Unable to view diff

2012-03-08 Thread Chris Baron
Hi review board users, I just upgraded from version 1.0.1 to 1.6.3.
Most things are going smoothly.  However, when I try to view a diff :

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 151, in view_diff
interdiffset, highlighting, True)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 1071, in
get_diff_files
large_data=True)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.6.15-
py2.7.egg/djblets/util/misc.py, line 157, in cache_memoize
data = lookup_callable()
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 1070, in lambda
enable_syntax_highlighting)),
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 551, in
get_chunks
old = get_original_file(filediff)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 364, in
get_original_file
large_data=True)[0]
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.6.15-
py2.7.egg/djblets/util/misc.py, line 157, in cache_memoize
data = lookup_callable()
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 363, in lambda
data = cache_memoize(key, lambda: [fetch_file(file, revision)],
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 342, in
fetch_file
data = tool.get_file(file, revision)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 306, in get_file
return self.client.get_file(path, revision)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 224, in get_file
return self._run_worker(lambda: self._get_file(path, revision))
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 154, in _run_worker
result = worker()
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 224, in lambda
return self._run_worker(lambda: self._get_file(path, revision))
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/perforce.py, line 201, in _get_file
stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
  File /usr/lib64/python2.7/subprocess.py, line 672, in __init__
errread, errwrite)
  File /usr/lib64/python2.7/subprocess.py, line 1201, in
_execute_child
raise child_exception
OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied


Any suggestions?  Thanks in advance.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


Re: Migrating Review Board Database

2012-01-22 Thread Chris Baron
Thanks for the feedback.  I appreciate it.  Looks like I've got a
1.0.1 in production.  I'll compare the two schemas and see what's most
appropriate.  I'll use your comments as a guide - feel free to post
more information too ;)

On Jan 21, 12:00 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Ah. Ignore that. That's the version of the rb-site tool, not of the site
 you have installed. You should be able to see on the Review Board install
 what version you have. It's right after Review Board. If it says beta,
 it's pre-1.0 somewhere.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com







 On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Chris Baron topher.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
  Thanks for the responses.

  From the command line, I did an rb-site --version and '0.1' was
  returned.

  How would I let django evolutions do its thing ?

  On Jan 20, 1:10 am, Anton Cohen an...@antoncohen.com wrote:
   On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Chris Baron topher.ba...@gmail.com
  wrote:

There is a reviewboard 0.1 version in production.

There is a 1.6 version in a test environment.  Anyone have suggestions
on the best way to copy the 0.1 production data, transform it into 1.6
data?

   What will need to be done will depend on the specific version you are
   moving from, and what is missing/different in the database. I did a
   migration from a pre-1.0 to 1.5.5. Though it wasn't 0.1, if it had a
   version it probably would have been something like 0.9.

   I detailed the upgrade in this post:
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/msg/5b445e99632190ab

   If your old version is close enough to 1.0 you may not need to
   manually manipulate the database at all, just install a new site with a
   dump of the old database, and let the Django evolutions do their thing.
  If
   your old version is really, really old, there may be a lot of manual DB
   manipulation. I was pretty lucky that there was only one table missing
  and
   I could copy the whole table from a new install.

   -Anton

  --
  Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
  Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


Re: Migrating Review Board Database

2012-01-20 Thread Chris Baron
Thanks for the responses.

From the command line, I did an rb-site --version and '0.1' was
returned.

How would I let django evolutions do its thing ?

On Jan 20, 1:10 am, Anton Cohen an...@antoncohen.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Chris Baron topher.ba...@gmail.comwrote:

  There is a reviewboard 0.1 version in production.

  There is a 1.6 version in a test environment.  Anyone have suggestions
  on the best way to copy the 0.1 production data, transform it into 1.6
  data?

 What will need to be done will depend on the specific version you are
 moving from, and what is missing/different in the database. I did a
 migration from a pre-1.0 to 1.5.5. Though it wasn't 0.1, if it had a
 version it probably would have been something like 0.9.

 I detailed the upgrade in this 
 post:http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/msg/5b445e99632190ab

 If your old version is close enough to 1.0 you may not need to
 manually manipulate the database at all, just install a new site with a
 dump of the old database, and let the Django evolutions do their thing. If
 your old version is really, really old, there may be a lot of manual DB
 manipulation. I was pretty lucky that there was only one table missing and
 I could copy the whole table from a new install.

 -Anton

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


Migrating Review Board Database

2012-01-19 Thread Chris Baron
Hi reviewboard people,

There is a reviewboard 0.1 version in production.

There is a 1.6 version in a test environment.  Anyone have suggestions
on the best way to copy the 0.1 production data, transform it into 1.6
data?

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


P4PythonInstaller

2012-01-13 Thread Chris Baron
Hi all,

I'm a software engineer by trade and not really a sysadmin, so I'll do
my best to describe the problem.

I'm trying to install Review Board on SuSE 12.1, which uses the linux
3.1 kernel.  Also, I'm trying to use Perforce.

When trying to install P4PythonInstaller, I run into trouble because
of the version of the linux kernel :

sudo easy_install P4PythonInstaller
Searching for P4PythonInstaller
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/P4PythonInstaller/
Reading http://www.review-board.org/
Best match: P4PythonInstaller 0.2
Downloading 
http://reviewboard.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/P4PythonInstaller#egg=P4PythonInstaller-0.2
Doing subversion checkout from 
http://reviewboard.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/P4PythonInstaller
to /tmp/easy_install-S8gt_F/P4PythonInstaller
Processing P4PythonInstaller
Running setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/easy_install-S8gt_F/
P4PythonInstaller/egg-dist-tmp-NTacbZ
Unsupported Linux version: 3.1.0-1.2-desktoperror: Setup script exited
with 1

What can I do here ?

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en