Re: Trouble with post-review and py2exe
I did use easy_install to set up RBTools. I unzipped the egg because
someone in the earlier thread pointed out that py2exe couldn't handle
zipped .egg files, so they had to be unzipped before trying to create
an executable. My install and use of the post-review script works
fine, but I want to create the executable so I can give it to
coworkers who don't have Python installed at all.
On Jul 8, 4:06 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Rather than unzipping the egg, you really should be using easy_install (part
of Python setuptools, which there's a Windows installer for). This will
register the RBTools distribution entry.
The next version of RBTools will provide a post-review.exe automatically on
Windows.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Mark B. mar...@maine.rr.com wrote:
Hi,
I have installed a demo of ReviewBoard for my company to evaluate, but
I am having trouble with compiling post-review into an .exe as
described in a href=http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/
browse_thread/thread/d8595a6ab0b2ca56/5d9bf8331629aa4c?
lnk=gstq=py2exe#http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/%0Abrowse_thread/thread/d8...this
thread/a. While my Python installation
works fine, when running the .exe I get the following:
pre
Traceback (most recent call last):
File post-review.py, line 4, in module
File zipextimporter.pyc, line 82, in load_module
File pkg_resources.pyc, line 2562, in module
File pkg_resources.pyc, line 626, in require
File pkg_resources.pyc, line 524, in resolve
pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: RBTools==0.2beta1
/pre
I unzipped the RBTools distribution egg as directed in the thread; it
is in C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\RBTools-0.2beta1-py2.5.egg. The
diff I am using is Cygwin's (but I am running post-review from a cmd
prompt, not a bash prompt). I did rename the post-review that was
provided in the download to post-review.py, and also created an icon
for the program. My setup.py looks like this:
pre
from distutils.core import setup
import py2exe
setup(
options = {'py2exe': {'bundle_files': 1}},
console = [
{
script: 'post-review.py',
icon_resources: [(0, reviewboard.ico)]
}
],
zipfile = None,
)
/pre
I'm working on a WinXP SP 3 machine. Can anyone help me figure out
why the RBTools distro isn't being found? Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Newbie to ReviewBoard
Hello All- I was trying to find out Open Source Code review tools and I came across Review Board. I am only familiar with Rational Clearcase for source code management. That is the I have for usage. I have gone through the Review board website. I am not getting how it takes the code differences for the review. When I was trying to use the demo website, there it asks base file path and diff to choose a file. I don't understand what it needs to be gone here. I have following queries regarding my usage of Review Board, - How do I give files to see the differences for the review. - Does it support Rational Clearcase repository? if not, is there any way to tweak it? - Can I refer the review files directly from the repository in my case it is Clearcase? - How do I give multiple files differences in a single review? since it is always possible to have multiple files changes in a single review. Thanks in advance! Awaiting for the reply! Regards, Karthik --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Trouble with post-review and py2exe
Oh, did you run py2exe on the post-review that was in the path, or the one
that was in the RBTools*.egg/scripts directory? The one installed in the
Python scripts directory is just a wrapper for the one in the egg. What's
likely happening is that you're running it on the wrong script, and it's
still trying to wrap the installed version. If you do it on the one in the
egg, it should work.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Mark B. mar...@maine.rr.com wrote:
I did use easy_install to set up RBTools. I unzipped the egg because
someone in the earlier thread pointed out that py2exe couldn't handle
zipped .egg files, so they had to be unzipped before trying to create
an executable. My install and use of the post-review script works
fine, but I want to create the executable so I can give it to
coworkers who don't have Python installed at all.
On Jul 8, 4:06 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Rather than unzipping the egg, you really should be using easy_install
(part
of Python setuptools, which there's a Windows installer for). This will
register the RBTools distribution entry.
The next version of RBTools will provide a post-review.exe automatically
on
Windows.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Mark B. mar...@maine.rr.com wrote:
Hi,
I have installed a demo of ReviewBoard for my company to evaluate, but
I am having trouble with compiling post-review into an .exe as
described in a href=http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/
browse_thread/thread/d8595a6ab0b2ca56/5d9bf8331629aa4c?
lnk=gstq=py2exe#
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/%0Abrowse_thread/thread/d8..
.this
thread/a. While my Python installation
works fine, when running the .exe I get the following:
pre
Traceback (most recent call last):
File post-review.py, line 4, in module
File zipextimporter.pyc, line 82, in load_module
File pkg_resources.pyc, line 2562, in module
File pkg_resources.pyc, line 626, in require
File pkg_resources.pyc, line 524, in resolve
pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: RBTools==0.2beta1
/pre
I unzipped the RBTools distribution egg as directed in the thread; it
is in C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\RBTools-0.2beta1-py2.5.egg. The
diff I am using is Cygwin's (but I am running post-review from a cmd
prompt, not a bash prompt). I did rename the post-review that was
provided in the download to post-review.py, and also created an icon
for the program. My setup.py looks like this:
pre
from distutils.core import setup
import py2exe
setup(
options = {'py2exe': {'bundle_files': 1}},
console = [
{
script: 'post-review.py',
icon_resources: [(0, reviewboard.ico)]
}
],
zipfile = None,
)
/pre
I'm working on a WinXP SP 3 machine. Can anyone help me figure out
why the RBTools distro isn't being found? Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Trouble with post-review and py2exe
That was precisely the problem! Thanks! (And I am looking forward to
the .exe being included in the next release!)
On Jul 9, 3:49 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Oh, did you run py2exe on the post-review that was in the path, or the one
that was in the RBTools*.egg/scripts directory? The one installed in the
Python scripts directory is just a wrapper for the one in the egg. What's
likely happening is that you're running it on the wrong script, and it's
still trying to wrap the installed version. If you do it on the one in the
egg, it should work.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Mark B. mar...@maine.rr.com wrote:
I did use easy_install to set up RBTools. I unzipped the egg because
someone in the earlier thread pointed out that py2exe couldn't handle
zipped .egg files, so they had to be unzipped before trying to create
an executable. My install and use of the post-review script works
fine, but I want to create the executable so I can give it to
coworkers who don't have Python installed at all.
On Jul 8, 4:06 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Rather than unzipping the egg, you really should be using easy_install
(part
of Python setuptools, which there's a Windows installer for). This will
register the RBTools distribution entry.
The next version of RBTools will provide a post-review.exe automatically
on
Windows.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Mark B. mar...@maine.rr.com wrote:
Hi,
I have installed a demo of ReviewBoard for my company to evaluate, but
I am having trouble with compiling post-review into an .exe as
described in a href=http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/
browse_thread/thread/d8595a6ab0b2ca56/5d9bf8331629aa4c?
lnk=gstq=py2exe#
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/%0Abrowse_thread/thread/d8..
.this
thread/a. While my Python installation
works fine, when running the .exe I get the following:
pre
Traceback (most recent call last):
File post-review.py, line 4, in module
File zipextimporter.pyc, line 82, in load_module
File pkg_resources.pyc, line 2562, in module
File pkg_resources.pyc, line 626, in require
File pkg_resources.pyc, line 524, in resolve
pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: RBTools==0.2beta1
/pre
I unzipped the RBTools distribution egg as directed in the thread; it
is in C:\Python25\Lib\site-packages\RBTools-0.2beta1-py2.5.egg. The
diff I am using is Cygwin's (but I am running post-review from a cmd
prompt, not a bash prompt). I did rename the post-review that was
provided in the download to post-review.py, and also created an icon
for the program. My setup.py looks like this:
pre
from distutils.core import setup
import py2exe
setup(
options = {'py2exe': {'bundle_files': 1}},
console = [
{
script: 'post-review.py',
icon_resources: [(0, reviewboard.ico)]
}
],
zipfile = None,
)
/pre
I'm working on a WinXP SP 3 machine. Can anyone help me figure out
why the RBTools distro isn't being found? Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
ClearCase and Reviewboard setup.
According to the ReviewBoard 1.0 release notes ReviewBoard is supposed to support ClearCase out of the box. However once I had ReviewBoard 1.0 installed on my Windows server the config section's Scmtools area didn't mention ClearCase. After a little Googling I found that you need to add the ClearCase SCMTool manually into the DB. That I have done. Now I assume I need to add a repository. However I have no idea what to enter into the Path configuration item when adding the repo. This page contains info on determining the path with SVN, Git, etc, but not ClearCase: http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/management/repositories/#determining-repository-information Is ClearCase actually supported?? Reading the post-review script it also appears that the clearcase code assumes you're using Cygwin. We do not have Cygwin installed here. And getting it installed could be difficult. It also seems to hard code the vob location. Can someone who has actually gotten ClearCase and ReviewBoard to play nice with each other in a Windows (non-Cygwin) environment help me out here. Thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 1183 in reviewboard: Viewing diff in review request causes traceback involving memcache
Comment #3 on issue 1183 by ksee.zelgadis: Viewing diff in review request causes traceback involving memcache http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1183 Ah, upgrade to 1.0 helped. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 1213 in reviewboard: reviewboard doesn't show empty files from Files Changed listing
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1213 by zhirsch: reviewboard doesn't show empty files from Files Changed listing http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1213 What version are you running? Whichever version is used inside VMware. What's the URL of the page containing the problem? Any review request. What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Create a change that adds an empty file to Perforce 2. Post this change 3. Look at the review request, notice that the empty file does not show up in the Files Changed listing What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Empty files should be shown just like any other file. What operating system are you using? What browser? Debian unstable, iceweasel 3.0.11. Please provide any additional information below. I ran into this when posting a review that contained empty __init__.py files. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
