Re: upgrade from 2.0.20 to 2.5.1.1 failed

[Christian Hammond]

Hi Wesly,

I believe I've identified and fixed the failure in django-evolution. It's
undergoing review, and then we'll do a release. This will happen after the
holidays, and then you should be back in shape, hopefully.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Wesly Chen  wrote:

> Any clue for the upgrade failure?
>
> Happy Thanksgiving Days.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Wesly Chen
>
> Christian Hammond於 2015年11月16日星期一 UTC-8下午5時22分13秒寫道：
>>
>> I haven't had time to look into this yet, but am scheduling time this
>> week to try to figure it out.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com
>> Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
>> Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Wesly Chen  wrote:
>>
>>> Any update?
>>>
>>> Previously, I upgraded from 1.7.27  to 2.0.20 without problem.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Wesly
>>>
>>> Wesly Chen於 2015年11月14日星期六 UTC-8下午2時30分40秒寫道：

 I used MySQL
 mysql-server-5.1.73-5.el6_6.x86_64

 rb-mysql-schema.sql  is the reviewboard schema
 ($ mysqldump -uroot -p --databases reviewboard --no-data --quick
 --single-transaction > /tmp/rb-mysql-schema.sql)
 rb-mysql-django.sql  is these table dump,   django_evolution and
 django_project_version
 ($ mysqldump -uroot -p reviewboard django_evolution
 django_project_version --quick --single-transaction >
 /tmp/rb-mysql-django.sql)


 Christian Hammond於 2015年11月14日星期六 UTC-8下午2時13分28秒寫道：
>
> Glad it's not the production one.
>
> Can you tell me what type of database you're using, and can you get me
> both a dump of the database schema (no content, just the schema), and a
> second dump containing just the django_evolution and 
> django_project_version
> table contents? With those, I can try reproducing the problem here, see
> what may have gone wrong.
>
> Christian
>
> --
>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "reviewboard" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: PDF Document Review does not allow replying to comments from the file review.

[Christian Hammond]

On Wednesday, November 25, 2015, Carel Combrink 
wrote:

> Hi Christian,
>
> We'll take a look and see what's going on here.
>>
> Are you in a situation where you can reproduce the 'issue'?
>
>
>> We're gearing up for a new bug fix release of Power Pack, so we'll be
>> sure to incorporate any fixes we come up with.
>>
> Any ETA perhaps?
>

At the moment, I'm out of town for the holidays. I'll try to reproduce in
the next couple of days, but until I know where the problem originates, I
can't give an ETA.

Christian


>
> Regards,
>


-- 
-- 
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

rb-site install fails on RedHat EL 7 with "Site matching query does not exist"

[Vikrant Gatne]

Hi,

I am trying to do a fresh installation for ReviewBoard on a RedHat EL 7 VM. 
I could successfully install the ReviewBoard 2.0.11 with 'yum install 
ReviewBoard' after getting the EPEL package repositories. But my attempt to 
create a review board site fails with the following error - 
"django,contrib.sites.models.DoesNotExist: Site matching query does not 
exist." If I query the database, I can see quite a few tables have been 
created by the installation process. The table names relevant to the error 
are as follows

site_localsite
site_localsite_admins
site_localsite_users
siteconfig_siteconfiguration

But none of these tables contain any data in it. Not sure what's wrong. Any 
help will be highly appreciated on this.

Cheers,
Vik

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.