Migrating Review Board Database
Hi reviewboard people, There is a reviewboard 0.1 version in production. There is a 1.6 version in a test environment. Anyone have suggestions on the best way to copy the 0.1 production data, transform it into 1.6 data? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Migrating Review Board Database
Hi Chris, 0.1, or 1.0? We never had a real 0.1 release of any sort, and anything that would have had a label at all like that would have been way before there was any sort of database migration. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Chris Baron topher.ba...@gmail.comwrote: Hi reviewboard people, There is a reviewboard 0.1 version in production. There is a 1.6 version in a test environment. Anyone have suggestions on the best way to copy the 0.1 production data, transform it into 1.6 data? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Migrating Review Board Database
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Chris Baron topher.ba...@gmail.comwrote: There is a reviewboard 0.1 version in production. There is a 1.6 version in a test environment. Anyone have suggestions on the best way to copy the 0.1 production data, transform it into 1.6 data? What will need to be done will depend on the specific version you are moving from, and what is missing/different in the database. I did a migration from a pre-1.0 to 1.5.5. Though it wasn't 0.1, if it had a version it probably would have been something like 0.9. I detailed the upgrade in this post: http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/msg/5b445e99632190ab If your old version is close enough to 1.0 you may not need to manually manipulate the database at all, just install a new site with a dump of the old database, and let the Django evolutions do their thing. If your old version is really, really old, there may be a lot of manual DB manipulation. I was pretty lucky that there was only one table missing and I could copy the whole table from a new install. -Anton -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Issue 2454 in reviewboard: Search Button returns error 500
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2454 by jpfill...@gmail.com: Search Button returns error 500 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2454 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If you need immediate support, please contact* * reviewbo...@googlegroups.com * What version are you running? Viewing website What's the URL of the page containing the problem? http://reviews.ott.qnx.com/dashboard/?view=to-groupgroup=HMI# What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Type in anything into the search box (numbers / letters) 2. Click Search What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Search Results What operating system are you using? What browser? Win XP, Google Chrome Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2454 in reviewboard: Search Button returns error 500
Updates: Status: SetupIssue Comment #1 on issue 2454 by trowb...@gmail.com: Search Button returns error 500 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2454 You'll need to talk to your server administrator about this. If there's a backtrace in the server logs that isn't due to a problem with the deployment, we can reopen this, but we'll need the actual error. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2455 in reviewboard: Reverting a file then comparing revisions shows changed version on the right
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2455 by djibo...@gmail.com: Reverting a file then comparing revisions shows changed version on the right http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2455 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If you need immediate support, please contact* * reviewbo...@googlegroups.com * What version are you running? 1.6.1 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? Can't show the confidential example. What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Make a change to a file and post. 2. Revert changed file and post. 3. Compare r1 to r2. The changed version is on the right, even though it was changed in r1, not r2 (reverted in r2). What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Left side should have the changed version, right side should have the reverted (original) version. What operating system are you using? What browser? MacOSX 10.6.8/Chrome 16.0.912.75 Please provide any additional information below. Contact oded at cs dot thatfamousuniversityinpaloalto dot edu if further info required. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1486 in reviewboard: Diff viewer displays incorrectly diffs for files which were removed in later revision of the change
Updates: Status: New Comment #7 on issue 1486 by trowb...@gmail.com: Diff viewer displays incorrectly diffs for files which were removed in later revision of the change http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1486 Still occurs. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2455 in reviewboard: Reverting a file then comparing revisions shows changed version on the right
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 1486 Comment #1 on issue 2455 by trowb...@gmail.com: Reverting a file then comparing revisions shows changed version on the right http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2455 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1486 in reviewboard: Diff viewer displays incorrectly diffs for files which were removed in later revision of the change
Comment #8 on issue 1486 by trowb...@gmail.com: Diff viewer displays incorrectly diffs for files which were removed in later revision of the change http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1486 Issue 2455 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2456 in reviewboard: RB API doesn't allow updating changenum field for Git
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 2456 by eyuw...@gmail.com: RB API doesn't allow updating
changenum field for Git
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2456
*NOTE: If you have a patch, please submit it to
http://reviews.reviewboard.org/
What version are you running?
1.6.1
What's the URL of the page this enhancement relates to, if any?
https://myserver/r/{review_id}
Describe the enhancement and the motivation for it.
I'm using API 2.0 to write a script to update the changenum field of a
review. The URL is api/review-requests/{review_id}/draft/. It seems only a
few fields (such as description, summary, etc) can be updated via HTTP.
What operating system are you using? What browser?
Centos 6
Please provide any additional information below.
I'd like to add the commit SHA1 string associated with the review to
the 'Change Number' field so that I can keep track of the commit later on.
Because I'm not able to use API to PUT the changenum field, I had to put
that info in the description field guarded by a special string as a
workaround. I'd love to see API is updated to support updating that field.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2456 in reviewboard: RB API doesn't allow updating changenum field for Git
Updates: Status: NotABug Comment #1 on issue 2456 by chip...@gmail.com: RB API doesn't allow updating changenum field for Git http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2456 The changenum field is only for Perforce. It represents server-side changeset numbers, which is different than a revision. Best to put this as part of a close message when submitting. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2456 in reviewboard: RB API doesn't allow updating changenum field for Git
Comment #2 on issue 2456 by eyuw...@gmail.com: RB API doesn't allow updating changenum field for Git http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2456 Thanks for your quick response! Yes, I understand RB currently only supports change number if the backend SCM supports such concept natively. But wouldn't it be nice if the web service API provides the ability to update the field? Right now that field always shows 'None' if the underlying SCM is not Perforce. As an administrator/developer/user, I'd like to be able to overload that field to do meaningful task, such as use it to store the commit SHA1 string associated with the change, rather than be wasted? From there, I can do a lot more work build on top of it... Would you consider providing such functionality in the API? I mean people who use the API probably know what they are doing, isn't it? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
