Re: Review Request 65477: Fix UI table layout issue on Config Summaries
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/#review196715 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Reza Motamedi On Feb. 2, 2018, 7:52 a.m., David McLaughlin wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/ > --- > > (Updated Feb. 2, 2018, 7:52 a.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Jordan Ly and Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham. > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > --- > > Fix UI table layout issue when configuration metadata (or any other cell) is > longer than the max width of the table. > > > Diffs > - > > ui/src/main/sass/components/_job-page.scss > 2ae4e73c5d8d4e653cd1c550e699888b42554aec > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/diff/1/ > > > Testing > --- > > See screenshots. > > > File Attachments > > > before > > https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2018/02/02/dcfa3542-10cb-42d2-9a3f-7fd8e5d54ddf__Screen_Shot_2018-02-01_at_11.50.04_PM.png > after > > https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2018/02/02/ff3cf950-e26f-4593-9169-aa8b489d7d49__Screen_Shot_2018-02-01_at_11.49.51_PM.png > > > Thanks, > > David McLaughlin > >
Re: Review Request 65477: Fix UI table layout issue on Config Summaries
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/#review196712 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham On Feb. 1, 2018, 11:52 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/ > --- > > (Updated Feb. 1, 2018, 11:52 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Jordan Ly and Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham. > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > --- > > Fix UI table layout issue when configuration metadata (or any other cell) is > longer than the max width of the table. > > > Diffs > - > > ui/src/main/sass/components/_job-page.scss > 2ae4e73c5d8d4e653cd1c550e699888b42554aec > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/diff/1/ > > > Testing > --- > > See screenshots. > > > File Attachments > > > before > > https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2018/02/02/dcfa3542-10cb-42d2-9a3f-7fd8e5d54ddf__Screen_Shot_2018-02-01_at_11.50.04_PM.png > after > > https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2018/02/02/ff3cf950-e26f-4593-9169-aa8b489d7d49__Screen_Shot_2018-02-01_at_11.49.51_PM.png > > > Thanks, > > David McLaughlin > >
Re: Review Request 65477: Fix UI table layout issue on Config Summaries
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/#review196704 --- Master (21a371c) is red with this patch. ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. --- Captured log call health_checker.py 167 INFO INFO] Reached consecutive success limit. health_checker.py 143 WARNING WARN] Health check failure: failure-2 health_checker.py 184 WARNING WARN] Ignoring failure of attempt: 2 health_checker.py 143 WARNING WARN] Health check failure: failure-3 health_checker.py 159 WARNING WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. 5 failed, 795 passed, 6 skipped in 492.44 seconds FAILURE Waiting for background workers to finish. 10:22:57 08:50 [complete] FAILURE I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing "@ReviewBot retry" - Aurora ReviewBot On Feb. 2, 2018, 3:52 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/ > --- > > (Updated Feb. 2, 2018, 3:52 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Jordan Ly and Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham. > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > --- > > Fix UI table layout issue when configuration metadata (or any other cell) is > longer than the max width of the table. > > > Diffs > - > > ui/src/main/sass/components/_job-page.scss > 2ae4e73c5d8d4e653cd1c550e699888b42554aec > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/diff/1/ > > > Testing > --- > > See screenshots. > > > File Attachments > > > before > > https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2018/02/02/dcfa3542-10cb-42d2-9a3f-7fd8e5d54ddf__Screen_Shot_2018-02-01_at_11.50.04_PM.png > after > > https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2018/02/02/ff3cf950-e26f-4593-9169-aa8b489d7d49__Screen_Shot_2018-02-01_at_11.49.51_PM.png > > > Thanks, > > David McLaughlin > >
Re: Review Request 65477: Fix UI table layout issue on Config Summaries
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/#review196701 --- @ReviewBot retry - Stephan Erb On Feb. 2, 2018, 8:52 a.m., David McLaughlin wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/ > --- > > (Updated Feb. 2, 2018, 8:52 a.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Jordan Ly and Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham. > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > --- > > Fix UI table layout issue when configuration metadata (or any other cell) is > longer than the max width of the table. > > > Diffs > - > > ui/src/main/sass/components/_job-page.scss > 2ae4e73c5d8d4e653cd1c550e699888b42554aec > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/diff/1/ > > > Testing > --- > > See screenshots. > > > File Attachments > > > before > > https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2018/02/02/dcfa3542-10cb-42d2-9a3f-7fd8e5d54ddf__Screen_Shot_2018-02-01_at_11.50.04_PM.png > after > > https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2018/02/02/ff3cf950-e26f-4593-9169-aa8b489d7d49__Screen_Shot_2018-02-01_at_11.49.51_PM.png > > > Thanks, > > David McLaughlin > >
Re: Review Request 65477: Fix UI table layout issue on Config Summaries
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/#review196698 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Stephan Erb On Feb. 2, 2018, 8:52 a.m., David McLaughlin wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/ > --- > > (Updated Feb. 2, 2018, 8:52 a.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Jordan Ly and Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham. > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > --- > > Fix UI table layout issue when configuration metadata (or any other cell) is > longer than the max width of the table. > > > Diffs > - > > ui/src/main/sass/components/_job-page.scss > 2ae4e73c5d8d4e653cd1c550e699888b42554aec > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/diff/1/ > > > Testing > --- > > See screenshots. > > > File Attachments > > > before > > https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2018/02/02/dcfa3542-10cb-42d2-9a3f-7fd8e5d54ddf__Screen_Shot_2018-02-01_at_11.50.04_PM.png > after > > https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2018/02/02/ff3cf950-e26f-4593-9169-aa8b489d7d49__Screen_Shot_2018-02-01_at_11.49.51_PM.png > > > Thanks, > > David McLaughlin > >
Re: Review Request 65477: Fix UI table layout issue on Config Summaries
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/#review196693 --- Master (21a371c) is red with this patch. ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. --- Captured log call health_checker.py 167 INFO INFO] Reached consecutive success limit. health_checker.py 143 WARNING WARN] Health check failure: failure-2 health_checker.py 184 WARNING WARN] Ignoring failure of attempt: 2 health_checker.py 143 WARNING WARN] Health check failure: failure-3 health_checker.py 159 WARNING WARN] Reached consecutive failure limit. 1 failed, 799 passed, 6 skipped in 260.33 seconds FAILURE Waiting for background workers to finish. 08:06:46 04:55 [complete] FAILURE I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing "@ReviewBot retry" - Aurora ReviewBot On Feb. 2, 2018, 3:52 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/ > --- > > (Updated Feb. 2, 2018, 3:52 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Jordan Ly and Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham. > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > --- > > Fix UI table layout issue when configuration metadata (or any other cell) is > longer than the max width of the table. > > > Diffs > - > > ui/src/main/sass/components/_job-page.scss > 2ae4e73c5d8d4e653cd1c550e699888b42554aec > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/diff/1/ > > > Testing > --- > > See screenshots. > > > File Attachments > > > before > > https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2018/02/02/dcfa3542-10cb-42d2-9a3f-7fd8e5d54ddf__Screen_Shot_2018-02-01_at_11.50.04_PM.png > after > > https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2018/02/02/ff3cf950-e26f-4593-9169-aa8b489d7d49__Screen_Shot_2018-02-01_at_11.49.51_PM.png > > > Thanks, > > David McLaughlin > >
Review Request 65477: Fix UI table layout issue on Config Summaries
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/ --- Review request for Aurora, Jordan Ly and Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham. Repository: aurora Description --- Fix UI table layout issue when configuration metadata (or any other cell) is longer than the max width of the table. Diffs - ui/src/main/sass/components/_job-page.scss 2ae4e73c5d8d4e653cd1c550e699888b42554aec Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65477/diff/1/ Testing --- See screenshots. File Attachments before https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2018/02/02/dcfa3542-10cb-42d2-9a3f-7fd8e5d54ddf__Screen_Shot_2018-02-01_at_11.50.04_PM.png after https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2018/02/02/ff3cf950-e26f-4593-9169-aa8b489d7d49__Screen_Shot_2018-02-01_at_11.49.51_PM.png Thanks, David McLaughlin
