[GitHub] [spark] vanzin commented on issue #24732: [SPARK-27868][core] Better default value and documentation for socket server backlog.

2019-05-29 Thread GitBox
vanzin commented on issue #24732: [SPARK-27868][core] Better default value and 
documentation for socket server backlog.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24732#issuecomment-497122483
 
 
   It's such a small change that it shouldn't affect anybody. (For comparison, 
the default value on sockets not created from Java is 128.) In fact it makes it 
clearer that Spark is setting a value explicitly instead of relying on the JVM 
default (for those who know that detail).


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] [spark] vanzin commented on issue #24732: [SPARK-27868][core] Better default value and documentation for socket server backlog.

2020-01-13 Thread GitBox
vanzin commented on issue #24732: [SPARK-27868][core] Better default value and 
documentation for socket server backlog.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24732#issuecomment-573761584
 
 
   Sorry you ran into problems, but I'm curious about this:
   
   > In our set up we had the default JVM value overridden
   
   How did you do that? I just looked at the source again and it's hardcoded to 
50. Which is why in my mind this wouldn't cause any problems.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] [spark] vanzin commented on issue #24732: [SPARK-27868][core] Better default value and documentation for socket server backlog.

2020-01-15 Thread GitBox
vanzin commented on issue #24732: [SPARK-27868][core] Better default value and 
documentation for socket server backlog.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24732#issuecomment-574885029
 
 
   Ah, in that case it might be a better idea to revert the configuration 
change. Want to open a PR?


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] [spark] vanzin commented on issue #24732: [SPARK-27868][core] Better default value and documentation for socket server backlog.

2020-01-15 Thread GitBox
vanzin commented on issue #24732: [SPARK-27868][core] Better default value and 
documentation for socket server backlog.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24732#issuecomment-574898859
 
 
   I think that since Netty makes an effort to look at the OS configuration to 
define the default value, that it makes more sense to not have Spark override 
that.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org