Re: Issue 3719 in reviewboard: 2.0.12 fails to render tables in Markdown according to the Markdown reference guide
Comment #1 on issue 3719 by ran...@circularreasoning.com: 2.0.12 fails to render tables in Markdown according to the Markdown reference guide https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3719 I'm seeing this as well in 2.0.13. Server is linux. I'm running Firefox 38.0.5 in Windows 7 64 bit. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
RBtools version for ReviewBoard 2.0.12
Hi, We have a setup of Review Board Server version 1.7.12 and we are looking for an upgrade to the latest version 2.0.x. We need to test the new version before we roll out the changes to the users. I did a fresh install of Review Board 2.0.12 on a test machine for the same. When I try to do a post-review to the new Review Board server I get the following message: Got API Error 206 (HTTP code 400): The repository path specified is not in the list of known repositories. However, the review gets posted to the older server without any issues. I also tried updating the RBTools to version 0.7 on a test client machine. (older RBTools version 0.2). The review got posted successfully using rbt command ( is *post-review* command deprecated now??) So, do we need to make sure the client piece also gets updated in order to communicate with the latest Review Board server? Thanks Satish -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: RBtools version for ReviewBoard 2.0.12
Hi Satish, RBTools 0.2 is 5 years old, and our first public release. You'll definitely want a modern version of RBTools for modern versions of Review Board. We removed post-review (a pretty hacky script from the olden days of Review Board) some time ago, replacing the bulk of its responsibilities with 'rbt post' (which is quite similar, but far better) and a handful of other commands (rbt close, rbt diff, etc.). You'll definitely want to grab the newer versions of RBTools. I know it'll be an adjustment, with the command name change, but there's a lot of improvements in modern RBTools over the old post-review. For instance: * Aliases ( http://blog.beanbaginc.com/2015/01/19/composing-workflows-using-aliases-in-rbtools/ ) * Better posting of revision ranges/branches, if using Git/Mercurial/etc. ( http://blog.beanbaginc.com/2015/01/26/an-effective-rbtools-workflow-for-git/ ) * Quickly attaching files, checking status of outgoing review requests, and other useful tasks ( http://blog.beanbaginc.com/2014/12/08/5-tips-for-your-rbtools-workflow/) * Performance improvements *A full Python API for Review Board * Native installers for Windows and Mac ( https://www.reviewboard.org/downloads/) Plus lots of bug/compatibility fixes and other features we've accumulated over the years. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 11:31 PM, Satish Thareja satishthar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We have a setup of Review Board Server version 1.7.12 and we are looking for an upgrade to the latest version 2.0.x. We need to test the new version before we roll out the changes to the users. I did a fresh install of Review Board 2.0.12 on a test machine for the same. When I try to do a post-review to the new Review Board server I get the following message: Got API Error 206 (HTTP code 400): The repository path specified is not in the list of known repositories. However, the review gets posted to the older server without any issues. I also tried updating the RBTools to version 0.7 on a test client machine. (older RBTools version 0.2). The review got posted successfully using rbt command ( is *post-review* command deprecated now??) So, do we need to make sure the client piece also gets updated in order to communicate with the latest Review Board server? Thanks Satish -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Issue 3719 in reviewboard: 2.0.12 fails to render tables in Markdown according to the Markdown reference guide
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3719 by jr...@yelp.com: 2.0.12 fails to render tables in Markdown according to the Markdown reference guide https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3719 What version are you running? 2.0.12 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? See screenshots What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Paste the example table from the markdown reference guide into a new review request textarea field: Header | Header | Header ---||--- Cell | Cell | Cell Cell | Cell | Cell 2. Allow reviewboard to render the text What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Expected: See screenshot 2.0.11.png Actual: See screenshot 2.0.12.png What operating system are you using? What browser? RB is installed on Ubuntu Trusty. I am viewing RB via chromium. Attachments: 2.0.11.png 27.0 KB 2.0.12.png 21.2 KB -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: ReviewBoard 2.0.12?
It's been delayed, largely due to the holidays and some other work-related things. Actually, I'm hoping to release it tonight, if a couple things work out well today. Christian -- Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message- From: Bruce Cran bruce.c...@gmail.com Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com Date: January 6, 2015 at 1:09:07 PM To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com reviewboard@googlegroups.com Subject: ReviewBoard 2.0.12? I've noticed a few references to Review Board 2.0.12 such as https://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/6676/ (2.0.12 was a large release...) but it doesn't seem to have ever been made public. Should it have been, or has it just been delayed? -- Bruce -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
ReviewBoard 2.0.12?
I've noticed a few references to Review Board 2.0.12 such as https://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/6676/ (2.0.12 was a large release...) but it doesn't seem to have ever been made public. Should it have been, or has it just been delayed? -- Bruce -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
