Re: Upgrading python versions?

[Tucker]

Should I do a whole new install and migrate the DB?

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Tucker  wrote:
> I decided to try and build pylucene again on CentOs 5.2.  I kept
> running into problems with python2.4, so I built jcc against python2.6
> (ActivePython).  I eventually got it working (using openjdk-1.6 and a
> modern version of ant) but ReviewBoard doesn't seem to agree and I
> can't enable search.  Since I built jcc with python2.6 and installed
> ReviewBoard using python2.4. this makes sense.
>
> Anyone have any suggestions on how to either cheat the "enable search"
> setting or upgrade the python version ReviewBoard is using?
>
> --
>
> --tucker



-- 

--tucker

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Upgrading python versions?

[Anton Cohen]

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Tucker  wrote:

> Should I do a whole new install and migrate the DB?
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Tucker  wrote:
> > I decided to try and build pylucene again on CentOs 5.2.  I kept
> > running into problems with python2.4, so I built jcc against python2.6
> > (ActivePython).  I eventually got it working (using openjdk-1.6 and a
> > modern version of ant) but ReviewBoard doesn't seem to agree and I
> > can't enable search.  Since I built jcc with python2.6 and installed
> > ReviewBoard using python2.4. this makes sense.
>

If you can migrate to CentOS 6 your life will be easier.

If you have to stay with CentOS 5, you can't "upgrade" Python, as in you
can't replace Python 2.4 (/usr/bin/python). You can install Python 2.6
in parallel. The EPEL  repository has a
python26 package, and some dependencies you'll need like
python26-distribute, python26-mysqldb,
and python26-mod_wsgi. python26-distribute should provide a
python26 specific version of pip/easy_install you can try to use to install
Review Board. I've never tried it, but it's probably possible. Again,
CentOS 6 is easier.

-Anton

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Any restriction in extension of file being uploaded to reviewboard

[Nilesh Jaiswal]

Hi,

We are trying to check in the changes to perforce, but we see post-review
got stuck, it happens for only one file with extention (.STEP) which is
having headType as 'ctext', I would like to know if review board impose any
restriction while posting the diff to review board for certain set of
files. if yes then how could we solve this issue. if no what could be issue
and where it got stuck.

I can see reviewboard server has the file which has the *.upload* (eg: tmpJq8GqG.upload ) file present in the /tmp/ which
contain the files which is sent for review request.

Please help on this its been urgent.

Regards,
Nilesh J

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Any restriction in extension of file being uploaded to reviewboard

[David Trowbridge]

Are you doing pre- or post-commit reviews?

post-review will try to send diffs for all non-binary files. There's no way to 
exclude individual files except for temporarily removing them from the 
changelist. If your .STEP files are actually large binaries, I'd suggest 
changing the filetype in perforce.

If they're large text files which have big diffs, and you're doing post-commit 
reviews, it's not a great situation. Reviewers probably won't be able to deal 
with looking at very large diffs (and it's a big load on the server). You could 
falsely mark the file as binary, but that might interfere with line ending 
conversion (if you use that). Otherwise, it's possible that an improvement to 
post-review could be made to try to drop very large diffs instead of posting 
them.

- David

On Mar 2, 2012, at 6:45 PM, Nilesh Jaiswal  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> We are trying to check in the changes to perforce, but we see post-review got 
> stuck, it happens for only one file with extention (.STEP) which is having 
> headType as 'ctext', I would like to know if review board impose any 
> restriction while posting the diff to review board for certain set of files. 
> if yes then how could we solve this issue. if no what could be issue and 
> where it got stuck.
> 
> I can see reviewboard server has the file which has the  number>.upload (eg: tmpJq8GqG.upload ) file present in the /tmp/ which 
> contain the files which is sent for review request.
> 
> Please help on this its been urgent.
> 
> Regards,
> Nilesh J
> -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Any restriction in extension of file being uploaded to reviewboard

[Nilesh Jaiswal]

Thanks David,

While separately we are not doing any pre or post commit review its only
the tool which post-review does that it. Yes the file is very large so what
could be done here, are their any enhancement we need to do in our review
board server or client to make this thing work. Please suggest.

On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:03 AM, David Trowbridge wrote:

> Are you doing pre- or post-commit reviews?
>
> post-review will try to send diffs for all non-binary files. There's no
> way to exclude individual files except for temporarily removing them from
> the changelist. If your .STEP files are actually large binaries, I'd
> suggest changing the filetype in perforce.
>
> If they're large text files which have big diffs, and you're doing
> post-commit reviews, it's not a great situation. Reviewers probably won't
> be able to deal with looking at very large diffs (and it's a big load on
> the server). You could falsely mark the file as binary, but that might
> interfere with line ending conversion (if you use that). Otherwise, it's
> possible that an improvement to post-review could be made to try to drop
> very large diffs instead of posting them.
>
> - David
>
> On Mar 2, 2012, at 6:45 PM, Nilesh Jaiswal  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are trying to check in the changes to perforce, but we see post-review
> got stuck, it happens for only one file with extention (.STEP) which is
> having headType as 'ctext', I would like to know if review board impose any
> restriction while posting the diff to review board for certain set of
> files. if yes then how could we solve this issue. if no what could be issue
> and where it got stuck.
>
> I can see reviewboard server has the file which has the * number>.upload* (eg: tmpJq8GqG.upload ) file present in the /tmp/ which
> contain the files which is sent for review request.
>
> Please help on this its been urgent.
>
> Regards,
> Nilesh J
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
>  --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Any restriction in extension of file being uploaded to reviewboard

[David Trowbridge]

As I said, there are a few approaches. Ordered in terms of simplicity:
- Mark the file as binary in perforce.
- Tell users to remove the file from their changelist during review (it's not 
possible for people to review megabytes of text, and reviewing things which are 
automatically generated generally isn't useful anyway).
- Make an improvement to post-review to avoid including any file diffs which 
are very large.

- David

On Mar 2, 2012, at 8:44 PM, Nilesh Jaiswal  wrote:

> Thanks David,
> 
> While separately we are not doing any pre or post commit review its only the 
> tool which post-review does that it. Yes the file is very large so what could 
> be done here, are their any enhancement we need to do in our review board 
> server or client to make this thing work. Please suggest.
> 
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:03 AM, David Trowbridge  wrote:
> Are you doing pre- or post-commit reviews?
> 
> post-review will try to send diffs for all non-binary files. There's no way 
> to exclude individual files except for temporarily removing them from the 
> changelist. If your .STEP files are actually large binaries, I'd suggest 
> changing the filetype in perforce.
> 
> If they're large text files which have big diffs, and you're doing 
> post-commit reviews, it's not a great situation. Reviewers probably won't be 
> able to deal with looking at very large diffs (and it's a big load on the 
> server). You could falsely mark the file as binary, but that might interfere 
> with line ending conversion (if you use that). Otherwise, it's possible that 
> an improvement to post-review could be made to try to drop very large diffs 
> instead of posting them.
> 
> - David
> 
> On Mar 2, 2012, at 6:45 PM, Nilesh Jaiswal  wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> We are trying to check in the changes to perforce, but we see post-review 
>> got stuck, it happens for only one file with extention (.STEP) which is 
>> having headType as 'ctext', I would like to know if review board impose any 
>> restriction while posting the diff to review board for certain set of files. 
>> if yes then how could we solve this issue. if no what could be issue and 
>> where it got stuck.
>> 
>> I can see reviewboard server has the file which has the > number>.upload (eg: tmpJq8GqG.upload ) file present in the /tmp/ which 
>> contain the files which is sent for review request.
>> 
>> Please help on this its been urgent.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Nilesh J
>> -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> 
> -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> 
> -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Is it possible to install ReviewBoard without sudo?

[傅晓东]

Thanks, I got some response from TM, they said I need to buy some
service for a dedicated server.

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Stephen Gallagher
 wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 23:59 -0800, David Trowbridge wrote:
>> I won't rule it out entirely because I haven't tried, but I think it's
>> pretty unlikely that
>> you'll be able to install and configure everything that you need.
>
>
> Strictly speaking, you could install your own private Python
> installation in your home directory, as well as your own private HTTPD
> (running on a non-privileged port), but you're talking about a MUCH more
> complicated setup than any sane person would want to do.
>
> (As an aside, this IS how openshift sets up ReviewBoard instances in the
> cloud, but it's carefully scripted)
>
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Upgrading python versions?

[Christian Hammond]

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Anton Cohen  wrote:

>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Tucker  wrote:
>
>> Should I do a whole new install and migrate the DB?
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Tucker  wrote:
>> > I decided to try and build pylucene again on CentOs 5.2.  I kept
>> > running into problems with python2.4, so I built jcc against python2.6
>> > (ActivePython).  I eventually got it working (using openjdk-1.6 and a
>> > modern version of ant) but ReviewBoard doesn't seem to agree and I
>> > can't enable search.  Since I built jcc with python2.6 and installed
>> > ReviewBoard using python2.4. this makes sense.
>>
>
> If you can migrate to CentOS 6 your life will be easier.
>
> If you have to stay with CentOS 5, you can't "upgrade" Python, as in you
> can't replace Python 2.4 (/usr/bin/python). You can install Python 2.6
> in parallel. The EPEL  repository has
> a python26 package, and some dependencies you'll need like
> python26-distribute, python26-mysqldb,
> and python26-mod_wsgi. python26-distribute should provide a
> python26 specific version of pip/easy_install you can try to use to install
> Review Board. I've never tried it, but it's probably possible. Again,
> CentOS 6 is easier.
>
> -Anton
>
>
>
This is an important point.

We'll make a more formal announcement in time, but the next version of
Review Board will not be compatible with Python 2.4. So it's best to get a
2.6 or 2.7 setup if at all possible.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en