Re: Bug#855282: debsign: support .buildinfo files

2017-03-12 Thread James McCoy 
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 11:45:20PM -0500, James McCoy wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 05:23:00PM +, Ximin Luo wrote:
> > I've done an initial implementation here:
> > 
> > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/devscripts.git/log/?h=pu/debsign-buildinfo
> > 
> > Please review!
> 
> This was merged and uploaded in 2.17.2.  However, now I see that
> buildinfo files may be arch-qualified even with a _source.changes (e.g.,
> by using "sbuild -A --source-only-changes").  That's not currently
> handled properly since "debsign foo_ver_source.changes" expects
> "foo_ver_source.buildinfo" to exist.
> 
> Should debsign be deriving the path for the buildinfo from the contents
> of the changes file?

I've changed all of the "child file" handling to use this approach in
4a4238dbf1e789e998cf047ea0f006e982fba56b.  That seems cleaner than
debsign replicating logic to determine the names of related files.

Cheers,
-- 
James
GPG Key: 4096R/91BF BF4D 6956 BD5D F7B7  2D23 DFE6 91AE 331B A3DB

___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds

Please review the draft for week 98's blog post

2017-03-12 Thread Chris Lamb 
Hi all,

Please review the draft for week 98's blog post:

  https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/blog/drafts/98/

Feel free to commit any changes directly to drafts/98.mdwn in Git:

https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/blog.git/

I am very happy to reword and/or rework prior to publishing. I intend
to publish it no earlier than:

  https://time.is/compare/2359_13_Mar_2017_in_UTC

or

  $ date -d 'Mon Mar 13 23:59:00 UTC 2017'


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-

___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds