URGENT: post-review queries
Dear All, I am trying to post the review request as below argument. My perforce id:njaiswal *I am using --submit-as option.* *post-review --bugs-closed=TEST --file-list=/tmp/tmp9Dj3Dt --branch=DEV_BR --server=http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr--submit-as=nileshj --description-file=/tmp/tmp79D4Hj 1567 --p4-port= pf-ch.nds.com:1666* My while posting i am getting below error message. FOR RB USE DO NOT EDIT -- p4web link: http://pf-ch.nds.com:5500/1567?ac=10 baseline: 1564 ' for review request '3' HTTP PUTting to http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr/api/review-requests/3/draft/: {'description': 'RB testing for china \n\n\nFOR RB USE DO NOT EDIT\n--\np4web link: http://pf-ch.nds.com:5500/1567?ac=10\nbaseline: 1564\n'} Uploading diff, size: 159 HTTP POSTing to http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr/api/review-requests/3/diffs/: {} Got API Error 105 (HTTP code 400): One or more fields had errors Error data: {u'fields': {u'path': [u'[Errno 2] No such file or directory']}, u'stat': u'fail', u'err': {u'msg': u'One or more fields had errors', u'code': 105}} Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached. *My question is, * 1. Does my RB server user id requires account in perforce? 2. What should i do make posting of review request if am having one perforce id with multiple RB server user id. 3. Is it mandatory that perforce id to be in the user list of reviewboard server This is very urgent request, i would really appreciate your quick reply with solution. Regards, Nilesh J -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Not able to use post-review
Hi Christian, Thanks for the reply . I an getting following error when i typed post-review in cmd GNU diff is required for Subversion repositories. Make sure it is installed and in the path. On Windows, you can install this from: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/diffutils.htm; I have already installed GNU Diff and set in the Path . For your information,I have also installed both Tortoise SVN as well as collabnet subversion client . Please suggest how to proceed further. Regards Vijay On Saturday, 4 August 2012 00:29:03 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, Can you describe to me how GNU diff isn't working? What are you seeing? Christian On Aug 3, 2012, at 2:50, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi , I was trying to use post-review filename but I get following error always : GNU diff is required for Subversion repositories. Make sure it is installed and in the path. On Windows, you can install this from: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/diffutils.htmd I have installed GNU Diff and even post-review installation seems to work but some how GNU diff is not working. i debuged and type following command SVN info and it is giving me the configured SVN repo browser value Please suggest how to configure . For your information I setup Review Board on Linux machine and configured SVN which is hosted on Windows machine . I am using my Windows client machine to use review board and trying to post review but apparently got stuck with GNU diff ...Please help me to come out from here !!! Regards Vijay -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: post-review queries
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: Dear All, I am trying to post the review request as below argument. My perforce id:njaiswal *I am using --submit-as option.* *post-review --bugs-closed=TEST --file-list=/tmp/tmp9Dj3Dt --branch=DEV_BR --server=http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr--submit-as=nileshj --description-file=/tmp/tmp79D4Hj 1567 --p4-port= pf-ch.nds.com:1666* My while posting i am getting below error message. FOR RB USE DO NOT EDIT It looks like you're using a custom post-review script. We can't fully support that, but I'll try to answer your questions. -- p4web link: http://pf-ch.nds.com:5500/1567?ac=10 baseline: 1564 ' for review request '3' HTTP PUTting to http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr/api/review-requests/3/draft/: {'description': 'RB testing for china \n\n\nFOR RB USE DO NOT EDIT\n--\np4web link: http://pf-ch.nds.com:5500/1567?ac=10\nbaseline: 1564\n'} Uploading diff, size: 159 HTTP POSTing to http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr/api/review-requests/3/diffs/: {} Got API Error 105 (HTTP code 400): One or more fields had errors Error data: {u'fields': {u'path': [u'[Errno 2] No such file or directory']}, u'stat': u'fail', u'err': {u'msg': u'One or more fields had errors', u'code': 105}} Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached. *My question is, * 1. Does my RB server user id requires account in perforce? No. 2. What should i do make posting of review request if am having one perforce id with multiple RB server user id. All you need is one Perforce ID that's configured in the repository settings. The Review Board users have nothing to do with Perforce users. 3. Is it mandatory that perforce id to be in the user list of reviewboard server No. It wouldn't matter in any way. It sounds like there's just something wrong with your diff. Run that command with --output-diff and inspect the output. Also, check your reviewboard.log for errors that correspond to the time you made that request. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Not able to use post-review
Can you run diff --version and show me the output? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Christian, Thanks for the reply . I an getting following error when i typed post-review in cmd GNU diff is required for Subversion repositories. Make sure it is installed and in the path. On Windows, you can install this from: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/diffutils.htm; I have already installed GNU Diff and set in the Path . For your information,I have also installed both Tortoise SVN as well as collabnet subversion client . Please suggest how to proceed further. Regards Vijay On Saturday, 4 August 2012 00:29:03 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, Can you describe to me how GNU diff isn't working? What are you seeing? Christian On Aug 3, 2012, at 2:50, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi , I was trying to use post-review filename but I get following error always : GNU diff is required for Subversion repositories. Make sure it is installed and in the path. On Windows, you can install this from: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.**net/packages/diffutils.htmdhttp://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/diffutils.htm%22d I have installed GNU Diff and even post-review installation seems to work but some how GNU diff is not working. i debuged and type following command SVN info and it is giving me the configured SVN repo browser value Please suggest how to configure . For your information I setup Review Board on Linux machine and configured SVN which is hosted on Windows machine . I am using my Windows client machine to use review board and trying to post review but apparently got stuck with GNU diff ...Please help me to come out from here !!! Regards Vijay -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/ http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscribe@** googlegroups.com reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Post Review script fails to submit SVN deleted files
Or try to help improve post-review by submitting a patch. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Ivan Gavryliuk ivan.gavril...@gmail.comwrote: This saved my life today, thanks! I may dump post-review in favour of my own script. On Wednesday, 2 May 2012 14:17:13 UTC+1, carlshen wrote: Hi, You can use svn diff to generate diff file. such as: svn diff text.diff Then login Review Board and click ew Review Request by add the Repository and text.diff file. regards. carl shen 2012/5/1 David Virtser poiso...@gmail.com Hi, When I try to run manually post review script in order to submit a new review request from range of SVN revisions and in some revision was a file that was changed and then deleted, it fails with the error below: *$ post-review --revision-range=43023:43470 --debug RBTools 0.4.1* * Home = /home/dev* * HTTP GETting api/* * HTTP GETting http://localhost/api/info/* * Using the new web API* *Failed to execute command: ['svn', 'info', 'Mobile/css/main.css']* *['Mobile/css/main.css: (Not a versioned resource)\n', '\n', 'svn: A problem occurred; see other errors for details\n']* Is there anything we can do to solve it? I tried to look for all the keys that post-review get, but nothing really help there.. Thanks, David. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscribe@** googlegroups.com reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Best regards. carl shen (xiangfeng) Phone: 13811550669 -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: post-review queries
Thank for prompt reply. Your reply motivated me. I think you will provide me solution after looking into the requested diff. Here is the requested output. The line marked with red have been added to file. posting review request... RBTools 0.3.4 Home = /home/nileshj svn info p4 info repository info: Path: pf-ch.nds.com:1666, Base path: None, Supports changesets: True HTTP GETting api/ HTTP GETting http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr/api/info/ Using the new web API Generating diff for changenum 1568 p4 describe -s 1568 CREATING WHERE FILE FROM /tmp/tmpMhEcPa p4 -ztag -x /tmp/tmpMhEcPa where Processing edit of //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript WRITING //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 to /tmp/tmp_yDlEz CREATING OLD PRINT BATCH /tmp/tmp26cwU1 p4 -s -p pf-ch.nds.com:1666 -x /tmp/tmp_yDlEz print CREATING NEW PRINT BATCH /tmp/tmp5APfF- p4 -s -p pf-ch.nds.com:1666 -x /tmp/tmpxe11Ch print Processing edit of //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript Writing //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 to /tmp/tmpnNHcoH diff -urNp /tmp/tmpnNHcoH /home/nileshj/fwei///dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript --- //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 +++ //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript 2012-08-06 14:50:29 @@ -18,6 +18,6 @@ env.InstallTree( DeclarativeFiles, .. #== -* +#=* retval = env.ProcessDir(env_base) Return('retval') Thank you again. Regards, Nilesh On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: Dear All, I am trying to post the review request as below argument. My perforce id:njaiswal *I am using --submit-as option.* *post-review --bugs-closed=TEST --file-list=/tmp/tmp9Dj3Dt --branch=DEV_BR --server=http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr--submit-as=nileshj --description-file=/tmp/tmp79D4Hj 1567 --p4-port= pf-ch.nds.com:1666* My while posting i am getting below error message. FOR RB USE DO NOT EDIT It looks like you're using a custom post-review script. We can't fully support that, but I'll try to answer your questions. -- p4web link: http://pf-ch.nds.com:5500/1567?ac=10 baseline: 1564 ' for review request '3' HTTP PUTting to http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr/api/review-requests/3/draft/: {'description': 'RB testing for china \n\n\nFOR RB USE DO NOT EDIT\n--\np4web link: http://pf-ch.nds.com:5500/1567?ac=10\nbaseline: 1564\n'} Uploading diff, size: 159 HTTP POSTing to http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr/api/review-requests/3/diffs/: {} Got API Error 105 (HTTP code 400): One or more fields had errors Error data: {u'fields': {u'path': [u'[Errno 2] No such file or directory']}, u'stat': u'fail', u'err': {u'msg': u'One or more fields had errors', u'code': 105}} Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached. *My question is, * 1. Does my RB server user id requires account in perforce? No. 2. What should i do make posting of review request if am having one perforce id with multiple RB server user id. All you need is one Perforce ID that's configured in the repository settings. The Review Board users have nothing to do with Perforce users. 3. Is it mandatory that perforce id to be in the user list of reviewboard server No. It wouldn't matter in any way. It sounds like there's just something wrong with your diff. Run that command with --output-diff and inspect the output. Also, check your reviewboard.log for errors that correspond to the time you made that request. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: post-review queries
Can you find anything in reviewboard.log that starts with Error uploading new diff ? That's the most likely trigger for this error. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: Thank for prompt reply. Your reply motivated me. I think you will provide me solution after looking into the requested diff. Here is the requested output. The line marked with red have been added to file. posting review request... RBTools 0.3.4 Home = /home/nileshj svn info p4 info repository info: Path: pf-ch.nds.com:1666, Base path: None, Supports changesets: True HTTP GETting api/ HTTP GETting http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr/api/info/ Using the new web API Generating diff for changenum 1568 p4 describe -s 1568 CREATING WHERE FILE FROM /tmp/tmpMhEcPa p4 -ztag -x /tmp/tmpMhEcPa where Processing edit of //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript WRITING //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 to /tmp/tmp_yDlEz CREATING OLD PRINT BATCH /tmp/tmp26cwU1 p4 -s -p pf-ch.nds.com:1666 -x /tmp/tmp_yDlEz print CREATING NEW PRINT BATCH /tmp/tmp5APfF- p4 -s -p pf-ch.nds.com:1666 -x /tmp/tmpxe11Ch print Processing edit of //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript Writing //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 to /tmp/tmpnNHcoH diff -urNp /tmp/tmpnNHcoH /home/nileshj/fwei///dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript --- //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 +++ //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript 2012-08-06 14:50:29 @@ -18,6 +18,6 @@ env.InstallTree( DeclarativeFiles, .. #== -* +#=* retval = env.ProcessDir(env_base) Return('retval') Thank you again. Regards, Nilesh On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: Dear All, I am trying to post the review request as below argument. My perforce id:njaiswal *I am using --submit-as option.* *post-review --bugs-closed=TEST --file-list=/tmp/tmp9Dj3Dt --branch=DEV_BR --server=http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr--submit-as=nileshj --description-file=/tmp/tmp79D4Hj 1567 --p4-port= pf-ch.nds.com:1666* My while posting i am getting below error message. FOR RB USE DO NOT EDIT It looks like you're using a custom post-review script. We can't fully support that, but I'll try to answer your questions. -- p4web link: http://pf-ch.nds.com:5500/1567?ac=10 baseline: 1564 ' for review request '3' HTTP PUTting to http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr/api/review-requests/3/draft/: {'description': 'RB testing for china \n\n\nFOR RB USE DO NOT EDIT\n--\np4web link: http://pf-ch.nds.com:5500/1567?ac=10\nbaseline: 1564\n'} Uploading diff, size: 159 HTTP POSTing to http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr/api/review-requests/3/diffs/: {} Got API Error 105 (HTTP code 400): One or more fields had errors Error data: {u'fields': {u'path': [u'[Errno 2] No such file or directory']}, u'stat': u'fail', u'err': {u'msg': u'One or more fields had errors', u'code': 105}} Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached. *My question is, * 1. Does my RB server user id requires account in perforce? No. 2. What should i do make posting of review request if am having one perforce id with multiple RB server user id. All you need is one Perforce ID that's configured in the repository settings. The Review Board users have nothing to do with Perforce users. 3. Is it mandatory that perforce id to be in the user list of reviewboard server No. It wouldn't matter in any way. It sounds like there's just something wrong with your diff. Run that command with --output-diff and inspect the output. Also, check your reviewboard.log for errors that correspond to the time you made that request. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For
Re: URGENT: post-review queries
here you go: 2012-08-06 00:00:57,711 - DEBUG - DiffParser.parse: Finished parsing diff. 2012-08-06 00:00:57,800 - ERROR - Error uploading new diff: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/webapi/resources.py, line 1510, in create request.FILES.get('parent_diff_path')) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/forms.py, line 295, in create history) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line 84, in create diff_file, basedir, check_existance=(not parent_diff_file))) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line 170, in _process_files not self.repository.get_file_exists(filename, revision))): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/models.py, line 169, in get_file_exists return self.get_scmtool().file_exists(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/core.py, line 72, in file_exists self.get_file(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 306, in get_file return self.client.get_file(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 224, in get_file return self._run_worker(lambda: self._get_file(path, revision)) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 154, in _run_worker result = worker() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 224, in lambda return self._run_worker(lambda: self._get_file(path, revision)) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 201, in _get_file stderr=subprocess.PIPE) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py, line 679, in __init__ errread, errwrite) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py, line 1228, in _execute_child raise child_exception OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory 2012-08-06 00:25:50,140 - DEBUG - Attempting authentication on API for user nileshj On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Can you find anything in reviewboard.log that starts with Error uploading new diff ? That's the most likely trigger for this error. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: Thank for prompt reply. Your reply motivated me. I think you will provide me solution after looking into the requested diff. Here is the requested output. The line marked with red have been added to file. posting review request... RBTools 0.3.4 Home = /home/nileshj svn info p4 info repository info: Path: pf-ch.nds.com:1666, Base path: None, Supports changesets: True HTTP GETting api/ HTTP GETting http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr/api/info/ Using the new web API Generating diff for changenum 1568 p4 describe -s 1568 CREATING WHERE FILE FROM /tmp/tmpMhEcPa p4 -ztag -x /tmp/tmpMhEcPa where Processing edit of //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript WRITING //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 to /tmp/tmp_yDlEz CREATING OLD PRINT BATCH /tmp/tmp26cwU1 p4 -s -p pf-ch.nds.com:1666 -x /tmp/tmp_yDlEz print CREATING NEW PRINT BATCH /tmp/tmp5APfF- p4 -s -p pf-ch.nds.com:1666 -x /tmp/tmpxe11Ch print Processing edit of //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript Writing //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 to /tmp/tmpnNHcoH diff -urNp /tmp/tmpnNHcoH /home/nileshj/fwei///dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript --- //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 +++ //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript 2012-08-06 14:50:29 @@ -18,6 +18,6 @@ env.InstallTree( DeclarativeFiles, .. #== -* +#=* retval = env.ProcessDir(env_base) Return('retval') Thank you again. Regards, Nilesh On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: Dear All, I am trying to post the review request as below argument. My perforce id:njaiswal *I am using --submit-as option.* *post-review --bugs-closed=TEST --file-list=/tmp/tmp9Dj3Dt --branch=DEV_BR --server=http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr--submit-as=nileshj
Need Help with Integrating Clearcase with Review Board
Hi, I'm new to Review Board, i have installed RB 1.6.11 in windows machine after long struggle. I'm now facing issue with Integrating Clearcase with Review Board. and upload diffs. If someone could help me with step by step of the same would be really helpful, Thanks, Peer -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: post-review queries
You don't have p4 installed in a path that Apache can access. Make sure it's installed in /usr/bin. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: here you go: 2012-08-06 00:00:57,711 - DEBUG - DiffParser.parse: Finished parsing diff. 2012-08-06 00:00:57,800 - ERROR - Error uploading new diff: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/webapi/resources.py, line 1510, in create request.FILES.get('parent_diff_path')) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/forms.py, line 295, in create history) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line 84, in create diff_file, basedir, check_existance=(not parent_diff_file))) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line 170, in _process_files not self.repository.get_file_exists(filename, revision))): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/models.py, line 169, in get_file_exists return self.get_scmtool().file_exists(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/core.py, line 72, in file_exists self.get_file(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 306, in get_file return self.client.get_file(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 224, in get_file return self._run_worker(lambda: self._get_file(path, revision)) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 154, in _run_worker result = worker() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 224, in lambda return self._run_worker(lambda: self._get_file(path, revision)) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 201, in _get_file stderr=subprocess.PIPE) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py, line 679, in __init__ errread, errwrite) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py, line 1228, in _execute_child raise child_exception OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory 2012-08-06 00:25:50,140 - DEBUG - Attempting authentication on API for user nileshj On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Can you find anything in reviewboard.log that starts with Error uploading new diff ? That's the most likely trigger for this error. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: Thank for prompt reply. Your reply motivated me. I think you will provide me solution after looking into the requested diff. Here is the requested output. The line marked with red have been added to file. posting review request... RBTools 0.3.4 Home = /home/nileshj svn info p4 info repository info: Path: pf-ch.nds.com:1666, Base path: None, Supports changesets: True HTTP GETting api/ HTTP GETting http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr/api/info/ Using the new web API Generating diff for changenum 1568 p4 describe -s 1568 CREATING WHERE FILE FROM /tmp/tmpMhEcPa p4 -ztag -x /tmp/tmpMhEcPa where Processing edit of //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript WRITING //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 to /tmp/tmp_yDlEz CREATING OLD PRINT BATCH /tmp/tmp26cwU1 p4 -s -p pf-ch.nds.com:1666 -x /tmp/tmp_yDlEz print CREATING NEW PRINT BATCH /tmp/tmp5APfF- p4 -s -p pf-ch.nds.com:1666 -x /tmp/tmpxe11Ch print Processing edit of //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript Writing //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 to /tmp/tmpnNHcoH diff -urNp /tmp/tmpnNHcoH /home/nileshj/fwei///dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript --- //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 +++ //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript 2012-08-06 14:50:29 @@ -18,6 +18,6 @@ env.InstallTree( DeclarativeFiles, .. #== -* +#=* retval = env.ProcessDir(env_base) Return('retval') Thank you again. Regards, Nilesh On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Christian Hammond
Re: URGENT: post-review queries
I am having p4 installed at /usr/local/bin/p4 What should i do.? On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: You don't have p4 installed in a path that Apache can access. Make sure it's installed in /usr/bin. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: here you go: 2012-08-06 00:00:57,711 - DEBUG - DiffParser.parse: Finished parsing diff. 2012-08-06 00:00:57,800 - ERROR - Error uploading new diff: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/webapi/resources.py, line 1510, in create request.FILES.get('parent_diff_path')) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/forms.py, line 295, in create history) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line 84, in create diff_file, basedir, check_existance=(not parent_diff_file))) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line 170, in _process_files not self.repository.get_file_exists(filename, revision))): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/models.py, line 169, in get_file_exists return self.get_scmtool().file_exists(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/core.py, line 72, in file_exists self.get_file(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 306, in get_file return self.client.get_file(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 224, in get_file return self._run_worker(lambda: self._get_file(path, revision)) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 154, in _run_worker result = worker() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 224, in lambda return self._run_worker(lambda: self._get_file(path, revision)) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 201, in _get_file stderr=subprocess.PIPE) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py, line 679, in __init__ errread, errwrite) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py, line 1228, in _execute_child raise child_exception OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory 2012-08-06 00:25:50,140 - DEBUG - Attempting authentication on API for user nileshj On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Can you find anything in reviewboard.log that starts with Error uploading new diff ? That's the most likely trigger for this error. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: Thank for prompt reply. Your reply motivated me. I think you will provide me solution after looking into the requested diff. Here is the requested output. The line marked with red have been added to file. posting review request... RBTools 0.3.4 Home = /home/nileshj svn info p4 info repository info: Path: pf-ch.nds.com:1666, Base path: None, Supports changesets: True HTTP GETting api/ HTTP GETting http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr/api/info/ Using the new web API Generating diff for changenum 1568 p4 describe -s 1568 CREATING WHERE FILE FROM /tmp/tmpMhEcPa p4 -ztag -x /tmp/tmpMhEcPa where Processing edit of //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript WRITING //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 to /tmp/tmp_yDlEz CREATING OLD PRINT BATCH /tmp/tmp26cwU1 p4 -s -p pf-ch.nds.com:1666 -x /tmp/tmp_yDlEz print CREATING NEW PRINT BATCH /tmp/tmp5APfF- p4 -s -p pf-ch.nds.com:1666 -x /tmp/tmpxe11Ch print Processing edit of //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript Writing //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 to /tmp/tmpnNHcoH diff -urNp /tmp/tmpnNHcoH /home/nileshj/fwei///dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript --- //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 +++ //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript 2012-08-06 14:50:29 @@ -18,6 +18,6 @@ env.InstallTree( DeclarativeFiles, .. #== -* +#=* retval =
Re: URGENT: post-review queries
Move it to /usr/bin so Apache can see it. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: I am having p4 installed at /usr/local/bin/p4 What should i do.? On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: You don't have p4 installed in a path that Apache can access. Make sure it's installed in /usr/bin. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: here you go: 2012-08-06 00:00:57,711 - DEBUG - DiffParser.parse: Finished parsing diff. 2012-08-06 00:00:57,800 - ERROR - Error uploading new diff: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/webapi/resources.py, line 1510, in create request.FILES.get('parent_diff_path')) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/forms.py, line 295, in create history) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line 84, in create diff_file, basedir, check_existance=(not parent_diff_file))) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line 170, in _process_files not self.repository.get_file_exists(filename, revision))): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/models.py, line 169, in get_file_exists return self.get_scmtool().file_exists(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/core.py, line 72, in file_exists self.get_file(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 306, in get_file return self.client.get_file(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 224, in get_file return self._run_worker(lambda: self._get_file(path, revision)) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 154, in _run_worker result = worker() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 224, in lambda return self._run_worker(lambda: self._get_file(path, revision)) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 201, in _get_file stderr=subprocess.PIPE) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py, line 679, in __init__ errread, errwrite) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py, line 1228, in _execute_child raise child_exception OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory 2012-08-06 00:25:50,140 - DEBUG - Attempting authentication on API for user nileshj On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Can you find anything in reviewboard.log that starts with Error uploading new diff ? That's the most likely trigger for this error. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: Thank for prompt reply. Your reply motivated me. I think you will provide me solution after looking into the requested diff. Here is the requested output. The line marked with red have been added to file. posting review request... RBTools 0.3.4 Home = /home/nileshj svn info p4 info repository info: Path: pf-ch.nds.com:1666, Base path: None, Supports changesets: True HTTP GETting api/ HTTP GETting http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr/api/info/ Using the new web API Generating diff for changenum 1568 p4 describe -s 1568 CREATING WHERE FILE FROM /tmp/tmpMhEcPa p4 -ztag -x /tmp/tmpMhEcPa where Processing edit of //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript WRITING //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 to /tmp/tmp_yDlEz CREATING OLD PRINT BATCH /tmp/tmp26cwU1 p4 -s -p pf-ch.nds.com:1666 -x /tmp/tmp_yDlEz print CREATING NEW PRINT BATCH /tmp/tmp5APfF- p4 -s -p pf-ch.nds.com:1666 -x /tmp/tmpxe11Ch print Processing edit of //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript Writing //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 to /tmp/tmpnNHcoH diff -urNp /tmp/tmpnNHcoH /home/nileshj/fwei///dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript --- //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript
Re: URGENT: post-review queries
Hello Mr Life Saver !! You made my work so easy !! you are fantastic !! Whole of MSC Software will be proud of you !! Thank you so much. On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Move it to /usr/bin so Apache can see it. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: I am having p4 installed at /usr/local/bin/p4 What should i do.? On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: You don't have p4 installed in a path that Apache can access. Make sure it's installed in /usr/bin. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: here you go: 2012-08-06 00:00:57,711 - DEBUG - DiffParser.parse: Finished parsing diff. 2012-08-06 00:00:57,800 - ERROR - Error uploading new diff: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/webapi/resources.py, line 1510, in create request.FILES.get('parent_diff_path')) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/forms.py, line 295, in create history) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line 84, in create diff_file, basedir, check_existance=(not parent_diff_file))) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line 170, in _process_files not self.repository.get_file_exists(filename, revision))): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/models.py, line 169, in get_file_exists return self.get_scmtool().file_exists(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/core.py, line 72, in file_exists self.get_file(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 306, in get_file return self.client.get_file(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 224, in get_file return self._run_worker(lambda: self._get_file(path, revision)) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 154, in _run_worker result = worker() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 224, in lambda return self._run_worker(lambda: self._get_file(path, revision)) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 201, in _get_file stderr=subprocess.PIPE) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py, line 679, in __init__ errread, errwrite) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py, line 1228, in _execute_child raise child_exception OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory 2012-08-06 00:25:50,140 - DEBUG - Attempting authentication on API for user nileshj On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Can you find anything in reviewboard.log that starts with Error uploading new diff ? That's the most likely trigger for this error. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: Thank for prompt reply. Your reply motivated me. I think you will provide me solution after looking into the requested diff. Here is the requested output. The line marked with red have been added to file. posting review request... RBTools 0.3.4 Home = /home/nileshj svn info p4 info repository info: Path: pf-ch.nds.com:1666, Base path: None, Supports changesets: True HTTP GETting api/ HTTP GETting http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr/api/info/ Using the new web API Generating diff for changenum 1568 p4 describe -s 1568 CREATING WHERE FILE FROM /tmp/tmpMhEcPa p4 -ztag -x /tmp/tmpMhEcPa where Processing edit of //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript WRITING //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 to /tmp/tmp_yDlEz CREATING OLD PRINT BATCH /tmp/tmp26cwU1 p4 -s -p pf-ch.nds.com:1666 -x /tmp/tmp_yDlEz print CREATING NEW PRINT BATCH /tmp/tmp5APfF- p4 -s -p pf-ch.nds.com:1666 -x /tmp/tmpxe11Ch print Processing edit of //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript Writing
Re: URGENT: post-review queries
Glad it works! Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Mr Life Saver !! You made my work so easy !! you are fantastic !! Whole of MSC Software will be proud of you !! Thank you so much. On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Move it to /usr/bin so Apache can see it. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: I am having p4 installed at /usr/local/bin/p4 What should i do.? On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: You don't have p4 installed in a path that Apache can access. Make sure it's installed in /usr/bin. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.comwrote: here you go: 2012-08-06 00:00:57,711 - DEBUG - DiffParser.parse: Finished parsing diff. 2012-08-06 00:00:57,800 - ERROR - Error uploading new diff: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/webapi/resources.py, line 1510, in create request.FILES.get('parent_diff_path')) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/forms.py, line 295, in create history) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line 84, in create diff_file, basedir, check_existance=(not parent_diff_file))) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/forms.py, line 170, in _process_files not self.repository.get_file_exists(filename, revision))): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/models.py, line 169, in get_file_exists return self.get_scmtool().file_exists(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/core.py, line 72, in file_exists self.get_file(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 306, in get_file return self.client.get_file(path, revision) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 224, in get_file return self._run_worker(lambda: self._get_file(path, revision)) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 154, in _run_worker result = worker() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 224, in lambda return self._run_worker(lambda: self._get_file(path, revision)) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.9-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 201, in _get_file stderr=subprocess.PIPE) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py, line 679, in __init__ errread, errwrite) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py, line 1228, in _execute_child raise child_exception OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory 2012-08-06 00:25:50,140 - DEBUG - Attempting authentication on API for user nileshj On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Can you find anything in reviewboard.log that starts with Error uploading new diff ? That's the most likely trigger for this error. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Nilesh Jaiswal nileshj...@gmail.com wrote: Thank for prompt reply. Your reply motivated me. I think you will provide me solution after looking into the requested diff. Here is the requested output. The line marked with red have been added to file. posting review request... RBTools 0.3.4 Home = /home/nileshj svn info p4 info repository info: Path: pf-ch.nds.com:1666, Base path: None, Supports changesets: True HTTP GETting api/ HTTP GETting http://rbc.nds.com:8000/rbsvr/api/info/ Using the new web API Generating diff for changenum 1568 p4 describe -s 1568 CREATING WHERE FILE FROM /tmp/tmpMhEcPa p4 -ztag -x /tmp/tmpMhEcPa where Processing edit of //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript WRITING //dator/Dev/DEV_BR/Plugins/PostPlugin/SConscript#1 to /tmp/tmp_yDlEz CREATING OLD PRINT BATCH /tmp/tmp26cwU1 p4 -s -p
Re: Not able to use post-review
Hi , Following is the output diff --version. Usage: diff [OPTIONS] file1 file2 Display the differences between file1 and file2 in unified diff format. OPTIONS are diff extensions as described by 'svn help diff'. Use '--' alone to indicate that no more options follow. Regards Vijay On Monday, 6 August 2012 12:52:54 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Can you run diff --version and show me the output? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, Thanks for the reply . I an getting following error when i typed post-review in cmd GNU diff is required for Subversion repositories. Make sure it is installed and in the path. On Windows, you can install this from: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/diffutils.htm; I have already installed GNU Diff and set in the Path . For your information,I have also installed both Tortoise SVN as well as collabnet subversion client . Please suggest how to proceed further. Regards Vijay On Saturday, 4 August 2012 00:29:03 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, Can you describe to me how GNU diff isn't working? What are you seeing? Christian On Aug 3, 2012, at 2:50, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi , I was trying to use post-review filename but I get following error always : GNU diff is required for Subversion repositories. Make sure it is installed and in the path. On Windows, you can install this from: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.**net/packages/diffutils.htmdhttp://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/diffutils.htm%22d I have installed GNU Diff and even post-review installation seems to work but some how GNU diff is not working. i debuged and type following command SVN info and it is giving me the configured SVN repo browser value Please suggest how to configure . For your information I setup Review Board on Linux machine and configured SVN which is hosted on Windows machine . I am using my Windows client machine to use review board and trying to post review but apparently got stuck with GNU diff ...Please help me to come out from here !!! Regards Vijay -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscribe@** googlegroups.com reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Not able to use post-review
Hi , As a workaround I guess ... I have put all the diff exe to the folder where I have installed post-review . Then this error goes off .Now I am getting another error. if i give command like post-review --server http:\\10.117.8.9 --debug ,i am getting following error RBTools 0.4.1 Home = C:\Users\vtiwary\AppData\Roaming HTTP GETting api/ HTTP GETting http://10.117.8.9/api/info/ Using the new web API Failed to execute command: ['svn', 'diff', '--diff-cmd=diff'] ['Index: .\n', ' ===\n', '--- .\t(revision 206)\n', '+++ .\t(working copy)\n', '\n', 'Property ch anges on: .\n', '___ \n', 'Added: reviewboard:url\n', '## -0,0 +1 ##\n', '+http://10.117.2.8\n', '\\ No newline at end of property\n', 'Index: IMessageCallback.cs\n', '= ==\n', 'Usage: diff [OPT IONS] file1 file2\n', '\n', 'Display the differences between file1 and fi le2 in unified diff\n', format. OPTIONS are diff extensions as described by ' svn help diff'.\n, Use '--' alone to indicate that no more options follow.\n, svn: E200012: 'diff' returned 2\n] How can i get rid of this error . Thanks Vijay On Monday, 6 August 2012 15:51:33 UTC+5:30, Vijay Kumar Tiwary wrote: Hi , Following is the output diff --version. Usage: diff [OPTIONS] file1 file2 Display the differences between file1 and file2 in unified diff format. OPTIONS are diff extensions as described by 'svn help diff'. Use '--' alone to indicate that no more options follow. Regards Vijay On Monday, 6 August 2012 12:52:54 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Can you run diff --version and show me the output? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, Thanks for the reply . I an getting following error when i typed post-review in cmd GNU diff is required for Subversion repositories. Make sure it is installed and in the path. On Windows, you can install this from: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/diffutils.htm; I have already installed GNU Diff and set in the Path . For your information,I have also installed both Tortoise SVN as well as collabnet subversion client . Please suggest how to proceed further. Regards Vijay On Saturday, 4 August 2012 00:29:03 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, Can you describe to me how GNU diff isn't working? What are you seeing? Christian On Aug 3, 2012, at 2:50, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi , I was trying to use post-review filename but I get following error always : GNU diff is required for Subversion repositories. Make sure it is installed and in the path. On Windows, you can install this from: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.**net/packages/diffutils.htmdhttp://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/diffutils.htm%22d I have installed GNU Diff and even post-review installation seems to work but some how GNU diff is not working. i debuged and type following command SVN info and it is giving me the configured SVN repo browser value Please suggest how to configure . For your information I setup Review Board on Linux machine and configured SVN which is hosted on Windows machine . I am using my Windows client machine to use review board and trying to post review but apparently got stuck with GNU diff ...Please help me to come out from here !!! Regards Vijay -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscribe@* *googlegroups.com reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options,
Re: Not able to use post-review
The version of diff it's using is not GNU diff. It sounds like it's some other diff tool, possibly from collabnet or Tortoise SVN. You need exactly GNU diff. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.comwrote: Hi , As a workaround I guess ... I have put all the diff exe to the folder where I have installed post-review . Then this error goes off .Now I am getting another error. if i give command like post-review --server http:\\10.117.8.9 --debug ,i am getting following error RBTools 0.4.1 Home = C:\Users\vtiwary\AppData\Roaming HTTP GETting api/ HTTP GETting http://10.117.8.9/api/info/ Using the new web API Failed to execute command: ['svn', 'diff', '--diff-cmd=diff'] ['Index: .\n', ' ===\n', '--- .\t(revision 206)\n', '+++ .\t(working copy)\n', '\n', 'Property ch anges on: .\n', '___ \n', 'Added: reviewboard:url\n', '## -0,0 +1 ##\n', '+ http://10.117.2.8\n', '\\ No newline at end of property\n', 'Index: IMessageCallback.cs\n', '= ==\n', 'Usage: diff [OPT IONS] file1 file2\n', '\n', 'Display the differences between file1 and fi le2 in unified diff\n', format. OPTIONS are diff extensions as described by ' svn help diff'.\n, Use '--' alone to indicate that no more options follow.\n, svn: E200012: 'diff' returned 2\n] How can i get rid of this error . Thanks Vijay On Monday, 6 August 2012 15:51:33 UTC+5:30, Vijay Kumar Tiwary wrote: Hi , Following is the output diff --version. Usage: diff [OPTIONS] file1 file2 Display the differences between file1 and file2 in unified diff format. OPTIONS are diff extensions as described by 'svn help diff'. Use '--' alone to indicate that no more options follow. Regards Vijay On Monday, 6 August 2012 12:52:54 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Can you run diff --version and show me the output? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, Thanks for the reply . I an getting following error when i typed post-review in cmd GNU diff is required for Subversion repositories. Make sure it is installed and in the path. On Windows, you can install this from: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.**net/packages/diffutils.htmhttp://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/diffutils.htm I have already installed GNU Diff and set in the Path . For your information,I have also installed both Tortoise SVN as well as collabnet subversion client . Please suggest how to proceed further. Regards Vijay On Saturday, 4 August 2012 00:29:03 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, Can you describe to me how GNU diff isn't working? What are you seeing? Christian On Aug 3, 2012, at 2:50, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi , I was trying to use post-review filename but I get following error always : GNU diff is required for Subversion repositories. Make sure it is installed and in the path. On Windows, you can install this from: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.**ne**t/packages/diffutils.htmdhttp://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/diffutils.htm%22d I have installed GNU Diff and even post-review installation seems to work but some how GNU diff is not working. i debuged and type following command SVN info and it is giving me the configured SVN repo browser value Please suggest how to configure . For your information I setup Review Board on Linux machine and configured SVN which is hosted on Windows machine . I am using my Windows client machine to use review board and trying to post review but apparently got stuck with GNU diff ...Please help me to come out from here !!! Regards Vijay -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/**don**ate/http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/**use**rs/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscribe@ **google**groups.com reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group **/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
Re: Not able to use post-review
Hi Christian, But I have installed the GNU Diff . How can I override the property and use GNU Diff . Do you have idea ? Regards Vijay On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: The version of diff it's using is not GNU diff. It sounds like it's some other diff tool, possibly from collabnet or Tortoise SVN. You need exactly GNU diff. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi , As a workaround I guess ... I have put all the diff exe to the folder where I have installed post-review . Then this error goes off .Now I am getting another error. if i give command like post-review --server http:\\10.117.8.9 --debug ,i am getting following error RBTools 0.4.1 Home = C:\Users\vtiwary\AppData\Roaming HTTP GETting api/ HTTP GETting http://10.117.8.9/api/info/ Using the new web API Failed to execute command: ['svn', 'diff', '--diff-cmd=diff'] ['Index: .\n', ' ===\n', '--- .\t(revision 206)\n', '+++ .\t(working copy)\n', '\n', 'Property ch anges on: .\n', '___ \n', 'Added: reviewboard:url\n', '## -0,0 +1 ##\n', '+http://10.117.2.8\n', '\\ No newline at end of property\n', 'Index: IMessageCallback.cs\n', '= ==\n', 'Usage: diff [OPT IONS] file1 file2\n', '\n', 'Display the differences between file1 and fi le2 in unified diff\n', format. OPTIONS are diff extensions as described by ' svn help diff'.\n, Use '--' alone to indicate that no more options follow.\n, svn: E200012: 'diff' returned 2\n] How can i get rid of this error . Thanks Vijay On Monday, 6 August 2012 15:51:33 UTC+5:30, Vijay Kumar Tiwary wrote: Hi , Following is the output diff --version. Usage: diff [OPTIONS] file1 file2 Display the differences between file1 and file2 in unified diff format. OPTIONS are diff extensions as described by 'svn help diff'. Use '--' alone to indicate that no more options follow. Regards Vijay On Monday, 6 August 2012 12:52:54 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Can you run diff --version and show me the output? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, Thanks for the reply . I an getting following error when i typed post-review in cmd GNU diff is required for Subversion repositories. Make sure it is installed and in the path. On Windows, you can install this from: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/diffutils.htm; I have already installed GNU Diff and set in the Path . For your information,I have also installed both Tortoise SVN as well as collabnet subversion client . Please suggest how to proceed further. Regards Vijay On Saturday, 4 August 2012 00:29:03 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, Can you describe to me how GNU diff isn't working? What are you seeing? Christian On Aug 3, 2012, at 2:50, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi , I was trying to use post-review filename but I get following error always : GNU diff is required for Subversion repositories. Make sure it is installed and in the path. On Windows, you can install this from: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/diffutils.htmd I have installed GNU Diff and even post-review installation seems to work but some how GNU diff is not working. i debuged and type following command SVN info and it is giving me the configured SVN repo browser value Please suggest how to configure . For your information I setup Review Board on Linux machine and configured SVN which is hosted on Windows machine . I am using my Windows client machine to use review board and trying to post review but apparently got stuck with GNU diff ...Please help me to come out from here !!! Regards Vijay -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
Re: Not able to use post-review
It's going to be whatever is in the path first. When you run diff --version with GNU diff, you should see something like: diff (GNU diffutils) 3.0 Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html . This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Written by Paul Eggert, Mike Haertel, David Hayes, Richard Stallman, and Len Tower. All I can say is, make sure you have your path and the executables all set correctly. There's not much I can really do other than suggest that. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Christian, But I have installed the GNU Diff . How can I override the property and use GNU Diff . Do you have idea ? Regards Vijay On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: The version of diff it's using is not GNU diff. It sounds like it's some other diff tool, possibly from collabnet or Tortoise SVN. You need exactly GNU diff. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi , As a workaround I guess ... I have put all the diff exe to the folder where I have installed post-review . Then this error goes off .Now I am getting another error. if i give command like post-review --server http:\\10.117.8.9 --debug ,i am getting following error RBTools 0.4.1 Home = C:\Users\vtiwary\AppData\Roaming HTTP GETting api/ HTTP GETting http://10.117.8.9/api/info/ Using the new web API Failed to execute command: ['svn', 'diff', '--diff-cmd=diff'] ['Index: .\n', ' ===\n', '--- .\t(revision 206)\n', '+++ .\t(working copy)\n', '\n', 'Property ch anges on: .\n', '___ \n', 'Added: reviewboard:url\n', '## -0,0 +1 ##\n', '+http://10.117.2.8\n', '\\ No newline at end of property\n', 'Index: IMessageCallback.cs\n', '= ==\n', 'Usage: diff [OPT IONS] file1 file2\n', '\n', 'Display the differences between file1 and fi le2 in unified diff\n', format. OPTIONS are diff extensions as described by ' svn help diff'.\n, Use '--' alone to indicate that no more options follow.\n, svn: E200012: 'diff' returned 2\n] How can i get rid of this error . Thanks Vijay On Monday, 6 August 2012 15:51:33 UTC+5:30, Vijay Kumar Tiwary wrote: Hi , Following is the output diff --version. Usage: diff [OPTIONS] file1 file2 Display the differences between file1 and file2 in unified diff format. OPTIONS are diff extensions as described by 'svn help diff'. Use '--' alone to indicate that no more options follow. Regards Vijay On Monday, 6 August 2012 12:52:54 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Can you run diff --version and show me the output? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, Thanks for the reply . I an getting following error when i typed post-review in cmd GNU diff is required for Subversion repositories. Make sure it is installed and in the path. On Windows, you can install this from: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/diffutils.htm; I have already installed GNU Diff and set in the Path . For your information,I have also installed both Tortoise SVN as well as collabnet subversion client . Please suggest how to proceed further. Regards Vijay On Saturday, 4 August 2012 00:29:03 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, Can you describe to me how GNU diff isn't working? What are you seeing? Christian On Aug 3, 2012, at 2:50, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi , I was trying to use post-review filename but I get following error always : GNU diff is required for Subversion repositories. Make sure it is installed and in the path. On Windows, you can install this from: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/diffutils.htmd I have installed GNU Diff and even post-review installation seems to work but some how GNU diff is not working. i debuged and type following command SVN info and it is giving me the configured SVN repo browser value Please suggest how to configure . For your information I setup Review Board on Linux
Re: Not able to use post-review
Hi Vijay, Let's try few things. 1. Check if cmd finds 'diff' command. Send us the output of 'where diff'. This should basically point to your GNU diff installation directory ('C:\Program Files (x86)\GnuWin32\bin\diff.exe' in my system). If it doesn't, add this path at the beginning of system variable 'Path', run a new instance of cmd and execute 'where diff' again. 2. Go to %appdata%\Subversion and open 'config' file in text editor. Check if diff tool is specified in this file (line should look like: diff-cmd=something). On 6 August 2012 12:41, Vijay Kumar Tiwary vijayktiw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, But I have installed the GNU Diff . How can I override the property and use GNU Diff . Do you have idea ? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 15:56 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 12:31 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: Yeah, the pipeline (django_pipeline) module. Guessing we left it out of the dependency list for Djblets (though RB has it). I can fix this in a couple hours, but I imagine that's not fully necessary on fedora once you have a package for it? Yeah, looks like I'm going to have to package that up first, since it doesn't appear to be available in Fedora yet. Ah well, one step at a time. Ok, finally got django_pipeline accepted into Fedora today. Unfortunately, now I'm having a compilation problem with ReviewBoard: Note: TypeError: compile_file() got an unexpected keyword argument 'outdated' This is with the ReviewBoard 1.7beta1 tarball and django_pipeline 1.2.14. Any help would be appreciated. I need to get this in today to make the Fedora 18 deadline :( Full traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 19, in module ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py, line 150, in call_command return klass.execute(*args, **defaults) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line 232, in execute output = self.handle(*args, **options) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line 371, in handle return self.handle_noargs(**options) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py, line 163, in handle_noargs collected = self.collect() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py, line 119, in collect dry_run=self.dry_run) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py, line 30, in post_process packager.pack_stylesheets(package) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 90, in pack_stylesheets variant=package.variant, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 99, in pack paths = self.compile(package.paths, force=True) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 93, in compile return self.compiler.compile(paths, force=force) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compilers/__init__.py, line 41, in compile compiler.compile_file(infile, outfile, outdated=outdated, force=force) TypeError: compile_file() got an unexpected keyword argument 'outdated' Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 182, in module Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance, File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py, line 152, in setup dist.run_commands() File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 953, in run_commands self.run_command(cmd) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py, line 53, in run return _install.run(self) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py, line 575, in run self.run_command(cmd_name) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py, line 29, in run self.run_command('egg_info') File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File setup.py, line 63, in run self.run_command('build_media') File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File setup.py, line 81, in run raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files') RuntimeError: Failed to build media files error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dvLLKA (%install) -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
There's a few things that it seems are broken with newer Pipelines. I know for sure that 1.2.1 works. Any way you could just package that for now? Looking into the remaining things, but there's some ugly issue I'm not completely sure about yet. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 15:56 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 12:31 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: Yeah, the pipeline (django_pipeline) module. Guessing we left it out of the dependency list for Djblets (though RB has it). I can fix this in a couple hours, but I imagine that's not fully necessary on fedora once you have a package for it? Yeah, looks like I'm going to have to package that up first, since it doesn't appear to be available in Fedora yet. Ah well, one step at a time. Ok, finally got django_pipeline accepted into Fedora today. Unfortunately, now I'm having a compilation problem with ReviewBoard: Note: TypeError: compile_file() got an unexpected keyword argument 'outdated' This is with the ReviewBoard 1.7beta1 tarball and django_pipeline 1.2.14. Any help would be appreciated. I need to get this in today to make the Fedora 18 deadline :( Full traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 19, in module ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py, line 150, in call_command return klass.execute(*args, **defaults) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line 232, in execute output = self.handle(*args, **options) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line 371, in handle return self.handle_noargs(**options) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py, line 163, in handle_noargs collected = self.collect() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py, line 119, in collect dry_run=self.dry_run) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py, line 30, in post_process packager.pack_stylesheets(package) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 90, in pack_stylesheets variant=package.variant, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 99, in pack paths = self.compile(package.paths, force=True) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 93, in compile return self.compiler.compile(paths, force=force) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compilers/__init__.py, line 41, in compile compiler.compile_file(infile, outfile, outdated=outdated, force=force) TypeError: compile_file() got an unexpected keyword argument 'outdated' Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 182, in module Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance, File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py, line 152, in setup dist.run_commands() File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 953, in run_commands self.run_command(cmd) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py, line 53, in run return _install.run(self) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py, line 575, in run self.run_command(cmd_name) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py, line 29, in run self.run_command('egg_info') File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File setup.py, line 63, in run self.run_command('build_media') File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File setup.py, line 81, in run raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files') RuntimeError: Failed to build media files error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dvLLKA (%install) -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:18 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: There's a few things that it seems are broken with newer Pipelines. I know for sure that 1.2.1 works. Any way you could just package that for now? Looking into the remaining things, but there's some ugly issue I'm not completely sure about yet. Ugh, unfortunately not. It's a real pain to revert a version in Fedora. (It can be done, such as when regressions necessitate it), but it's never done lightly. It requires mangling the version numbers in a particularly ugly way to ensure that anyone who happened to install the previous package will still update to the new one (despite the version being lower). I don't suppose you could point me at specific patches that I could revert in the django_pipeline 1.2.14 release instead that would get it working in the meantime? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
I have no idea. I fixed a few things (they changed the API around a bit, breaking non-bundled media compilers), but even after fixing that, I'm getting a much more concerning error. I'll try to track it down and see if we can fix it, but if not, it'll need to be fixed in pipeline. Given the API changes, I'd be concerned about reverting code in pipeline for the package. I'll keep you informed as I learn more. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:18 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: There's a few things that it seems are broken with newer Pipelines. I know for sure that 1.2.1 works. Any way you could just package that for now? Looking into the remaining things, but there's some ugly issue I'm not completely sure about yet. Ugh, unfortunately not. It's a real pain to revert a version in Fedora. (It can be done, such as when regressions necessitate it), but it's never done lightly. It requires mangling the version numbers in a particularly ugly way to ensure that anyone who happened to install the previous package will still update to the new one (despite the version being lower). I don't suppose you could point me at specific patches that I could revert in the django_pipeline 1.2.14 release instead that would get it working in the meantime? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
This branch has what we need on the djblets side: https://github.com/chipx86/djblets/tree/pipeline-fix Unless there's just something messed up here, you should hit problems with pipeline not finding files in the PipelineCachedStorage. I traced the first occurrence to revision dd2eed6e51bcfa4352b95a12e8f43c0feaca8819, but even if I revert that on master, I still hit some issues. Can you confirm? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 16:33 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: I have no idea. I fixed a few things (they changed the API around a bit, breaking non-bundled media compilers), but even after fixing that, I'm getting a much more concerning error. I'll try to track it down and see if we can fix it, but if not, it'll need to be fixed in pipeline. Given the API changes, I'd be concerned about reverting code in pipeline for the package. I'll keep you informed as I learn more. Thanks, I appreciate it. I'm attacking it on my end as well. Do you have a github with your in-progress changes I could sync to, so we don't duplicate effort? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 16:54 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: This branch has what we need on the djblets side: https://github.com/chipx86/djblets/tree/pipeline-fix Unless there's just something messed up here, you should hit problems with pipeline not finding files in the PipelineCachedStorage. I traced the first occurrence to revision dd2eed6e51bcfa4352b95a12e8f43c0feaca8819, but even if I revert that on master, I still hit some issues. Can you confirm? I get the following traceback with your bless patch (as expected): Traceback (most recent call last): File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 19, in module ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py, line 150, in call_command return klass.execute(*args, **defaults) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line 232, in execute output = self.handle(*args, **options) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line 371, in handle return self.handle_noargs(**options) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py, line 163, in handle_noargs collected = self.collect() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py, line 119, in collect dry_run=self.dry_run) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py, line 30, in post_process packager.pack_stylesheets(package) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 90, in pack_stylesheets variant=package.variant, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 100, in pack content = compress(paths, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py, line 72, in compress_css css = self.concatenate_and_rewrite(paths, output_filename, variant) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py, line 135, in concatenate_and_rewrite content = self.read_file(path) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py, line 208, in read_file file = default_storage.open(path, 'rb') File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/files/storage.py, line 33, in open return self._open(name, mode) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py, line 114, in _open storage = self.find_storage(name) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py, line 111, in find_storage raise ValueError(The file '%s' could not be found with %r. % (name, self)) ValueError: The file 'rb/css/diffviewer.css' could not be found with pipeline.storage.PipelineFinderStorage object at 0x1aeaad0. Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 182, in module Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance, File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py, line 152, in setup dist.run_commands() File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 953, in run_commands self.run_command(cmd) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py, line 53, in run return _install.run(self) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py, line 575, in run self.run_command(cmd_name) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py, line 29, in run self.run_command('egg_info') File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File setup.py, line 63, in run self.run_command('build_media') File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File setup.py, line 81, in run raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files') RuntimeError: Failed to build media files error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pmGIf8 (%install) Looking at the pipeline commit you referenced, I can understand why it's still having issue. That patch is just an exception-catcher for an underlying issue that they must have introduced earlier. I'm going to see if I can spot an earlier patch that may have introduced the issue with writing to a static root (unless that's an assumption that Review Board is making that it should not be). -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 20:50 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 17:27 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: Going further, if that change is reverted, the next failure seems to come from when they redid the compiler API. What's odd is that the code doesn't look like it should be an issue, but the bisects keep pointing to it. This is revision 96b356d7c9a8e5626b4ce018577984b89c7f2178. From further investigation, it looks like that patch was completely broken until they added both c1ff4867fe57a9fffbddae38b51d888c85304a87 and fb51fba3f391a9685f4ab65757e7511e3f927df8 to fix it properly. So we're probably getting a false-positive from git bisect because those two patches are also not included. Maybe a quick 'git rebase -i' to merge those into 96b356d7c9a8e5626b4ce018577984b89c7f2178 will allow git bisect to find the real culprit? The only other thing I noticed was that they did change behavior in one place in that code. In Compiler.compile(), they were previously passing output_path to the compilers as the output argument, but this patch changes that to be output_file as determined by finders.find(). Being unfamiliar with the code and the return type of finders.find(), I can't say whether this is relevant. Thanks very much for your help on this Christian, but at this point (with my deadline running close and the hour growing late), I'm just going to go the downgrade route and treat this as a life-lesson: always test version compatibility before making a release. Thanks again, and if we find a solution for this later on, I can still upgrade django_pipeline back up to a recent release. I'll just be carrying the annoying epoch version-mangle forever. C'est la vie. Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and nightly builds upgraded to django-pipeline along with the release, but no, apparently not. I'll keep poking at this and talk to the developer. He's a good guy and has helped with these regressions before, so we'll get it figured out. Thanks for all your help on this. Really sorry for the trouble. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 18:48 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and nightly builds upgraded to django-pipeline along with the release, but no, apparently not. I'll keep poking at this and talk to the developer. He's a good guy and has helped with these regressions before, so we'll get it figured out. Thanks for all your help on this. Really sorry for the trouble. Actually, in a lucky comedy of errors, an unrelated glitch in the Fedora servers meant that my 1.2.14 package never actually made it out to any of the Fedora mirrors. So I got lucky and was able to just yank it out of the queue and I'll be able to avoid the version-mangling for now. So all's well that ends well, I suppose. If you and the pipeline upstream do sort things out though, I'd be appreciative of a heads-up so I can rev the version back up. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 18:48 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and nightly builds upgraded to django-pipeline along with the release, but no, apparently not. I'll keep poking at this and talk to the developer. He's a good guy and has helped with these regressions before, so we'll get it figured out. Thanks for all your help on this. Really sorry for the trouble. Actually, in a lucky comedy of errors, an unrelated glitch in the Fedora servers meant that my 1.2.14 package never actually made it out to any of the Fedora mirrors. So I got lucky and was able to just yank it out of the queue and I'll be able to avoid the version-mangling for now. So all's well that ends well, I suppose. If you and the pipeline upstream do sort things out though, I'd be appreciative of a heads-up so I can rev the version back up. One more problem :( Now I'm seeing this traceback (failure to import jsmin.py). I assume there's another package I need, but Google is failing me here. Traceback (most recent call last): File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 19, in module ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py, line 150, in call_command return klass.execute(*args, **defaults) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line 232, in execute output = self.handle(*args, **options) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line 371, in handle return self.handle_noargs(**options) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py, line 163, in handle_noargs collected = self.collect() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py, line 119, in collect dry_run=self.dry_run) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py, line 30, in post_process output_file = packager.pack_javascripts(package) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 106, in pack_javascripts return self.pack(package, self.compressor.compress_js, js_compressed, templates=package.templates, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 100, in pack content = compress(paths, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py, line 65, in compress_js js = getattr(compressor(verbose=self.verbose), 'compress_js')(js) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/jsmin/__init__.py, line 10, in compress_js from jsmin import jsmin ImportError: No module named jsmin Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 182, in module Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance, File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py, line 152, in setup dist.run_commands() File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 953, in run_commands self.run_command(cmd) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py, line 53, in run return _install.run(self) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py, line 575, in run self.run_command(cmd_name) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py, line 29, in run self.run_command('egg_info') File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File setup.py, line 63, in run self.run_command('build_media') File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File setup.py, line 81, in run raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files') RuntimeError: Failed to build media files error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tnVeed (%install) -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:07 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 18:48 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and nightly builds upgraded to django-pipeline along with the release, but no, apparently not. I'll keep poking at this and talk to the developer. He's a good guy and has helped with these regressions before, so we'll get it figured out. Thanks for all your help on this. Really sorry for the trouble. Actually, in a lucky comedy of errors, an unrelated glitch in the Fedora servers meant that my 1.2.14 package never actually made it out to any of the Fedora mirrors. So I got lucky and was able to just yank it out of the queue and I'll be able to avoid the version-mangling for now. So all's well that ends well, I suppose. If you and the pipeline upstream do sort things out though, I'd be appreciative of a heads-up so I can rev the version back up. One more problem :( Now I'm seeing this traceback (failure to import jsmin.py). I assume there's another package I need, but Google is failing me here. Traceback (most recent call last): File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 19, in module ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py, line 150, in call_command return klass.execute(*args, **defaults) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line 232, in execute output = self.handle(*args, **options) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line 371, in handle return self.handle_noargs(**options) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py, line 163, in handle_noargs collected = self.collect() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py, line 119, in collect dry_run=self.dry_run) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py, line 30, in post_process output_file = packager.pack_javascripts(package) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 106, in pack_javascripts return self.pack(package, self.compressor.compress_js, js_compressed, templates=package.templates, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 100, in pack content = compress(paths, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py, line 65, in compress_js js = getattr(compressor(verbose=self.verbose), 'compress_js')(js) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/jsmin/__init__.py, line 10, in compress_js from jsmin import jsmin ImportError: No module named jsmin Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 182, in module Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance, File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py, line 152, in setup dist.run_commands() File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 953, in run_commands self.run_command(cmd) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py, line 53, in run return _install.run(self) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py, line 575, in run self.run_command(cmd_name) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py, line 29, in run self.run_command('egg_info') File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File setup.py, line 63, in run self.run_command('build_media') File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File setup.py, line 81, in run raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files') RuntimeError: Failed to build media files error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tnVeed (%install) *sigh* Okay, apparently django_pipeline has an undeclared runtime dependency on http://pypi.python.org/pypi/jsmin/ Looks like I'll have to try to package that in the morning. Review Board is probably not going to make it into the Fedora Alpha release. Hopefully they'll let me sneak it in for Beta (since 1.6.x is FTBFS with
Re: URGENT: Review Board still not building (was Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released)
On Aug 6, 2012, at 19:16, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:07 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 18:48 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and nightly builds upgraded to django-pipeline along with the release, but no, apparently not. I'll keep poking at this and talk to the developer. He's a good guy and has helped with these regressions before, so we'll get it figured out. Thanks for all your help on this. Really sorry for the trouble. Actually, in a lucky comedy of errors, an unrelated glitch in the Fedora servers meant that my 1.2.14 package never actually made it out to any of the Fedora mirrors. So I got lucky and was able to just yank it out of the queue and I'll be able to avoid the version-mangling for now. So all's well that ends well, I suppose. If you and the pipeline upstream do sort things out though, I'd be appreciative of a heads-up so I can rev the version back up. One more problem :( Now I'm seeing this traceback (failure to import jsmin.py). I assume there's another package I need, but Google is failing me here. Traceback (most recent call last): File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 19, in module ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py, line 150, in call_command return klass.execute(*args, **defaults) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line 232, in execute output = self.handle(*args, **options) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py, line 371, in handle return self.handle_noargs(**options) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py, line 163, in handle_noargs collected = self.collect() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py, line 119, in collect dry_run=self.dry_run) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/storage.py, line 30, in post_process output_file = packager.pack_javascripts(package) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 106, in pack_javascripts return self.pack(package, self.compressor.compress_js, js_compressed, templates=package.templates, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/packager.py, line 100, in pack content = compress(paths, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/__init__.py, line 65, in compress_js js = getattr(compressor(verbose=self.verbose), 'compress_js')(js) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pipeline/compressors/jsmin/__init__.py, line 10, in compress_js from jsmin import jsmin ImportError: No module named jsmin Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 182, in module Topic :: Software Development :: Quality Assurance, File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/core.py, line 152, in setup dist.run_commands() File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 953, in run_commands self.run_command(cmd) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install.py, line 53, in run return _install.run(self) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/command/install.py, line 575, in run self.run_command(cmd_name) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/install_egg_info.py, line 29, in run self.run_command('egg_info') File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File setup.py, line 63, in run self.run_command('build_media') File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py, line 326, in run_command self.distribution.run_command(command) File /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py, line 972, in run_command cmd_obj.run() File setup.py, line 81, in run raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files') RuntimeError: Failed to build media files error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tnVeed (%install) *sigh* Okay, apparently django_pipeline has an undeclared runtime dependency on http://pypi.python.org/pypi/jsmin/ Looks like I'll have to try to package that in the morning. Review Board is probably not going to make it into the Fedora Alpha release. Hopefully they'll let me sneak it in for Beta (since 1.6.x is FTBFS with Django 1.4) It's
Re: Issue 1388 in reviewboard: Visual Studio plugin/extension to run post-review/RBTools
Comment #5 on issue 1388 by ivan.gav...@gmail.com: Visual Studio plugin/extension to run post-review/RBTools http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1388 OMG sorry but this is terribly ugly and doesn't work. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2108 in reviewboard: Cannot run rbssh: No such file or directory; /usr/local/bin not in env path
Comment #2 on issue 2108 by ews...@gmail.com: Cannot run rbssh: No such file or directory; /usr/local/bin not in env path http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2108 I had a similar problem with reviewboard errors on adding a private GIT repository. I'd see rbssh errors in httpd's error_log such as: [Mon Aug 06 15:13:20 2012] [error] ERROR:root:Git: Failed to find valid repository ssh://g...@github.com/ourname/Common.git: Traceback (most recent call last): [Mon Aug 06 15:13:20 2012] [error] File /usr/bin/rbssh, line 5, in ? [Mon Aug 06 15:13:20 2012] [error] from pkg_resources import load_entry_point [Mon Aug 06 15:13:20 2012] [error] File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.4.egg/pkg_resources.py, line 2603, in ? [Mon Aug 06 15:13:20 2012] [error] working_set.require(__requires__) [Mon Aug 06 15:13:20 2012] [error] File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.4.egg/pkg_resources.py, line 666, in require [Mon Aug 06 15:13:20 2012] [error] needed = self.resolve(parse_requirements(requirements)) [Mon Aug 06 15:13:20 2012] [error] File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.4.egg/pkg_resources.py, line 565, in resolve [Mon Aug 06 15:13:20 2012] [error] raise DistributionNotFound(req) # XXX put more info here [Mon Aug 06 15:13:20 2012] [error] pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: Django==1.3.2 [Mon Aug 06 15:13:20 2012] [error] fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly [Mon Aug 06 15:13:20 2012] [error] at first we thought it was an SSH problem, but a peek at the above error log and the above post reminded me that we have a Python 2.4.3 install on this CENTOS 5 machine, and a recently installed Python 2.7 install after which I installed setuptools, easy_install Reviewboard, etc And thus there was an rbssh at /usr/bin/rbssh which was invoking Python 2.4 (hence the python 2.4 calls, should have been 2.7) and another at /usr/local/bin/rbssh which was invoking Python 2.7. So I linked the /usr/local/bin/rbssh to /usr/bin/rbssh (first mv /usr/bin/rbssh to /usr/bin/rbssh.py2.4), and git repository was now being added no problem. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1388 in reviewboard: Visual Studio plugin/extension to run post-review/RBTools
Comment #6 on issue 1388 by p...@swooby.com: Visual Studio plugin/extension to run post-review/RBTools http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1388 ? Please be more descriptive. What do you mean by is terribly ugly and doesn't work. Neither one of those two statements is helpful or constructive to solving any problem. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2108 in reviewboard: Cannot run rbssh: No such file or directory; /usr/local/bin not in env path
Comment #3 on issue 2108 by chip...@gmail.com: Cannot run rbssh: No such file or directory; /usr/local/bin not in env path http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2108 ewsinc: That problem is a different one. You need to upgrade to Django 1.3.3. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.