Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500
Hi Sara, Oh, that could certainly do it. The more recent versions should work a lot better with 2.0, if you were still interested in trying it out. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Sara Rayburn wrote: > Hi Christian, > > Thanks for your help, I think I've fixed it. I still had a beta version of > the PowerPack installed. Uninstalling that seems to have corrected our > issues. > > Sara > -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500
Hi Christian, Thanks for your help, I think I've fixed it. I still had a beta version of the PowerPack installed. Uninstalling that seems to have corrected our issues. Sara -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500
I've emailed you the detailed error 500 page generated. On Friday, May 23, 2014 2:21:03 PM UTC-5, Sara Rayburn wrote: > > oops. here's the httpd -V output, I'll try the debug configuration next. > > serayburn@reviewboard> httpd -V > Server version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) > Server built: Apr 3 2014 23:56:16 > Server's Module Magic Number: 20051115:25 > Server loaded: APR 1.3.9, APR-Util 1.3.9 > Compiled using: APR 1.3.9, APR-Util 1.3.9 > Architecture: 64-bit > Server MPM: Prefork > threaded: no > forked: yes (variable process count) > Server compiled with > -D APACHE_MPM_DIR="server/mpm/prefork" > -D APR_HAS_SENDFILE > -D APR_HAS_MMAP > -D APR_HAVE_IPV6 (IPv4-mapped addresses enabled) > -D APR_USE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZE > -D APR_USE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE > -D SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT > -D APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD > -D AP_HAVE_RELIABLE_PIPED_LOGS > -D DYNAMIC_MODULE_LIMIT=128 > -D HTTPD_ROOT="/etc/httpd" > -D SUEXEC_BIN="/usr/sbin/suexec" > -D DEFAULT_PIDLOG="run/httpd.pid" > -D DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD="logs/apache_runtime_status" > -D DEFAULT_LOCKFILE="logs/accept.lock" > -D DEFAULT_ERRORLOG="logs/error_log" > -D AP_TYPES_CONFIG_FILE="conf/mime.types" > -D SERVER_CONFIG_FILE="conf/httpd.conf" > > > On Friday, May 23, 2014 2:18:59 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote: >> >> Hi Sara, >> >> I'll need the full information from httpd -V. Several pieces in there are >> useful, though the most crucial to see are the "Server MPM" and the few >> lines below that. >> >> The database should remain unaffected if you upgrade the package. I >> wouldn't expect a problem there. However, mixing RPMs and the >> easy_install'd version could result in conflicting packages installed. >> >> Something to try temporarily is to set the following in your >> $sitedir/conf/settings_local.py: >> >> DEBUG = True >> >> Then reload Apache and try to reproduce. When it fails, you should >> hopefully see a full error page with a lot of details. Save the HTML for >> that and e-mail it to me (privately). >> >> If you see a generic 500 without any extra debug information, then the >> problem is below the Review Board layer, but I suspect there will be >> something useful in there. >> >> Christian >> >> -- >> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com >> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org >> Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com >> >> >> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Sara Rayburn wrote: >> >>> There are no other services. This is running on a VM dedicated solely to >>> hosting reviewboard. I disabled mod_python and I am having the same >>> problem. I was using mod_wsgi both before and after, although mod_python >>> was not disabled. >>> >>> serayburn@reviewboard> httpd -v >>> Server version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) >>> Server built: Apr 3 2014 23:56:16 >>> >>> I installed reviewboard quite a while ago via easy_install. I see that >>> there is a package available for el6 now. Do you think it is worthwhile to >>> try that instead? If I do, how do I maintain my database? When I query the >>> package installer, there are quite a few packages requiring update if I go >>> that route, so maybe there's something I'm missing. >>> >>> -- >>> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>> --- >>> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ >>> --- >>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "reviewboard" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500
oops. here's the httpd -V output, I'll try the debug configuration next. serayburn@reviewboard> httpd -V Server version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) Server built: Apr 3 2014 23:56:16 Server's Module Magic Number: 20051115:25 Server loaded: APR 1.3.9, APR-Util 1.3.9 Compiled using: APR 1.3.9, APR-Util 1.3.9 Architecture: 64-bit Server MPM: Prefork threaded: no forked: yes (variable process count) Server compiled with -D APACHE_MPM_DIR="server/mpm/prefork" -D APR_HAS_SENDFILE -D APR_HAS_MMAP -D APR_HAVE_IPV6 (IPv4-mapped addresses enabled) -D APR_USE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZE -D APR_USE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE -D SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT -D APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD -D AP_HAVE_RELIABLE_PIPED_LOGS -D DYNAMIC_MODULE_LIMIT=128 -D HTTPD_ROOT="/etc/httpd" -D SUEXEC_BIN="/usr/sbin/suexec" -D DEFAULT_PIDLOG="run/httpd.pid" -D DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD="logs/apache_runtime_status" -D DEFAULT_LOCKFILE="logs/accept.lock" -D DEFAULT_ERRORLOG="logs/error_log" -D AP_TYPES_CONFIG_FILE="conf/mime.types" -D SERVER_CONFIG_FILE="conf/httpd.conf" On Friday, May 23, 2014 2:18:59 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Sara, > > I'll need the full information from httpd -V. Several pieces in there are > useful, though the most crucial to see are the "Server MPM" and the few > lines below that. > > The database should remain unaffected if you upgrade the package. I > wouldn't expect a problem there. However, mixing RPMs and the > easy_install'd version could result in conflicting packages installed. > > Something to try temporarily is to set the following in your > $sitedir/conf/settings_local.py: > > DEBUG = True > > Then reload Apache and try to reproduce. When it fails, you should > hopefully see a full error page with a lot of details. Save the HTML for > that and e-mail it to me (privately). > > If you see a generic 500 without any extra debug information, then the > problem is below the Review Board layer, but I suspect there will be > something useful in there. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com > Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org > Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com > > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Sara Rayburn > > > wrote: > >> There are no other services. This is running on a VM dedicated solely to >> hosting reviewboard. I disabled mod_python and I am having the same >> problem. I was using mod_wsgi both before and after, although mod_python >> was not disabled. >> >> serayburn@reviewboard> httpd -v >> Server version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) >> Server built: Apr 3 2014 23:56:16 >> >> I installed reviewboard quite a while ago via easy_install. I see that >> there is a package available for el6 now. Do you think it is worthwhile to >> try that instead? If I do, how do I maintain my database? When I query the >> package installer, there are quite a few packages requiring update if I go >> that route, so maybe there's something I'm missing. >> >> -- >> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >> --- >> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ >> --- >> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "reviewboard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500
Hi Sara, I'll need the full information from httpd -V. Several pieces in there are useful, though the most crucial to see are the "Server MPM" and the few lines below that. The database should remain unaffected if you upgrade the package. I wouldn't expect a problem there. However, mixing RPMs and the easy_install'd version could result in conflicting packages installed. Something to try temporarily is to set the following in your $sitedir/conf/settings_local.py: DEBUG = True Then reload Apache and try to reproduce. When it fails, you should hopefully see a full error page with a lot of details. Save the HTML for that and e-mail it to me (privately). If you see a generic 500 without any extra debug information, then the problem is below the Review Board layer, but I suspect there will be something useful in there. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Sara Rayburn wrote: > There are no other services. This is running on a VM dedicated solely to > hosting reviewboard. I disabled mod_python and I am having the same > problem. I was using mod_wsgi both before and after, although mod_python > was not disabled. > > serayburn@reviewboard> httpd -v > Server version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) > Server built: Apr 3 2014 23:56:16 > > I installed reviewboard quite a while ago via easy_install. I see that > there is a package available for el6 now. Do you think it is worthwhile to > try that instead? If I do, how do I maintain my database? When I query the > package installer, there are quite a few packages requiring update if I go > that route, so maybe there's something I'm missing. > > -- > Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ > --- > Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ > --- > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "reviewboard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500
There are no other services. This is running on a VM dedicated solely to hosting reviewboard. I disabled mod_python and I am having the same problem. I was using mod_wsgi both before and after, although mod_python was not disabled. serayburn@reviewboard> httpd -v Server version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) Server built: Apr 3 2014 23:56:16 I installed reviewboard quite a while ago via easy_install. I see that there is a package available for el6 now. Do you think it is worthwhile to try that instead? If I do, how do I maintain my database? When I query the package installer, there are quite a few packages requiring update if I go that route, so maybe there's something I'm missing. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500
Hey Sara, Yeah, that all looks normal. Some more questions... Are any other services being run off this Apache using either mod_python or mod_wsgi? Wondering if something is conflicting. (Multiple Python services need to be separated out using some additional directives.) If not, you may want to disable mod_python entirely. Before the upgrade to 2.0, were you using mod_python, or mod_wsgi? Also, can you show me the output of: httpd -V Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Sara Rayburn wrote: > I wish I had more information to give you, it doesn't seem like anything > specific happens to make it work or fail. > > Here's my apache error_log since the last httpd restart. > > It seems like after restarting httpd, it takes a long time (~10 minutes) > before we get anything besides the error 500. Once it's up, I've been able > to look at a few diffs, but within a few minutes it's producing error 500 > messages again. > > [Fri May 23 13:32:51 2014] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down > [Fri May 23 13:33:01 2014] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: > /usr/sbin/suexec) > [Fri May 23 13:33:01 2014] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest > authentication ... > [Fri May 23 13:33:01 2014] [notice] Digest: done > [Fri May 23 13:33:01 2014] [notice] mod_python: Creating 4 session mutexes > based on 256 max processes and 0 max threads. > [Fri May 23 13:33:01 2014] [notice] mod_python: using mutex_directory /tmp > [Fri May 23 13:33:02 2014] [notice] Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) DAV/2 > mod_python/3.3.1 Python/2.6.6 mod_wsgi/3.2 configured -- resuming normal > operations > [Fri May 23 18:33:34 2014] [error] > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: > DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use > djblets.db.fields instead. > [Fri May 23 18:33:34 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', > DeprecationWarning) > [Fri May 23 18:33:44 2014] [error] > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: > DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use > djblets.db.fields instead. > [Fri May 23 18:33:44 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', > DeprecationWarning) > [Fri May 23 18:33:47 2014] [error] > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: > DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use > djblets.db.fields instead. > [Fri May 23 18:33:47 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', > DeprecationWarning) > [Fri May 23 18:33:51 2014] [error] > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: > DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use > djblets.db.fields instead. > [Fri May 23 18:33:51 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', > DeprecationWarning) > [Fri May 23 18:34:10 2014] [error] > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: > DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use > djblets.db.fields instead. > [Fri May 23 18:34:10 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', > DeprecationWarning) > [Fri May 23 18:34:29 2014] [error] > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: > DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use > djblets.db.fields instead. > [Fri May 23 18:34:29 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', > DeprecationWarning) > [Fri May 23 18:35:09 2014] [error] > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: > DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use > djblets.db.fields instead. > [Fri May 23 18:35:09 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', > DeprecationWarning) > [Fri May 23 18:35:43 2014] [error] > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: > DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use > djblets.db.fields instead. > [Fri May 23 18:35:43 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', > DeprecationWarning) > > > Here's the last 30 minutes or so of my reviewboard.log, too. > > 2014-05-23 18:16:46,636 - DEBUG - None - jdmeador - > /r/3170/fragments/diff-comments/23903/ - Patching file > library/ccscm-vc-modbus/plcModbus.C took 0.047194 seconds > 2014-05-23 18:16:47,057 - DEBUG - None - jdmeador - > /r/3170/fragments/diff-comments/23903/ - Begin: Generating diff chunks for > self.filediff id 63371 (library/ccscm-vc-modbus/plcModbus.C) > 2014-05-23 18:16:47,081 - DEBUG - None - jdmeador - > /r/3170/fragments/diff-comments/23903/ - End: Generating diff chunks for > self.filediff id 63371 (library/ccscm-vc-modbus/plcModbus.C) > 2014-05-23 18:16:47,082 - DEBUG - None - jdmeador - > /r/3170/fragments/diff-comments/23903/ - Generating diff chunks for > self.filediff id 63371 (library/ccscm-vc-modbus/plcModbus.C) took 0.024082 > seconds > 2014-05-23
Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500
I wish I had more information to give you, it doesn't seem like anything specific happens to make it work or fail. Here's my apache error_log since the last httpd restart. It seems like after restarting httpd, it takes a long time (~10 minutes) before we get anything besides the error 500. Once it's up, I've been able to look at a few diffs, but within a few minutes it's producing error 500 messages again. [Fri May 23 13:32:51 2014] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down [Fri May 23 13:33:01 2014] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec) [Fri May 23 13:33:01 2014] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest authentication ... [Fri May 23 13:33:01 2014] [notice] Digest: done [Fri May 23 13:33:01 2014] [notice] mod_python: Creating 4 session mutexes based on 256 max processes and 0 max threads. [Fri May 23 13:33:01 2014] [notice] mod_python: using mutex_directory /tmp [Fri May 23 13:33:02 2014] [notice] Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) DAV/2 mod_python/3.3.1 Python/2.6.6 mod_wsgi/3.2 configured -- resuming normal operations [Fri May 23 18:33:34 2014] [error] /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use djblets.db.fields instead. [Fri May 23 18:33:34 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', DeprecationWarning) [Fri May 23 18:33:44 2014] [error] /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use djblets.db.fields instead. [Fri May 23 18:33:44 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', DeprecationWarning) [Fri May 23 18:33:47 2014] [error] /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use djblets.db.fields instead. [Fri May 23 18:33:47 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', DeprecationWarning) [Fri May 23 18:33:51 2014] [error] /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use djblets.db.fields instead. [Fri May 23 18:33:51 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', DeprecationWarning) [Fri May 23 18:34:10 2014] [error] /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use djblets.db.fields instead. [Fri May 23 18:34:10 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', DeprecationWarning) [Fri May 23 18:34:29 2014] [error] /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use djblets.db.fields instead. [Fri May 23 18:34:29 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', DeprecationWarning) [Fri May 23 18:35:09 2014] [error] /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use djblets.db.fields instead. [Fri May 23 18:35:09 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', DeprecationWarning) [Fri May 23 18:35:43 2014] [error] /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use djblets.db.fields instead. [Fri May 23 18:35:43 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', DeprecationWarning) Here's the last 30 minutes or so of my reviewboard.log, too. 2014-05-23 18:16:46,636 - DEBUG - None - jdmeador - /r/3170/fragments/diff-comments/23903/ - Patching file library/ccscm-vc-modbus/plcModbus.C took 0.047194 seconds 2014-05-23 18:16:47,057 - DEBUG - None - jdmeador - /r/3170/fragments/diff-comments/23903/ - Begin: Generating diff chunks for self.filediff id 63371 (library/ccscm-vc-modbus/plcModbus.C) 2014-05-23 18:16:47,081 - DEBUG - None - jdmeador - /r/3170/fragments/diff-comments/23903/ - End: Generating diff chunks for self.filediff id 63371 (library/ccscm-vc-modbus/plcModbus.C) 2014-05-23 18:16:47,082 - DEBUG - None - jdmeador - /r/3170/fragments/diff-comments/23903/ - Generating diff chunks for self.filediff id 63371 (library/ccscm-vc-modbus/plcModbus.C) took 0.024082 seconds 2014-05-23 18:31:18,805 - DEBUG - - User is trying to log in via AD 2014-05-23 18:31:18,813 - DEBUG - - Search root dc=cctechnol,dc=com 2014-05-23 18:31:44,420 - DEBUG - - User is trying to log in via AD 2014-05-23 18:31:44,471 - WARNING - - Active Directory: Failed login for user alrichard 2014-05-23 18:31:51,550 - DEBUG - - User is trying to log in via AD 2014-05-23 18:31:51,556 - DEBUG - - Search root dc=cctechnol,dc=com 2014-05-23 18:32:28,702 - DEBUG - None - mpscherer - /r/3186/diff/ - Generating diff viewer page for filediff id 5257 2014-05-23 18:32:29,023 - DEBUG - None - mpscherer - /r/3186/diff/ - Begin: Generating diff file info for diffset id 5257 2014-05-23 18:32:29,182 - DEBUG - None - mpscherer - /r/3186/diff/ -
Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500
Hi Sara, That warning can be ignored. It's harmless. Is there anything in the Apache error_log? Also, are there any operations that reliably produce the 500? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Sara Rayburn wrote: > Hi Christian, > > Looking further, I was getting some errors about incompatibility between > mod_wsgi and python. After updating mod_python and mod_wsgi, this is the > error I'm left with: > > [Fri May 23 17:51:49 2014] [error] > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: > DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use > djblets.db.fields instead. > [Fri May 23 17:51:49 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', > DeprecationWarning) > > > It seems related to this posted problem: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/reviewboard/lbhUHuPDgQA > > I'm using: > Django 1.6.5 > Python 2.6.6 > MySQL > > Apache config is as follows: > > ServerName reviewboard.cctechnol.com > DocumentRoot "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs" > > # Error handlers > ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html > > WSGIPassAuthorization On > WSGIScriptAlias "/" "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/reviewboard.wsgi/" > > > AllowOverride All > Options -Indexes FollowSymLinks > Allow from all > > > # Alias static media requests to filesystem > > SetHandler None > > > Alias /static "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/static" > > Alias /media "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/media" > Alias /errordocs "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/errordocs" > Alias /favicon.ico > "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/media/rbcommons/images/favicon.png" > > > > On Friday, May 23, 2014 12:41:05 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote: > >> That's certainly not normal. >> >> Can you provide the error logs from reviewboard.log? >> >> I also need to know everything you can tell me about your configuration. >> Versions, software, database type, Apache config, whether you use >> mod_worker, etc. >> >> Christian >> >> >> On Friday, May 23, 2014, Sara Rayburn wrote: >> >>> After updating from 1.7.2x to 2.0, my users get occasional error 500 >>> messages. The site seems to be down more often than it is up. >>> >>> I have no errors in my reviewboard logs or my httpd logs. >>> >>> My update process was as follows: >>> >>> easy_install -U ReviewBoard >>> rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard >>> service httpd restart >>> service memcached restart >>> >>> The only oddity I encountered during the process was a message from >>> rb-site suggesting that I run condensediffs, which subsequently failed. >>> >>> Where should I look for hints abount what might be broken here? >>> >>> Sara >>> >>> -- >>> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>> --- >>> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ >>> --- >>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "reviewboard" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com >> >> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org >> Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com >> >> -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500
Hi Christian, Looking further, I was getting some errors about incompatibility between mod_wsgi and python. After updating mod_python and mod_wsgi, this is the error I'm left with: [Fri May 23 17:51:49 2014] [error] /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/util/fields.py:11: DeprecationWarning: djblets.util.fields is deprecated. Use djblets.db.fields instead. [Fri May 23 17:51:49 2014] [error] 'djblets.db.fields instead.', DeprecationWarning) It seems related to this posted problem: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/reviewboard/lbhUHuPDgQA I'm using: Django 1.6.5 Python 2.6.6 MySQL Apache config is as follows: ServerName reviewboard.cctechnol.com DocumentRoot "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs" # Error handlers ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html WSGIPassAuthorization On WSGIScriptAlias "/" "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/reviewboard.wsgi/" AllowOverride All Options -Indexes FollowSymLinks Allow from all # Alias static media requests to filesystem SetHandler None Alias /static "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/static" Alias /media "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/media" Alias /errordocs "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/errordocs" Alias /favicon.ico "/var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/media/rbcommons/images/favicon.png" On Friday, May 23, 2014 12:41:05 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote: > > That's certainly not normal. > > Can you provide the error logs from reviewboard.log? > > I also need to know everything you can tell me about your configuration. > Versions, software, database type, Apache config, whether you use > mod_worker, etc. > > Christian > > > On Friday, May 23, 2014, Sara Rayburn > > wrote: > >> After updating from 1.7.2x to 2.0, my users get occasional error 500 >> messages. The site seems to be down more often than it is up. >> >> I have no errors in my reviewboard logs or my httpd logs. >> >> My update process was as follows: >> >> easy_install -U ReviewBoard >> rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard >> service httpd restart >> service memcached restart >> >> The only oddity I encountered during the process was a message from >> rb-site suggesting that I run condensediffs, which subsequently failed. >> >> Where should I look for hints abount what might be broken here? >> >> Sara >> >> -- >> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >> --- >> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ >> --- >> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "reviewboard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > -- > -- > Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com > Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org > Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com > > -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500
That's certainly not normal. Can you provide the error logs from reviewboard.log? I also need to know everything you can tell me about your configuration. Versions, software, database type, Apache config, whether you use mod_worker, etc. Christian On Friday, May 23, 2014, Sara Rayburn wrote: > After updating from 1.7.2x to 2.0, my users get occasional error 500 > messages. The site seems to be down more often than it is up. > > I have no errors in my reviewboard logs or my httpd logs. > > My update process was as follows: > > easy_install -U ReviewBoard > rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard > service httpd restart > service memcached restart > > The only oddity I encountered during the process was a message from > rb-site suggesting that I run condensediffs, which subsequently failed. > > Where should I look for hints abount what might be broken here? > > Sara > > -- > Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ > --- > Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ > --- > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "reviewboard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Failed upgrade from 1.7.x to 2.0, Error 500
After updating from 1.7.2x to 2.0, my users get occasional error 500 messages. The site seems to be down more often than it is up. I have no errors in my reviewboard logs or my httpd logs. My update process was as follows: easy_install -U ReviewBoard rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard service httpd restart service memcached restart The only oddity I encountered during the process was a message from rb-site suggesting that I run condensediffs, which subsequently failed. Where should I look for hints abount what might be broken here? Sara -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
