Re: Status of mercurial+ssh support

2013-04-19 Thread Christian Hammond
How does it fail? That should work, in theory, so long as you're importing
the logging module in that file.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com


On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:35 PM, jimmy jiang wrote:

> Thanks. it is good to hear it works in your test suite. i will further
> check.
> i want to add some logs in rb source code in the installed review board
> dir
> (/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Reviewboard-1.7.6.**.egg/reviewboard/),
> it seems failed to take effective. how can i change the local review board
> source code for further checking? thanks,
>
> BR
> Jimmy
>
> 在 2013年4月17日星期三UTC+8上午3时34分58秒,Christian Hammond写道:
>>
>> Can you look for any related errors in reviewboard.log?
>>
>> We test this in our test suite, so I'd expect it to work. Could be an
>> issue invoking rbssh.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:11 AM, jimmy jiang  wrote:
>>
>>> I am using rb1.7.6 and ssh:// hg repo, and still found the auhentication
>>> is ok based on ssh key when create repo in reviewboard, but when i upload
>>> diff into review request, it still report as below error:
>>> the file .. (revision ) was not found in the repository.
>>>
>>> is rb still not working well on ssh:// rg repo? thanks,
>>>
>>> Jimmy
>>>
>>> 在 2011年7月14日星期四UTC+8下午5时34分26秒,**morisgi写道:

 On Thursday 14 July 2011 01:18:33 am Mark Wang wrote:
 > Hi all -- does Reviewboard currently support remote mercurial repos
 > over ssh?  I had read messages on this list from 2009 saying that such
 > support didn't exist but haven't seen any updates yet about this.
 >
 > I tried setting up a remote hg repo via ssh (keys, etc. are all OK,
 > and I can rbssh from the command line), and got this error.
 >
 > If it's supported, is there anything that might be going wrong?  If hg
 > +ssh isn't in there yet, that's fine -- just wanted to know.  Thanks!
 >
 > Mark
 >

 To my knowledge, nothing more than my reply in that post:
 http://groups.google.com/**group/reviewboard/browse_**thread/thread/**
 d2ba3808e0c8304c/**4221300c55e5cd80

 So still not possible.

 Regards.
 Gilles.

  --
>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/
>>> Happy user? Let us know at 
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/
>>> -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~---
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@**
>>> googlegroups.com
>>>
>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
>>> group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to reviewboard...@**googlegroups.com.
>>>
>>> For more options, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>  --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Unable to view diff for multiple files.

2013-04-19 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Jonathan,

I don't think I've seen this. Can you open the Chrome console log, try
again, and see what errors may appear?

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com


On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Jonathan Wilson  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> For some reason I am unable to view the diffs for multiple files on
> Reviewboard v1.7.6.
> I can only see the diff for the first file. The rest of the file diffs are
> stuck loading forever (with the little circular animated loading icon)
>
> I've tried with Internet Explorer 8, 9, Google Chrome and firefox and I
> get the same behavior.
> I even tried clearing my internet cache but that doesn't seem to help.
>
> Does anyone have any idea what is causing this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -JW
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Unable to view diff for multiple files.

2013-04-19 Thread Jonathan Wilson
Hi,
 
For some reason I am unable to view the diffs for multiple files on 
Reviewboard v1.7.6.
I can only see the diff for the first file. The rest of the file diffs are 
stuck loading forever (with the little circular animated loading icon)
 
I've tried with Internet Explorer 8, 9, Google Chrome and firefox and I get 
the same behavior.
I even tried clearing my internet cache but that doesn't seem to help.
 
Does anyone have any idea what is causing this?
 
Thanks,
 
-JW

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Chrome Extension: Review Board Notifier

2013-04-19 Thread David Trowbridge
Kiro,

Very cool!

What are the icons in the upper right?

-David


On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Kirollos Risk  wrote:

> Hey everyone!
>
> Here's a Chrome extension, *Review Board Notifie*r:
>
> *Features:*
>
>- Quick glance on an review board requests assigned to you, whether
>they are waiting for *ship it*, or have been given *ship it*
>- Click on an item to quickly get to the details
>- Notifies you when there are new RB requests assigned to you
>- Configurable via the settings page
>
>
> *Screenshots:*
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> You can install it for free, via https://github.com/krisk/rbn
>
> - Kiro
>
>  --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Status of mercurial+ssh support

2013-04-19 Thread jimmy jiang
Thanks. it is good to hear it works in your test suite. i will further 
check.
i want to add some logs in rb source code in the installed review board dir 
(/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Reviewboard-1.7.6.**.egg/reviewboard/), 
it seems failed to take effective. how can i change the local review board 
source code for further checking? thanks,

BR
Jimmy

在 2013年4月17日星期三UTC+8上午3时34分58秒,Christian Hammond写道:
>
> Can you look for any related errors in reviewboard.log?
>
> We test this in our test suite, so I'd expect it to work. Could be an 
> issue invoking rbssh.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:11 AM, jimmy jiang 
> > wrote:
>
>> I am using rb1.7.6 and ssh:// hg repo, and still found the auhentication 
>> is ok based on ssh key when create repo in reviewboard, but when i upload 
>> diff into review request, it still report as below error:
>> the file .. (revision ) was not found in the repository.
>>
>> is rb still not working well on ssh:// rg repo? thanks,
>>
>> Jimmy
>>
>> 在 2011年7月14日星期四UTC+8下午5时34分26秒,morisgi写道:
>>>
>>> On Thursday 14 July 2011 01:18:33 am Mark Wang wrote:
>>> > Hi all -- does Reviewboard currently support remote mercurial repos
>>> > over ssh?  I had read messages on this list from 2009 saying that such
>>> > support didn't exist but haven't seen any updates yet about this.
>>> >
>>> > I tried setting up a remote hg repo via ssh (keys, etc. are all OK,
>>> > and I can rbssh from the command line), and got this error.
>>> >
>>> > If it's supported, is there anything that might be going wrong?  If hg
>>> > +ssh isn't in there yet, that's fine -- just wanted to know.  Thanks!
>>> >
>>> > Mark
>>> >
>>>
>>> To my knowledge, nothing more than my reply in that post:
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/d2ba3808e0c8304c/4221300c55e5cd80
>>>
>>> So still not possible.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>> Gilles.
>>>
>>>  -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Chrome Extension: Review Board Notifier

2013-04-19 Thread Kirollos Risk
Hey everyone!

Here's a Chrome extension, *Review Board Notifie*r:

*Features:*

   - Quick glance on an review board requests assigned to you, whether they 
   are waiting for *ship it*, or have been given *ship it*
   - Click on an item to quickly get to the details
   - Notifies you when there are new RB requests assigned to you
   - Configurable via the settings page
   

*Screenshots:*



























































































You can install it for free, via https://github.com/krisk/rbn

- Kiro

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Trouble installing Review Board offline

2013-04-19 Thread James Rice
Thanks for your reply.  That worked out great!

On Thursday, April 18, 2013 10:55:51 AM UTC-4, James Rice wrote:
>
> In order to try out the product I need to set it up in a VM with no 
> external network connectivity (Don't ask.)
>
> Using Ubuntu 12.04.  I installed everything required and recommended on 
> this page 
>
> http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.7/admin/installation/linux/
>
> Then downloaded the tarball for 1.7.6.  When I tried to install, it was 
> clear I needed Djblets, so I downloaded the 0.7.10 of that, and get the 
> following errors attempting to install.  I then installed the 
> python-django-pipeline but it didn't make any difference.  Can anyone point 
> me in the right direction?  Thanks!
>
> running install
> Checking .pth file support in /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/
> /usr/bin/python -E -c pass
> TEST PASSED: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ appears to support 
> .pth files
> running bdist_egg
> running egg_info
> running build_media
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "./contrib/internal/build-media.py", line 18, in 
> ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
>   File 
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 
> 153, in call_command
> klass = load_command_class(app_name, name)
>   File 
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 
> 68, in load_command_class
> return module.Command()
>   File 
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/contrib/staticfiles/management/commands/collectstatic.py",
>  
> line 41, in __init__
> self.storage = get_storage_class(settings.STATICFILES_STORAGE)()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/core/files/storage.py", 
> line 265, in get_storage_class
> raise ImproperlyConfigured('Error importing storage module %s: "%s"' % 
> (module, e))
> django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing storage 
> module pipeline.storage: "cannot import name CachedFilesMixin"
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "./setup.py", line 125, in 
> "Topic :: Software Development :: Libraries :: Python Modules",
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/core.py", line 152, in setup
> dist.run_commands()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 953, in run_commands
> self.run_command(cmd)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/setuptools/command/install.py", 
> line 73, in run
> self.do_egg_install()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/setuptools/command/install.py", 
> line 93, in do_egg_install
> self.run_command('bdist_egg')
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
> self.distribution.run_command(command)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/setuptools/command/bdist_egg.py", 
> line 172, in run
> self.run_command("egg_info")
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
> self.distribution.run_command(command)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File "./setup.py", line 47, in run
> self.run_command('build_media')
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
> self.distribution.run_command(command)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in run_command
> cmd_obj.run()
>   File "./setup.py", line 65, in run
> raise RuntimeError('Failed to build media files')
> RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Setting up a local git repository

2013-04-19 Thread James Rice
Ok, maybe I am totally missing something, but bear with me.  Went through 
the docs a couple of times, and searched through this group for the answer.

I am only evaluating review board for my organization right now.   We do 
not use a git server or gitweb or the like.  We simply have a cm controlled 
git repository, and a local developer git repository cloned from CM  The 
developer creates branches based on a change, and currently we use meld 
combined with a perl script for code review like "git meld 
master...".  Perhaps this is a barbaric way to use git, we just 
transitioned recently, this is simple, and it works.

So, is there a way to use Review board in this manner, with only a local 
repo?  From the docs, from what I can see, if I do not have any hosting 
service, the only requirement to add a Git repository is a Name, Repository 
type, and Path, which should be the path containing the .git directory.   
If I do this, it states "Unable to retrieve information for local Git 
repository".  I have made sure the repo, including the .git objects are 
world readable.

Any help would be appreciated.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: post-review is it mandatory to pass "ssl" prefix in --p4-port option.

2013-04-19 Thread David Trowbridge
If the p4port on the client matches that on the server, it will use that to 
figure out which repository to post against.  If it doesn't (which is what 
you're describing), you need to specify it manually, either with command-line 
arguments or a .reviewboardrc file.
-David

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:38 AM, chuck j  wrote:

> Hi David,
> But while posting to non ssl base reviewboard i didn't require 
> .reviewbaordrc. why it's require for this? where this file should be 
> present. What should be content of .reviewboardrc.
> -chuck.
> On Friday, April 19, 2013 2:05:56 PM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>>
>> post-review (and rbt post) shouldn't require the ssl: prefix, but you 
>> probably will want to create a .reviewboardrc with the repository name.
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:31 AM, chuck j 
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> For ssl enabled perforce, while posting a review request, is it mandatory 
>>> to pass --p4-port='ssl:pf-server:1234' or normal port i.e 
>>> --p4-port=pf-sserver:1234' will work?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Chuck.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "reviewboard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>  
>>>  
>>>
>>
>>
> -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: post-review is it mandatory to pass "ssl" prefix in --p4-port option.

2013-04-19 Thread chuck j
Hi David,

But while posting to non ssl base reviewboard i didn't require 
.reviewbaordrc. why it's require for this? where this file should be 
present. What should be content of .reviewboardrc.

-chuck.



On Friday, April 19, 2013 2:05:56 PM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> post-review (and rbt post) shouldn't require the ssl: prefix, but you 
> probably will want to create a .reviewboardrc with the repository name.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:31 AM, chuck j 
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> For ssl enabled perforce, while posting a review request, is it mandatory 
>> to pass --p4-port='ssl:pf-server:1234' or normal port i.e 
>> --p4-port=pf-sserver:1234' will work?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chuck.
>>
>> -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com 
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




HELP: post-review tools report Got API Error 206 (HTTP code 400) for ssl enabled perforce.

2013-04-19 Thread chuck j
Dear All,

I googled it for the above error message for ssl enabled repository but
could found any appropriate help need please ..


We have now attached ssl enabled perforce to review board server, now
posting of review request gives us error what is missing... please see
debug output log.

Note: On the same server posting of review request on non ssl perforce
server are working fine.

DEBUG:root:Checking for a Perforce repository...
DEBUG:root:Running: p4 info

DEBUG:root:Running: diff --version
DEBUG:root:repository info: Path: pf-sa-perforce:19773, Base path: None,
Supports changesets: True

INFO:root:Generating diff for changenum 191316
DEBUG:root:Running: p4 describe -s 191316

DEBUG:root:Processing edit of //path/to/depot/tools/assembly/README.txt
DEBUG:root:Writing "//path/to/depot/tools/assembly/README.txt#1" to
"c:\users\chuck\appdata\local\temp\tmp-s6buh"
DEBUG:root:Running: p4 print -o c:\users\chuck\appdata\local\temp\tmp-s6buh
-q //path/to/depot/tools/assembly/README.txt#1

DEBUG:root:Running: diff -urNp c:\users\chuck\appdata\local\temp\tmp-s6buh
D:/pf_ch_ws\depot\tools\MAIN\tools\assembly\README.txt


post-review.exe -o --bugs-closed="TAI3039" --branch="MAIN" --server=
http://company.com/svrb --submit-as=chuck
--description-file="c:\users\chuck\appdata\local\temp\tmpsghdd6" 191316
--p4-port="ssl:pf-sa-perforce:19773"

posting review request...
>>> RBTools 0.4.3

>>> Python 2.5.4 (r254:67916, Dec 23 2008, 15:10:54) [MSC v.1310 32 bit
(Intel)]

>>> Running on Windows-Vista-6.1.7601

>>> Home = C:\Users\chuck\AppData\Roaming

>>> Current Directory = d:\pf_ch_ws

>>> Checking the repository type. Errors shown below are mostly harmless.

>>> Finished checking the repository type.

>>> HTTP GETting api/info/

Warning: //path/to/depot/tools/assembly/README.txt in your changeset is
unmodified

>>> HTTP GETting api/

>>> HTTP GETting http://company.com/svrb/api/info/

>>> Using the new web API

>>> Attempting to create review request on pf-sa-perforce:19773 for 191316

>>> Submitting the review request as chuck

>>> HTTP POSTing to http://company.com/svrb/api/review-requests/:
{'changenum': '191316', 'submit_as': 'chuck', 'repository':
'pf-sa-perforce:19773'}

>>> Got API Error 206 (HTTP code 400): The repository path specified is not
in the list of known repositories

>>> Error data: {u'stat': u'fail', u'repository': u'pf-sa-perforce:19773',
u'err': {u'msg': u'The repository path specified is not in the list of
known repositories', u'code': 206}}



There was an error creating this review request.

The repository path "pf-sa-perforce:19773" is not in the
list of known repositories on the server.

Ask the administrator to add this repository to the Review Board server.
For information on adding repositories, please read
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/configuration/repositories/

-Chuck

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Trying the new rbt tool, but cannot perform rbt post

2013-04-19 Thread Gregory Krasnow
I have been trying to use the new rbt tool form RBTools 0.5.  I have been 
able to successfully get status and close requests using the rbt tool. 
 However, I still need to use post-review in order to post a review 
request.  When I try to use rbt post I get the following error message:
DEBUG:root:Making HTTP GET request to http:///reviews/api/info/
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/bin/rbt", line 8, in 
load_entry_point('RBTools==0.5', 'console_scripts', 'rbt')()
  File "build/bdist.macosx-10.8-intel/egg/rbtools/commands/main.py", line 
99, in main
  File "build/bdist.macosx-10.8-intel/egg/rbtools/commands/__init__.py", 
line 150, in run_from_argv
  File "build/bdist.macosx-10.8-intel/egg/rbtools/commands/post.py", line 
432, in main
  File "build/bdist.macosx-10.8-intel/egg/rbtools/utils/diffs.py", line 12, 
in get_diff
  File "build/bdist.macosx-10.8-intel/egg/rbtools/clients/svn.py", line 
108, in diff
TypeError: can only concatenate list (not "tuple") to list

I am using ReviewBoard 1.7.6
svn, version 1.7.8


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: Trouble installing Review Board offline

2013-04-19 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 04/18/2013 01:46 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi James,
> 
> Generally speaking, you should never install from a tarball. It requires
> a bunch of additional build dependencies you should not deal with.
> They're really for our usage. Instead, you should get the eggs only.
> 
> There's a lot of dependencies. An offline install is a definite hassle.
> I'd recommend installing it in, say, a VM using the same version of
> Python as the destination system, and then you'll have a good reference
> to each thing you'll need to download and install on the machine.
> 
> If you're just looking to try it out, BitNami offers a couple options
> that may help:
> 
> http://bitnami.com/stack/reviewboard
> 

Another option might be to install it on RHEL/CentOS 6, using the RPM
packages I've provided for EPEL (1.7.6 is currently in the epel-testing
repository[1]). You can then just download the complete set of RPMs to
the machine (or sneakernet them to it via USB key) and install them locally.

[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: ReviewBoard 1.7.6 for EPEL 6

2013-04-19 Thread pfee





>
> From: Alfred von Campe 
>To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com 
>Cc: pfee  
>Sent: Thursday, 18 April 2013, 23:42
>Subject: Re: ReviewBoard 1.7.6 for EPEL 6
> 
>
>Thanks for making this available.  It can't wait to try it out, but
>I've waited 4 days, and I still don't see the new version:
>
>Can you verify that it made it to the mirrors?
>
>Alfred
>
>
>
It's currently in epel-testing.  Can you install it with:

# yum --enablerepo=epel-testing install ReviewBoard

If you find it works without issue, give the package some karma (via link 
below), that'll speed up its journey into the stable epel repo.

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard-1.7.6-4.el6.3,python-django-evolution-0.6.9-1.el6.1,python-slimit-0.7.4-3.el6,nodejs-less-1.3.3-3.el6,python-djblets-0.7.11-2.el6,python-django-pipeline-1.2.24-2.el6

Thanks,
Paul

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: post-review is it mandatory to pass "ssl" prefix in --p4-port option.

2013-04-19 Thread David Trowbridge
post-review (and rbt post) shouldn't require the ssl: prefix, but you
probably will want to create a .reviewboardrc with the repository name.

-David


On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:31 AM, chuck j  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> For ssl enabled perforce, while posting a review request, is it mandatory
> to pass --p4-port='ssl:pf-server:1234' or normal port i.e
> --p4-port=pf-sserver:1234' will work?
>
> Regards,
> Chuck.
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




post-review is it mandatory to pass "ssl" prefix in --p4-port option.

2013-04-19 Thread chuck j
Hi All,

For ssl enabled perforce, while posting a review request, is it mandatory
to pass --p4-port='ssl:pf-server:1234' or normal port i.e
--p4-port=pf-sserver:1234' will work?

Regards,
Chuck.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.