0.19.5.1-1.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
[Reproducible-builds] Bug#794603: xchat: please make the build reproducible (timestamps, randomness)
Source: xchat Version: 2.8.8-7.3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps randomness X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that xchat could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes extra timestamps from the build system and strip Build ID from the produced executable. Once applied, xchat can be built reproducibly in our current experimental framework. [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds Regards, Valentin diff -ru xchat-2.8.8.orig/debian/control xchat-2.8.8/debian/control --- xchat-2.8.8.orig/debian/control 2015-08-04 18:38:25.271425177 + +++ xchat-2.8.8/debian/control 2015-08-04 19:20:18.931512526 + @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Maintainer: Davide Puricelli (evo) e...@debian.org Uploaders: Bart Martens ba...@debian.org Standards-Version: 3.8.4.0 -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), bison, libssl-dev, libglib2.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev (= 2.0.6), libperl-dev, gettext (= 0.10.37), libtool, zlib1g-dev, perl (= 5.8), python-dev, tcl-dev, autotools-dev, libdbus-glib-1-dev, libgtkspell-dev, gconf2, dpkg-dev (= 1.13.19), libsexy-dev, chrpath, imagemagick, autoconf +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), bison, libssl-dev, libglib2.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev (= 2.0.6), libperl-dev, gettext (= 0.10.37), libtool, zlib1g-dev, perl (= 5.8), python-dev, tcl-dev, autotools-dev, libdbus-glib-1-dev, libgtkspell-dev, gconf2, dpkg-dev (= 1.13.19), libsexy-dev, chrpath, imagemagick, autoconf, dh-strip-nondeterminism Homepage: http://www.xchat.org/ Package: xchat diff -ru xchat-2.8.8.orig/debian/rules xchat-2.8.8/debian/rules --- xchat-2.8.8.orig/debian/rules 2015-08-04 18:38:25.271425177 + +++ xchat-2.8.8/debian/rules 2015-08-04 19:29:11.975531049 + @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ dh_link -pxchat ifeq $(findstring nostrip,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)) dh_strip -pxchat + dh_strip_nondeterminism -pxchat endif dh_compress -pxchat dh_fixperms -pxchat diff -ru xchat-2.8.8.orig/src/fe-gtk/about.c xchat-2.8.8/src/fe-gtk/about.c --- xchat-2.8.8.orig/src/fe-gtk/about.c 2015-08-04 18:38:25.267425176 + +++ xchat-2.8.8/src/fe-gtk/about.c 2015-08-04 19:28:08.0 + @@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ (snprintf) (buf, sizeof (buf), An IRC Client for UNIX.\n\n - This binary was compiled on __DATE__\n Using GTK %d.%d.%d X %d\n Running on %s, gtk_major_version, gtk_minor_version, gtk_micro_version, @@ -126,7 +125,7 @@ #else bRenderer/b: %s\n #endif -bCompiled/b: __DATE__\n\n +\n small\302\251 1998-2010 Peter \305\275elezn\303\275 lt;z...@xchat.org/small, _(A multiplatform IRC Client), get_cpu_str(), diff -ru xchat-2.8.8.orig/src/fe-text/fe-text.c xchat-2.8.8/src/fe-text/fe-text.c --- xchat-2.8.8.orig/src/fe-text/fe-text.c 2015-08-04 18:38:25.267425176 + +++ xchat-2.8.8/src/fe-text/fe-text.c 2015-08-04 19:28:08.0 + @@ -103,7 +103,6 @@ \n \017xchat \00310PACKAGE_VERSION\n \017Running on \00310%s \017glib \00310%d.%d.%d\n - \017This binary compiled \00310__DATE__\017\n, get_cpu_str(), glib_major_version, glib_minor_version, glib_micro_version); fe_print_text (sess, buf, 0); ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] dpkg_1.18.1.0~reproducible5 ftbfs
On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 08:42:48 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: On 2015-07-31, Guillem Jover wrote: Right, I noticed this quite some time ago, but forgot to bring it up. W/o having checked anything, it might be that whoever prepared the release perhaps forgot to «autoreconf -f -i» the sources and prepared it from a previous .dsc instead of a git tree? I *think* what's happening is the reproducible builds git tree doesn't include tags for the version, and .dist-version isn't present, so ./get-version is returning an empty string (it can't get it from git or From .dist-version), so autoreconf -f -i fails... running: echo 1.18.1.0~reproducible5 .dist-version autoreconf -f -i debuild -us -uc # or your build of choice Seems to fix/workaround the issue. Ah, the problem is that the releases are being made directly from git with dpkg-buildpackage. The correct way to release dpkg is to «make dist» and then build Debian packages from that tarball. The detailed instructions on releasing can be found on the “How to release“ section here: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/GitUsage although several points might not be relevant here. Thanks, Guillem ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
