RE: Stubbornly Invisible Client!

2000-07-30 Thread John Gee

The "Macintosh centric" feel of the product has begun to concern me. While I
certainly have no bias against Apple (we were once an Apple shop before
moving to NT), I hope Dantz is not struggling with a lack of depth of
experience with NT/Win2K as compared to other vendors with a more well
defined Wintel heritage...

Dantz may not have had a Windows server until recently, but they have 
had a Windows Retrospect client for a long time. Years ago I had 
terrible problems backing up a Windows NT 3.5.1 server, and Dantz 
technical support were very helpful. Despite Retrospect being the 
only application affected, I eventually identified a hardware 
problem. Windows NT 3.5 experience suggests a reasonable Wintel 
heritage. :-)

So a personal vote of confidence from years of backing up Windows and 
Macintosh clients: I have complete confidence in the Retrospect 
software and in Dantz technical support, for both Windows and 
Macintosh.

1. Does anyone have the Retrospect CLIENT running successfully on a
Win2k SERVER?

Yes.

My only problem was that when the Windows 2000 server was first set 
up, the TCP/IP protocol was binding to a second ethernet card with no 
ethernet attached. Walking through a Dantz trouble-shooting guide 
helped me to resolve the problem.

2. Does anyone have the Retrospect Client working on a dual-homed machine?

Not at the moment, but our previous Windows NT 3.5.1 server acted as 
a gateway between two ethernet segments and was backed up using 
Retrospect client. (Which might or might not be dual-homed, excuse my 
ignorance.)
-- 
John Gee[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dunedin, New ZealandProgrammers live in interesting times...



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Micompare errors with 4.3

2000-07-30 Thread Michael Scheurer

on 31/7/00 10:03 AM, John Gee  wrote:

 I get about the same number of miscompare errors as with the previous
 version, and they all make sense. (e.g. Files which are in use by
 running applications like email clients which haven't been shut down.)

The files in question are on a NT volume which is used as a repository by
our retouching dept. They never open files from the server, I fail to see
how these files can be flagged as busy.

michael

--
Michael Scheurer
Systems Administrator

Show-Ads Digital Centre
479 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004
Phone: +613 9821 4588
Fax:   +613 9821 4599
Mobile 0419 554 495
http://www.showads.com.au




--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Micompare errors with 4.3

2000-07-30 Thread Matthew Tevenan

Michael,

It would be really helpful if you would send the pertinent portion of your
log showing the miscompares to [EMAIL PROTECTED] We could then try and
diagnose what the problem is. A "miscompare" to me is still not enough
information to even begin troubleshooting. What miscompared? Date/time, data
size, data offset, resource offset...? Depending on what it was, this could
be a trivial or extremely serious problem!

Regards,

Matthew Tevenan
Technical Support Specialist
Dantz Development Corporation
925.253.3050
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 From: "Michael Scheurer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: "retro-talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 09:54:57 +1000
 To: retro-talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Micompare errors with 4.3
 
 Hi all,
 I'm getting heaps of miscompare errors with the new version, anyone else
 experiencing this?
 
 My setup is PPC 7300/180, 2 Sony DDS2, 1 HP DDS2, MacOS 8.6. with Retrospect
 4.3 backing up various clients and NT Volumes.
 
 This setup is the same I've been running for the last year without any
 problems. It's not a tape problem (Sony DGD120P) as the problem re appears
 on new storage sets and new tapes.
 
 I don't btw recycle tapes, tapes are written to once and stored.
 
 cheers
 michael
 -
 Michael Scheurer
 Systems Administrator
 
 Show-Ads Digital Centre
 479 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004
 Phone: +613 9821 4588
 Fax:   +613 9821 4599
 Mobile 0419 554 495
 http://www.showads.com.au
 
 
 
 
 --
 --
 To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
 Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Micompare errors with 4.3

2000-07-30 Thread Pat Lee

on 7/30/00 5:36 PM, Michael Scheurer at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 on 31/7/00 10:03 AM, John Gee  wrote:
 
 I get about the same number of miscompare errors as with the previous
 version, and they all make sense. (e.g. Files which are in use by
 running applications like email clients which haven't been shut down.)
 
 The files in question are on a NT volume which is used as a repository by
 our retouching dept. They never open files from the server, I fail to see
 how these files can be flagged as busy.
 

What are the exact errors in question? Copy and paste the log and send it to
the list. There is no way to know what the errors you are getting are about
if people don't know the EXACT error in question.

Error messages and numbers will be helpful in figuring out your problem.
Otherwise, people are just going to guess.






--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Micompare errors with 4.3

2000-07-30 Thread Michael Scheurer

on 31/7/00 1:45 PM, Pat Lee  wrote:

 What are the exact errors in question? Copy and paste the log and send it to
 the list. There is no way to know what the errors you are getting are about
 if people don't know the EXACT error in question.
 
 Error messages and numbers will be helpful in figuring out your problem.
 Otherwise, people are just going to guess.

I've sent a portion to Matthew, however here's a snippet:

Miscompare at data offset 9,099,563 for file
³ARCHIVE_CREATIVE:DC7392_HEINZsnow:MAN:ORIGS:heinz02.tif².

They are all the same, except for the data offset changing number. No other
error messages though.


michael

--
Michael Scheurer
Systems Administrator

Show-Ads Digital Centre
479 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004
Phone: +613 9821 4588
Fax:   +613 9821 4599
Mobile 0419 554 495
http://www.showads.com.au




--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]