date:20101105

Re: Can't authenticate using API 2.0

2010-11-05 Thread Jan Koprowski

Hi,

  Few questions.
  1) While rb-site install there is user created. Is authentication
login works fine for this user?
  2) When You login as AD user: what do You see in logs when You login
using login page, and what if You use API?

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Christian Hammond  wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> Sorry for my subsequent less-than-speedy reply. Long day.
>
> I don't know that AD would be the cause, but it's worth considering.
>
> I would like to see the Wireshark trace, just to see if I can simulate the
> same problem. Feel free to just e-mail me that directly.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Colin Caughie 
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the speedy reply. I’ve tried with the FQDN and IP address as
>> well as the plain hostname and I get the same result. The wireshark trace
>> shows that it’s using Basic Authentication as described in the API docs. (I
>> can send you the wireshark trace if you think it would help).
>>
>>
>>
>> The server is running Apache 2.2.16 on Fedora 14. We imported all of the
>> configuration and data from our 1.0.9 installation in order to test the new
>> version.
>>
>>
>>
>> It uses Active Directory as the authentication back-end. Could that be
>> part of the problem? I changing my account to use a sha1 password instead
>> but it made no difference.
>>
>>
>>
>> Colin
>>
>>
>>
>> From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com]
>> On Behalf Of Christian Hammond
>> Sent: 05 November 2010 08:09
>> To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Can't authenticate using API 2.0
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Colin,
>>
>> I just tried to repro it here, and it works fine. We'll have to do some
>> investigation...
>>
>> When you try this, is it with a fully-qualified domain, or just something
>> more like "ourserver"? If the latter, see what happens when you try a FQDN
>> or an IP address.
>>
>> What type of authentication is being used on there? And what web server?
>>
>> If the above doesn't work, it would help to set up a development install
>> and to try it there in order to rule out the possibility of it being the web
>> server.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Colin Caughie
>>  wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm playing with the new ReviewBoard API with a test installation of RB
>> 1.5, and can't seem to get basic authentication to work. I'm testing it just
>> by typing "http://ourserver/api/info/"; into Firefox, entering my username
>> and password when it asks, but I keep getting 401 UNAUTHORIZED responses.
>>
>> I've taken a Wireshark trace and it looks like the client is doing the
>> right thing. Moreover I can log in fine using the normal login page, which
>> seems to use a different mechanism. (After logging in from the login page I
>> can access the API resources because it uses the cookie thereafter.)
>>
>> Is there anything I need to do to get this to work?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Colin
>>
>>
>> Latest News at: http://www.indigovision.com/news2010.php
>>
>> --
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>> 
>>
>> scanned for viruses and spam by indigovision
>> If you consider this email spam, please forward to s...@emailfiltering.com
>>
>> --
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegro

Re: Moving to a different server

2010-11-05 Thread Christian Hammond

It may have to do with the encrypted passwords in the database. These are
based off your SECRET_KEY setting, which is typically computed for you
during 'rb-site install'. Make sure that your new conf/settings_local.py has
the same SECRET_KEY as the old one.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Charles Gagnon wrote:

> The move went pretty week and seems somewhere simple to do. The one
> problem I have now is user authentication. The siteconfiguration from
> the SQL backup seem to have AD authentication in there but it doesn't
> work and I can't figure out why? I can't even login with the admin
> user?
>
> Is there something I can do in mysql to flush all setings, clear
> passwords so I can easily login and rebuild my setting from there. I
> clear the password on one of my admin users and it still doesn't let
> me in.
>
> All I get constantly is "Incorrect username or password."
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Christian Hammond 
> wrote:
> > Hi Charles,
> >
> > Yeah, I'd start with a test install, but you should be able to just
> > dump/import the SQL and copy over the entire site directory (make sure to
> > preserve permissions).
> >
> > Christian
> >
> > --
> > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> > VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Charles Gagnon 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I have a working reviewboard site that needs to be moved to a
> >> different server. I am trying to figure out the best approach. I just
> >> started maintaining this site so I'm not super familiar with the
> >> product.
> >>
> >> I assume I would have to install everything I need on the new box.
> >> Maybe create a test site to check things. Than dump and import all the
> >> related mysql files. Can I just copy over the site directory
> >> structure?
> >>
> >> Anybody has notes on this?
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Charles Gagnon
> >> http://unixrealm.com
> >> charlesg at unixrealm.com
> >>
> >> --
> >> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> >> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> >> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> >> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> >
> > --
> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
>
>
> --
> Charles Gagnon
> http://unixrealm.com
> charlesg at unixrealm.com
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Can't authenticate using API 2.0

2010-11-05 Thread Christian Hammond

Hi Colin,

Sorry for my subsequent less-than-speedy reply. Long day.

I don't know that AD would be the cause, but it's worth considering.

I would like to see the Wireshark trace, just to see if I can simulate the
same problem. Feel free to just e-mail me that directly.

Thanks!

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Colin Caughie wrote:

>  Hi Christian,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the speedy reply. I’ve tried with the FQDN and IP address as
> well as the plain hostname and I get the same result. The wireshark trace
> shows that it’s using Basic Authentication as described in the API docs. (I
> can send you the wireshark trace if you think it would help).
>
>
>
> The server is running Apache 2.2.16 on Fedora 14. We imported all of the
> configuration and data from our 1.0.9 installation in order to test the new
> version.
>
>
>
> It uses Active Directory as the authentication back-end. Could that be part
> of the problem? I changing my account to use a sha1 password instead but it
> made no difference.
>
>
>
> Colin
>
>
>
> *From:* reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com]
> *On Behalf Of *Christian Hammond
> *Sent:* 05 November 2010 08:09
> *To:* reviewboard@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: Can't authenticate using API 2.0
>
>
>
> Hi Colin,
>
> I just tried to repro it here, and it works fine. We'll have to do some
> investigation...
>
> When you try this, is it with a fully-qualified domain, or just something
> more like "ourserver"? If the latter, see what happens when you try a FQDN
> or an IP address.
>
> What type of authentication is being used on there? And what web server?
>
> If the above doesn't work, it would help to set up a development install
> and to try it there in order to rule out the possibility of it being the web
> server.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>  On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Colin Caughie <
> c.caug...@indigovision.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm playing with the new ReviewBoard API with a test installation of RB
> 1.5, and can't seem to get basic authentication to work. I'm testing it just
> by typing "http://ourserver/api/info/"; into Firefox, entering my username
> and password when it asks, but I keep getting 401 UNAUTHORIZED responses.
>
> I've taken a Wireshark trace and it looks like the client is doing the
> right thing. Moreover I can log in fine using the normal login page, which
> seems to use a different mechanism. (After logging in from the login page I
> can access the API resources because it uses the cookie thereafter.)
>
> Is there anything I need to do to get this to work?
>
> Thanks,
> Colin
>
>
> Latest News at: http://www.indigovision.com/news2010.php
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
>
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>  --
>
> *scanned for viruses and spam by **indigovision
> *If you consider this email spam, please forward to
> s...@emailfiltering.com
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Moving to a different server

2010-11-05 Thread Charles Gagnon

The move went pretty week and seems somewhere simple to do. The one
problem I have now is user authentication. The siteconfiguration from
the SQL backup seem to have AD authentication in there but it doesn't
work and I can't figure out why? I can't even login with the admin
user?

Is there something I can do in mysql to flush all setings, clear
passwords so I can easily login and rebuild my setting from there. I
clear the password on one of my admin users and it still doesn't let
me in.

All I get constantly is "Incorrect username or password."

Thanks for your help.

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Christian Hammond  wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> Yeah, I'd start with a test install, but you should be able to just
> dump/import the SQL and copy over the entire site directory (make sure to
> preserve permissions).
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Charles Gagnon 
> wrote:
>>
>> I have a working reviewboard site that needs to be moved to a
>> different server. I am trying to figure out the best approach. I just
>> started maintaining this site so I'm not super familiar with the
>> product.
>>
>> I assume I would have to install everything I need on the new box.
>> Maybe create a test site to check things. Than dump and import all the
>> related mysql files. Can I just copy over the site directory
>> structure?
>>
>> Anybody has notes on this?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> --
>> Charles Gagnon
>> http://unixrealm.com
>> charlesg at unixrealm.com
>>
>> --
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en



-- 
Charles Gagnon
http://unixrealm.com
charlesg at unixrealm.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Windows configuration issue

2010-11-05 Thread asawhney

With continuous persistence and assistance from Christian we finally
got it working.

FYI, we are using https with certificate for SVN authentication.
In this kind of a setup, you need to make sure that the 'data'
directory of the reviewboard site has the '.subversion' folder with
the certificate and 'server' file with 'www-data' being the owner of
that folder. Generally, you would have this setup already configured
in the current users home directory.
So, all you need to do is copy the .subversion folder (which has the
certificate file and servers file) from /home/reviewboard (assuming
current user is reviewboard) to /var/www/reviewboard/data folder and
change the owner of this folder resursively to 'www-data'.

Hopefully, this would save somebody sometime and not struggle for days
trying to figure it out like me.

On Nov 3, 6:55 pm, Christian Hammond  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thought I responded to this, but I suppose not.
>
> When you attempt the 'svn info' yourself, did you do it from the same
> computer running Review Board?
>
> Is this a fully-qualified domain?
>
> The problem is generally that the system cannot look up the server name as
> specified.
>
> If you can e-mail me privately the exact error message, it would help clear
> things up. I don't mind if the name is mangled, but it must be otherwise
> intact (leave all ".", "/", etc. characters as they were).
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:28 PM, asawhney  wrote:
> > I have installed the same setup on Ubuntu 9.1 and I'm still getting
> > the same error message.
> > I wanted to showcase this tool to the team and possibly use it in our
> > organisation.
> > But, I'm getting really frustrated now.
>
> > Any help would be highly appreciated...
>
> > Regards,
> > Aditya
>
> > On Oct 31, 12:23 am, asawhney  wrote:
> > > I'm having troubling adding a SVN repository in the admin UI. It keeps
> > > failing with "A repository was not found at the specified path.".
>
> > > The log file has following error:
> > > 2010-10-29 18:02:23,892 - ERROR - SVN: Failed to get repository
> > > information forhttps://path-to-repository:OPTIONSof 'https://path-
> > > to-repository': could not connect to server (https://host-name)
>
> > > Configuration information:
> > > 1. Windows Server 2008
> > > 2. Review Board 1.5
> > > 3. Subversion 1.6.6
>
> > > The repository path has 'https' and is authenticated via certificate
> > > which is placed in the Subversion folder inside AppData. I'm able to
> > > retrieve the repository info via svn command line using 'svn info
> > > ".
>
> > > What do I need to do to make it work?
>
> > > Regards,
> > > Aditya- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

RE: Can't authenticate using API 2.0

2010-11-05 Thread Colin Caughie

Hi Christian,

Thanks for the speedy reply. I've tried with the FQDN and IP address as well as 
the plain hostname and I get the same result. The wireshark trace shows that 
it's using Basic Authentication as described in the API docs. (I can send you 
the wireshark trace if you think it would help).

The server is running Apache 2.2.16 on Fedora 14. We imported all of the 
configuration and data from our 1.0.9 installation in order to test the new 
version.

It uses Active Directory as the authentication back-end. Could that be part of 
the problem? I changing my account to use a sha1 password instead but it made 
no difference.

Colin

From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On 
Behalf Of Christian Hammond
Sent: 05 November 2010 08:09
To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Can't authenticate using API 2.0

Hi Colin,

I just tried to repro it here, and it works fine. We'll have to do some 
investigation...

When you try this, is it with a fully-qualified domain, or just something more 
like "ourserver"? If the latter, see what happens when you try a FQDN or an IP 
address.

What type of authentication is being used on there? And what web server?

If the above doesn't work, it would help to set up a development install and to 
try it there in order to rule out the possibility of it being the web server.

Christian

--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Colin Caughie 
mailto:c.caug...@indigovision.com>> wrote:
Hi,

I'm playing with the new ReviewBoard API with a test installation of RB 1.5, 
and can't seem to get basic authentication to work. I'm testing it just by 
typing "http://ourserver/api/info/"; into Firefox, entering my username and 
password when it asks, but I keep getting 401 UNAUTHORIZED responses.

I've taken a Wireshark trace and it looks like the client is doing the right 
thing. Moreover I can log in fine using the normal login page, which seems to 
use a different mechanism. (After logging in from the login page I can access 
the API resources because it uses the cookie thereafter.)

Is there anything I need to do to get this to work?

Thanks,
Colin


Latest News at: http://www.indigovision.com/news2010.php

--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


scanned for viruses and spam by indigovision
If you consider this email spam, please forward to s...@emailfiltering.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Can't authenticate using API 2.0

2010-11-05 Thread Christian Hammond

Hi Colin,

I just tried to repro it here, and it works fine. We'll have to do some
investigation...

When you try this, is it with a fully-qualified domain, or just something
more like "ourserver"? If the latter, see what happens when you try a FQDN
or an IP address.

What type of authentication is being used on there? And what web server?

If the above doesn't work, it would help to set up a development install and
to try it there in order to rule out the possibility of it being the web
server.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Colin Caughie
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm playing with the new ReviewBoard API with a test installation of RB
> 1.5, and can't seem to get basic authentication to work. I'm testing it just
> by typing "http://ourserver/api/info/"; into Firefox, entering my username
> and password when it asks, but I keep getting 401 UNAUTHORIZED responses.
>
> I've taken a Wireshark trace and it looks like the client is doing the
> right thing. Moreover I can log in fine using the normal login page, which
> seems to use a different mechanism. (After logging in from the login page I
> can access the API resources because it uses the cookie thereafter.)
>
> Is there anything I need to do to get this to work?
>
> Thanks,
> Colin
>
>
> Latest News at: http://www.indigovision.com/news2010.php
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Can't authenticate using API 2.0

2010-11-05 Thread Colin Caughie

Hi,

I'm playing with the new ReviewBoard API with a test installation of RB 1.5, 
and can't seem to get basic authentication to work. I'm testing it just by 
typing "http://ourserver/api/info/"; into Firefox, entering my username and 
password when it asks, but I keep getting 401 UNAUTHORIZED responses.

I've taken a Wireshark trace and it looks like the client is doing the right 
thing. Moreover I can log in fine using the normal login page, which seems to 
use a different mechanism. (After logging in from the login page I can access 
the API resources because it uses the cookie thereafter.)

Is there anything I need to do to get this to work?

Thanks,
Colin


Latest News at: http://www.indigovision.com/news2010.php

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Can't authenticate using API 2.0

Re: Moving to a different server

Re: Can't authenticate using API 2.0

Re: Moving to a different server

Re: Windows configuration issue

RE: Can't authenticate using API 2.0

Re: Can't authenticate using API 2.0

Can't authenticate using API 2.0

8 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information