date:20170417

[GitHub] spark pull request #17663: [SPARK-17647][SQL][FOLLOWUP][MINOR] fix typo

2017-04-17 Thread asfgit

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17663


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

[GitHub] spark issue #17342: [SPARK-12868][SQL] Allow adding jars from hdfs

2017-04-17 Thread AmplabJenkins

Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342
  
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

[GitHub] spark issue #17342: [SPARK-12868][SQL] Allow adding jars from hdfs

2017-04-17 Thread AmplabJenkins

Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342
  
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75887/
Test FAILed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

[GitHub] spark issue #17342: [SPARK-12868][SQL] Allow adding jars from hdfs

2017-04-17 Thread SparkQA

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17342
  
**[Test build #75887 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75887/testReport)**
 for PR 17342 at commit 
[`0d30271`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0d302717b85cdf2d4c35eebcb97795a456fd1bed).
 * This patch **fails PySpark unit tests**.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

[GitHub] spark issue #17666: [SPARK-20311][SQL] Support aliases for table value funct...

2017-04-17 Thread SparkQA

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17666
  
**[Test build #75888 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75888/testReport)**
 for PR 17666 at commit 
[`539a9e8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/539a9e82aa306b0f4a5fa0cd32121732e9e3ef15).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

[GitHub] spark issue #16989: [WIP][SPARK-19659] Fetch big blocks to disk when shuffle...

2017-04-17 Thread AmplabJenkins

Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

[GitHub] spark issue #16989: [WIP][SPARK-19659] Fetch big blocks to disk when shuffle...

2017-04-17 Thread AmplabJenkins

Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75883/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

[GitHub] spark issue #16989: [WIP][SPARK-19659] Fetch big blocks to disk when shuffle...

2017-04-17 Thread SparkQA

Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
  
**[Test build #75883 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75883/testReport)**
 for PR 16989 at commit 
[`c63f39b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c63f39b755b0f9b66c61d96fb84368ddd6b0a6fd).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

[GitHub] spark issue #17582: [SPARK-20239][Core] Improve HistoryServer's ACL mechanis...

2017-04-17 Thread jerryshao

Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17582

@tgravescs , with the changes of history UI, REST API and web UI are now
mixed. The base URL to list all the apps is through REST API.

The key problem here is that in History Server we could have configured two
ACLs (spark.acls.enable
[here](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServer.scala#L299)
and spark.history.ui.acls.enable
[here](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala#L248)),
this two ACLs checks different URLs, for example:

```
/api/v1/applications
/api/v1/applications/
/api/v1/applications//logs
```

are controlled by `spark.acls.enable`. And web UI will use this API to list
and show apps on the UI. If this is enabled, then only SHS owner, admin/view
user groups could see the apps list on the SHS's base web UI.

And all the other URLs (web UI and REST API) for application details are
controlled by `spark.history.ui.acls.enable`.

If we configured differently for this two ACLs, then we will get some
unexpected behaviors.

So what I here fixed is to unify the ACL and offer the right behavior.

>No, there shouldn't be sensitive information there and many times a user
is looking for a job run by say a headless user or other user. I guess you
could filter only the jobs that user has acls to but that makes it more
complicated. Do you have a concrete reason it should be protected? Note that
this follow how other Hadoop UI's work.

We worked with customers and they wish to filter and list apps based on the
login users. But I don't have strong opinion it. I could change to what you
suggested.

---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

1 2 3 4 >

1 - 100 of 317 matches

Mail list logo