Difference between the cache setting in settings_local.py and admin console cache setting
What is difference between the cache setting in settings_local.py and admin console cache setting, I can see value at both the place can be different ? How to add multiple memcached server through Admin GUI ? Regards, Satish Singh -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Can RB client post review request to replica server perforce server.
Thanks Christian for asking more details. Here is how i can explain about the scenario. We have master perforce server ( PF1 ) placed in site 1 ( used as license server) and another perforce server PF2 placed at site 1 having ssl enabled. There is another perforce server PF3 ( ssl enable) which is replica server of PF2, Since this PF3 placed in some remote location (site2) which requires highly security for some reason. The developer at site 2 checkin any changes to PF3 (site2) server, gets replicated back to perforce server at site 1 on PF2 and changes made on PF2 at site 1 gets synced/replicated to perforce server PF3 at site 2. hence I used the term replica server. Our RB server is placed at Site 1 which has two perforce repository registered, 1) PF1 and 2) PF2 with ssl enabled. The transaction between PF2 and PF1 happens over SSL. Since our RB server is common between two sites, when user at site 1 performs review request on any of perforce server i.e PF1 or PF2, RBTools works fine, since I know that PF2 and PF1 is known repository to RB server. Now user at site to also want to perform posting of review request, but since they use PF3 server which is unknown to review board server posting is not happening which i guess is expected. 1. Do we need to add this PF3 server as well in RB server to make posting happen? I know it requires. 2. Does review board support such feature where if we add PF2 as repository, since PF2 is replica of PF3 it will automatically reads server and let us proceed with posting. am i missing something.? -Chuck this master master server is accessible to all the location On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:59:56 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Chuck, What do you mean by a replica server? Can you go into more detail on the scenario? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On June 17, 2013 at 10:52:40 PM, chuck j (cjerr...@gmail.com javascript:) wrote: Dear All, We need to know if review board support posting a review request to replica perforce server. we also wants to know what configuration we need to make in review board server to make such posting possible. Any document would be appreciated. I tried to find in our KB but could find any. Thanks in advance. -Chuck. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Difference between the cache setting in settings_local.py and admin console cache setting
Resolved the issue. Thanks a lot. Regards, Satish On Tuesday, 18 June 2013 12:59:26 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Satish, The one in the admin console overrides the one in settings_local.py. The settings_local one is the default one generated at install time. What version are you running? If it's a newer version of Review Board, the inline help will tell you that you can just separate addresses with semicolons. This should also work for versions without this notice, I believe. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On June 18, 2013 at 12:26:30 AM, satish singh (triv...@gmail.comjavascript:) wrote: What is difference between the cache setting in settings_local.py and admin console cache setting, I can see value at both the place can be different ? How to add multiple memcached server through Admin GUI ? Regards, Satish Singh -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
No supported repository could be accessed at the supplied url
HI, I have review Board(1.7.9) set up on windows 7. Using post-review.exe from command line I am able to create review request for a svn repository , that has 'Basic authentication' enabled. But while trying to do the same using a post commit hook , I get the error 'No supported repository could be accessed at the supplied url' . It tries to do a svn info on the repository and fails at the point. More info using the -d command: DEBUG:root: Running svn info https://xxx/svn/Test--non-interactive svn:E170001: Unable to connect to a repositor at URL '* https://xxx/svn/Test*' svn:E170001: OPTIONS of '*https://xxx/svn/Test*': authorization failed. Could not authenticate to server:rejected Basic challenge(* https://xxx/svn/Test*). -- When post-review.exe does a svn info, does it use the parameters --username,--password that we send to post-review. What credentails does it to use to authenticate against svn.. I printed out the command send reviewboard-post-commit-hook.py and used the same command from command-line , and that successfully created a review request in RB. Thanks, Secita Jose -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard
I have found a fairly severe problem. Reported here: http://answers.bitnami.com/questions/14009/bitnami-reviewboard-version-17x-for-windows-the-file-was-not-found-in-the-repository-207 Warren On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 4:19:58 PM UTC-5, victoria wrote: Hi, As I already mentioned in the list in BitNami we were working on a Windows installer for Review Board. Well, we have just released it and you can download it from http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard This version includes Python, Django, MySQL, Apache with mod_wsgi, Git, Subversion and all the required dependencies. As you already may know Review Board is not longer officially supported on Windows. It is was difficult to install on Windows and lot of incompatibilities with different Python versions or modules made difficult to support. However we (in BitNami) still have people asking if we planned to provide a windows installer of Review Board as we already do for Linux. As we offer all-in-one installer which includes all the required dependencies most of those incompatibility issues should not appear. You still will want to use a Linux version for a production environment but I'm sure that for lot of users will find useful the Windows installer to give a try to ReviewBoard and discover if it is the right solution for them. Also we will keep it update so you can quickly test new versions when released. Please notice that the the installation should be fully functional (although not officially supported by the ReviewBoard team) and we will love to hear from you if you find any issue so we can fix it. Christian I also wanted to take the opportunity to thank you for the support you provide to me for getting this done :) Well I hope you all enjoy it! Best regards, Victoria. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard
What is the nature of the problems on Windows? Is Mercurial one of the problematic areas? The docs say it's not supported, but don't give real details. I reported this issue to bitnami, not sure if it's a windows issue, or a mercurial + reviewboard issue: http://answers.bitnami.com/questions/14009/bitnami-reviewboard-version-17x-for-windows-the-file-was-not-found-in-the-repository-207 The docs I read are a bit light on reasons: http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/windows/ W -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Announce - BitNami Windows installer for ReviewBoard
Hi Victoria, I like the the Reviewboard stack that's been created and it's only missing the python-ldap. However, I've seen a strange issue with IE that is not apparent in Firefox or Chrome. Has only else reported any issue using the stack with IE9 in our case? On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 4:19:58 PM UTC-5, victoria wrote: Hi, As I already mentioned in the list in BitNami we were working on a Windows installer for Review Board. Well, we have just released it and you can download it from http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard This version includes Python, Django, MySQL, Apache with mod_wsgi, Git, Subversion and all the required dependencies. As you already may know Review Board is not longer officially supported on Windows. It is was difficult to install on Windows and lot of incompatibilities with different Python versions or modules made difficult to support. However we (in BitNami) still have people asking if we planned to provide a windows installer of Review Board as we already do for Linux. As we offer all-in-one installer which includes all the required dependencies most of those incompatibility issues should not appear. You still will want to use a Linux version for a production environment but I'm sure that for lot of users will find useful the Windows installer to give a try to ReviewBoard and discover if it is the right solution for them. Also we will keep it update so you can quickly test new versions when released. Please notice that the the installation should be fully functional (although not officially supported by the ReviewBoard team) and we will love to hear from you if you find any issue so we can fix it. Christian I also wanted to take the opportunity to thank you for the support you provide to me for getting this done :) Well I hope you all enjoy it! Best regards, Victoria. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: How to make compatibility mode enable RB for IE9
I'm having an issue where IE9 is causing the site to hang not just my brower but anyone else who tries to access the site!!! Is there something I can do to troubleshoot this nagging issue with IE9? On Wednesday, October 19, 2011 3:50:51 AM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote: It's likely a JavaScript breakage. IE is often more strict about JavaScript syntax. Can you check the JavaScript error log? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:39 AM, jack jack jai...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: we try to query database and retrieves these values such as rid, version, prod etc and show in GUI, while doing this operation in IE9 we where not able to see there value due to compatibility issue. but we can see these values in older IE. How and where to add meta tag in RB to make compatibility mode on. On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Christian Hammond chi...@chipx86.comjavascript: wrote: What values? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:06 AM, jack jack jai...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: I am seeing this issue where the values are not getting populated if the compatibility mode is not set, could anyone let me know how to make this enable in my RB compatibility mode for that URL Please refer this link for more info http://evolpin.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/ie9-compatibility-and-the-meta-tag. Regards, Jack -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: No supported repository could be accessed at the supplied url
Never mind got this working :-) On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:40:03 PM UTC-4, Secita Jose wrote: HI, I have review Board(1.7.9) set up on windows 7. Using post-review.exe from command line I am able to create review request for a svn repository , that has 'Basic authentication' enabled. But while trying to do the same using a post commit hook , I get the error 'No supported repository could be accessed at the supplied url' . It tries to do a svn info on the repository and fails at the point. More info using the -d command: DEBUG:root: Running svn info https://xxx/svn/Test--non-interactive svn:E170001: Unable to connect to a repositor at URL '* https://xxx/svn/Test*' svn:E170001: OPTIONS of '*https://xxx/svn/Test*': authorization failed. Could not authenticate to server:rejected Basic challenge(* https://xxx/svn/Test*). -- When post-review.exe does a svn info, does it use the parameters --username,--password that we send to post-review. What credentails does it to use to authenticate against svn.. I printed out the command send reviewboard-post-commit-hook.py and used the same command from command-line , and that successfully created a review request in RB. Thanks, Secita Jose -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Issue 3010 in reviewboard: First Last name fields are switched
Comment #1 on issue 3010 by rburk...@gmail.com: First Last name fields are switched http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3010 Tried the following: 1) Removed/Deleted my login 2) Switched sn to GivenName givenName to Surname 3) Login 4) SurName GivenName still in wrong position. 5) Comma still added to LastName -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
