Re: post-review
IMHO try to create empty VirtualEnvironemt without site-packages and
install there ReviewBoard development:
http://www.arthurkoziel.com/2008/10/22/working-virtualenv/
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Are you trying to install it for development purposes, or for production? If
production, you shouldn't be touching prepare-dev.py.
If for development, then it sounds like perhaps your pycrypto is too old?
You could try upgrading that manually. I'm not sure about the error
though...
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Chandra Moye clmoy...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to install reviewboard again on a new server. I run python
./contrib/internal/prepare-dev.py and I get the following. Which i believe
is causing my tests to fail and not allowing me to post anything. What am I
doing wrong?
writing requirements to ReviewBoard.egg-info/requires.txt
writing ReviewBoard.egg-info/PKG-INFO
writing top-level names to ReviewBoard.egg-info/top_level.txt
writing dependency_links to ReviewBoard.egg-info/dependency_links.txt
writing entry points to ReviewBoard.egg-info/entry_points.txt
reading manifest file 'ReviewBoard.egg-info/SOURCES.txt'
reading manifest template 'MANIFEST.in'
warning: no files found matching '*' under directory 'locale'
no previously-included directories found matching 'docs/*/_build'
no previously-included directories found matching
'reviewboard/htdocs/media/uploaded/images'
writing manifest file 'ReviewBoard.egg-info/SOURCES.txt'
Rebuilding media paths...
Using Djblets media from /services/src/reviewboard/djblets/djblets/media
Synchronizing database...
There are unapplied evolutions for reviews.
There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools.
No fixtures found.
Unable to load SCMTool svn = reviewboard.scmtools.svn:SVNTool:
pycrypto=1.9
Unable to load SCMTool git = reviewboard.scmtools.git:GitTool:
pycrypto=1.9
Unable to load SCMTool bzr = reviewboard.scmtools.bzr:BZRTool:
pycrypto=1.9
Unable to load SCMTool cvs = reviewboard.scmtools.cvs:CVSTool:
pycrypto=1.9
Unable to load SCMTool perforce =
reviewboard.scmtools.perforce:PerforceTool: pycrypto=1.9
Unable to load SCMTool clearcase =
reviewboard.scmtools.clearcase:ClearCaseTool: pycrypto=1.9
Unable to load SCMTool hg = reviewboard.scmtools.hg:HgTool: pycrypto=1.9
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:40 AM, channiemo clmoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Just installed review board. When I run post-review I get the
following error:
xception RuntimeError: 'maximum recursion depth exceeded in
__subclasscheck__' in type 'exceptions.RuntimeError' ignored
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/bin/post-review, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('RBTools==0.2.1alpha0.dev', 'console_scripts',
'post-review')()
File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/RBTools-0.2.1alpha0.dev-
py2.6.egg/rbtools/postreview.py, line 3043, in main
server.login()
File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/RBTools-0.2.1alpha0.dev-
py2.6.egg/rbtools/postreview.py, line 349, in login
'password': password,
File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/RBTools-0.2.1alpha0.dev-
py2.6.egg/rbtools/postreview.py, line 663, in api_post
return self.process_json(self.http_post(path, fields, files))
File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/RBTools-0.2.1alpha0.dev-
py2.6.egg/rbtools/postreview.py, line 643, in http_post
data = urllib2.urlopen(r).read()
File /usr/lib/python2.6/urllib2.py, line 126, in urlopen
return _opener.open(url, data, timeout)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/urllib2.py, line 397, in open
response = meth(req, response)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/urllib2.py, line 510, in http_response
'http', request, response, code, msg, hdrs)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/urllib2.py, line 429, in error
result = self._call_chain(*args)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/urllib2.py, line 369, in _call_chain
result = func(*args)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/urllib2.py, line 855, in http_error_401
url, req, headers)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/urllib2.py, line 833, in
http_error_auth_reqed
return self.retry_http_basic_auth(host, req, realm)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/urllib2.py, line 843, in
retry_http_basic_auth
return self.parent.open(req, timeout=req.timeout)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/urllib2.py, line 397, in open
response = meth(req, response)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/urllib2.py, line 510, in http_response
'http', request, response, code, msg, hdrs)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/urllib2.py, line 429, in error
result = self._call_chain(*args)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/urllib2.py, line 369, in _call_chain
result = func(*args)
at the very bottom
File /usr/lib/python2.6/socket.py, line 504, in create_connection
sock = socket(af, socktype, proto)
RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded
Re: Upgrade from 1.5 beta1 to 1.5 failed
http_proxy isn't used for ftp sites. Try setting ftp_proxy. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Martelo martel...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings, I’m trying to upgrade my RB from version 1.5 beta1 to the stable 1.5 using the following command: easy_install -U ReviewBoard I’m behind a proxy server, so I’ve set the http_proxy variable correctly. The command output is: --- (...) Using /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.5-py2.6.egg Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/ Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard Searching for python-memcached Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/python-memcached/ Reading http://www.tummy.com/Community/software/python-memcached/ Reading ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/python-memcached/ Download error: ftp error: [Errno 110] Connection timed out -- Some packages may not be found! Best match: python-memcached 1.45 Downloading ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/python-memcached/old-releases/python-memcached-1.45.tar.gz error: Download error for ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/python-memcached/old-releases/python-memcached-1.45.tar.gz : ftp error: [Errno 110] Connection timed out - I’m able to access ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/python-memcached through the browser... Any thoughts? Thanks in advanced! -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Windows configuration issue
I have installed the same setup on Ubuntu 9.1 and I'm still getting the same error message. I wanted to showcase this tool to the team and possibly use it in our organisation. But, I'm getting really frustrated now. Any help would be highly appreciated... Regards, Aditya On Oct 31, 12:23 am, asawhney adityasawh...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having troubling adding a SVN repository in the admin UI. It keeps failing with A repository was not found at the specified path.. The log file has following error: 2010-10-29 18:02:23,892 - ERROR - SVN: Failed to get repository information forhttps://path-to-repository:OPTIONS of 'https://path- to-repository': could not connect to server (https://host-name) Configuration information: 1. Windows Server 2008 2. Review Board 1.5 3. Subversion 1.6.6 The repository path has 'https' and is authenticated via certificate which is placed in the Subversion folder inside AppData. I'm able to retrieve the repository info via svn command line using 'svn info path_to_repo. What do I need to do to make it work? Regards, Aditya -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Issue 1875 in reviewboard: There is no indication of a comments in hidden lines of code
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1875 by chrisnetapp: There is no indication of a comments in hidden lines of code http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1875 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What version are you running? 1.5 beta 1 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? r//diff What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. On A Review expand hidden lines 2. Make a comment on one of the hidden lines of code. 3. Publish your review 4. The review (r/) will have the information with the line numbers, but r//diff will have no indication that those hidden lines have comments unless you expand the lines. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Some sort of indication that the hidden lines have a comment. What operating system are you using? What browser? os X 10.6.4, Chrome 7.0.517.41 Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
