Issue 1222 - Send e-mails from static address
We really need to reopen this issue as more and more people are going to have problems with this design of sending as the logged in user. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1222 -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Finally a PyLucene Package
For anyone interested I just installed an Ubuntu 10.04 LTS server and the PyLucene package is finally built with Python 2.6 which means it is finally usable via modpython. No more painful building of PyLucene, just an easy to install package. I just got the system installed and restored a backup so I have not done much testing but so far everything seems to be working fine. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Finally a PyLucene Package
I just got the package through apt-get. Looks like it's 2.3.1 so it's actually a bit dated. But it seems to work. http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/pylucene On Apr 30, 12:35 pm, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On 04/30/2010 01:32 PM, grimbeaver wrote: For anyone interested I just installed an Ubuntu 10.04 LTS server and the PyLucene package is finally built with Python 2.6 which means it is finally usable via modpython. No more painful building of PyLucene, just an easy to install package. I just got the system installed and restored a backup so I have not done much testing but so far everything seems to be working fine. A link to the package would be helpful :) Also, is it 3.0 (which if I remember correctly is not compatible with ReviewBoard), or is it an older version? (I'm very interested, because I want to put together a Fedora package for it) -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: AD Settings in RB
You might be able to do it by setting the group name or a custom search root in the settings but I'm not real familiar with the AD scheme. Currently I'm just using the Find DC from DNS option. The other thing to remember is that a user is not created in reviewboard until after the user logs in once. This makes assigning privileges kind of difficult. On Apr 29, 2:50 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi, I was hoping someone else would respond to this. AD is a contributor-supplied feature, which I have little personal knowledge of. We make use of the Python ldap and DNS modules in order to handle authentication. I don't know what is needed to support multiple security groups, whether we need to modify code to allow for it or what. I'd love to give you a better answer, but this is just outside my area of expertise. I'd be fine with providing such support in our ActiveDirectory backend if someone with the ability to test this could provide a patch. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone please replay as soon as possible? On Apr 27, 5:42 pm, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: We have RB 1.0.5.1 installed. We have configured AD settings so all the users can login easily. Now, the issue is that we want to restrict users to only few departments in our company. So, we have created new windows security groups which has nested multiple department names in it. After doing this, the users of this departments can not access RB. If we put one department group then it works. But nesting of departments does not work. Does the RB 1.0.5.1 has ability to put multiple windows security groups for access/authentication? Is nesting possible? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp:// www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr oups.com For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr oups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: PyLucene installation
A quick search turned up Xapian. Is that what you were thinking about using? I somewhat question the value of the search though. If you know what group the review was opened under and you know who opened the review it's not difficult to find the review. Plus it's not that frequent that you go back and look at an old review. I have my doubts that any of my coworkers even are using it. On Apr 25, 1:08 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: I want to use something else. The problem is, the only good, extensive, performant search indexing systems are equally hard to install, and many actually require Lucene under the hood. There's a new project for doing search that may be easier to use, and I'm looking into switching to it (even worked on this for a bit) but it's still too immature. Hopefully in time we can offer support for things other than Lucene. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:01 AM, grimbeaver tbrez...@gmail.com wrote: I just went though installing PyLucene on a new server. Thought I had it documented how I did it last time but I was missing a few steps. PyLucene is the biggest pain in the $# to install and I really wish they would use something else. On Apr 23, 1:21 pm, Titi Ala'ilima tigreti...@gmail.com wrote: In a followup to an old thread from last year (http:// groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/ 615b108947474d86?pli=1), I encountered this error while trying to install PyLucene: /usr/bin/python: module jcc has no associated file Like the OP, I am new to most things python and lucene. The OP figured out the issue but then didn't give specifics. I likewise figured it out eventually, so I figured I'd give a little more info in case it should help others. It's more accurately a pylucene issue, but since it happened in the course of installing reviewboard for me as well, and since this came up at the top of my search even excluding reviewboard from the criteria, it seemed as good a place as any to record the info. In my case, I'm on CentOS 5.4 64-bit, Python 2.4, OpenJDK 1.6. setuptools 0.6c11. Looking at the options in the Makefile, I picked the one that seemed to match the best: # Linux (Ubuntu 8.10 64-bit, Python 2.5.2, OpenJDK 1.6, setuptools 0.6c9) PREFIX_PYTHON=/usr ANT=ant PYTHON=$(PREFIX_PYTHON)/bin/python JCC=$(PYTHON) -m jcc --shared NUM_FILES=2 Well it turns out that the python version impacts the JCC command significantly. For my version of python, they suggested: JCC=$(PYTHON) $(PREFIX_PYTHON)/lib/python2.4/site-packages/jcc/ __init__.py But I didn't have my jcc files located there. I had to pay attention to where the jcc installation placed the files. What I ended up with was: JCC=$(PYTHON) $(PREFIX_PYTHON)/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/JCC-2.5.1- py2.4-linux-x86_64.egg/jcc/__init__.py Hope this helps! Titi -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp:// www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr oups.com For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr oups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Misaligned Dashboard w/ 1.0.6
After updating to 1.0.6 the dashboard is often misaligned or text is under the wrong columns if you use the pencil to add fields or change the position of the columns. Refreshing the screen will sometimes correct it or sometimes make it worse. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en To unsubscribe, reply using remove me as the subject.
Re: Misaligned Dashboard w/ 1.0.6
Issue 1582 has been created with screenshot. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1582 Normally I would not have worried about blanking stuff out but we have some education issues still with getting some users to actually close out the review when they are done with them. On Mar 31, 1:50 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Might be an issue with the new caching. Will look into it. Can you file a bug? Preferably with a screenshot, if you can blur anything out. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:40 AM, grimbeaver tbrez...@gmail.com wrote: After updating to 1.0.6 the dashboard is often misaligned or text is under the wrong columns if you use the pencil to add fields or change the position of the columns. Refreshing the screen will sometimes correct it or sometimes make it worse. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr oups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en To unsubscribe, reply using remove me as the subject. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Totals / Reports?
I need a simple way to get the total number of reviews in a group. We've assigned all the code reviews into groups based on project. Project management has to report the total number of code reviews completed for a project to our partner. When you look at the group view it only gives you a count of the pending reviews, no total count. Obviously in an ideal world there will be better reports some day, but for now I just need an easy way to get this number when needed. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Totals / Reports?
That worked. I wanted the total number of review requests, not the number of reviews. Perhaps that could be added as a column some day to the groups page. On Jan 5, 2:21 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.com wrote: grimbeaver wrote: I need a simple way to get the total number of reviews in a group. We've assigned all the code reviews into groups based on project. Project management has to report the total number of code reviews completed for a project to our partner. When you look at the group view it only gives you a count of the pending reviews, no total count. Obviously in an ideal world there will be better reports some day, but for now I just need an easy way to get this number when needed. Off the top of my head there are 2 options: 1. use the Django manage shell and write simple Python queries 2. access the database directly, e.g. using native sql terminal monitor tools and query the table(s) directly I don't have queries for these but it probably wouldn't take long by poking around. The Django tutorials are pretty good if you want to try option #1 which requires basic Python skills. Option #2 requires basic SQL skills. If you create useful scripts they would be good to post back to the mailing list. Chris Yeah, these options are necessary for now. Is it the total number of reviews, or review requests? To get into the Python shell for Review Board, run: $ rb-site manage /path/to/site shell Then: from django.db.models import Count from reviewboard.reviews.models import ReviewRequest # Total number of public review requests to a group (pending and closed) review_requests = ReviewRequest.objects.to_group(yourgroupname, status=None) print review_requests.count() # Total number of public reviews to all review requests in a group print review_requests.filter(reviews__public=True).aggregate(Count(reviews))['r eviews__count'] I think that should work off-hand. Let me know if there are problems with it. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Can't enable search though PyLucene is installed
I ran into this same problem. Ubuntu 9.04 has a package for PyLucene but it is built for Python 2.5. Apache uses libapache2-mod-python built for Python 2.6 so no changes to the path or default python are going to make any difference. The only way I got it to work was to manually build PyLucene instead of using the package. Hope this helps. -Tom On Oct 21, 2:34 am, David Resnick abune...@gmail.com wrote: Do you have any idea how I can reinstall PyLucene with 2.6? I'm running a vanilla installation of Ubuntu 9.04. There's nothing in the browser JavaScript log. I'm running Firefox 3.5.3. Thanks, David On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Switching Python paths will certainly break things if you're switching to a different version of Python. If you're using mod_python with 2.6 and using the 2.5 search path, you'll experience a number of issues. Instead, you should reinstall PyLucene with 2.6. Did you see anything in your browser's JavaScript debug log? And which browser are you using? Christian On Tuesday, October 20, 2009, David Resnick abune...@gmail.com wrote: I got an ImportError when I tried doing imp.find_module(lucene). I saw that lucene is installed in python2.5 and the default python used was 2.6. So I changed the default python to 2.5 and now the import does work. But after restarting Apache the checkbox is still disabled. How does mod_python choose the installation of python to use? -David On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Also, can you manually run Python and type: import imp imp.find_module(lucene) If that throws an exception (an ImportError), then PyLucene isn't set up properly. If it simply returns without any message, then it's installed fine and Review Board is seeing it, so something else is going wrong. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:08 AM, David Resnick abune...@gmail.com wrote: Yes. -David On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Did you restart the web server after installing PyLucene? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:39 AM, David Resnick abune...@gmail.com wrote: I've installed PyLucene on an Ubuntu server and would like to enable search in Review Board but the check box is disabled. Any ideas? Thanks,David To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr oups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr oups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr oups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr oups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr oups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- -- -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr oups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
Re: Review Board 1.0.2 released
It's taking a nap for me after upgrade. Kind of in panic mode that I'll have ticked off people coming to see me soon. I started a thread here: http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/981a2bdff7e99433# On Sep 16, 9:35 am, roshan pius roshanpiustho...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, I'm having issues upgrading to the latest 1.02 release, when i try upgrading i get a mesage saying that the latest release ReviewBoard 1.1alpha1.dev-20090916 is already the active version in easy-install.pth is already installed. I was initially running reviewboard from the svn checkout, but i had migrated to the normal install about 2 months back, so i don't know if that history has something to do with this. linux-izbn:~ # easy_install -U ReviewBoard Searching for ReviewBoard Readinghttp://www.review-board.org/downloads/nightlies/ Readinghttp://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/ Readinghttp://www.review-board.org/ Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/ Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ Best match: ReviewBoard 1.1alpha1.dev-20090916 Processing ReviewBoard-1.1alpha1.dev_20090916-py2.6.egg ReviewBoard 1.1alpha1.dev-20090916 is already the active version in easy-install.pth Installing rb-site script to /usr/local/bin Using /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.1alpha1.dev_20090916-p y2.6.egg Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/mirror/ Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/nightlies/ Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard Finished processing dependencies for ReviewBoard Thanks, Roshan Pius On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Hi everyone, We just put out the 1.0.2 release, which contains many bug fixes that users have hit, and improved error logging to help diagnose problems. We strongly encourage everyone to upgrade, and if you hit any new page crashes, we'll probably ask you to upgrade and send us your log file. There's a brief news post at http://review-board.org/news/2009/09/16/review-board-102-released/ Full release notes are up at http://www.review-board.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.0.2/ As always, we're looking to fill out our page of Happy Users ( http://review-board.org/users/), so if you use Review Board and can give us permission to list you, please let us know! Thanks, Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Reviewboard taking a nap after 1.0.2 upgrade!
Anyone have any help at all on this? I don't really want to reload the server because of this. I'm using Ubuntu 8.0(4) LTS and have tried getting the latest updates for all the packages. On Sep 16, 10:43 am, grimbeaver tbrez...@gmail.com wrote: Ok this is really not good, after upgrading to 1.0.2 I get the following error and reviewboard won't load. Someone please help. [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] mod_python (pid=5369, interpreter='reviewboard_reviewboard', phase='PythonHandler', handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'): Application error [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] ServerName: 'reviewboard.xxx.xxx' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] DocumentRoot: '/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] URI: '/' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Location: '/' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Directory: None [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Filename: '/ var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] PathInfo: '' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Traceback (most recent call last): [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File /usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1537, in HandlerDispatch\n default=default_handler, arg=req, silent=hlist.silent) [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File /usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1229, in _process_target\n result = _execute_target(config, req, object, arg) [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File /usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1128, in _execute_target\n result = object(arg) [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File /usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg/django/core/ handlers/modpython.py, line 228, in handler\n return ModPythonHandler()(req) [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File /usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg/django/core/ handlers/modpython.py, line 191, in __call__\n self.load_middleware () [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File /usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg/django/core/ handlers/base.py, line 40, in load_middleware\n raise exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured, 'Error importing middleware %s: %s' % (mw_module, e) [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing middleware reviewboard.admin.middleware: cannot import name parse_backend_uri --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Reviewboard taking a nap after 1.0.2 upgrade!
Thank you, thank you so much. I removed: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg Then when I ran easy_setup again it downloaded Django 1.1 instead and everything works fine. On Sep 16, 12:31 pm, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote: It looks like maybe Django got installed wrong? Can you remove the egg directory and try reinstalling it? -David On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:02 AM, grimbeaver tbrez...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone have any help at all on this? I don't really want to reload the server because of this. I'm using Ubuntu 8.0(4) LTS and have tried getting the latest updates for all the packages. On Sep 16, 10:43 am, grimbeaver tbrez...@gmail.com wrote: Ok this is really not good, after upgrading to 1.0.2 I get the following error and reviewboard won't load. Someone please help. [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] mod_python (pid=5369, interpreter='reviewboard_reviewboard', phase='PythonHandler', handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'): Application error [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] ServerName: 'reviewboard.xxx.xxx' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] DocumentRoot: '/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] URI: '/' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Location: '/' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Directory: None [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Filename: '/ var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] PathInfo: '' [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] Traceback (most recent call last): [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File /usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1537, in HandlerDispatch\n default=default_handler, arg=req, silent=hlist.silent) [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File /usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1229, in _process_target\n result = _execute_target(config, req, object, arg) [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File /usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1128, in _execute_target\n result = object(arg) [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File /usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg/django/core/ handlers/modpython.py, line 228, in handler\n return ModPythonHandler()(req) [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File /usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg/django/core/ handlers/modpython.py, line 191, in __call__\n self.load_middleware () [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] File /usr/ lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg/django/core/ handlers/base.py, line 40, in load_middleware\n raise exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured, 'Error importing middleware %s: %s' % (mw_module, e) [Wed Sep 16 08:35:19 2009] [error] [client 10.10.10.137] ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing middleware reviewboard.admin.middleware: cannot import name parse_backend_uri --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Email Settings
I already asked about this once before. The e-mails always come from the address of the person who performed the action. I've already opened an enhancement request a while ago to have them come from a single static address. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1222 On Aug 28, 2:08 am, dartarrow dartar...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, how do i set the FROM email address? I have exim4 setup on my localhost which send the email from webmas...@localhost I would like to change that to something like reviewbo...@mycompany.com Thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: email not working
I would test smtp via telnet from the review board server. Try sending mail that way. Many companies may restrict use of smtp to certain hosts to avoid it being used for spam. http://www.messagingtalk.org/content/470.html On Jul 20, 3:35 am, chris ch...@thebayleys.net wrote: Thanks for your reply Christian The mail server concerned is the company's central mail server and it cooperates well with 'Trac' when trac is configured with no more than the server's ip:port When you say configured correctly do you mean that there is any greater requirement than smtp on 25 ? I have no administration over that server but I do have an exim instance that I could test against. Is there no logging at all of email activity/connections etc within the RB/django logging subsystems ? Thanks and Kind regards, Chris BAYLEY --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
e-mail notifications from address
I'm sure this has been asked before but I can not seem to find it. Is there any way to set the FROM address the e-mail notificaitons use to a specific address instead of it getting set to the TO address? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: e-mail notifications from address
Yes that is what happens. However it would be nice to have them come from a general address to make them easier to sort out in the inbox. On Jul 15, 4:20 pm, Manny Rodriques manny.rodriq...@gmail.com wrote: Hi grimbeaver, From my experience the emails should be coming from the person that perform the update to the review. So, if you made the change to the review then the email should come from you. If personA made an update, then the email comes from personA. On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:13 PM, grimbeaver tbrez...@gmail.com wrote: I'm sure this has been asked before but I can not seem to find it. Is there any way to set the FROM address the e-mail notificaitons use to a specific address instead of it getting set to the TO address? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: e-mail notifications from address
Enhancement opened... http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1222 Come to think of it something like this might help people who's e-mail servers do not like the TO and FROM being identical. On Jul 15, 7:08 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: This can perhaps be done in a future release. I don't recall if there's a bug filed on this or not, but it would be worth looking and filing. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:25 PM, grimbeaver tbrez...@gmail.com wrote: Yes that is what happens. However it would be nice to have them come from a general address to make them easier to sort out in the inbox. On Jul 15, 4:20 pm, Manny Rodriques manny.rodriq...@gmail.com wrote: Hi grimbeaver, From my experience the emails should be coming from the person that perform the update to the review. So, if you made the change to the review then the email should come from you. If personA made an update, then the email comes from personA. On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:13 PM, grimbeaver tbrez...@gmail.com wrote: I'm sure this has been asked before but I can not seem to find it. Is there any way to set the FROM address the e-mail notificaitons use to a specific address instead of it getting set to the TO address? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Enable Search?
That did the trick. Thanks.
On Jun 29, 4:15 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
You need to run a command periodically to update the search index, through a
scheduled task. Specifically:
rb-site manage /path/to/site index -- --full
(Note the -- in there. It's important.)
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:41 AM, grimbeaver tbrez...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems it's throwing an exception because the search indexes do not
exist. What creates these files? The folder gets created when I
enable search but there are never any files in it. Did I miss a step?
Environment:
Request Method: GET
Request URL:http://10.10.10.97/r/search/
Django Version: 1.0.2 final
Python Version: 2.6.2
Installed Applications:
['django.contrib.admin',
'django.contrib.auth',
'django.contrib.contenttypes',
'django.contrib.markup',
'django.contrib.sites',
'django.contrib.sessions',
'djblets.datagrid',
'djblets.feedview',
'djblets.siteconfig',
'djblets.util',
'djblets.webapi',
'reviewboard.accounts',
'reviewboard.admin',
'reviewboard.changedescs',
'reviewboard.diffviewer',
'reviewboard.iphone',
'reviewboard.reports',
'reviewboard.reviews',
'reviewboard.scmtools',
'reviewboard.webapi',
'django_evolution']
Installed Middleware:
('django.middleware.gzip.GZipMiddleware',
'django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware',
'django.middleware.doc.XViewMiddleware',
'django.middleware.http.ConditionalGetMiddleware',
'django.middleware.locale.LocaleMiddleware',
'django.contrib.sessions.middleware.SessionMiddleware',
'django.contrib.auth.middleware.AuthenticationMiddleware',
'djblets.siteconfig.middleware.SettingsMiddleware',
'reviewboard.admin.middleware.LoadSettingsMiddleware',
'djblets.log.middleware.LoggingMiddleware',
'reviewboard.admin.middleware.CheckUpdatesRequiredMiddleware')
Traceback:
File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-
py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py in get_response
86. response = callback(request, *callback_args,
**callback_kwargs)
File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0-py2.6.egg/
reviewboard/reviews/views.py in search
743. raise e
Exception Type: JavaError at /r/search/
Exception Value: java.io.FileNotFoundException: no segments* file
found in org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectory@/tmp/rbsearch_index:
files:
On Jun 26, 3:51 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
If you set DEBUG = True in your site's conf/settings_local.py and restart
Apache, you should be able to get more debug information for the 500.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:58 AM, grimbeaver tbrez...@gmail.com wrote:
I removed the packages for PyLucene and JCC. I downloaded and built
the source. I can enable search now. However when I try to use it I
get an Error 500 and the directory for the index gets created but is
empty. Starting to think about giving up on search for now.
On Jun 26, 8:03 am, grimbeaver tbrez...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. That answers what's wrong. The PyLucene package in Ubuntu
9.04 is built against Python 2.5 (http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/
pylucene). But mod_python is built using Python 2.6 (http://
packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/libapache2-mod-python). So much for the
idea of using Ubuntu 9.04 to avoid manually building PyLucene.
Guessing there's no way around this.
On Jun 26, 1:39 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi,
Run python, and type:
import lucene
That's basically the entire check we use for search. If that fails,
then
PyLucene isn't properly installed.
Also make sure the version of Python that's being used to run
Review
Board
matches the version used to install PyLucene.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:22 AM, grimbeaver tbrez...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've just installed on Ubuntu 9.04. Everything is working great,
included AD. But I can not get it to allow me to enable search.
I've
installed the packages for PyLucene and JCC via APT. Anyone know
what
I might be missing? Where would I look for an error to give me a
clue?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
Re: Enable Search?
Thanks. That answers what's wrong. The PyLucene package in Ubuntu 9.04 is built against Python 2.5 (http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/ pylucene). But mod_python is built using Python 2.6 (http:// packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/libapache2-mod-python). So much for the idea of using Ubuntu 9.04 to avoid manually building PyLucene. Guessing there's no way around this. On Jun 26, 1:39 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi, Run python, and type: import lucene That's basically the entire check we use for search. If that fails, then PyLucene isn't properly installed. Also make sure the version of Python that's being used to run Review Board matches the version used to install PyLucene. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:22 AM, grimbeaver tbrez...@gmail.com wrote: I've just installed on Ubuntu 9.04. Everything is working great, included AD. But I can not get it to allow me to enable search. I've installed the packages for PyLucene and JCC via APT. Anyone know what I might be missing? Where would I look for an error to give me a clue? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: rb-site install - Review Board is taking a nap
Not sure about what you are seeing in the logs because I did not look at my logs. But I was getting that error when SELinux was enabled. Try turning off SELinux. On Jun 25, 12:34 pm, Eric P eric.maill...@gmail.com wrote: Hi (me again), I have all my dependency issues sorted, and I've installed my first Review Board site per the documentation. When I go to visit the site, I see the 'Review Board is taking a nap' dialog box. In my Apache error_log, I see some errors: [error] [client 127.0.0.1] mod_python (pid=3617, interpreter='reviewboard_reviews_mysite_com', phase='PythonHandler', handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'): Application error ... [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Traceback (most recent call last): [Thu Jun 25 09:51:56 2009] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py, line 1537, in HandlerDispatch\n default=default_handler, arg=req, silent=hlist.silent) ... [error] [client 127.0.0.1] OperationalError: attempt to write a readonly database FYI. Here are the params I used to set up the site. rb-site install reviews.mysite.com \ --domain-name=reviews.mysite.com \ --site-root=/ \ --media-url=/media \ --db-type=sqlite3 \ --cache-type=memcached \ --cache-info=memcached://localhost:11211/ \ --web-server-type=apache \ --python-loader=modpython I'm not sure what to make of those errors. It looks like there are a couple issues. Anyway, thanks for reading. Eric P --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
