Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released
Yes, I realized this after I posted. I had accidentally pulled in a nightly build at one point due to my .pydistutils.cfg, but I had since downgraded to 1.0.1. Is there any way to get rid of the issue, or am I stuck with the warning forever? :) Dan On Sep 17, 3:44 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Were you at any point running a 1.1 nightly or out of a Git tree? This is a > field introduced in the 1.1 branch, so I don't know why you would see this > in 1.0.x. It doesn't appear that the 1.0.x releases mention this at all in > the codebase. If you went from a 1.1 to a 1.0.3, then you would definitely > hit this error, as the field would be introduced and then removed without an > evolution rule. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Dan Savilonis wrote: > > > I got the following error during the evolution: > > > # rb-site upgrade /home/reviewboard_head > > Rebuilding directory structure > > Updating database. This may take a while. > > There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. > > Project signature has changed - an evolution is required > > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.3-py2.5.egg/ > > reviewboard/scmtools/bzr.py:6: ImportWarning: Not importing directory > > '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib': missing __init__.py > > from bzrlib import bzrdir, revisionspec > > The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. > > Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes > > required. > > > The following are the changes that could not be resolved: > > In model scmtools.Repository: > > Field 'raw_file_url' has been deleted > > > It appears to be working okay, though. Other thing I noticed is that > > the admin dashboard has CSS applied but appears very basic and has no > > images. Other pages look okay, and the same as they used to. > > > Dan > > > On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > > > Last night's 1.0.2 release was pretty broken in two major ways. The web > > > server configuration templates were no longer bundled in the package, due > > to > > > a change in the structure of our code tree, and users using Django 1.0.2 > > > would hit a bug, as we needed functionality only present in 1.0.3 and > > > higher. > > > > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been > > bitten > > > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and let > > us > > > know how it works. > > > > Full release notes are available athttp:// > >www.review-board.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.0.3/ > > > > Christian > > > > -- > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: question about incorrect URL for Documentation
Christian Hammond wrote: > There was just an issue on the server. The documentation link is fixed > now. > > Christian > Thank you for your quick response. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: question about incorrect URl for Documentation
There was just an issue on the server. The documentation link is fixed now. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:41 PM, H. Paul Beebe wrote: > > I installed ReviewBoard 1.0.1 and the Documentation link on the login > web page points to http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/1.0/ > instead of to http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/ . > > I am a beginner at python and ReviewBoard and have not discovered > where the actual URL gets defined. > > I tried upgrading to ReviewBoard 1.0.3, but that did not change > anything. > > Any pointers would be appreciated. > > Thanks > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: question about incorrect URl for Documentation
Hi Paul, On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 5:41 PM, H. Paul Beebe wrote: > > I installed ReviewBoard 1.0.1 and the Documentation link on the login > web page points to http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/1.0/ > instead of to http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/ . > > I am a beginner at python and ReviewBoard and have not discovered > where the actual URL gets defined. > Your ReviewBoard URL should be something like http://yourserver.com/reviews/(you would have gone through the RB installation wizard where you gave your server name and the path for RB installation and other details). If you dont understand what is above, then you have not done the installation step. Look through the manual to see what that means (look in isntallation in linux or windows as the case may be). Regards -V http://mailvarun.blogspot.com /* This mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons */ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released
Yes, that was it. Thanks! On Sep 17, 12:51 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > It sounds like that server is, for whatever reason, set up to pull from the > nightlies tree. Do you have a ~/.pydistutils.cfg file that links to the > nightlies downloads page? > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:38 AM, ciaomary wrote: > > > To upgrade, I ran 'easy_install -U ReviewBoard' (as the documentation > > suggests) and it upgraded me to ReviewBoard 1.1 alpha-dev. > > > I would have expected this to just pull down the latest released > > version, 1.0.3. > > > On Sep 17, 8:52 am, Dan Savilonis wrote: > > > I got the following error during the evolution: > > > > # rb-site upgrade /home/reviewboard_head > > > Rebuilding directory structure > > > Updating database. This may take a while. > > > There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. > > > Project signature has changed - an evolution is required > > > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.3-py2.5.egg/ > > > reviewboard/scmtools/bzr.py:6: ImportWarning: Not importing directory > > > '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib': missing __init__.py > > > from bzrlib import bzrdir, revisionspec > > > The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. > > > Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes > > > required. > > > > The following are the changes that could not be resolved: > > > In model scmtools.Repository: > > > Field 'raw_file_url' has been deleted > > > > It appears to be working okay, though. Other thing I noticed is that > > > the admin dashboard has CSS applied but appears very basic and has no > > > images. Other pages look okay, and the same as they used to. > > > > Dan > > > > On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > > > > > Last night's 1.0.2 release was pretty broken in two major ways. The web > > > > server configuration templates were no longer bundled in the package, > > due to > > > > a change in the structure of our code tree, and users using Django > > 1.0.2 > > > > would hit a bug, as we needed functionality only present in 1.0.3 and > > > > higher. > > > > > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been > > bitten > > > > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and > > let us > > > > know how it works. > > > > > Full release notes are available athttp:// > >www.review-board.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.0.3/ > > > > > Christian > > > > > -- > > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > > > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com-Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
question about incorrect URl for Documentation
I installed ReviewBoard 1.0.1 and the Documentation link on the login web page points to http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/1.0/ instead of to http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/ . I am a beginner at python and ReviewBoard and have not discovered where the actual URL gets defined. I tried upgrading to ReviewBoard 1.0.3, but that did not change anything. Any pointers would be appreciated. Thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Admin CSS issues with Review Board 1.0.3
Hi everyone, So Django 1.1 made our admin UI look ugly, due to some CSS changes. I've put out a very tiny patch release on top of 1.0.3, that you should be able to get with an upgrade. It's just simply a fix to reference certain stylesheets correctly. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released
It sounds like that server is, for whatever reason, set up to pull from the nightlies tree. Do you have a ~/.pydistutils.cfg file that links to the nightlies downloads page? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:38 AM, ciaomary wrote: > > To upgrade, I ran 'easy_install -U ReviewBoard' (as the documentation > suggests) and it upgraded me to ReviewBoard 1.1 alpha-dev. > > I would have expected this to just pull down the latest released > version, 1.0.3. > > On Sep 17, 8:52 am, Dan Savilonis wrote: > > I got the following error during the evolution: > > > > # rb-site upgrade /home/reviewboard_head > > Rebuilding directory structure > > Updating database. This may take a while. > > There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. > > Project signature has changed - an evolution is required > > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.3-py2.5.egg/ > > reviewboard/scmtools/bzr.py:6: ImportWarning: Not importing directory > > '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib': missing __init__.py > > from bzrlib import bzrdir, revisionspec > > The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. > > Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes > > required. > > > > The following are the changes that could not be resolved: > > In model scmtools.Repository: > > Field 'raw_file_url' has been deleted > > > > It appears to be working okay, though. Other thing I noticed is that > > the admin dashboard has CSS applied but appears very basic and has no > > images. Other pages look okay, and the same as they used to. > > > > Dan > > > > On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > > > > > > > > > Last night's 1.0.2 release was pretty broken in two major ways. The web > > > server configuration templates were no longer bundled in the package, > due to > > > a change in the structure of our code tree, and users using Django > 1.0.2 > > > would hit a bug, as we needed functionality only present in 1.0.3 and > > > higher. > > > > > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been > bitten > > > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and > let us > > > know how it works. > > > > > Full release notes are available athttp:// > www.review-board.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.0.3/ > > > > > Christian > > > > > -- > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released
Hi Dan, Were you at any point running a 1.1 nightly or out of a Git tree? This is a field introduced in the 1.1 branch, so I don't know why you would see this in 1.0.x. It doesn't appear that the 1.0.x releases mention this at all in the codebase. If you went from a 1.1 to a 1.0.3, then you would definitely hit this error, as the field would be introduced and then removed without an evolution rule. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Dan Savilonis wrote: > > I got the following error during the evolution: > > # rb-site upgrade /home/reviewboard_head > Rebuilding directory structure > Updating database. This may take a while. > There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. > Project signature has changed - an evolution is required > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.3-py2.5.egg/ > reviewboard/scmtools/bzr.py:6: ImportWarning: Not importing directory > '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib': missing __init__.py > from bzrlib import bzrdir, revisionspec > The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. > Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes > required. > > The following are the changes that could not be resolved: > In model scmtools.Repository: >Field 'raw_file_url' has been deleted > > It appears to be working okay, though. Other thing I noticed is that > the admin dashboard has CSS applied but appears very basic and has no > images. Other pages look okay, and the same as they used to. > > Dan > > > On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Last night's 1.0.2 release was pretty broken in two major ways. The web > > server configuration templates were no longer bundled in the package, due > to > > a change in the structure of our code tree, and users using Django 1.0.2 > > would hit a bug, as we needed functionality only present in 1.0.3 and > > higher. > > > > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been > bitten > > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and let > us > > know how it works. > > > > Full release notes are available athttp:// > www.review-board.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.0.3/ > > > > Christian > > > > -- > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released
Hi Jim, I noticed this. Looks like something changed in the new admin stylesheets that break in some setups. I'm looking into it. Guess maybe another release may be coming. *sigh*. Think maybe I'll make this a 1.0.3.1 to save some face. Glad things are working for you again! Thanks for letting us know :) Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Jim Priest wrote: > > On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been > bitten > > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and let > us > > know how it works. > > 1.0.3 seems to working here - no more 500 errors! > > The CSS in parts of the admin section seem a bit off. I have some > colors but not all formatting is in place. I'm not 100% positive but > it seems some pages are missing a link to "/reviewboard/media/admin/ > css/base.css" ?? > > Jim > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released
On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been bitten > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and let us > know how it works. 1.0.3 seems to working here - no more 500 errors! The CSS in parts of the admin section seem a bit off. I have some colors but not all formatting is in place. I'm not 100% positive but it seems some pages are missing a link to "/reviewboard/media/admin/ css/base.css" ?? Jim --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released
To upgrade, I ran 'easy_install -U ReviewBoard' (as the documentation suggests) and it upgraded me to ReviewBoard 1.1 alpha-dev. I would have expected this to just pull down the latest released version, 1.0.3. On Sep 17, 8:52 am, Dan Savilonis wrote: > I got the following error during the evolution: > > # rb-site upgrade /home/reviewboard_head > Rebuilding directory structure > Updating database. This may take a while. > There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. > Project signature has changed - an evolution is required > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.3-py2.5.egg/ > reviewboard/scmtools/bzr.py:6: ImportWarning: Not importing directory > '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib': missing __init__.py > from bzrlib import bzrdir, revisionspec > The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. > Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes > required. > > The following are the changes that could not be resolved: > In model scmtools.Repository: > Field 'raw_file_url' has been deleted > > It appears to be working okay, though. Other thing I noticed is that > the admin dashboard has CSS applied but appears very basic and has no > images. Other pages look okay, and the same as they used to. > > Dan > > On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > > > > > Last night's 1.0.2 release was pretty broken in two major ways. The web > > server configuration templates were no longer bundled in the package, due to > > a change in the structure of our code tree, and users using Django 1.0.2 > > would hit a bug, as we needed functionality only present in 1.0.3 and > > higher. > > > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been bitten > > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and let us > > know how it works. > > > Full release notes are available > > athttp://www.review-board.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.0.3/ > > > Christian > > > -- > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released
I got the following error during the evolution: # rb-site upgrade /home/reviewboard_head Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. Project signature has changed - an evolution is required /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.3-py2.5.egg/ reviewboard/scmtools/bzr.py:6: ImportWarning: Not importing directory '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib': missing __init__.py from bzrlib import bzrdir, revisionspec The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes required. The following are the changes that could not be resolved: In model scmtools.Repository: Field 'raw_file_url' has been deleted It appears to be working okay, though. Other thing I noticed is that the admin dashboard has CSS applied but appears very basic and has no images. Other pages look okay, and the same as they used to. Dan On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > Last night's 1.0.2 release was pretty broken in two major ways. The web > server configuration templates were no longer bundled in the package, due to > a change in the structure of our code tree, and users using Django 1.0.2 > would hit a bug, as we needed functionality only present in 1.0.3 and > higher. > > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been bitten > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and let us > know how it works. > > Full release notes are available > athttp://www.review-board.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.0.3/ > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ReviewBoard and Clearcase Integration
If you search the mailing list archives, you should see several threads on the subject, including one where I described my process of setting up Clearcase support and the limitations we've seen. Dan On Sep 17, 5:52 am, irshad wrote: > Hi All, > > Review Board 1.0 Release Notes says that ClearCase support is provided > as a new Features. But there is no documentation for ReviewBoard > Installation with ClearCase as repository. Can anybody help me from > where I can get the documentation when repository is ClearCase. > > Regards, > Irshad --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: HTTPS certificate not accepted.
So, I got reviewboard working ! Yay! (but still accessing the wrong cert location). I figured out that I had accidentally goofed up the permissions, which led to /home/varun/.subversion/auth directory being inaccessible by the review board user www-data. Once I got that fixed, my installation started working. However, I am still at mystery why the installation is picking from my home directory instead of using from ~ of www-data user (which is /var/www). Regards Varun On Sep 16, 9:08 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > Hi Varun, > > Huh, it's odd that it's trying to use your home directory. To generate that > string, Review Board figures out what "~" points to, and in your case, it's > your own home directory. You said this was Apache before? Is it an > out-of-the-box install? Which distro? Mod_Python or FastCGI? > > We're looking at making this problem go away by making it easy to download > and verify certificates as part of the repository setup process, but I don't > have an ETA just yet on it. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Varun Soundararajan wrote: > > > > > Hi Christian, > > > So as you have explained here, I did > > sudo -u www-data > > > it led me to /var/www when i typed cd > > now I did svn co > > it asked me to accept cert permantnety to which i typed p > > before that I created .subversion directory in /var/www and chowned to > > www-data > > I also created the directory for the rep url dir and chowned so that > > the local copy can be created (otherwise it seems that www-data has no > > permission to create any file in /var/www > > > Now when I give my diff file and path and click create request, it > > says - HTTPS certificate not accepted. Please ensure that the proper > > certificate exists in /home/varun/.subversion/auth for the user that > > reviewboard is running as. > > > The confusion here is apache runs as www-data, but the error seems to > > be printing saying that its trying to access /home/varun/.. path. I > > also chmoded the entire .subversion directory in /home/ > > varun/.subversion and I still dont see reviewboard picking those > > certs. (I would practically want reviewboard to use certs in > > ~/.subversion directory of the user www-data). > > > Is there something that I am missing? > > > Thanks > > Varun > > > On Aug 25, 6:30 am, Christian Hammond wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The easiest way to work around this is if you have read-only access to > > the > > > repository over http. If you do, then set that read-only HTTP URL as your > > > Path in the repository configuration, and set your HTTPS URL as the > > Mirror > > > Path. > > > > If not, then it gets a little more tricky. Essentially (and this may vary > > a > > > bit between installs on different distros), you'll need to sudo to the > > > Apache user, using its home directory and environment variables, and then > > do > > > an svn checkout of your repository somewhere. This should store the > > > certificate where the Apache user can get to it. > > > > We're looking into making this work in a much smoother manner in a future > > > release without having to use any workarounds. > > > > Christian > > > > -- > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Pubudu Rathnayake > >wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > when i tried to make a new review request ,i got the following > > message, > > > > HTTPS certificate not accepted. Please ensure that the proper > > certificate > > > > exists in ~/.subversion/auth for the user that reviewboard is running > > as. > > > > Any advice how to diagnose it is highly appreciated. > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Pubudu --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
ReviewBoard and Clearcase Integration
Hi All, Review Board 1.0 Release Notes says that ClearCase support is provided as a new Features. But there is no documentation for ReviewBoard Installation with ClearCase as repository. Can anybody help me from where I can get the documentation when repository is ClearCase. Regards, Irshad --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
