Bug#857975: strip-nondeterminism: endless loop while stripping ar files
Package: strip-nondeterminism
Version: 0.031-1
Severity: important
It is possible to trigger an endless loop while stripping ar files which
contain an illegal file size.
How to reproduce:
echo H4sICHfpylgCA3Rlc3QuYQBTtEksSs6w49JXQAUGGGwIaWZiA\
qZ1zWAqErgAcKtfFkQ= | base64 -d | gzip -d > loop.a
strip-nondeterminism loop.a
See this patch for a possible solution:
diff --git a/lib/File/StripNondeterminism/handlers/ar.pm
b/lib/File/StripNondeterminism/handlers/ar.pm
index 660fa8f..a71307a 100644
--- a/lib/File/StripNondeterminism/handlers/ar.pm
+++ b/lib/File/StripNondeterminism/handlers/ar.pm
@@ -67,6 +67,8 @@ sub normalize {
my $file_size = substr($buf, 48, 10);
seek $fh, $file_header_start + 16, SEEK_SET;
+ die "Incorrect file size" if $file_size < 1;
+
# mtime
syswrite $fh,
sprintf("%-12d", $File::StripNondeterminism::canonical_time
// 0);
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Bug#857940: marked as done (diffoscope: FTBFS: test errors)
Your message dated Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:33:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#857940: fixed in diffoscope 80
has caused the Debian Bug report #857940,
regarding diffoscope: FTBFS: test errors
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
857940: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857940
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: diffoscope
Version: 79
Severity: serious
=== FAILURES ===
test_diff_meta
differences_meta = []
@skip_unless_tools_exist('img2txt', 'identify')
@skip_unless_tool_is_at_least('identify', identify_version, '6.9.6')
def test_diff_meta(differences_meta):
expected_diff = get_data('ico_image_meta_expected_diff')
> assert differences_meta[-1].unified_diff == expected_diff
E assert '@@ -1,9 +1,9... Channels: \n' == '@@ -1,17 +1,1...a: 0.454545\n'
E - @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
E ? ^^
E + @@ -1,17 +1,17 @@
E ? ^^^^
EImage format: ICO
E - -File size: 6.8Ki
E ? ^ ^
E + -File size: 6.93KB
E ? ^^ ^
E - +File size: 3.2Ki
E ? ^
E + +File size: 3.27KB
E ?+ ^
E - Height:
E + Height: 100
E ? +++
E - Width:
E + Width: 100
E ? +++
E - Orientation:
E + Orientation: Undefined
E ? +
E - Compression type:
E + Compression type: Undefined
E ?+
E - Compression quality:
E + Compression quality: 0
E ? +
E - Colorspace:
E + Colorspace: sRGB
E ?
E - Channels:
E + Channels: srgba
E ?+
E + -Depth: 4
E + +Depth: 1
E + Interlace mode: None
E + Rendering intent: Perceptual
E + X resolution: 0
E + Y resolution: 0
E + Resolution units: Undefined
E + Transparency channel enabled: True
E + Gamma: 0.454545
differences_meta = []
expected_diff = '@@ -1,17 +1,17 @@\n Image format: ICO\n-File size:
6.93KB\n+File size: 3.27KB\n Height: 100\n Width: 100\n
Orientatio...resolution: 0\n Y resolution: 0\n Resolution units: Undefined\n
Transparency channel enabled: True\n Gamma: 0.454545\n'
tests/comparators/test_ico_image.py:58: AssertionError
test_diff_meta
differences_meta = []
@skip_unless_tools_exist('img2txt', 'identify')
@skip_unless_tool_is_at_least('identify', identify_version, '6.9.6')
def test_diff_meta(differences_meta):
expected_diff = get_data('jpeg_image_meta_expected_diff')
> assert differences_meta[-1].unified_diff == expected_diff
E assert '@@ -1,9 +1,9...EXIF data: \n' == '@@ -1,20 +1,2...EXIF data: \n'
E - @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
E ? ^^
E + @@ -1,20 +1,20 @@
E ? ^^^^
EImage format: JPEG
E - -File size: 662
E + -File size: 662B
E ?+
E - +File size: 627
E + +File size: 627B
E ?+
E - Height:
E + Height: 100
E ? +++
E - Width:
E + Width: 100
E ? +++
E - Orientation:
E + Orientation: Undefined
E ? +
E - Compression type:
E + Compression type: JPEG
E ?
E - Compression quality:
E ? ^
E + -Compression quality: 90
E ? ^ ++
E + +Compression quality: 95
E - Colorspace:
E + Colorspace: sRGB
E ?
E - Channels:
E + Channels: srgb
E ?
E - @@ -12,9 +12,9 @@
E + Depth: 8
E + Interlace mode: JPEG
E - Rendering intent:
E + Rendering intent: Perceptual
E ?++
E - X resolution:
E ? ^
E + -X resolution: 88
E ? ^ ++
E - Y resolution:
E ? ^
E + -Y resolution: 88
E ? ^ ++
E + +X resolution: 65
E + +Y resolution: 65
E
diffoscope_80_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 17:06:45 +0100 Source: diffoscope Binary: diffoscope Architecture: source Version: 80 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks Changed-By: Chris Lamb Description: diffoscope - in-depth comparison of files, archives, and directories Closes: 857940 Changes: diffoscope (80) experimental; urgency=medium . * Ensure that we really are using ImageMagick and not, for example, the GraphicsMagick compatibility layer installed by graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat. (Closes: #857940) * Factor out the unicode decoding of the identify -version output. * travis.yml: Don't build tags. Checksums-Sha1: a8a4a56f6667975f4b0a70f33b4b49e889e1a515 2997 diffoscope_80.dsc 36581c3e2bd013633239339ecfb29655f1fd4f73 355288 diffoscope_80.tar.xz 2f7d4838f6c895e678496234593ce3c661a96cea 17076 diffoscope_80_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: c09b6e35b2b0157f0052f254283dac9f5a3fbc2fe8b97827d94cbe0640521c2b 2997 diffoscope_80.dsc f0f7ff19818f38066c967d61b265dde770fc1c2d2e192e4f2bd401fee999 355288 diffoscope_80.tar.xz 8ea3a40a865109f284430b49de4f051ecc5f5c2ec15ef05809f02515dfc1d818 17076 diffoscope_80_amd64.buildinfo Files: d861e4bda26f4cfe1d4c9154a136526e 2997 devel optional diffoscope_80.dsc dcac924507ab8c61790d85b26f46b9ce 355288 devel optional diffoscope_80.tar.xz 0bfda91dd8c1b44acfe6da050c236cd7 17076 devel optional diffoscope_80_amd64.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEwv5L0nHBObhsUz5GHpU+J9QxHlgFAljKuZIACgkQHpU+J9Qx HlihNRAArHqMecPG/q6B56zpaGlZL1cY/UgRml65hVP58UOdgm6xiP/0IlKWm6Yd azfBdsyX53UaepsUeogpC9sD7zwflzlrdt9eDBCPJZt4UcLatU60Zv1Eo3RjFCxe 8grJInxuQ7TKsZp+ksWzYHQllUPlciKHCv/AmtYGpz/xDhiJsAcau7PfVM3uy2a8 cvHTEjNPhZ5WR6HrGWZLcJ9P0Axzvx28nfFoxiW0+jvoufDGbZ5bf+655g1Y6tID 3g75NfX0sfLa3pwdZX96njlmRhMtaS5tu2JyUj/Lt0SbKAZuJesXMcLV9aUBBl98 HfjZiIxrPt/+j+DLMZQuDZE0pExo4yfz0jgCRERoazg6P5T7B7PQka68RKve0mQQ wgASz8GfomyyWGO/RBeaphH1b1I9L8WWRZTI6JBZXfJL4E23b6FQrOqycY3rk0Si 1YiXh8is91/PFTBN4xSjArx0cgfRv6YESEaJU0k3PCQJjmfY0OMzp9iuJ5shs5GQ La4fEe0SPe3ZWptSmGbSmshUON/7N9WnIAHAx5a4SC6Q1II7xHCWeqaZ1zxl4sE0 LamBsissUaQuUHdP0vji3D9OIjnTnYvBN/cSmiFhs2CAdO5/pxBBUZbfGn183CNs VU3gHf40+h2IzjPu79pCihUETLo0WRWdsabLh+HRkjtJs6vRkkw= =gqGt -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Processing of diffoscope_80_amd64.changes
diffoscope_80_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: diffoscope_80.dsc diffoscope_80.tar.xz diffoscope_80_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Bug#857940: diffoscope: FTBFS: test errors
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> The buildds are using the aspcud sbuild resolver for experimental
I'm using mk-build-deps w/--no-install-recommends. It does not get
installed with that (and therefore I did not see the build failures
prior to uploading).
> Anyhow, if a package causes the build to fail it should either be in
> Build-Conflicts{,-Indep,-Arch}, or the package be fixed, imho
I agree, hence d030378 etc.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Processed: Re: diffoscope: FTBFS: test errors
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 857940 + pending Bug #857940 [src:diffoscope] diffoscope: FTBFS: test errors Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 857940: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857940 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Bug#857940: diffoscope: FTBFS: test errors
tags 857940 + pending thanks Fixed in Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/diffoscope.git/commit/?id=d03037820c34ddd168d6ce5d000e5a5dbcbf4e7f Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Bug#857940: diffoscope: FTBFS: test errors
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:40:46PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Assuming this is from...
>
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=diffoscope&arch=all&ver=79&stamp=1489658432&raw=0
yes.
> ... it appears to be caused by "graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat"
> package being installed. With this package installed locally I can
> reproduce the test failures.
umh
> (Perhaps the/this experimental:all buildd is installing packages
> with Recommends, or a different APT pinning, or...?)
The buildds are using the aspcud sbuild resolver for experimental, this
might have something to do with that.
Anyhow, if a package causes the build to fail it should either be in
Build-Conflicts{,-Indep,-Arch}, or the package be fixed, imho (besides,
this is the same argument we brought to add those Build-Conflicts with
package failing to build with a buggy locales-all two years ago…).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Bug#857940: diffoscope: FTBFS: test errors
Hi Mattia, > […] Assuming this is from... https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=diffoscope&arch=all&ver=79&stamp=1489658432&raw=0 ... it appears to be caused by "graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat" package being installed. With this package installed locally I can reproduce the test failures. I don't yet know why it is being installed at all; it isn't when installing all the build-dependencies on my machine, even under experimental. Nor is it being installed on tests.reproducible.org or we would naturally have all seen this prior to upload. Indeed, we should have seen it whenever we first pushed to experimental weeks ago; there have been no code changes to the ICO or JPEG handler. (Perhaps the/this experimental:all buildd is installing packages with Recommends, or a different APT pinning, or...?) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Bug#857944: marked as done (diffoscope: release 79 has a python version of VERSION = "78")
Your message dated Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:46:29 + with message-id <20170316144629.gd31...@layer-acht.org> and subject line Re: Bug#857944: diffoscope: release 79 has a python version of VERSION = "78" has caused the Debian Bug report #857944, regarding diffoscope: release 79 has a python version of VERSION = "78" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 857944: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857944 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: diffoscope Version: 79 Severity: normal hi, so the current release 79 has a python version of VERSION = "78" :P -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- closing because | mapreri: h01ger: so as mentioned: the release is indeed 79, i checked master instead of experimental -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message --- ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Bug#857944: diffoscope: release 79 has a python version of VERSION = "78"
Package: diffoscope Version: 79 Severity: normal hi, so the current release 79 has a python version of VERSION = "78" :P -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Bug#857940: diffoscope: FTBFS: test errors
Source: diffoscope
Version: 79
Severity: serious
=== FAILURES ===
test_diff_meta
differences_meta = []
@skip_unless_tools_exist('img2txt', 'identify')
@skip_unless_tool_is_at_least('identify', identify_version, '6.9.6')
def test_diff_meta(differences_meta):
expected_diff = get_data('ico_image_meta_expected_diff')
> assert differences_meta[-1].unified_diff == expected_diff
E assert '@@ -1,9 +1,9... Channels: \n' == '@@ -1,17 +1,1...a: 0.454545\n'
E - @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
E ? ^^
E + @@ -1,17 +1,17 @@
E ? ^^^^
EImage format: ICO
E - -File size: 6.8Ki
E ? ^ ^
E + -File size: 6.93KB
E ? ^^ ^
E - +File size: 3.2Ki
E ? ^
E + +File size: 3.27KB
E ?+ ^
E - Height:
E + Height: 100
E ? +++
E - Width:
E + Width: 100
E ? +++
E - Orientation:
E + Orientation: Undefined
E ? +
E - Compression type:
E + Compression type: Undefined
E ?+
E - Compression quality:
E + Compression quality: 0
E ? +
E - Colorspace:
E + Colorspace: sRGB
E ?
E - Channels:
E + Channels: srgba
E ?+
E + -Depth: 4
E + +Depth: 1
E + Interlace mode: None
E + Rendering intent: Perceptual
E + X resolution: 0
E + Y resolution: 0
E + Resolution units: Undefined
E + Transparency channel enabled: True
E + Gamma: 0.454545
differences_meta = []
expected_diff = '@@ -1,17 +1,17 @@\n Image format: ICO\n-File size:
6.93KB\n+File size: 3.27KB\n Height: 100\n Width: 100\n
Orientatio...resolution: 0\n Y resolution: 0\n Resolution units: Undefined\n
Transparency channel enabled: True\n Gamma: 0.454545\n'
tests/comparators/test_ico_image.py:58: AssertionError
test_diff_meta
differences_meta = []
@skip_unless_tools_exist('img2txt', 'identify')
@skip_unless_tool_is_at_least('identify', identify_version, '6.9.6')
def test_diff_meta(differences_meta):
expected_diff = get_data('jpeg_image_meta_expected_diff')
> assert differences_meta[-1].unified_diff == expected_diff
E assert '@@ -1,9 +1,9...EXIF data: \n' == '@@ -1,20 +1,2...EXIF data: \n'
E - @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
E ? ^^
E + @@ -1,20 +1,20 @@
E ? ^^^^
EImage format: JPEG
E - -File size: 662
E + -File size: 662B
E ?+
E - +File size: 627
E + +File size: 627B
E ?+
E - Height:
E + Height: 100
E ? +++
E - Width:
E + Width: 100
E ? +++
E - Orientation:
E + Orientation: Undefined
E ? +
E - Compression type:
E + Compression type: JPEG
E ?
E - Compression quality:
E ? ^
E + -Compression quality: 90
E ? ^ ++
E + +Compression quality: 95
E - Colorspace:
E + Colorspace: sRGB
E ?
E - Channels:
E + Channels: srgb
E ?
E - @@ -12,9 +12,9 @@
E + Depth: 8
E + Interlace mode: JPEG
E - Rendering intent:
E + Rendering intent: Perceptual
E ?++
E - X resolution:
E ? ^
E + -X resolution: 88
E ? ^ ++
E - Y resolution:
E ? ^
E + -Y resolution: 88
E ? ^ ++
E + +X resolution: 65
E + +Y resolution: 65
E - Resolution units:
E + Resolution units: PixelsPerInch
E ?+
E - Transparency channel enabled: false
E ?^
E + Transparency channel enabled: False
E ?^
E - Gamma:
E + Gamma: 0.454545
E - Number of unique colors:
E + Number of unique colors: 1
E ? +
E -Comment: Comment #1
E +Comment: Comment #2
EEXIF data:
differences_meta = []
expected_diff = '@@ -1,20 +1,20 @@\n Image format: JPEG\n-File size:
662B\n+File size: 627B\n Height: 100\n Width: 100\n Orientation: ...bled:
False\n Gamma: 0.454545\n Number of unique colors: 1\n-Comment:
Bug#857610: marked as done (diffoscope: dump GIF images to text using gifbuild (or giftext))
Your message dated Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:18:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#857610: fixed in diffoscope 79 has caused the Debian Bug report #857610, regarding diffoscope: dump GIF images to text using gifbuild (or giftext) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 857610: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857610 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: diffoscope Severity: wishlist I noticed that gifbuild can dump GIF images to text. It might be interesting to use gifbuild in a similar way to how sng is used to dump PNG images to text. The giftext tool can also dump GIFs images to text. Both of these tools are from the giflib-tools package. Here is an example of a small gif image: $ gifbuild -d dep.gif # # GIF information from dep.gif screen width 16 screen height 16 screen colors 128 screen background 0 pixel aspect byte 0 screen map sort flag off rgb 006 002 004 rgb 154 142 132 rgb 118 006 004 rgb 098 086 084 rgb 066 002 004 rgb 122 114 108 rgb 214 210 196 rgb 166 006 004 rgb 050 038 036 rgb 202 046 044 rgb 058 002 004 rgb 194 022 020 rgb 026 014 012 rgb 238 238 220 rgb 182 010 004 rgb 018 002 004 rgb 234 178 180 rgb 098 006 004 rgb 082 002 004 rgb 206 074 076 rgb 226 146 148 rgb 242 210 212 rgb 250 250 236 rgb 190 010 004 rgb 014 002 004 rgb 170 014 012 rgb 018 010 012 rgb 174 166 156 rgb 106 098 092 rgb 074 002 004 rgb 134 122 116 rgb 230 226 212 rgb 178 006 004 rgb 190 030 028 rgb 026 002 004 rgb 206 198 188 rgb 090 002 004 rgb 222 122 124 rgb 254 250 252 rgb 194 014 012 rgb 010 002 004 rgb 158 146 140 rgb 070 002 004 rgb 126 114 108 rgb 222 218 204 rgb 170 006 004 rgb 054 042 044 rgb 206 062 060 rgb 034 022 020 rgb 194 026 028 rgb 026 018 012 rgb 246 246 228 rgb 186 010 004 rgb 022 002 004 rgb 234 182 180 rgb 114 006 004 rgb 086 002 004 rgb 210 090 092 rgb 230 166 164 rgb 246 222 220 rgb 254 254 236 rgb 190 010 012 rgb 014 006 004 rgb 110 098 092 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 000 rgb 000 000 00
Bug#856446: marked as done (diffoscope: test_cbfs::test_listing fails due to unexpected header in output)
Your message dated Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:18:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#856446: fixed in diffoscope 79
has caused the Debian Bug report #856446,
regarding diffoscope: test_cbfs::test_listing fails due to unexpected header in
output
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
856446: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856446
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: diffoscope
Version: 48
Hi,
I'm trying to package diffoscope for Fedora and the tests listed
in $subject are failing. Seems to be some timezone issue:
= FAILURES
==
_ test_differences
__
differences = [, ]>]>]
@pytest.mark.skipif(not guestfs_working(), reason='guestfs not working on
the system')
@pytest.mark.skipif(tool_missing('qemu-img'), reason='missing qemu-img')
@pytest.mark.skipif(miss_guestfs, reason='guestfs is missing')
def test_differences(differences):
assert differences[0].source1 == 'test1.ext4.tar'
tarinfo = differences[0].details[0]
tardiff = differences[0].details[1]
encodingdiff = tardiff.details[0]
assert tarinfo.source1 == 'file list'
assert tarinfo.source2 == 'file list'
assert tardiff.source1 == './date.txt'
assert tardiff.source2 == './date.txt'
assert encodingdiff.source1 == 'encoding'
assert encodingdiff.source2 == 'encoding'
expected_diff = open(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__),
'../data/ext4_expected_diffs'), encoding='utf-8').read()
found_diff = tarinfo.unified_diff + tardiff.unified_diff +
encodingdiff.unified_diff
> assert expected_diff == found_diff
E assert '@@ -1,3 +1,3...cii\n+utf-8\n' == '@@ -1,3 +1,3 ...cii\n+utf-8\n'
E @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
E - -drwxr-xr-x 0000 2015-12-02
16:01:40.00 ./
E - +drwxr-xr-x 0000 2015-12-02
16:03:11.00 ./
E - drwx-- 0000 2015-12-02
16:00:55.00 ./lost+found/
E + -drwxr-xr-x 0 root (0) root (0)0
2015-12-02 16:01:40.00 ./
E + +drwxr-xr-x 0 root (0) root (0)0
2015-12-02 16:03:11.00 ./
E + drwx-- 0 root (0) root (0)0
2015-12-02 16:00:55.00 ./lost+found/
E --rw-rw-rw- 0 1234 1234 28 2015-12-02
16:01:40.00 ./date.txt
E +-r--r--r-- 0 4321 4321 44 2015-12-02
16:03:11.00 ./date.txt
E @@ -1 +1 @@
E -Wed Dec 2 17:01:40 CET 2015
E +jeudi 3 décembre 2015, 06:03:11 (UTC+1400)
E @@ -1 +1 @@
E -us-ascii
E +utf-8
tests/comparators/test_fsimage.py:85: AssertionError
___ test_metadata
___
differences = [, ]
def test_metadata(differences):
assert differences[0].source1 == 'metadata'
assert differences[0].source2 == 'metadata'
expected_diff = open(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__),
'../data/gzip_metadata_expected_diff')).read()
> assert differences[0].unified_diff == expected_diff
E assert '@@ -1 +1 @@\..., from Unix\n' == '@@ -1 +1 @@\n..., from Unix\n'
E @@ -1 +1 @@
E - -gzip compressed data, last modified: Tue Jun 23 06:12:28 2015, max
compression, from Unix
E ? -
E + -gzip compressed data, last modified: Tue Jun 23 10:12:28 2015, max
compression, from Unix
E ? +
E - +gzip compressed data, last modified: Tue Jun 23 06:12:28 2015,
from Unix
E ? -
E + +gzip compressed data, last modified: Tue Jun 23 10:12:28 2015,
from Unix
E ? +
tests/comparators/test_gzip.py:54: AssertionError
___ test_metadata
___
differences = [, , ]>]>]>]
def test_metadata(differences):
assert differences[0].source1 == 'metadata'
expected_diff = open(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__),
'../data/ipk_metadata_expected_diff')).read()
> assert differences[0].unified_diff == expected_diff
E
Bug#856447: marked as done (diffoscope: test_icc::test_diff fails due to locale difference in output)
Your message dated Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:18:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#856447: fixed in diffoscope 79
has caused the Debian Bug report #856447,
regarding diffoscope: test_icc::test_diff fails due to locale difference in
output
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
856447: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856447
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: diffoscope
Version: 48
Hi,
I'm trying to package diffoscope for Fedora and the tests listed
in $subject are failing. Seems to be some timezone issue:
= FAILURES
==
_ test_differences
__
differences = [, ]>]>]
@pytest.mark.skipif(not guestfs_working(), reason='guestfs not working on
the system')
@pytest.mark.skipif(tool_missing('qemu-img'), reason='missing qemu-img')
@pytest.mark.skipif(miss_guestfs, reason='guestfs is missing')
def test_differences(differences):
assert differences[0].source1 == 'test1.ext4.tar'
tarinfo = differences[0].details[0]
tardiff = differences[0].details[1]
encodingdiff = tardiff.details[0]
assert tarinfo.source1 == 'file list'
assert tarinfo.source2 == 'file list'
assert tardiff.source1 == './date.txt'
assert tardiff.source2 == './date.txt'
assert encodingdiff.source1 == 'encoding'
assert encodingdiff.source2 == 'encoding'
expected_diff = open(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__),
'../data/ext4_expected_diffs'), encoding='utf-8').read()
found_diff = tarinfo.unified_diff + tardiff.unified_diff +
encodingdiff.unified_diff
> assert expected_diff == found_diff
E assert '@@ -1,3 +1,3...cii\n+utf-8\n' == '@@ -1,3 +1,3 ...cii\n+utf-8\n'
E @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
E - -drwxr-xr-x 0000 2015-12-02
16:01:40.00 ./
E - +drwxr-xr-x 0000 2015-12-02
16:03:11.00 ./
E - drwx-- 0000 2015-12-02
16:00:55.00 ./lost+found/
E + -drwxr-xr-x 0 root (0) root (0)0
2015-12-02 16:01:40.00 ./
E + +drwxr-xr-x 0 root (0) root (0)0
2015-12-02 16:03:11.00 ./
E + drwx-- 0 root (0) root (0)0
2015-12-02 16:00:55.00 ./lost+found/
E --rw-rw-rw- 0 1234 1234 28 2015-12-02
16:01:40.00 ./date.txt
E +-r--r--r-- 0 4321 4321 44 2015-12-02
16:03:11.00 ./date.txt
E @@ -1 +1 @@
E -Wed Dec 2 17:01:40 CET 2015
E +jeudi 3 décembre 2015, 06:03:11 (UTC+1400)
E @@ -1 +1 @@
E -us-ascii
E +utf-8
tests/comparators/test_fsimage.py:85: AssertionError
___ test_metadata
___
differences = [, ]
def test_metadata(differences):
assert differences[0].source1 == 'metadata'
assert differences[0].source2 == 'metadata'
expected_diff = open(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__),
'../data/gzip_metadata_expected_diff')).read()
> assert differences[0].unified_diff == expected_diff
E assert '@@ -1 +1 @@\..., from Unix\n' == '@@ -1 +1 @@\n..., from Unix\n'
E @@ -1 +1 @@
E - -gzip compressed data, last modified: Tue Jun 23 06:12:28 2015, max
compression, from Unix
E ? -
E + -gzip compressed data, last modified: Tue Jun 23 10:12:28 2015, max
compression, from Unix
E ? +
E - +gzip compressed data, last modified: Tue Jun 23 06:12:28 2015,
from Unix
E ? -
E + +gzip compressed data, last modified: Tue Jun 23 10:12:28 2015,
from Unix
E ? +
tests/comparators/test_gzip.py:54: AssertionError
___ test_metadata
___
differences = [, , ]>]>]>]
def test_metadata(differences):
assert differences[0].source1 == 'metadata'
expected_diff = open(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__),
'../data/ipk_metadata_expected_diff')).read()
> assert differences[0].unified_diff == expected_diff
E
Bug#850758: marked as done (diffoscope: redundant undecoded AndroidManifest.xml (Binary XML) comparison in APK comparator)
Your message dated Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:18:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#850758: fixed in diffoscope 79 has caused the Debian Bug report #850758, regarding diffoscope: redundant undecoded AndroidManifest.xml (Binary XML) comparison in APK comparator to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 850758: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850758 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: diffoscope Version: 67 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, The result of comparing AndroidManifest.xml (Binary XML) file from APK file in apk.py comparator is shown twice, first, as AndroidManifest.xml (XML file decoded from original file by apktool) second, as original/AndroidManifest.xml (the original undecoded binary file) fix: 1. if there is a difference in decoded AndroidManifest.xml file, remove the original/AndroidManifest.xml. if there is no difference in AndroidManifest.xml but original/AndroidManifest.xml differ, show "No file format specific differences found inside, yet data differs" message (which shown by diffoscope in similar scenarios [when tool failed to find differences]) 2. it will be better to indicate the AndroidManifest.xml type, such as for example: show AndroidManifest.xml as "AndroidManifest.xml (decoded)" show original/AndroidManifest.xml as "AndroidManifest.xml (original / undecoded)" examples: https://verification.f-droid.org/org.opengemara.shiurim_2.apk.diffoscope.html https://verification.f-droid.org/org.systemcall.scores_2.apk.diffoscope.html TXT result example: ├── AndroidManifest.xml @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ │ │ End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: diffoscope Source-Version: 79 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of diffoscope, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 850...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Chris Lamb (supplier of updated diffoscope package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:38:16 +0100 Source: diffoscope Binary: diffoscope Architecture: source Version: 79 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks Changed-By: Chris Lamb Description: diffoscope - in-depth comparison of files, archives, and directories Closes: 850758 856446 856447 857610 Changes: diffoscope (79) experimental; urgency=medium . [ Chris Lamb ] * Extract SquashFS images in one go rather than per-file, speeding up (eg.) Tails ISO comparison by ~10x. * Support newer versions of cbfstool to avoid test failures. (Closes: #856446) * Skip icc test that varies on endian if the Debian-specific patch is not present. (Closes: #856447) * Compare GIF images using gifbuild. (Closes: #857610) * Also interpret "DOS/MBR boot sector" files as ISO images as they may have been processed by isohybrid. * Progress bar: - Hide bar if we are running with --debug mode. - Update prior to working on an item so the displayed filename is correct. . [ Maria Glukhova ] * Improve AndroidManifest.xml comparison for APK files. - Indicate the AndroidManifest.xml type. (Closes: #850758) Checksums-Sha1: 496feb215d728030e2fa59f2fac3b208a9a16db8 2997 diffoscope_79.dsc d8d840bf0aeda8568a0edf27ac4e3653eb58e7db 355184 diffoscope_79.tar.xz fcbd3d8359b293f85c3cd51a23113b5e210a 17076 diffoscope_79_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 6d45b881a6769f389a8035cad5f3a7f0b35520661cd9c4b11fc0d7a60d8157cb 2997 diffoscope_79.dsc 66f22b45b2186e83532a3271b07b783dcf68d69e4140420935c6925c4a92a11d 355184 diffoscope_79.tar.xz 4979216727fd8d538a2b877cbfa6fd5f8df7e3860739a6902492bd3fbbdf6f86 17076 diffoscope_79_amd64.buildinfo Files: 82c74d4cccb1caa650f1666a8c04c3aa 2997 devel optional diffoscope_79.dsc 88fb8d44784783ea46b115b89a93f162 355184 devel optional diffoscope_79.tar.xz 0d100c2a8c845473f387ed458795634c 17076 devel optional diffoscope_79_amd64.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEwv5L
diffoscope_79_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:38:16 +0100 Source: diffoscope Binary: diffoscope Architecture: source Version: 79 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks Changed-By: Chris Lamb Description: diffoscope - in-depth comparison of files, archives, and directories Closes: 850758 856446 856447 857610 Changes: diffoscope (79) experimental; urgency=medium . [ Chris Lamb ] * Extract SquashFS images in one go rather than per-file, speeding up (eg.) Tails ISO comparison by ~10x. * Support newer versions of cbfstool to avoid test failures. (Closes: #856446) * Skip icc test that varies on endian if the Debian-specific patch is not present. (Closes: #856447) * Compare GIF images using gifbuild. (Closes: #857610) * Also interpret "DOS/MBR boot sector" files as ISO images as they may have been processed by isohybrid. * Progress bar: - Hide bar if we are running with --debug mode. - Update prior to working on an item so the displayed filename is correct. . [ Maria Glukhova ] * Improve AndroidManifest.xml comparison for APK files. - Indicate the AndroidManifest.xml type. (Closes: #850758) Checksums-Sha1: 496feb215d728030e2fa59f2fac3b208a9a16db8 2997 diffoscope_79.dsc d8d840bf0aeda8568a0edf27ac4e3653eb58e7db 355184 diffoscope_79.tar.xz fcbd3d8359b293f85c3cd51a23113b5e210a 17076 diffoscope_79_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 6d45b881a6769f389a8035cad5f3a7f0b35520661cd9c4b11fc0d7a60d8157cb 2997 diffoscope_79.dsc 66f22b45b2186e83532a3271b07b783dcf68d69e4140420935c6925c4a92a11d 355184 diffoscope_79.tar.xz 4979216727fd8d538a2b877cbfa6fd5f8df7e3860739a6902492bd3fbbdf6f86 17076 diffoscope_79_amd64.buildinfo Files: 82c74d4cccb1caa650f1666a8c04c3aa 2997 devel optional diffoscope_79.dsc 88fb8d44784783ea46b115b89a93f162 355184 devel optional diffoscope_79.tar.xz 0d100c2a8c845473f387ed458795634c 17076 devel optional diffoscope_79_amd64.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEwv5L0nHBObhsUz5GHpU+J9QxHlgFAljKU3YACgkQHpU+J9Qx HlgtLRAAkiAY0JtDHAe2YATK7gUfZYGf8TF+iYDAx3rp5TW+pIEZCQRTuNbPoH0k WyBpd3KA7wpnX3jpl0lp+XgzY7ZVhXhEjE5kDwII1ZZd7bacS1n3E85Rf36pPfD+ 5ZVTFx0oVkWN3/GG2lq2kZaiDthnfhh3hEvKWKtn2miWxPoIkWPkbt2mko9eSOUn /92Ps8rQnBvuhY+0idFQzY1RCz59Q+rQBqySZqA36/0cWruY/Dt2fVR+5HeH157/ YVVxAmpSKwM1mJPEWTR0sCbb79dNSFLW/acK03MqQNTKHrpLPfzD9q9dwfS1HImL grf3Zm2OPjMRy02nAZgccn7sLTsPba7bt6nbP6T1Og0P7aQdrDrwZgsR2Z1zM9dS JxSGgkYh6Iadry4zVX3hUdnS8EMdR9dskm4NxQr42IvKJ2ntgZD/nTaEgkNCkj7D vTJJk/JVTWkYIzVYtvW0AARuGOePZ8Bb3Qadwuj47J7O4L6Zi52sIjZotzkelFSq q63I8dn6iS3v8zU20XDnJ0lst2jGG8zUi8Iz/2KgQUlgS8+nmCLO+QyNUe4dK/UB wT/Fm843IksTZvBIms+esXOQ5aIH9dBbXLZH3ea1imKC2Uke2q6hNAMre1oj0iSn pu0WaXmzlTgKTwc6+1xHAxG+EXFUUcpmJ9if2yKBfifjd1cwYgg= =Y7Hn -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Processing of diffoscope_79_amd64.changes
diffoscope_79_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: diffoscope_79.dsc diffoscope_79.tar.xz diffoscope_79_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
