Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released
In theory, doing: rb-site manage /path/to/site evolve -- --hint --execute should do the trick. I'd back up the database first though, just to be safe. But it should be fine. Or you could just use the alphas of 1.1 when they're out (probably this weekend). :) Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Dan Savilonis wrote: > > Yes, I realized this after I posted. I had accidentally pulled in a > nightly build at one point due to my .pydistutils.cfg, but I had since > downgraded to 1.0.1. Is there any way to get rid of the issue, or am I > stuck with the warning forever? :) > > Dan > > On Sep 17, 3:44 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > > > Were you at any point running a 1.1 nightly or out of a Git tree? This is > a > > field introduced in the 1.1 branch, so I don't know why you would see > this > > in 1.0.x. It doesn't appear that the 1.0.x releases mention this at all > in > > the codebase. If you went from a 1.1 to a 1.0.3, then you would > definitely > > hit this error, as the field would be introduced and then removed without > an > > evolution rule. > > > > Christian > > > > -- > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Dan Savilonis wrote: > > > > > I got the following error during the evolution: > > > > > # rb-site upgrade /home/reviewboard_head > > > Rebuilding directory structure > > > Updating database. This may take a while. > > > There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. > > > Project signature has changed - an evolution is required > > > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.3-py2.5.egg/ > > > reviewboard/scmtools/bzr.py:6: ImportWarning: Not importing directory > > > '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib': missing __init__.py > > > from bzrlib import bzrdir, revisionspec > > > The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. > > > Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes > > > required. > > > > > The following are the changes that could not be resolved: > > > In model scmtools.Repository: > > >Field 'raw_file_url' has been deleted > > > > > It appears to be working okay, though. Other thing I noticed is that > > > the admin dashboard has CSS applied but appears very basic and has no > > > images. Other pages look okay, and the same as they used to. > > > > > Dan > > > > > On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > > > > Last night's 1.0.2 release was pretty broken in two major ways. The > web > > > > server configuration templates were no longer bundled in the package, > due > > > to > > > > a change in the structure of our code tree, and users using Django > 1.0.2 > > > > would hit a bug, as we needed functionality only present in 1.0.3 and > > > > higher. > > > > > > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been > > > bitten > > > > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and > let > > > us > > > > know how it works. > > > > > > Full release notes are available athttp:// > > >www.review-board.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.0.3/ > > > > > > Christian > > > > > > -- > > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > > > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released
Yes, I realized this after I posted. I had accidentally pulled in a nightly build at one point due to my .pydistutils.cfg, but I had since downgraded to 1.0.1. Is there any way to get rid of the issue, or am I stuck with the warning forever? :) Dan On Sep 17, 3:44 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Were you at any point running a 1.1 nightly or out of a Git tree? This is a > field introduced in the 1.1 branch, so I don't know why you would see this > in 1.0.x. It doesn't appear that the 1.0.x releases mention this at all in > the codebase. If you went from a 1.1 to a 1.0.3, then you would definitely > hit this error, as the field would be introduced and then removed without an > evolution rule. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Dan Savilonis wrote: > > > I got the following error during the evolution: > > > # rb-site upgrade /home/reviewboard_head > > Rebuilding directory structure > > Updating database. This may take a while. > > There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. > > Project signature has changed - an evolution is required > > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.3-py2.5.egg/ > > reviewboard/scmtools/bzr.py:6: ImportWarning: Not importing directory > > '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib': missing __init__.py > > from bzrlib import bzrdir, revisionspec > > The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. > > Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes > > required. > > > The following are the changes that could not be resolved: > > In model scmtools.Repository: > > Field 'raw_file_url' has been deleted > > > It appears to be working okay, though. Other thing I noticed is that > > the admin dashboard has CSS applied but appears very basic and has no > > images. Other pages look okay, and the same as they used to. > > > Dan > > > On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > > > Last night's 1.0.2 release was pretty broken in two major ways. The web > > > server configuration templates were no longer bundled in the package, due > > to > > > a change in the structure of our code tree, and users using Django 1.0.2 > > > would hit a bug, as we needed functionality only present in 1.0.3 and > > > higher. > > > > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been > > bitten > > > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and let > > us > > > know how it works. > > > > Full release notes are available athttp:// > >www.review-board.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.0.3/ > > > > Christian > > > > -- > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released
Yes, that was it. Thanks! On Sep 17, 12:51 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > It sounds like that server is, for whatever reason, set up to pull from the > nightlies tree. Do you have a ~/.pydistutils.cfg file that links to the > nightlies downloads page? > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:38 AM, ciaomary wrote: > > > To upgrade, I ran 'easy_install -U ReviewBoard' (as the documentation > > suggests) and it upgraded me to ReviewBoard 1.1 alpha-dev. > > > I would have expected this to just pull down the latest released > > version, 1.0.3. > > > On Sep 17, 8:52 am, Dan Savilonis wrote: > > > I got the following error during the evolution: > > > > # rb-site upgrade /home/reviewboard_head > > > Rebuilding directory structure > > > Updating database. This may take a while. > > > There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. > > > Project signature has changed - an evolution is required > > > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.3-py2.5.egg/ > > > reviewboard/scmtools/bzr.py:6: ImportWarning: Not importing directory > > > '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib': missing __init__.py > > > from bzrlib import bzrdir, revisionspec > > > The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. > > > Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes > > > required. > > > > The following are the changes that could not be resolved: > > > In model scmtools.Repository: > > > Field 'raw_file_url' has been deleted > > > > It appears to be working okay, though. Other thing I noticed is that > > > the admin dashboard has CSS applied but appears very basic and has no > > > images. Other pages look okay, and the same as they used to. > > > > Dan > > > > On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > > > > > Last night's 1.0.2 release was pretty broken in two major ways. The web > > > > server configuration templates were no longer bundled in the package, > > due to > > > > a change in the structure of our code tree, and users using Django > > 1.0.2 > > > > would hit a bug, as we needed functionality only present in 1.0.3 and > > > > higher. > > > > > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been > > bitten > > > > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and > > let us > > > > know how it works. > > > > > Full release notes are available athttp:// > >www.review-board.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.0.3/ > > > > > Christian > > > > > -- > > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > > > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com-Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released
It sounds like that server is, for whatever reason, set up to pull from the nightlies tree. Do you have a ~/.pydistutils.cfg file that links to the nightlies downloads page? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:38 AM, ciaomary wrote: > > To upgrade, I ran 'easy_install -U ReviewBoard' (as the documentation > suggests) and it upgraded me to ReviewBoard 1.1 alpha-dev. > > I would have expected this to just pull down the latest released > version, 1.0.3. > > On Sep 17, 8:52 am, Dan Savilonis wrote: > > I got the following error during the evolution: > > > > # rb-site upgrade /home/reviewboard_head > > Rebuilding directory structure > > Updating database. This may take a while. > > There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. > > Project signature has changed - an evolution is required > > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.3-py2.5.egg/ > > reviewboard/scmtools/bzr.py:6: ImportWarning: Not importing directory > > '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib': missing __init__.py > > from bzrlib import bzrdir, revisionspec > > The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. > > Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes > > required. > > > > The following are the changes that could not be resolved: > > In model scmtools.Repository: > > Field 'raw_file_url' has been deleted > > > > It appears to be working okay, though. Other thing I noticed is that > > the admin dashboard has CSS applied but appears very basic and has no > > images. Other pages look okay, and the same as they used to. > > > > Dan > > > > On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > > > > > > > > > Last night's 1.0.2 release was pretty broken in two major ways. The web > > > server configuration templates were no longer bundled in the package, > due to > > > a change in the structure of our code tree, and users using Django > 1.0.2 > > > would hit a bug, as we needed functionality only present in 1.0.3 and > > > higher. > > > > > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been > bitten > > > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and > let us > > > know how it works. > > > > > Full release notes are available athttp:// > www.review-board.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.0.3/ > > > > > Christian > > > > > -- > > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released
Hi Dan, Were you at any point running a 1.1 nightly or out of a Git tree? This is a field introduced in the 1.1 branch, so I don't know why you would see this in 1.0.x. It doesn't appear that the 1.0.x releases mention this at all in the codebase. If you went from a 1.1 to a 1.0.3, then you would definitely hit this error, as the field would be introduced and then removed without an evolution rule. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Dan Savilonis wrote: > > I got the following error during the evolution: > > # rb-site upgrade /home/reviewboard_head > Rebuilding directory structure > Updating database. This may take a while. > There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. > Project signature has changed - an evolution is required > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.3-py2.5.egg/ > reviewboard/scmtools/bzr.py:6: ImportWarning: Not importing directory > '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib': missing __init__.py > from bzrlib import bzrdir, revisionspec > The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. > Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes > required. > > The following are the changes that could not be resolved: > In model scmtools.Repository: >Field 'raw_file_url' has been deleted > > It appears to be working okay, though. Other thing I noticed is that > the admin dashboard has CSS applied but appears very basic and has no > images. Other pages look okay, and the same as they used to. > > Dan > > > On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Last night's 1.0.2 release was pretty broken in two major ways. The web > > server configuration templates were no longer bundled in the package, due > to > > a change in the structure of our code tree, and users using Django 1.0.2 > > would hit a bug, as we needed functionality only present in 1.0.3 and > > higher. > > > > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been > bitten > > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and let > us > > know how it works. > > > > Full release notes are available athttp:// > www.review-board.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.0.3/ > > > > Christian > > > > -- > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released
Hi Jim, I noticed this. Looks like something changed in the new admin stylesheets that break in some setups. I'm looking into it. Guess maybe another release may be coming. *sigh*. Think maybe I'll make this a 1.0.3.1 to save some face. Glad things are working for you again! Thanks for letting us know :) Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Jim Priest wrote: > > On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been > bitten > > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and let > us > > know how it works. > > 1.0.3 seems to working here - no more 500 errors! > > The CSS in parts of the admin section seem a bit off. I have some > colors but not all formatting is in place. I'm not 100% positive but > it seems some pages are missing a link to "/reviewboard/media/admin/ > css/base.css" ?? > > Jim > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released
On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been bitten > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and let us > know how it works. 1.0.3 seems to working here - no more 500 errors! The CSS in parts of the admin section seem a bit off. I have some colors but not all formatting is in place. I'm not 100% positive but it seems some pages are missing a link to "/reviewboard/media/admin/ css/base.css" ?? Jim --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released
To upgrade, I ran 'easy_install -U ReviewBoard' (as the documentation suggests) and it upgraded me to ReviewBoard 1.1 alpha-dev. I would have expected this to just pull down the latest released version, 1.0.3. On Sep 17, 8:52 am, Dan Savilonis wrote: > I got the following error during the evolution: > > # rb-site upgrade /home/reviewboard_head > Rebuilding directory structure > Updating database. This may take a while. > There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. > Project signature has changed - an evolution is required > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.3-py2.5.egg/ > reviewboard/scmtools/bzr.py:6: ImportWarning: Not importing directory > '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib': missing __init__.py > from bzrlib import bzrdir, revisionspec > The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. > Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes > required. > > The following are the changes that could not be resolved: > In model scmtools.Repository: > Field 'raw_file_url' has been deleted > > It appears to be working okay, though. Other thing I noticed is that > the admin dashboard has CSS applied but appears very basic and has no > images. Other pages look okay, and the same as they used to. > > Dan > > On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > > > > > Last night's 1.0.2 release was pretty broken in two major ways. The web > > server configuration templates were no longer bundled in the package, due to > > a change in the structure of our code tree, and users using Django 1.0.2 > > would hit a bug, as we needed functionality only present in 1.0.3 and > > higher. > > > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been bitten > > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and let us > > know how it works. > > > Full release notes are available > > athttp://www.review-board.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.0.3/ > > > Christian > > > -- > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Review Board 1.0.3 released
I got the following error during the evolution: # rb-site upgrade /home/reviewboard_head Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. Project signature has changed - an evolution is required /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.3-py2.5.egg/ reviewboard/scmtools/bzr.py:6: ImportWarning: Not importing directory '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib': missing __init__.py from bzrlib import bzrdir, revisionspec The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes required. The following are the changes that could not be resolved: In model scmtools.Repository: Field 'raw_file_url' has been deleted It appears to be working okay, though. Other thing I noticed is that the admin dashboard has CSS applied but appears very basic and has no images. Other pages look okay, and the same as they used to. Dan On Sep 16, 8:38 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > Last night's 1.0.2 release was pretty broken in two major ways. The web > server configuration templates were no longer bundled in the package, due to > a change in the structure of our code tree, and users using Django 1.0.2 > would hit a bug, as we needed functionality only present in 1.0.3 and > higher. > > The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been bitten > by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and let us > know how it works. > > Full release notes are available > athttp://www.review-board.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.0.3/ > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.review-board.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Review Board 1.0.3 released
Last night's 1.0.2 release was pretty broken in two major ways. The web server configuration templates were no longer bundled in the package, due to a change in the structure of our code tree, and users using Django 1.0.2 would hit a bug, as we needed functionality only present in 1.0.3 and higher. The new 1.0.3 release should address these problems. If you've been bitten by 1.0.2 (our deepest apologies), please give this release a try and let us know how it works. Full release notes are available at http://www.review-board.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.0.3/ Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
